Skip to main content

Full text of "Problems of relative growth"

See other formats


^^—^^■■—■^^^■—^m^^— ii  in  lining — M^^^^M^^M^— ^I^M 


JfniiHHIlillllllllilllilllliilliiiiillililiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniikiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiifiiiiiiiiniiniiiiiiiiiiiiiHiiininiiiiiHHiiiiiiiiiHiiiiiiiiHiiiiiii! 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


HETEROCIfELY  AND    REGENERATION    IN   THE   COMMON    LOBSTER 

i.  Marine  Lobster,  Homarus  (Gammarus)  vulgaris,  Normal  Left-handed  Specimen. 

2.  The  Same  Regenerating  the  Left  'Crusher'  Claw  after  Autotomy. 

3.  Shed  Skin  of  the  Same  at  the  Next  Moult. 

4.  The  Same  after  this  Moult,  showing  Direct  Regeneration  of  Left  Crusher. 

Note  the  slenderer  propus  and  absolutely  longer  dactylus  in  the  smaller  ('  nipper ')  claw. 


PROBLEMS 


OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 


BY 


JULIAN   S.   HUXLEY,   M.A. 

Honorary  Lecturer  in  Experimental  Zoology,   King's  College,  London 


WITH    IO5    ILLUSTRATIONS 


LINCOLN  MAC  VEAGH 
THE  DIAL  PRESS 
NEW  YORK  •  MCMXXXII 


PRINTED    IN    GREAT    BRITAIN 


TO 

D'ARCY   WENTWORTH   THOMPSON 


'  The  morphologist,  when  comparing  one  organism  with 
another,  describes  the  differences  between  them  point  by  point, 
and  "  character  "  by  "  character."  If  he  is  from  time  to  time 
constrained  to  admit  the  existence  of  "  correlation  "  between 
characters  (as  a  hundred  years  ago  Cuvier  first  showed  the 
way),  yet  all  the  while  he  recognizes  this  fact  of  correlation 
somewhat  vaguely,  as  a  phenomenon  due  to  causes  which, 
except  in  rare  instances,  he  cannot  hope  to  trace  ;  and  he  falls 
readily  into  the  habit  of  thinking  and  talking  of  evolution  as 
though  it  had  proceeded  on  the  lines  of  his  own  descriptions, 
point  by  point,  and  character  by  character.  But  if,  on  the 
other  hand,  diverse  and  dissimilar  fishes  can  be  referred  as  a 
whole  to  identical  functions  of  very  different  co-ordinate 
systems,  this  fact  will  of  itself  constitute  a  proof  that  a  com- 
prehensive "  law  of  growth  "  has  pervaded  the  whole  structure 
in  its  integrity,  and  that  some  more  or  less  simple  and  recog- 
nizable system  of  forces  has  been  at  work.' — D'Arcy  Thompson 
(Growth  and  Form,  p.  727). 


vn 


PREFACE 

IN  this  book  I  have  attempted  to  give  some  account  of 
the  chief  results  emerging  from  a  study  of  the  relative 
growth  of  parts  in  animals  which  I  have  undertaken 
during  the  last  ten  years.  I  have  tried  to  correlate  my  own 
findings  and  conclusions  with  those  of  other  workers  in  the 
same  and  related  fields,  but  am  well  aware  of  the  many  gaps 
that  remain.  However,  it  has  not  been  my  main  intention 
to  produce  an  exhaustive  survey  of  the  subject,  but  rather 
to  set  forth  certain  new  facts  and  ideas  and  some  of  their 
chief  implications. 

There  are,  I  think,  four  chief  points  in  the  book  which  are 
more  or  less  new.  One  is  the  quantitative  formulation  of 
heterogonic  growth  (Chapters  I  and  II)  ;  a  second  is  the  dis- 
covery of  the  widespread  existence  of  growth-gradients,  and 
their  quantitative  analysis  (Chapters  III  and  IV) ;  a  third  is  the 
recognition  that  growth  of  logarithmic  spiral  type  as  seen  in 
Molluscan  shells,  etc.,  operates  with  the  same  growth- 
mechanisms  (growth-centres  and  growth-gradients)  as  does 
growth  of  ordinary  type  as  seen  in  a  Crustacean  antenna  or 
a  sheep's  leg  (Chapter  V)  ;  and  the  fourth  is  the  application 
of  these  results  to  certain  evolutionary  problems,  as  set  forth 
in  the  final  chapter. 

I  owe  a  great  deal  to  previous  work  in  this  field  :  first  and 
foremost  to  D'Arcy  Thompson's  Growth  and  Form,  but  also 
to  the  books  and  papers  of  Champy,  Teissier,  Schmalhausen , 
and  others  too  numerous  to  mention. 

I  have  to  thank  Professor  L.  T.  Hogben  and  Dr.  R.  A. 
Fisher,  F.R.S.,  for  reading  the  book  in  typescript  and  making 
various  useful  suggestions  ;  and  I  owe  a  great  deal  to  Pro- 
fessor H.  Levy  for  helping  me  with  some  of  the  mathematical 
problems  involved.  My  thanks  are  also  due  to  Dr.  C.  F.  A. 
Pantin  and  Professor  Selig  Hecht,  whose  discussions  with  me 
of  various  problems  raised  in  this  book  have  helped  greatly 
in  clarifying  my  ideas.  And  especially  I  would  like  to  thank 
my  pupils  and  co-workers,  Mr.  E.  B.  Ford,  Mr.  F.  N.  Rat- 
cliff  e,  Miss  M.  Shaw  (Mrs.  White),  Miss  M.  A.  Tazelaar,  Mr. 

ix 


x  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

S.  F.  Bush,  Professor  F.  W.  Kunkel,  Mr.  J.  A.  Robertson, 
Miss  I.  Dean,  Mr.  A.  S.  Edwards  and  Mr.  F.  S.  Callow,  without 
whose  collaboration  I  should  never  have  been  able  to  collect 
and  analyse  the  data  on  which  this  treatment  of  the  subject 
is  founded.  Finally,  I  must  not  forget  my  secretary,  Miss 
P.  Coombs,  whose  aid  has  been  invaluable  in  preparing  the 
book  for  the  press. 

Many  of  the  figures  have  been  drawn  for  this  book.  As 
regards  the  others,  I  would  like  to  express  my  thanks  for  the 
willingness  of  the  authors  and  publishers  concerned  for  allow- 
ing me  to  reproduce  them.  Acknowledgements  have  been 
made  in  the  list  of  illustrations  :  the  citations  there  made 
refer  to  the  literature  list  for  fuller  details. 

JULIAN   S.    HUXLEY 
King's  College,  London 
December,  1931 


ERRATUM 

Page  84,  Fig.  46,  legend.  For  "  dactylus  ; 
ischium  "  read  "  dactylus  ;  carpus  ; 
ischium  "—problems  of  relative  growth. 


CONTENTS 

PAGE 

Preface        .........        ix 

List  of  Illustrations.  ......      xiv 

CHAPTER   I 
CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL   GROWTH-RATIOS 

§  i.  Introductory       ........  i 

§  2.  Constant  Differential  Growth-Ratios        ...  4 

§  3.  Examples  of  Constant  Differential  Growth-Ratios.  13 

§  4.  Inconstancy  of  Form  and  Constancy  of  Form-change  38 

CHAPTER   II 

THE   COEFFICIENT  OF  CONSTANT  GROWTH- 
PARTITION ;   AND   SOME  SPECIAL  CASES 

§  1.     The  Heterogony  of  Deer  Antlers     ....  42 

§  2.     The  Coefficient  of  Constant  Growth-partition  .  49 

§  3.     Heterogony  in  Holometabolous  Insects  55 
§  4.     Heterogony    and    Polymorphism    in    Neuter    Social 

Insects      .........  61 

§  5.     Heterogony,  Moulting,  and  Dimorphism     ...  68 

CHAPTER   III 
GROWTH-CENTRES  AND   GROWTH-GRADIENTS 


§1 

§2 

§3 

§4 
§5 
§6 

§7 
§8 


Growth-gradients  within  Single  Organs  ...  79 
Steepness  of  Growth-gradient  within  an  Organ  and 

Growth-intensity  of  the  Organ  as  a  whole  .  .  83 
Reversal   of   the   Sign   of   the   Growth-gradient   in 

Negative  Heterogony      ......  87 

The  Form  of  Growth-gradients.  .  .  .  .90 

Growth-gradients  in  Regions  of  the  Body  .  .  92 
Graded  Growth-intensity  in  the  Different  Planes 

of  Space  .........  95 

Gradients  in  Growth-rate  of  Epidermal  Structures  100 

Conclusion  .........  102 

xi 


xii  PROBLEMS   OF    RELATIVE   GROWTH 

PAGE 

CHAPTER   IV 

GROWTH-GRADIENTS      AND      THE      GENERAL 

DISTRIBUTION    OF    GROWTH-POTENTIAL     IN 

THE  ANIMAL  BODY 

§  i.     General     Growth-gradients  :       D'Arcy     Thompson's 

Graphic  Method        .  .  .  .  .  .  .104 

§2.     General  Growth-gradients:    Quantitative  Analysis     iio 

§  3.     The    Two  Phases  of  Growth        .  .  .  .  .118 

§  4.     Growth-changes  Correlated  with  High  Local  Growth- 
intensity  ........      120 

§  5.     Some  Cases  of  Teratological  and  Abnormal  Growth     128 

§  6.     The  Law  of  Antero-posterior  Development  and  its 

Effect  upon  Growth         ......      132 

§  7.     The  Mathematical  Formulation  of  Relative  Growth 

in  Embryonic  Life   .......     139 

§  8.     Conclusion  .........     147 

CHAPTER   V 

GROWTH-CENTRES  AND   GROWTH-GRADIENTS 
IN  ACCRETIONARY  GROWTH 

§  1.     The  Accretionary  Method  of  Growth        .  .  .     149 

§  2.     Logarithmic    Spirals    as    the    Result    of    Growth- 
gradients  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .151 

§  3.     Growth-gradients  and  the  Shells  of  Molluscs  .      154 

§  4.     Conclusion  .........     163 

CHAPTER   VI 

HETEROGONY,     GROWTH-GRADIENTS    AND 
PHYSIOLOGY 

§  1.     Normal  Proportions  as  Result  of  a  Partition-equili- 
brium        .........      165 

§  2.     The  Initial  Determination  and  Physiological  Basis 

of  Growth-gradients        .  .  .  .  .  .167 

§  3.  Other  Gradient  Theories  .  .  .  .  .170 

§  4.  Heterogony  and  Hormones  .  .  .  .  .176 

§  5.  Heterochely  and  Relative  Growth-rates.  .  .      1S9 

§  6.  Specific  Growth-intensities  and  their  Interaction  .      191 


CONTENTS 


Xlll 


§  7.     The  Influence  of  External  Conditions 

§  8.     Rhythmical  Irregularities  of  Growth-ratio 


page 
197 
203 


§  1. 

§2. 
§3- 
§4- 
§5- 
§6. 

§7- 

§8. 


CHAPTER   VII 

BEARINGS     OF    THE     STUDY     OF     RELATIVE 
GROWTH  ON  OTHER  BRANCHES  OF  BIOLOGY 

Heterogony  and  Taxonomy  :    Sub-species  and  Taxo- 

nomic  Forms     ........  204 

Heterogony  in  Groups  Higher  than  the  Species       .  212 

Heterogony  and  Evolution         .  .  .  .  .216 

Heterogony  and  Comparative  Physiology            .          .  224 

Relative  Growth  and  Genetics  .  .  .  .229 

Relative   Growth,   Embryology,   and   Recapitulation  234 

General  Approach   to   the   Problem   of   Qualitative 

Form-change     ........  240 

Conclusion  .........  243 

Bibliography        ........  245 

Addenda       .          .          .          .          .          .           .          ...  257 

Index  of  Authors        .......  267 

Subject  Index     ........  270 

Index  of  Organisms     .......  274 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 

FIG.  PAGE 

Heterochely   AND    REGENERATION   IN   THE   LOBSTER 

Frontispiece 
(From  Przibram,  1931) 
i.     Diagram  illustrating  some  quantitative  aspects  of 

heterogony      ........         5 

2.  Changes  in  absolute  and  percentage  weight  of  the 

large  claw  during  growth  in  fiddler-crabs  .         9 

3.  heterogony  of  the  large  claw  in  4oi  male  fiddler- 

CRABS  .........  IO 

(From  Huxley,  1927k) 
'    4.       HETEROGONY    OF    STEM-WEIGHT    AGAINST    ROOT-WEIGHT    IN 

VARIOUS    PLANTS  .  .  .  .  .  .  .13 

(From  Pearsall,  1927) 

5.  HETEROGONY    OF    PETIOLE    LENGTH    AGAINST    LAMINA    DIA- 

METER in  Nasturtium  leaves  .  .  .  .  -14 

(From  Pearsall,  1927) 

6.  Changes    in    relative   abdomen-breadth    during   the 

growth  of  the  shore-crab      .         .         .         .         .15 

7.  heterogony  of  abdomen-breadth  in  625  shore-crabs      io 

(After  Huxley  and  Richards,  1931) 

8.  HETEROGONY  OF  THE  CHELA  IN  THE  PRAWN  PALAEMON  MAL- 

COMSONI  .      .      .      .      .      .      .      .  17 

g.     heterogony  of  face  relative  to  cranium  in  sheep- 
dogs and  baboons   .  .  .  .  .  .  .        18 

10.  Baboon  skulls  of  various  ages  to  show  change  in  pro- 

portions .........       19 

(From  Zuckerman,  1926) 

11.  HETEROGONY  OF  TAIL-LENGTH  IN  THE  MOUSE  PHENACOMYS         22 

12.  HETEROGONIC    RELATION    OF    DORSAL    AND    VENTRAL    EYE- 

LOBES    IN    THE   BAR-EYED    MUTANTS    OF   DROSOPHILA  .  22 

(Modified  from  Hersh,  1928) 

13.  HETEROGONY   OF   INTER-OCULAR    DISTANCE    IN    CRABS  .  23 

(After  Teissier,  1931) 

14.  Change  of  proportions  in  shore-crab         ...       24 

(From  unpublished  drawings  kindly  supplied  by  Dr.  G.  Teissier) 

15.  HETEROGONY    OF    THORACIC    GANGLION    IN    CRABS  .  .  25 

(After  Teissier,  1931) 

16.  HETEROGONY    OF   WATER-CONTENT    IN    TENEBRIO    LARVAE  26 

(After  Teissier,  1931) 

17.  HETEROGONY  OF  NITROGEN-CONTENT  IN  TENEBRIO  LARVAE         26 

(After  Teissier,  1931) 

18.  HETEROGONY      OF      PHOSPHORUS-CONTENT      IN      TENEBRIO 

LARVAE       .........  28 

(After  Teissier,  1931) 

xiv 


LIST   OF   ILLUSTRATIONS  xv 

FIG.  PAGE 

ig.     Heterogonic  relation  of  heat  of  combustion  to  body- 
weight  in  Tenebrio  larvae     .....       28 

(After  Teissier,  1931) 

20.  Heterogony  of  water-content  in  wax-moth  larvae 

(Galleria)         .  .  .  .  .  .  .  -3i 

(After  Teissier,  1931) 

21.  Heterogony  of  male  and  female  chelae  in  two  species 

of  prawns  (palaemon)      ......        33 

(A,  from  Tazelaar,  1931) 

22.  Variation   in   the   relative   growth   of   the    female 

abdomen  in  fiddler-crabs        .....       35 

(A,  from  Morgan,  1923  ;   B,  after  Huxley,  1924) 

23.  Relative  growth   of  male  and   female  abdomen   in 

spider-crabs  (inachus)     ......       36 

(From  Shaw,  1928) 

24.  ISOGONIC  GROWTH  OF  PARTS  IN  THE  FISH  ORTHOPRISTIS       .  37 

(From  Hecht,  1916) 

25.  Heterogony  of  antler-weight  in  adult  Red  Deer  .       43 

(From  Huxley,  1931A) 

26.  Antler-weight  against  body-weight  by  age  in   Red 

Deer         .........       44 

(From  Huxley,  1931A) 

27.  Negative  heterogony  of  antler-weight  in  Roe  Deer         46 

(From  Huxley,  1931A) 

28.  Diagram  of  antler-growth  in  Red  and  Roe  Deer   .       47 

(From  Huxley,  1931A.) 

29.  Body-weight   and   antler-weight   against   age,    Red 

Deer         .........       48 

(From  Huxley,  1931A) 

30.  Decrease   of   growth-coefficient   during   regenera- 

tion, Sphodromantis         ......       50 

(Modified  from  Przibram,  1917) 

31.  Regulation  of  size  in  grafted  eyes  of  Amblystoma     .       52 

(From  Twitty,  1930) 

32.  Interrupted  heterogony  in  the  male  chela  of  spider- 

crabs  (Inachus)         .......       53 

33.  Heterogony  of  the  fore-limb  in  the  beetle  Euchirus      56 

(From  Champy,  1924) 

34.  Heterogony  of  the  '  tail  '  appendage  of  the  wting  in 

the  butterfly  papilio  dardanus    .  .  .  -57 

(From  Champy,  1924) 

35.  Heterogony  of  the  male  mandible  in  three  species 

of  stag-beetles  (Lucanidae)    .....       58 

(From  Huxley,  1931c) 

36.  Change  of  proportions  with  increased  size  in  neuter 

ants  (Pheidole)        .......       63 

(From  Wheeler,  1910) 

37.  Heterogony   of  head-size   in   neuter  ants   (Anomma 

and  Camponotus)      .......       64 

38.  Change  of  proportions  with  increased  size  in  neuter 

termites  (Termopsis)         ......       66 

(From  Heath,  1927) 

39.  Dimorphism  of  female  abdomen  and  male  chela  in 

spider-crabs  (Inachus)     ......       69 

(From  Shaw,  1928) 


xvi  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

FIG.  PAGE 

40.  Dimorphism  and  heterogony  of  the  male  forceps  in 

earwigs  (forficula)  .  .  .  .  .  -71 

(From  Huxley,  1927s) 

41.  Diagram  of  the  possible  origin  of  forceps-dimorphism 

in  male  earwigs     .  .  .....       73 

(From  Huxley,  1931c) 

42.  Differential     effect     of     adverse     conditions     on 

forceps-length  and  body-length  in  male  earwigs       75 
(From  Huxley,  1927s) 

43.  Dimorphism  and  heterogony  in  the  3RD  leg  of  the 

mite  Analges  ........       77 

(From  Jucci,  1924) 

44.  Difference  in  growth-coefficients  of  various  regions 

of  the  large  claw  of  fiddler-crabs       .  .  .       80 

45.  Growth-gradients  within  the  male  chela  of  crabs 

(uca  and  maia)        .......       83 

46.  Changes  in  proportion  of  parts  during  growth  of  the 

chela  in  prawns  (palaemon)  .....       84 

(From  Dean,  unpublished) 

47.  Growth-gradients  in  the  antennae  of  Copepods       .       86 

48.  Growth-gradients  and  evolutionary  change  in  the 

feet  of  Ungulates  ......       88 

(From  D'Arcy  Thompson,  1917) 

49.  Reversed  growth-gradient  in  the  limbs  of  sheep       .       89 

(From  Huxley,  1931B) 

50.  Change  in  form  of  growth-gradient  with  change  of 

growth-rate   in   the   large   claw   of  hermit-crabs 
(eupagurus)     .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .91 

(After  Bush,  1930) 

51.  Growth-gradients  in  pereiopods  and  chelae  of  prawns 

(Palaemon)        ........       92 

(From  Tazelaar,  unpublished) 

52.  Growth-gradients  in  the  abdomen  of  crabs  (Pinno- 

theres AND   TELMESSUS)     ......         93 

(From  Huxley,  1931B) 

53.  Female    pea-crabs    (Pinnotheres)    of    various    sizes, 

showing   changes   in    proportion   of   the   abdomen 
during  growth         .......       94 

(From  Atkins,  1926) 

54.  Relative  growth  in  the  three  planes  of  space  in  the 

crusher  and  nipper  claws  of  lobsters  ...       97 

55.  Relative  growth  in  length  and  breadth  of  the  chela 

in  females,  males  and  parasitized  males  of  upogebia      98 

56.  Gradients  in  feather-growth  in  the  fowl        .  .     101 

57.  Growth-gradients  and  evolutionary  change  in  fish 

(Diodon  and  Orthagoriscus)   .....     105 
(From  D'Arcy  Thompson,  1917) 

58.  Cartesian     transformations     of     the     carapace     of 

various  crabs  .  .  .  .  .  .  .107 

(From  D'Arcy  Thompson,  1917) 

59.  Reconstructions  of  evolutionary  stages  in  the  avian 

pelvis,  by  the  method  of  Cartesian  transformation     108 
(From  D'Arcy  Thompson,  1917) 


LIST  OF   ILLUSTRATIONS  xvii 

FIG.  PAGE 

60.  Reconstructions  of  evolutionary  stages  in  the  evo- 

lution OF  THE  HORSE  SKULL,  BY  THE  METHOD  OF  CAR- 
TESIAN TRANSFORMATION  ;  AND  COMPARISON  WITH 
ACTUAL   FOSSIL   SKULLS  .  .  .  .  .  log 

{From  D'Arcy  Thompson,  1917) 

61.  Growth-gradients  along  the  body- axis  of  the  hermit 

crab  eupagurus       .  .  .  .  .  .  .112 

{From  Bush,  1930) 

62.  Growth-intensities    of    various    parts    in    male    and 

female  Stag-beetles  (Lucanus)        .  .  .  .114 

63.  Growth-gradients  of  male  and  female  stag-beetles       115 

64.  Growth-profile  of  metamorphosing  herring      .  .116 

{From  Huxley,  1931B) 

65.  Effect   of   a   region    of   high    growth-intensity    on 

growth    of    neighbouring    parts    in    spider-crabs 
(Maia  and  Inachus)  ......      122 

{A,  from  Huxley,  1927 a  ;   B,  from  Shaw,  1928) 

66.  Effect   of   a   region   of   high   growth-intensity   on 

growth  of  neighbouring  parts  in  prawns  (Palae- 
mon)  .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .124 

{A,  from  Shaw,  1928  ;   B,  from  Tazelaar,  1930) 

67.  Relative  growth  of  parts  anterior  and  posterior  to 

a    region    of    high    growth-intensity    in    prawns 
(Palaemon)       ........     125 

{From  Tazelaar,  1930) 

68.  Effects  of  a  regenerating  limb  upon  the  growth  of 

neighbouring  limbs  in  Sphodromantis     .  .  .     127 

69.  Graded  growth-effects  in  two  human  monsters        .     130 

{A,  from  Nanagas,  1925  ;  B,  from  Mead,  1930) 

70.  Change  in  relative  weight  of  various  organs  of  the 

cat  during  fetal  life     .         .         .         .         .         -134 

{After  Latimer  and  Aikman,  1931) 

71.  Positive  heterogony  of  head-length  in  whalebone 

WHALES     .........        137 

72.  Changes  in  relative  weight  of  various  organs  of  the 

chick  during  embryonic  life  ....      i43 

{After  Schmalhausen,  192713) 

73.  Growth-rates  of  various  organs  of  the  chick  during 

embryonic  life         ......       i44-i45 

74.  Diagram     illustrating     the     co-operation     of     two 

growth-ratios  in  determining  the  form  of  mol- 
luscan  shells  .  .  .  .  .  .  1 56 

75.  Origin  of  the  spiral  form  of  the  shell  in  Limacina     .     159 

{From  original  by  Dr.  Lebour) 

76.  Diagram  of  the  growth-gradients  operating  to  pro- 

duce  THE   TURBINATE   SPIRAL   SHELL   OF  MOLLUSCS  .       l6o 

77.  Heterogony  of  normal  and  regenerating  claws  in 

portunus  ........     166 

78.  Asymmetry  in  the  thoracic  ganglia  of  the  male  fid- 

dler-crab        ........     168 

{From  Ratcliffe,  unpublished) 

79.  Chemical  and  metabolic  gradients  in  Crustacea  and 

earthworms     .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .170 

{From  Perkins,  1929) 


xviii         PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

FIG.  PAGE 

So.     Disproportionate  effect  of  starvation  on  a  hetero- 

GONIC  ORGAN   (DORSAL  CREST  IN  MALE  TRITON)  .  .        l8o 

(From  Champy,  1924) 

81.  Disproportion  of  limbs  caused  by  precocious  meta- 

morphosis in  the  frog     ......     182 

(Modified  from  Wells,  Huxley  and  Wells,  'The  Science  of  Life,' 
London,  1931) 

82.  Differential  effect  of  thyroidectomy  on  the  growth 

of  various  organs  of  the  rat  .  .  .  1 85 

(From  Hammett,  1929) 

83.  Effect  of  thyroidectomy  on  the  growth  of  the  hypo- 

physis  IN   THE   RAT     .  .  .  .  .  .  I 87 

(From  Hammett,  1929) 

84.  Diagram  illustrating  Przibram's  hypothesis  of  the 

effect    of    differential    growth-rates    on    chela- 
reversal  in  heterochelous  crustacea    .  .  .      igi 

85.  Growth  of  normal  and  grafted  eyes  in  two  species 

of  Amblystoma         ......       192-193 

(From  Twitty  and  Schwind,  1931) 

86.  Relative  growth  of  eye  in  two   species   of  Ambly- 

stoma       .........     194 

(From  Twitty  and  Schwind,  1931) 

87.  Interaction  of  parts  of  the  eye  in  Amblystoma  .     196 

88.  Regulation  of  growth  in  eyes  grafted  on  to  indi- 

viduals of  different  age        .....     198 

(From  Twitty,  1930) 

89.  Changes  in  relative  weight  of  different  parts  of  the 

body  caused  by  under-nourishment  in  rats  .  .     202 

(From  Jackson,  1925) 

90.  Comparison    of    absolute    size    and    proportions    of 

modern  and  prehistoric  scottish  red  deer   .  .     206 

(After  Ritchie,  1920) 

91.  The  female  and  five  different  forms  of  male  in  the 

stag-beetle  cyclommatus         .....     209 
(After  Dudich,  1923) 

92.  Relative  growth  of  mandible  in  the  five  male  forms 

of  Cyclommatus       .  .  .  .  .  .  .211 

(From  Huxley,  1931c) 

93.  Change  of  form  with  change  of  absolute  size  in  the 

mandible  of  male  stag-beetles        .  .  .  .212 

(From  Grijfini,  191 2) 

94.  Heterogony  in  groups  larger  than  the  species  :     PHE- 

NOMENON   OF    LAMEERE    IN    THE    GENUS    GOLOFA      .  213 

(After  Champy,  1929) 

95.  Specific  variations  in  the  detail  of  a  heterogonic 

organ  (cephalic  horn)  in  goliath  beetles     .  .     217 

(From  Champy,  1924) 

96.  Developmental  changes  of  proportion  in  wild  and 

domestic  sheep         .......     223 

(After  Hammond,  1928) 

97.  Graph  showing  relation  of  egg-weight  to  body-weight 

in  432  species  of  birds  ......     226 

(From  Huxley,  1927c) 


LIST   OF   ILLUSTRATIONS  xix 

FIG.  PAGE 

98.  Diagram  showing  the  effect  of  rate-genes  on  eye- 

pigmentation  in  Gammarus       .....     228 
(From  Wells,  Huxley  and  Wells,  'The  Science  of  Life,'  London, 
1931) 

99.  Rate   of  eye-darkening   in   two   genetic  strains  of 

Gammarus         ........     230 

(From  Ford  and  Huxley,  192Q) 

100.  Effect  of  rate  of  general  growth  on  rate  of  eye- 

darkening   IN   A   PURE   STRAIN   OF  GAMMARUS        .  .      230 

(From  Ford  and  Huxley,  1920) 

101.  Multimodal    frequency-distribution    of    body-build 

index  in  man  ........     233 

(From  Davenport,  1923) 

102.  Diagram  illustrating  the  effect  of  rate-genes  upon 

vestigial  organs      .......     236 

103.  Effect  of  temperature  on  rate  of  eye-darkening  in 

a  pure  strain  of  gammarus    .....     238 
(From  Ford  and  Huxley,  1929) 

104.  Diagram  illustrating  the  relation  of  mutations  in 

rate-genes  to  recapitulation  and  paedomorphosis        24o 


PROBLEMS    OF    RELATIVE 

GROWTH 

CHAPTER   I 
CONSTANT   DIFFERENTIAL   GROWTH-RATIOS 

§ i.    Introductory 

THE  problem  of  differential  growth  is  a  fundamental 
one  for  biology,  since,  as  D'Arcy  Thompson  especially 
has  stressed  (1917),  all  organic  forms,  save  the  simplest 
such  as  the  spherical  or  the  amoeboid,  are  the  result  of  dif- 
ferential growth, — whether  general  growth  which  is  quantita- 
tively different  in  the  three  planes  of  space,  or  growth  localized 
at  certain  circumscribed  spots.  But  the  subject  has  received 
little  consideration.  D'Arcy  Thompson's  own  treatment, 
though  exhaustive  on  certain  points  (e.g.  the  logarithmic 
spiral),  profoundly  original  and  important  in  others  (e.g.  his 
use  of  Cartesian  transformations  to  illuminate  the  evolution 
of  one  form  from  another),  and  interesting  throughout,  is 
admittedly  incomplete.  Certain  large  bodies  of  data,  such  as 
those  included  in  Donaldson's  The  Rat  (1924)  and  in  various 
treatises  on  physical  anthropology,  e.g.  R.  Martin  (1928 )  exist 
on  differential  growth  in  mammals,  but  have  so  far  not  been 
analysed  save  by  the  use  of  purely  empirical  formulae  ;  Champy 
(1924)  has  written  a  very  stimulating  book  on  differential 
growth  of  such  extreme  type  as  to  warrant  the  term  '  dys- 
harmonic ',  and  has  later  given  further  examples  (1929)  ; 
Przibram  has  recently  (1930)  collated  some  of  his  interesting 
results  and  ideas.  But,  apart  from  this,  little  that  is  con- 
nected or  general  has  been  written  on  the  subject  ;  and  even 
the  individual  papers  dealing  with  the  topic  are  few  and  on 
the  whole  disconnected. 

Since  1920  I  have  been  studying  certain  phases  of  the 
problem  :  the  purpose  of  the  present  review  is  to  bring  to- 
gether the  various  aspects  which  have  presented  themselves, 


2  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

to  demonstrate  the  existence  of  certain  broad  empirical  laws 
which  appear  to  govern  most  cases  of  differential  growth  so 
far  studied,  to  discuss  their  bearing  on  other  branches  of 
biology,  and  to  point  the  way  to  further  attack  on  the  subject 
by  those  trained  in  other  methods. 

The  first  step,  it  appeared  to  me,  was  to  study  a  number 
of  clear-cut  cases  of  differential  growth  and  to  see  whether 
they  were  capable  of  quantitative  expression.  My  own  mathe- 
matics are  regrettably  deficient,  but  I  was  able  (see  Section  2) 
to  obtain  a  simple  formula  which  appears  to  be  at  any  rate 
a  first  approximation  to  a  general  law  for  differential  growth. 
Among  many  morphologists  and  systematists  there  appears 
still  to  linger  a  distrust  of  the  application  of  even  such  element- 
ary mathematics  to  biological  problems.  The  usual  criticism 
is  that  the  formulae  arrived  at  may  have  a  certain  convenience, 
but  can  tell  us  nothing  new,  and  nothing  worth  knowing  of 
the  biology  of  the  phenomenon.  This  appears  to  me  to  be 
very  ill-founded.  In  the  first  place,  to  have  a  quantitative 
expression  in  place  of  a  vague  idea  of  a  general  tendency  is 
not  merely  a  mild  convenience.  It  may  even  be  a  very  great 
convenience,  and  it  may  even  be  indispensable  in  making 
certain  systematic  and  biological  deductions.  But  further,  it 
may  suggest  important  ideas  as  to  the  underlying  processes 
involved ;  and  this  is  precisely  what  the  quantitative  analysis 
of  relative  growth  is  doing.  As  will  be  seen  in  this  and  the 
subsequent  chapters,  there  are  certain  hypotheses  which  square 
with  the  formula,  others  which  do  not  :  without  the  quanti- 
tative expression,  we  should  be  largely  theorizing  in  the  air. 
I  would  not  trouble  to  spend  my  time  on  this  point  if  it  had 
not  been  urged  on  several  occasions  in  my  hearing  ;  other- 
wise, one  would  expect  that  the  interaction  of  quantitative 
theory  with  observation  and  experiment  devoted  to  testing 
the  theory,  so  fruitful  not  only  in  other  sciences  but  in 
genetics  within  the  field  of  biology,  would  automatically  be 
welcomed. 

Furthermore,  the  establishment  of  one  quantitative  rule 
leads  on  to  the  discovery  of  others.  Chapters  I  and  II  will 
be  devoted  to  showing  that,  when  we  consider  the  growth  of 
whole  organs  relative  to  the  rest  of  the  body,  the  results  can 
be  understood  if  we  postulate  that  the  ratio  between  the 
intensity  (or  relative  rate)  of  growth  of  the  organ  and  that 
of  the  body  remains  constant  over  long  periods  of  the  animal's 
life.     To  borrow  a  term  from  another  branch  of  science,  there 


INTRODUCTORY  3 

is  a  constant  partition-coefficient  of  growth-intensity  between 
organ  and  body.  It  was  next  found  that  in  many  organs, 
especially  those  growing  at  markedly  different  rates  from  the 
body  as  a  whole,  growth-intensity  was  not  distributed  uni- 
formly, but  in  a  more  or  less  regular  pattern.  This  led  on 
to  the  notion,  already  suggested  on  different  grounds  by 
D'Arcy  Thompson,  that  the  growth-intensity  of  the  body  as 
a  whole  (or,  if  you  prefer  it,  the  relative  growth-rates  of  its 
various  parts)  is  distributed  according  to  an  orderly  system 
of  '  growth-gradients  '.  These  conclusions  will  be  discussed 
in  Chapters  III  to  V. 

The  physiological  mechanism  underlying  these  general  rules 
still  remains  very  obscure,  in  the  absence  of  experiment 
specifically  directed  to  the  point  :  but  there  are  some  inter- 
esting hints  and  possibilities,  and  these  will  be  discussed  in 
Chapter  VI. 

Finally,  the  facts  derived  from  the  study  of  relative  growth 
have  a  number  of  important  bearings  upon  other  branches  of 
biology  ;  and  the  concluding  chapter  will  be  devoted  to  these. 
I  hope  to  convince  the  systematist  that  by  a  knowledge  of 
the  laws  of  relative  growth  we  are  put  in  possession  of  new 
criteria  bearing  on  the  validity  of  species,  sub-species,  and 
'  forms  ' ;  the  nature  of  certain  dwarf  forms  ;  and  the  import- 
ance (or  the  reverse)  of  size-differences  in  general  for  system- 
atics.  In  regard  to  that  special  branch  of  systematics  usually 
called  physical  anthropology,  it  will  be  found  that  these  laws 
have  a  bearing  on  the  important  question  as  to  whether  true 
evolutionary  change  has  taken  place  in  civilized  populations 
during  historical  time.  As  regards  evolution,  it  will  be  found 
that  the  subject  throws  light  upon  the  question  of  adaptation, 
on  the  general  theory  of  orthogenesis,  and  on  the  selection 
problem.  Furthermore,  the  existence  of  growth-gradients,  as 
D'Arcy  Thompson  has  already  pointed  out,  makes  it  much 
easier  for  us  to  understand  how  certain  types  of  evolutionary 
transformation  can  have  been  brought  about,  since  a  single 
genetic  change  affecting  a  growth-gradient  will  automatically 
express  itself  in  a  changed  relation  in  the  size  of  a  large 
number  of  organs  or  regions. 

Then  comparative  physiologists  will  find  it  necessary  to 
know  precisely  how  to  discount  the  effects  of  differences  in 
total  absolute  size  when  they  wish  to  estimate  the  compara- 
tive development  of  an  organ  in  a  series  of  related  species 
or  groups  ;    and  will  further  find  interesting  hints  as  to  the 


4  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

nature  of  factors  which  tend  to  limit  the  size  of  an  organ 
at  high  absolute  sizes. 

Nor  can  genetics  be  left  out.  A  constant  partition  of 
growth-intensity  between  different  regions  implies  constant 
differences  in  their  rates  of  growth.  Thus  any  genes  control- 
ling relative  size  of  parts  will  have  to  exert  their  action  by 
influencing  the  rates  of  processes,  and  so  fall  into  line  with 
the  numerous  other  rate-factors  whose  importance  has  been 
summarized  by  Goldschmidt  (1927)  and  by  Ford  and  Huxley 
(1929).  The  fact,  however,  that  the  ratios  between  growth- 
rates,  and  not  their  absolute  values,  are  the  determining 
factors  introduces  certain  complications,  whose  discussion  will 
be  found  to  have  an  interesting  bearing  upon  the  analysis  of 
other  genetic  '  characters  '. 

Finally,  the  ancient  problem  of  embryological  recapitulation 
will  be  found  to  be  illuminated  from  a  new  angle  ;  and  many 
undoubted  cases  of  recapitulation  will  be  found  to  owe  their 
origin  not  to  any  mysterious  phyletic  law,  but  to  embryological 
convenience,  adjusting  evolutionary  changes  in  the  size  of  an 
organ  to  the  general  rules  of  relative  growth  during  individual 
development. 

This  brief  introductory  sketch  will,  I  hope,  have  shown 
some  of  the  chief  points  of  interest  in  the  study  of  relative 
growth.  We  must  now  come  to  grips  with  the  subject, 
and  for  the  reasons  above  stated  propose  to  do  so  by  con- 
sidering what  at  first  sight  seems  a  rather  arid  point — the 
quantitative  expression  of  the  relation  between  the  body  as 
a  whole  and  an  organ  whose  proportionate  size  changes  during 
life. 

§  2.    Constant  Differential  Growth-ratios 

Champy  (1.  c.)  and  others  have  pointed  out  that  certain 
organs  increase  in  relative  size  with  the  absolute  size  of  the 
body  which  bears  them  ;  but  so  far  as  I  am  aware,  I  (Huxley, 
1924B)  was  the  first  to  demonstrate  the  simple  and  significant 
relation  between  the  magnitudes  of  the  two  variables.  In 
typical  cases,  if  x  be  the  magnitude  of  the  animal  (as  measured 
by  some  standard  linear  measurement,  or  by  its  weight  minus 
the  weight  of  the  organ)  and  y  be  the  magnitude  of  the  dif- 
ferentially-growing organ,  then  the  relation  between  them  is 
y  =  oxk,  where  b  and  k  are  constants.1     The  constant  b  is 

1  This  can  also  be  written  log  y  =  log  b  +  k  log  x,  which  means  that 
any  magnitudes  obeying  this  formula  will  fall  along  straight  lines  if 
plotted  on  a  double  logarithmic  grid. 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS      5 

here  of  no  particular  biological  significance,  since  it  merely 
denotes  the  value  of  y  when  x  =  1 — i.e.  the  fraction  of  x 
which  y  occupies  when  x  equals  unity.     We  may  call  it  the 


3000 


I 


^2000 

I 

•is 

"a 
1000 


500 


100 


k=20 

1 '           ■    ■     1 

b  = 

-  OO  003 

h  = 

f®  /•/  x  I0'5 

® /Ox/0"5 

/ 

k  -27  < 

®09*I0'S     d 

O0-002 

b  -  /0~5x/-7+\ 

1 
1 
1 
1 

1 
1 
f 

t     .  \H+tr 

-  O  0-001 

b  -  /0     x  i/o 9 

/ 

t 
/ 

■  O00005 

/       05  +  S 

/k  =  l3  (8/0  )x/0~5=  h 

S                      [(DOS   ) 

0 

< 

o-oooi  s 

eJOdbOOl 

J  000  5000  10,000  15,000 

size  of  body 


-3000 


2000 


1000 


Fig.  1. — Diagram  to  show  the  quantitative  effect  of  varying  the  constants 

in  the  simple  heterogony  formula,  y  =  bxk,  assuming  that  the  origin  of  growth 

in  x  and  y  begins  at  the  same  time. 

The  dotted  line  gives  the  growth  of  the  organ  (y)  when  k  =  2-0  and  b  =  -ooooi.  The  points  to 
the  left  show  values  of  y  for  different  values  of  b  when  the  rest-of-body  is  of  size  1000.  Those  to  the 
right  show  the  effects,  at  body-size  io,ooo,  of  varying  both  k  and  b. 


6  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

fractional  coefficient.  But  the  value  of  k  has  an  important 
meaning. 

It  implies  that,  for  the  range  over  which  the  formula  holds 
the  ratio  of  the  relative  growth-rate  of  the  organ  to  the  relative 
growth-rate  of  the  body  remains  constant,  the  ratio  itself 
being  denoted  by  the  value  of  k.  By  relative  growth-rate  is 
meant  the  rate  of  growth  per  unit  weight,  i.e.  the  actual  abso- 
lute growth-rate  at  any  instant  divided  by  the  actual  size  at 
that  instant. 

This  is  at  once  seen  by  plotting  the  logarithm  of  y  against 

the  logarithm  of  x.     In  unit  time  the  increase  in  the  logarithm 

of  y  is  k  times  the  increase  in  the  logarithm  of  x,  which  may 

be  written  : 

d    ,  ■,  d  , 

g.logy-Jglog* 

dy  ,  ,dx  , 

ily     -  kTtlx 

This  formula,  on  which  I  have  had  the  advantage  of  con- 
sulting Professor  Levy,  of  the  Imperial  College  of  Science, 
can  be  deduced  on  the  basis  of  very  simple  assumptions  about 
growth  in  general.  One  essential  fact  about  growth  is  that 
it  is  a  process  of  self-multiplication  of  living  substance — i.e. 
that  the  rate  of  growth  of  an  organism  growing  equally  in 
all  its  parts  is  at  any  moment  proportional  to  the  size  of  the 
organism.  A  second  fundamental  fact  about  growth  is  that 
the  rate  of  self -multiplication  slows  down  with  increasing  age 
(size)  ;  a  third  is  that  it  is  much  affected  by  the  external 
environment,  e.g.  by  temperature  and  nutrition.  The  two 
latter  considerations  affect  all  parts  of  the  body  equally,  so 
that  we  may  suppose  that  the  growth-rate  of  any  particular 
organ  is  proportional  simultaneously  (a)  to  a  specific  constant 
characteristic  of  the  organ  in  question,  (b)  to  the  size  of  the 
organ  at  any  instant,  and  (c)  to  a  general  factor  dependent 
on  age  and  environment  which  is  the  same  for  all  parts  of 
the  body. 

If  y  stand  for  the  size  of  the  organ,  and  x  for  that  of  the 
rest  of  the  body,  we  shall  then  have 

—  =  oaG   and  --  =  #yG, 
dt  at 

where  a  and  /?  are  the  specific  constants  for  the  rest  of  the 
body  and  for  the  organ  in   question,   and  G  measures  the 


CONSTANT   DIFFERENTIAL   GROWTH-RATIOS      7 

general  conditions  of  growth  as  affected  by  age  and  environ- 
ment,1 then  —  =  —  • 

ax       ax 

Thus  log  y  =  -  log  x  +  log  b,  where  b  is  a  constant  :    i.e. 

y  =  bxp/a. 

And  fi/a,  which  can  also  be  written  k,  is  a  constant,  and  is 
also  the  ratio  of  the  specific  components  of  the  growth-rates 
of  y  and  x  respectively.2 

I  am,  of  course,  aware  that  the  existence  of  growth-cycles 
and  other  facts  make  it  impossible  to  suppose  that  the  ex- 
pression for  change  of  growth  can  be  so  simple  as  here  set 
forth.  We  must  suppose  that  each  cycle  may  have  its  own 
general  and  specific  components  of  the  growth-rate — i.e.  that 
a,  /5  and  y  may  change  comparatively  abruptly  during  the 
life-cycle,  and  also  it  is  quite  possible  that  other  inherent 
alterations,  such  as  the  gradual  increase  of  viscosity  of  proto- 
plasm with  age  (Ruzicka,  1921),  will  cause  gradual  and  pro- 
gressive diminution  of  the  specific  constants  which  would 
account  for  the  various  distortions  of  the  S-shaped  curve  of 
growth  from  the  form  expected  on  the  simplest  assumptions. 
But  I  am  convinced  that  some  such  general  method  of  en- 
visaging growth  is  sound  ;  and  it  is  interesting  to  find  our 
empirical  formula  for  constant  differential  growth-ratios 
deducible  from  it.     (See  also  Schmalhausen,  1927B,  1930.) 

Exactly  the  same  formula  would  apply  to  two  sums  of 
money  put  out  at  different  rates  of  compound  interest,  pro- 
vided that  they  were  not  accumulating  discontinuously  by 
quarterly  or  annual  interest  payments,  as  in  financial  fact, 
but  continuously,  as  in  the  Compound  Interest  Law,  and  as 
in  biological  growth,     k  would   here  denote  the  ratio  of  the 

1  One  might  expect,  from  certain  experimental  data,  that  the  factor 
G  would  be  a  simple  function  of  the  defect  of  the  size  of  the  organism 
at  any  given  time  from  its  final  size  ;  but  this  would  not  interfere 
with  the  validity  of  our  more  general  formula. 

2  It  may  well  be  that  the  '  general  factor  '  is  not  capable  of  such 
a  simple  formulation.  But  provided  that  such  a  general  factor  does 
exist — i.e.  that  the  growth  both  of  organ  and  of  rest-of-body  is  related 
to  some  general  law  of  growth  affecting  the  organism  as  a  whole,  the 
deduction  of  constant  differential  growth-ratios  remains  valid.  And 
that  such  a  relation  does  exist  is  shown  by  the  work  of  Przibram, 
Harrison  and  others  discussed  in  Chapter  VI. 


8  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

two  rates  of  interest.  (In  our  biological  parallels,  we  know 
nothing  of  the  actual  rates  of  growth,  for  since  the  organ  and 
the  body  have  both  existed  for  the  same  length  of  time  when 
we  measure  them,  the  time-factor  cancels  out,  in  point  of  fact.)1 
The  actual  rates,  unlike  those  for  the  two  sums  of  money,  will 
obviously  be  altering  continuously;  they  will  be  high  in  youth, 
low  in  age ;  increased  by  high  temperature,  decreased  by  low ; 
and  so  forth.  What  concerns  us  is  that  if  our  formula  holds, 
the  ratio  of  the  relative  rates  of  growth  remain  constant. 

In  such  cases,  therefore,  we  have  a  constant  differential 
growth-ratio ,  denoted  by  the  value  of  k.  If  we  prefer  to  con- 
centrate upon  the  growth  of  the  organ  relative  to  the  growth 
of  the  body  considered  as  a  standard,  then  we  may  speak  of 
k  as  denoting  the  growth-coefficient  of  the  organ.  An  organ 
which  is  thus  growing  at  a  different  rate  from  the  body  as  a 
whole  may  be  called  heterogonic,  to  use  the  convenient  term 
coined  by  Pezard  (1918).  If  it  is  growing  at  the  same  rate 
as  the  body  it  must  be  styled  isogonic  ;  as  will  be  apparent, 
isogony  is  merely  a  special  case  of  heterogony,  as  the  circle 
is  a  special  case  of  the  ellipse. 

It  is  clear  that  comparatively  small  variations  in  the  value 
of  k  will  have  large  results  provided  that  growth  continues 
over  a  considerable  range  of  size.  An  attempt  to  show  this 
graphically  has  been  made  in  Fig.  1. 

The  best  worked-out  example  of  this  law  so  far  concerns 
the  large  chela  of  male  fiddler-crabs,  Uca  pugnax  (Huxley, 
1927A).  This  obeys  the  law  of  constant  growth-ratio  from  crabs 
of  only  about  60  milligrams  total  weight  to  the  largest  found, 
weighing  sixty  times  as  much  ;  the  value  of  k,  however,  changes 
quite  abruptly  at  about  i-i  g.  total  weight,  a  point  which 
probably  denotes  the  onset  of  sexual  maturity,  decreasing  here 
to  less  than  80  per  cent,  of  its  value  for  the  earlier  growth- 
phase.  (It  is  a  noteworthy  and  unexpected  fact  that  the 
growth-coefficient  of  this  secondary  sexual  character  should 
be  reduced  instead  of  increased  when  the  gonad  begins  to 
function.)     See  Figs.  2  and  3. 

In  our  examples  of  the  fiddler-crab,  the  weights  of  chela  and 
rest-of-body  behave,  over  the  earlier  and  longer  growth-phase, 
like  £2  and  £100  put  out  at  8  per  cent,  and  5  per  cent,  (continuous) 
compound  interest  respectively  2,  and  a  calculation  on  this  basis 

1  For  cases  where  an  organ  is  laid  down  considerably  later  than 
the  body  as  a  whole,  see  Chapter  IV. 

2  Strictly  speaking,  of  course,  8-i  and  5  per  cent,   (see  p.   10). 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL   GROWTH-RATIOS      9 

will  reproduce  the  actual  figures  for  weight.1  But  we  can  be 
perfectly  sure  that  the  actual  growth-rate  of  the  crab  and  of 
its  claw  slows  off  with  age,  that  it  differs  in  summer  and 
winter,  and  is  further  subjected  to  all  kinds  of  irregular  fluc- 
tuations due  to  temperature,  food  and  other  factors.  The 
actual  rates  may  be  as  8,000  :  5,000  in  early  life,  as  160  :  100 
later,  as  4  :  2-5  in  maturity,  and  as  0-08  :  0-05  in  extreme  old 
age  ;  yet  so  long  as  the  ratio  8  :  5  is  preserved,  claw-size  will 
always  be  the  same  function  of  body-size — a  body  of  given 


0      100   ZOO    300   400  600  BOO  1000  IZSO  H00  1750  Z000  ZZSO 

weight  of  rest  of  body.mg 

Fig.  2. — Increase  of  absolute  and  relative  chela-weight  in  the  large  chela  of 
the  male  fiddler-crab,   Uca  pugnax. 

(Constructed  from  the  data  of  Huxley,  1927A.) 

weight  will  have  attached  to  it  a  claw  whose  weight  would 
be  the  same  whether  the  body  had  taken  three  weeks  or  three 
years  to  reach  its  present  size. 2  The  differential  growth-ratio  re- 
mains the  biologically  and  morphogenetically  important  factor. 
The  expression^  =  bxk  can  be  written  log y  =  log  b  +  k  log  x. 

1  y0  =  2,  x0  =  100.  At  time  t,  y,  =  y0eom,  xt  =  A'oe005(.  After  ten 
years,  y10  =  2eos  =  ^4-45,  and  x10  =  iooe0'5'  =  ^164-92.  After  twenty 
years,  y20  =  ze16  =  ^9-9i.  and  x20  =  iooe10  =  £271-9,  and  so  on. 
Double  logarithmic  plotting  of  these  figures  gives  a  straight  line. 

2  In  all  probability  this  is  only  true  as  an  approximation.  It  is  a 
priori  unlikely  that  there  is  no  differential  effect  of  environmental 
agencies  on  the  growth-rates  of  body  and  chela  respectively. 


10 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


In  other  words,  if  the  logarithms  of  the  magnitudes  are  plotted, 
we  should  expect  a  straight  line,  from  the  slope  of  which  the 
value  of  k  can  be  read  off ;  (if  a  be  the  angle  the  line  makes 
with  the  x  axis,  then  tan  a  =  k).     Fig.  3  shows  the  excellent 


1.5 

2.0 

2.5          3.0 

I 

3.0 

1 

1                             1                   Q 

rT 

2.0 

Oj 

0 

1.0 

yO 

J>  Upugnflxb" 

M 1 

1 

3.5 

I 

H3.0 


2.0 


1P 


17    2.0 


0.5 


3P       3.4 


Fig.  3. — Increase  of  the  logarithm  of  absolute  chela-weight  with  the  logarithm 
of  body-weight  in  male  fiddler-crabs. 

approximation  of  the  actual  points  to  a  straight  line  when  so 
plotted.  In  this  particular  case,  the  constants  are  as  follows 
— first  phase  (to  total  weight  i-i  g.  or  just  over  ;  rest-of-body 
weight  about  075  g.)  :  b  =  0-0073,  k  =  1-62  ;  second  phase 
(from  this  point  to  maximum  size,  in  this  sample  maximum 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS    u 

total  weight  rather  over  3-5  g.)  :  b  =  0-083,  k  =  I#255-  As 
purely  graphic  methods,  especially  with  logarithmic  plotting, 
are  not  sufficient  to  establish  the  accuracy  of  an  empirical 
formula  of  this  sort  (see,  e.g.,  Gray,  1929),  I  have  calculated 
the  values  to  be  expected  from  the  formula.  As  will  be  seen 
from  Table  I,  the  deviations  from  expectation  are  slight — 
only  in  four  cases  over  5  per  cent.,  and  these  all  in  the  first 
phase,  where  errors  in  weighing  are  liable  to  be  relatively 
greater ;  the  mean  deviation  for  the  second  phase  is  only 
+  0-19  per  cent.,  for  the  second  phase  it  is  +  0-35  per  cent., 
and  would  be  smaller  but  for  the  large  deviation  of  the  last 
class,  which  consists  of  only  a  few  individuals.  Further,  there 
is  no  trend  of  the  deviations  from  predominantly  positive  to 
predominantly  negative  or  vice  versa.  We  may  thus  take 
the  formula  as  a  rather  surprisingly  close  approximation  to 
reality.  It  is  possible  that  the  delimitation  of  the  beginning 
of  the  second  phase  after  the  14th  instead  of  after  the 
15th  class  would  have  improved  matters ;  and  also  that 
small  alterations  in  the  values  of  k  would  have  given  an 
even  better  fit,1  but  I  am  only  concerned  to  show  that  the 
data  conform  to  this  type  of  mathematical  expression,  not 
to  obtain  accuracy  in  an  extra  decimal  place  in  the  formula 
itself. 

We  are  accordingly  justified  in  saying  that  the  large  chela 
of  the  male  Uca  grows  in  close  approximation  to  the  formula 
of  constant  differential  growth-ratio,  namely  :   y  —  bxh. 

In  passing,  it  is  worth  noting  that  the  logarithmic  method 
of  plotting  brings  into  true  relief  an  important  point  which 
is  entirely  obscured  by  the  usual  method  of  plotting  on  the 
absolute  scale — namely  the  fact  that  growth  is  concerned 
essentially  with  the  multiplication  of  living  substance.  On 
the  logarithmic  scale,  equal  spaces  on  the  graph  denote  equal 
amounts  of  multiplication,  whereas  on  the  ordinary  absolute 
scale  they  denote  equal  additions.  From  the  point  of  view 
of  growth,  the  increase  of  weight  of  our  fiddler-crabs  from 
5  mg.  to  25  mg.  is  equivalent  to  that  from  1  g.  to  5  g.  ;  but 
on  the  absolute  scale  the  former  interval  cannot  even  be  repre- 
sented on  the  same  graph  as  the  latter.  Thus  when  I  speak 
of  a  fraction  of  the  growth-period,  I  shall  invariably  be  think- 
ing in  terms  of  multiplicative  growth,   in  which  an  «-fold 

1  The  last  two  columns  of  the  table  give  the  expectation  if  0-0074 
be  substituted  for  0-0073  as  the  value  of  b,  and  show  that  this  gives 
a  greater  deviation,  but  one  of  opposite  sign. 


12 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


TABLE   I 

Uca  pugnax    (401  Specimens)  Growth-ratio  of  Large  Chela  {y) 

and  Rest  of  Body  (x) 

(a)  First  phase:  to  total  weight  (x  +  y)  =  i-i  g.   y  =  0-0073  *162  (mg-)' 


#  =  mean 

weight  cf 

y  =  mean 

Per  cent. 

y  calculated 

Per  cent. 

rest  of 

weight  of 

y 

deviation 

on  formula 

deviation 

body  after 

large  chela 

calculated 

actual  from 

y  = 

actual  from 

removal  of 
large  chela 

(actual) 

calculated 

o-oo74sr1'62 

calculated. 

mg. 

mg. 

mg. 

mg. 

I 

57'6 

5'3 

5-16 

+  2-7 

5-24 

+  I-I 

2 

80-3 

9-0 

8-89 

+   1-2 

9-02 

—  0-2 

3 

109-2 

13-7 

14-59 

-  6-i 

14-79 

-  7-4 

4 

156-1 

25-1 

25-88 

-  3-o 

26-24 

-  4-0 

5 

199-7 

38-3 

38-90 

-  i-5 

39-45 

—  2-9 

6 

238-3 

52-5 

51-76 

+  1-4 

52-48 

4-  0-4 

7 

270-0 

59-o 

63-53 

-  7-i 

64-42 

-8-4 

8 

300-2 

78-1 

75-34 

+  3-7 

76-38 

+  2-3 

9 

355-2 

104-5 

98-63 

+  5-9 

ioo-o 

+  4-5 

10 

420-1 

i35-o 

129-4 

+  4-3 

131-2 

4"  2-9 

11 

470-1 

164-9 

155-2 

+  6-2 

157-4 

+  4-8 

12 

535-7 

195-6 

191-9 

+  i-9 

194-5 

4-  o-6 

13 

617-9 

243-0 

242-7 

+  o-i 

246-0 

—   1-2 

14 

68o-6 

271-6 

283-8 

-  4-3 

287-7 

-5-6 

15 

743-3 

319-2 

327-3 

-  2-5 

331-9 

-3-8 

Algebraic  sum  of  deviations       4-  2-9 
Mean  deviation       4-0-19 


—  16-9 

-  i-i3 


(6) 

Second  phase  :    from  total  weight  1-2  g. 

onwards. 

y  =  0. 

y  calculated 

y 

Per  cent. 

on  formula 

X 

y 

calculated 

deviation 

y  = 

0-084  S1'256' 

Per  cent, 
deviation 

16 

872-4 

417-6 

406-8 

4-  2-6 

411-7 

4-  i-4 

17 

983-1 

460-8 

472-4 

-  2-5 

478-0 

-3-6 

18 

1,079-9 

537-o 

531-9 

+  I-I 

538-3 

—  0-2 

19 

^^SS 

593-8 

585-6 

4-  i-4 

592-7 

4-  0-2 

20 

1, 211*7 

616-8 

628-7 

-  1-9 

636-2 

-  3'i 

21 

1,291-3 

670-0 

665-6 

+  0-7 

673-6 

-  0-5 

22 

1,363-2 

699-3 

720-6 

-  3-o 

729-3 

-  4-i 

23 

1,449-1 

777-8 

769-1 

4-  1-7 

778-4 

—  o-i 

24 

1,807-9 

1,009-1 

1,015-0 

-  o-6 

1,028-0 

-  i-8 

25 

2,235-0 

1,380-0 

1,327-0 

+  4-° 

1,344'° 

4-  2-6 

Algebrai< 

;  sum  of  deviations 

+  3-5 

-  9-2 

Mean  deviation 

+  o-35 

—  0-92 

In  Huxley,  1927A  (p.  152),  this  was  stated  as  1-33  owing  to  an  error. 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS    13 

increase  from  one  absolute  size  is  regarded  as  equivalent  to 
an  «-fold  increase  from  another  absolute  size. 

The  same  total  increase  could  be  subdivided  into  fractions 
of  equal  absolute  size  ;  but  this  method  of  subdivision  in 
terms  of  additive  growth  has  not  the  same  biological  value, 
and  will  not  be  adopted.  Thus  for  an  increase  from  1  g.  to 
256  g.,  equal  fractions  of  the  growth-period  are  best  repre- 
sented by  the  equal  multiplicative  increases  from  1  to  4,  4  to  16, 
16  to  64  and  64  to  256  g.  ;  and  not  by  the  equal  additive 
increases  to  64,  128,  192  and  256  g. 

§  3.    Examples  of  Constant  Differential  Growth-ratios 

The  expression  y  =  bxu  I  shall  refer  to  as  the  simple  hetero- 
gony  formula.  This  formula,  or  an  approximation  to  it,  has 
been  found  to  hold  for  a  number  of  other  organs,  e.g.  the 


Fig.  4. — Increase  of  the  logarithm  of  stem-weight  against  the  logarithm  of 

root-weight  in  various  plants. 


14 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


abdomen  of  some  female  crabs  (Shaw,  1928  ;  Sasaki,  1928)  ; 
the  chelae  of  many  male  and  some  female  Decapoda  (Huxley, 
1927  ;  Shaw,  1928  ;  Tazelaar,  1930  ;  Tucker,  1930  *)  ;  other 
appendages  of  various  Crustacea  ;    the  trunk  of  Planarians  as 


Fig.   5. — Increase  of  the  logarithm  of  petiole-length  against  the  logarithm 
of  lamina  diameter  in  nasturtium  leaves,   Tropaeolum. 


against  the  head  (Abeloos,  1928)  ;  the  face  as  against  the 
cranium  of  dog  and  baboon  (Huxley,  1927,  analysing  Becher, 
1923  ;  Huxley,  unpublished,  analysing  Zuckerman,  1926)  ; 
the  shoot  as  against  the  root  of  certain  plants  (Pearsall,  1927)  ; 
the  size  (facet-number)  of  the  two  lobes  of  the  eye  in  the 

1  Tucker  states  that  his  data  indicate  a  linear  relation  between  male 
chela  length  and  breadth,  and  carapace  length.  However,  his  graphs 
and  his  percentage  measurements  indicate  that  this  does  not  give  an 
accurate  fit,  whereas  logarithmic  plotting  (Fig.  55)  gives  an  excellent 
approximation  to  a  combination  of  two  straight-line  curves,  as  in 
male  Uca. 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS     15 

bar-eye   mutant    of    Drosophila  melanogaster  (Hersh,    1928) ; 
the   linear  dimensions   of  certain   Molluscs    (Nomura,    1928  ; 


30"  "To 


/o 


40- 


30- 


20- 


10 


-— —  ---»t-. 


10 


20 


30 


40      50       60 


mm 


Fig.  6. — Increase  in  relative  width  of  abdomen  with  increase  of  carapace 
length  in  the  shore-crab,   Carcinus  maenas  :    above,   female ;   below,   male. 

The  ordinates  represent  °_?5 — \ O/    •     f he  abscissae   represent  carapace  length    in   mm. 

carapace  length     /<J  ' 

Nomura  and  Sasaki,  1928)  ;  the  tail  of  the  mouse  Phenacomys 
(Taylor,  1915)  ;  the  dimensions  of  the  casques  of  Hornbills 
(Banks,  unpublished)  ;    the  weights  of  various  organs  of  the 


i6 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


rat  (analysis  of  the  data  of  Donaldson,  Hatai,  Jackson,  etc., 
— see  Donaldson,  1.  c.)  ;  the  length  of  the  head  of  whalebone 
whales  during  post-natal  life  (Mackintosh  and  Wheeler,  1929)  ; 
the  lamina  diameter  and  petiole  length  in  Tropaeolum  leaves 


6         8      10  20 

carapace  length,    mm. 


30        40      50 


Fig.  7. 


-Increase  of  width  of  abdomen  with  increase  of  carapace  length  in 
the  shore  crab,  Carcinus  maenas  :    logarithmic  plotting. 

+■ ,  unsexables  ;    0,  females  ;    H  males.     The  growth  coefficient  for  unsexables  and  young  females  is 
1-26,  for  older  females  1-42,  that  for  young  males  107,  for  older  males  0-94. 

(Pearsall,  1927),  and  even  for  the  amounts  of  various  chemical 
substances  in  the  growing  larvae  of  the  wax-moth  Galleria 
and  the  meal-worm  beetle  Tenebrio  (Teissier,  1929,  1931),  as 
well  as  for  organs  which,  physiologically  speaking,  represent 
special  cases,  as  the  antlers  of  deer  which  are  shed  every  year 


CONSTANT   DIFFERENTIAL   GROWTH-RATIOS    17 


PaJaemon 
malcomsoni 


2  6 


2  4 


2  2 


2  0 


(Huxley,  1926,  1927,  193 1),  and  the  horns,  mandibles,  etc., 
of  various  holometabolous  insects  (Huxley,  1927 — see  Chapter 
II).  It  is  probable  that  any  other  changes  of  proportion  which 
have  not  yet  been  analysed  from  this  point  of  view  will  turn 
out  to  obey  the  same  law,  e.g. 
the  progressive  increase  of  rela- 
tive tail-length  in  the  salamander 
Eurycea  (Wilder,  1924),  or  that 
of  wing-rudiments  in  dragonflies 
(Balfour-Browne,  1909).  See  also 
p.  258  (Daphnia),  p.  263  (rat). 

Most  of  the  organs  thus  far 
cited  are  positively  heterogonic, 
increasing  in  relative  size  with 
growth ;  others,  however,  de- 
crease in  relative  size  with 
increase  in  absolute  size,  and 
are  accordingly  negatively  hetero- 
gonic. Such  of  these  cases  as 
have  been  analysed  also  appear 
to  obey  the  rule  of  constant 
differential  growth-ratios  :  e.g. 
nucleus  in  oocytes  of  Hydractina 
(Teissier,  1927)  ;  brain  in  vari- 
ous mammals  (Lapicque,  1907  ; 
Dubois,  1914,  1918) ;  the  number 
of  nerve-fibres  and /or  neurones 
in  mammals  (Lapicque  and 
Giroud,  1923 ;  Dubois,  1918)  ; 
heart  in  many  vertebrates  (Klatt, 

1919  ;  Clark,  1927,  for  references)  ;  limbs  in  post-natal  sheep 
(Hammond,  1927,  1929)  ;  certain  limbs  in  Hermit-crabs  (Bush, 
I93°)  '>  pereiopods  in  the  racing-crab  Ocypoda  (Cott,  1929)  ; 
legs  in  Orthoptera  (Przibram,  1930)  ;  Gammarus  eyes  (p.  260). 

Some  of  the  facts  are  graphically  illustrated  in  Figs.  4,  5 
(plant  organs)  ;  6,  7,  22,  23  (crab  abdomen)  ;  8,  21,  32,  55, 
77  (Crustacean  chelae)  ;  9,  10  (mammalian  cranium)  ;  11 
(mouse  tail-length)  ;  12  (facet-number,  Drosophila  eye)  ;  13-15 
(various  organs  of  crabs)  ;  16-20  (chemical  substances  in  insect- 
larvae)  ;  71  (head-length,  whales)  ;  25,  27  (deer  antlers)  ; 
33-35,  40,  91,  92  (organs  of  holometabolous  insects). 

We  may  give  some  tables  and  figures  in  support  of  these 
statements. 


log  body  length,  mm. 


Fig.   8. — Relative   growth   of  the 
chela  in  the  prawn,  Palaemon  mal- 
comsoni :  logarithmic  plotting. 

(From  the  data  of  Kemp,  and  Henderson  and 
Mathai.) 


i8 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


Sheep  Dog  (Fig.  9) 

Data  from  Becher  (1923) 
Analysed  in  Huxley,   1927 


x 
42-0 

05-3 
74-5 
85-5 
99-3 

II2-6 
I20-O 


y 
22 -o 

48-3 
58-0 

73-5 
89-1 

102-0 
II2-0 


x 

y 
k 


30- 

cranial  region  (mm.). 

facial  region  (mm.). 

1-5   (except  for  highest  values  of  x). 


160 

— 1 \ 1 — 

- 

130 

- 

I/K 

100 

• 

r 

- 

■ 

5? 

«5! 

■ 

/             1 

/              1 

- 

1    ™ 

/ X 

7               ' 
/               1 

/                1 

/                 1 

1 
1 

(6) 

■ 

20 

1 

— 1 1 1 

1 

40  60  80       100 

cranium  length,  mm. 


120 


Fig.  9. — Growth  of  the  facial  region  relative  to  the  cranial  region  in  the  skulls 
of  sheep-dogs  (x)  and  baboons  (©). 
k  for  sheep-dog  about  1-49  ;    for  baboon,  points  2-5,  about  4-25. 
[Constructed  from  the  data  of  Becher,  1923,  and  Zuckerman,  1926.) 


CONSTANT   DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS    19 

Values  of  Cranium-length  and  Face-length  in  the  Baboon  Papio 
porcarius  at  Different  Sizes  (from  Zuckerman,  1926)  (Figs.  9,  10) 


No.  of  Cases 

1 

4 
7 
3 
6 

4 

The  growth-coefficient  of  face-length  on  cranium-length  for 
Classes  2-5  is  about  4-25,  a  very  high  figure.  The  curve 
shows  irregularities  at  both  ends. 


Mean  Face- 

Mean  Cranium- 

length  (Naso 

length 

prosthion) 

mm. 

mm. 

•         78-5 

31-0 

100-25 

64-6 

108-9 

94-8 

•      "47 

131-0 

.       118-25 

140-8 

122-0 

M4-25 

Fig.  10. — Baboon  skulls  of  various  sizes,  to  show  the  increase  in  relative  size 

of  facial  region  with  absolute  size  of  skull. 

1,  new-born;    2,  juvenile  (with  milk  dentition);    3,  adult  female;    4,  adult  male. 


20 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


TABLE   Ia 
Abdomen-breadth  against  Carapace-length  in  Carcinus 

MAENAS    FROM    PLYMOUTH    (FigS.    6,    7) 

(Data  of  Huxley  and  Richards,   1931) 


Mean 

Mean 

V 

car.-l. 

abd.-br. 

(mm.) 

(mm.) 

(a)  Unsexable  (74  specimens) 

13 

3-09 

0-578 

22 

3-80 

0-680 

20 

4-22 

0-823 

11 

476 

0979 

8 

5-19 

1-019 

(b)  Fern 

ales  (281  specimens) 

12 

5-56 

1-16 

16 

6-52 

i-45 

14 

7-41 

1-67 

12 

9-32 

2-30 

15 

10-37 

2-80 

16 

n-35 

3-n 

17 

12-33 

3-37 

23 

13-29 

3-81 

19 

14-35 

4-06 

12 

I5-3I 

429 

19 

16-35 

4-82 

15 

17-36 

5-15 

15 

18-16 

5-48 

7 

19-34 

5-93 

6 

20-33 

6-72 

10 

21-51 

6-82 

12 

22-40 

7-54 

8 

23-34 

7-76 

6 

24-33 

8-33 

5 

25-52 

9-16 

10 

26-45 

9-59 

6 

27-65 

9-79 

2 

28-45 

10-40 

3 

29-30 

1 1  03 

4 

3o-55 

11-62 

4 

31-49 

12-46 

3 

32-37 

12-75 

5 

33-32 

12-70 

4 

34-33 

I3-56 

1 

43-5o 

17-50 

2 

45-3o 

19-20 

1 

46-30 

19-90 

1 

50-20 

23-70 

CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL   GROWTH-RATIOS    21 


Values  of  Constant  Differential  Growth-ratios  for  Shoot- 
weight  against  Root-weight  in  Various  Plants  (from  Pear- 
sail,  1927)  (Fig.  4) 


Plant 

Value  of  k 

Daucus  carota  (carrot) 

°'55 

Brassica  rapa  (turnip) 

0-65 

Gossypium  roseum  (cotton) 

090 

Impatiens  sp.      .... 

i-oo 

Pisum  sativum  (pea).  . 

0-90-1-15  (3  expts.). 

,,             ,,         (etiolated)    . 

1-75-2-65 

Triticum  vulgare 

1-05 

Hordeum  distichum  (low  N) 

1-20 

(highN) 

i-55 

Linum  usitatissimum 

1-30 

Values  of  Cell-diameter  and  Nuclear  Diameter  in  the  Oocytes 
of  Hydractinia  Echinata,  in  /i.     (From  Teissier,    1927) 

k  =  0-69  ;    b  —  1-5 


x  =  oocyte   diameter 
y  =  nuclear 
Deviations    from    cal- 
culated values 

6-8 
5-6 

o-o 

io-o 

7-3 

o-o 

13-6 
9-0 

—  o-i 

17-5 
1 1*4 

+o-i 

22-2 

12-5 

—  0-2 

25-3 
14-4 

+  0-5 

34'° 
16-9 

—  0-2 

x  =  oocyte   diameter 
y  =  nuclear          ,, 
Deviations  from  cal- 
culated values   . 

43-o 

22-5 

+  2-4 

53-5 

24-8 

+  i-5 

70-0 
29-6 

+  i-5 

•88-o 
3o-3 

-2-6 

n8-o 

36-5 

-3-8 

136-0 

42-7 

-2-5 

168-0 
52-0 

-f-O'2 

Mean  Values  of  Pre-ocular  Length  and  Total  Length  in  Planaria 
gonocephala,  calculated  from  Abeloos  (1928) 

k  —  0-63  approx. 

Total  length      .  1-5  3-0  50         18-0  mm. 

Pre-ocular  length       .     0-231         0-43         0-50         1-125  mm. 

Mean  Values  for  Facet-Number  in  the  Two  Lobes  of  Bar-eyed 
Drosophila  at  Different  Temperatures  (from  Hersh,  1928)  (Fig.  12) 


Temperature 

32-0° 

29-5° 

27-5° 

25-5° 

21-5° 

18-0° 

15-0° 

No.       facets 
dorsal  lobe 

No.       facets 
ventral  lobe 

17-63 
12-73 

22-15 
18-86 

23-30 
19-24 

28-63 
19-11 

43-35 
36-24 

62-08 

57-62 

66-04 
67-28 

I  Homozy- 
rgous  bar 
J       ?? 

No.       facets 
dorsal  lobe 

No.       facets 
ventral  lobe 

81-22 

41-93 

152-15 
9020 

150-29 
103-66 

193-54 
114-29 

196-21 
151-51 

222-45 
I59-OI 

256-12 

185-89 

\  Heterozy- 
1  gous     (Bar 
[  X  normal) 

)       99 

In  both  cases  k  for  ventral  lobe  on  dorsal  lobe  is  about  1-5, 
but  the  value  of  b  is  considerably  higher  for  the  homozygotes. 


Fig.  i  i . — Tail-length  against  total  length 

during  growth  in  the  mouse,  Phenacomys 

longicaudus  ;    logarithmic  plotting. 

k  =  about  i -41. 

(Recalculated  from  the  data  of  Taylor,  1915,  p.  129.) 


100  130        160       ZOO 

total  length,  mm. 


15 


20 


30        40     50    60  70  8090100 

dorsal  facet  number 


150      ZOO 


300 


Fig.  12. — Relation  of  facet-number  in  dorsal  and  ventral  lobes  of  mutant 
female  fruit-flies  of  the  bar-eye  series  ;  logarithmic  plotting.  With  decreasing 
temperature,  the  total  number  of  facets  in  the  eye  increases  ;  but  the  number 
in  the  ventral  lobe  of  the  eye  increases  heterogonically  relative  to  the  number 

in  the  dorsal  lobe. 

The  curve  on  the  right  denotes  heterozygotes  between  bar  and  wild-type  (full  eye).  In  the  curve 
on  the  left,  x  denotes  homozygous  ultra-bar  and  heterozygotes  between  ultra-bar  and  bar ;  o, 
heterozygotes  between  ultra-bar  and  wild-type  ;• ,  homozygous  bar. 

k  for  all  is  close  to  1-5  ;  6  is  lowered  by  admixture  of  the  wild-type  gene,  and  is  at  its  maximum 
in  pure  ultra-bar  (i.e.  rises  with  decreasing  absolute  size  of  the  eye).  It  is  clear  that  facet-formation 
must  begin  ontogenetically  in  the  dorsal  lobe. 


22 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS      23 

Dimensions  (in  inches)  of  Parts  of  the  Bill  and  Casque  of  the 
Hornbill  Antheracoceros  malaganus  (from  E.  Banks,  unpublished) 


$$ 

<? 

Length  of  gape  along 

curve     .... 

3-5 

3-8 

4-25 

4'25 

5-o 

5*3 

5-6 

5-8 

Length      of     casque 

(straight)     . 

* 

* 

2-6 

3-2 

3-55 

4.6 

5-2 

6*7 

Height      of      casque 

above  bill  . 

o-5 

O-Q 

I-O 

0-9 

1-4 

i-6 

i-5 

1-85 

Height  of  bill  proper 

1-2 

1*2 

i-5 

1-25 

i-5 

i-75 

1-6 

2-05 

*  Indistinguishable  from  bill. 

Both  in  length  and  height  the  casque  is  highly  heterogonic 
relative  to  the  length  and /or  the  height  of  the  bill  proper. 


■   50 


/ 


100 


-  20 


20 
1 


50 


100 


200        mm, 


1  '  ' 

Fig.  13. — Increase  of  interocular  distance  with  carapace  width  in  the  crabs 
Cancer  (i)  and  Eriphia  (3),  and  of  carapace  length  with  carapace  width  in 

Cancer  (2)  ;    logarithmic  plotting. 
k  for  interocular  distance,  in  Cancer  0-70,  in  Eriphia  0-76. 


3  mm. 


10mm. 


10 


20mm 


100 


e 


Fig.   14. — Change  of  proportions  in  the  crab,  Carcinus  maenas. 

A— D,  outline  of  carapace  and  of  thoracic  ganglion  in  four  specimens  of  different  absolute  size, 
to  show  negative  heterogony  of  interocular  breadth  {k  =  0-85),  and  of  thoracic  ganglion  (k=  06). 
The  carapace  lengths  have  been  made  the  same  for  all:  actually  they  were  3-1,  109,  30-0  and 
71-0  mm.  respectively. 

E — H,  ommatidia  of  the  same  four  specimens,  all  drawn  to  the  same  absolute  scale. 
k  for  ommatidial  diameter  =  0-32. 


24 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS     25 


mm 
5 


.0 

I' 

I' 


10  20 

carapace   breadth 


50     mm. 


Fig.  15. — Diameter  of  the  thoracic  ganglion  against  carapace  breadth  in  crabs  : 
(1)  Pachygrapsus  ;    (2)  Carcinus  ;    logarithmic  plotting. 

k  in  both  cases  about  o-6.     (After  Teissier,  193 1  :    in  the  original  paper,  the  Carcinus  curve  is 
erroneously  ascribed  to  Pachygrapsus  and  vice  versa.) 

Since  the  above  was  written,  the  important  paper  of  Teissier 
(1931)  has  provided  numerous  fresh  examples.  These  we  may 
summarize  in  tabular  form  (and  see  Figs.  13-20). 


Animal 

y  =  organ 

x  =  standard  to  which 
organ  is  compared 

Value  of  k 

Mealworm,  Tenebrio  mo- 

weight  of  moult- 

total fresh  weight 

o-8 

litor  larva 

ed  skin  or  cara- 
pace 

Water-beetle,    Dytiscus 

, ,             , , 

>)                            >  t 

o-8 

marginalis,  larva 

Water-boatman,    Noto- 

11             11 

)>                            it 

10 

necta  glauca 

Shore-crab,         Carcinus 

11             11 

j  »                            ,, 

10 

maenas 

Crab,  Pachygrapsus  raar- 

11             11 

11                            >  1 

10 

moratus 

Stagbeetle,  Lucanus  cer- 

weight  of  desic- 

weight of  desic- 

2-0 

vus    $ 

cated  mandibles 

cated  elytra 

>i             11             11 

weight  of  desic- 

» >                                       M 

i-5 

cated  head 

11             11              11 

weight  of  desic- 
cated legs 

,. 

10 

1. 

mean     diameter 

length  of  elytron 

10 

eye 

11             11             11 

maximum  breadth 
head 

,. 

20 

mgr. 
100 

50 


•w    20 

I 

i 

C.     10 

•§ 

*      5 


A 


? 


12  5  10  20  50         100       200  mgr. 

body  -  weight 

Fig.  i6. — Water-content  against  body-weight  in  the  larval  mealworm,  Tenebrio. 

Solid  line,  fresh  weight ;  dotted  line,  dry  weight  ;   logarithmic  plotting. 

k  (fresh  weight),  0-975  ;    (dry  weight),  0-92. 


mar 


Tig, 


Ho 


0,5 


§ 


0,2 


,6 


12  5  10         20  50        100  mgr. 

body  -  wetight 

Fig.  17. — Total  nitrogen  against  body-weight  (solid  line,  fresh  weight ;   dotted 

line,  dry  weight)  in  the  larval  mealworm,  Tenebrio  ;    logarithmic  plotting. 

k  for  fresh  weight,  0965  ;   for  dry  weight,  o-9r. 

26 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS     27 


Animal 

y  =  organ 

x  =  standard  to  which 
organ  is  compared 

Value  of  k 

Stick    insect,    Dixippus 

length  prothorax 

total  length 

I-O 

morosus 

it                       it                       tt 

length  head 

it                ti 

0-71 

tt                       11                       11 

breadth  head 

> »                 1 1 

0-71 

it                       11                       11 

diameter  eye 
breadth  head 

11                11 

0-48 

Mealworm,         Tenebrio 

ty  total  weight 

o-95 

molitor,  larva 

Crab,  Carcinus  maenas 

interocular 
breadth 

carapace  breath 

0-85 

}*               tt             a 

carapace  length 

11                       11 

about  i-o 

Pachygrapsus  mar- 

carapace  length 

It                      11 

about  i-o 

moratus 

ts                                 II                           II 

interocular 
breadth 

11                      11 

0-85 

Eriphia  spinifrons 

>  1                         it 

11 

0-76 

Cancer  pagurus    . 

11                         11 

11 

0-70 

Water-boatman,    Noto- 

diameter     of     a 

total  length   ^ 

0-46 

necta  glauca 

single  ommati- 
dium 

Cockroach,    Blatta    ori- 

11                         11 

11         a 

0-36 

entalis 

Stick    insect,    Dixippus 

11                         >  > 

11         a 

0-37 

morosus 

Crab,  Carcinus  maenas 

11                         11 

carapace  breadth 

0-32 

,,      Pachygrapsus  mar- 

11                         11 

a               a 

0-47 

moratus 

Crayfish,  Potamobius  as- 

11                         it 

length 

0-40 

tacus 

Crab,  Carcinus  maenas 

diameter  thoracic 
ganglion 

carapace  breadth 

about  o-6 

Pachygrapsus  mar- 

11                           ti 

tt             n 

o-6 

moratus 

Insect  larva,  Chaoborus 

diameter  cerebral 

body  length 

o-6 

crystallensis 

ganglion 

a             a             a 

mean      diameter 
abdominal 
ganglia 

tt         a 

o-6 

Stick    insect,    Dixippus 

diameter  cerebral 

total  length 

o-6 

morosus 

ganglion 

>»             a             a 

mean     diameter 
thoracic  ganglia 

a         a 

„        o-6 

a             a             a 

mean      diameter 
abdominal 
ganglia 

a         a 

o-6 

Mealworm,  Tenebrio  mo- 

mean     diameter 

total  length 

o-6 

litor  larva 

abdominal 
ganglia 

Water-boatman,    Noto- 

diameter    2nd 

11                  11 

„        o-6 

necta  glauca 

thor.  ganglion 

Insect  larva,  Chaoborus 

mean     diameter 

body  length 

0-4 

crystallensis 

nucleus,  nerve- 
cells 

mgr. 
0,5 


0,2 


0,1 

-tr 

^ 

o 

<: 

^ 

0,05 

J? 

-to 
3 

0,02 

0,01 


12  5  10  20  50         100      200  mgr. 

body  -  weight 

Fig.    i 8. — Total  phosphorus  against  body- weight  in  the  larval  mealworm, 

Tenebrio  ;    logarithmic  plotting. 

k  for  fresh  weight,  1-03,  later  1-08  ;   for  dry  weight,  0-975,  later  1-02. 


cod. 

500 


HO 


^  200 

I 

o    100 

1 


50 


5  10  20  50  100  mgr. 

body  -  weight 

FlG.  19. — Heat  of  combustion  against  body-weight  in  the  larval  mealworm, 

Tenebrio  ;    logarithmic  plotting. 

k  for  fresh  weight,  1-07 ;    for  dry  weight,  1-02. 
28 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS    29 


Animal 


Mealworm,         Tenebrio 
molitor  larva 


Wax-moth,  Galleria  mell 
onella,  larva 


y  =  organ 


x  =  standard  to  which 
organ  is  compared 


total  fat 


fat 


phos- 
phos- 


growth 


1-07 
i-o6 
1-04 


i-oi 
1  00 
098 


103      0-975 


(i-o8      1-02) 


I  03 

o-975 

I-OO 

o-945 

o-975 

0-92 

0-965 

o-gi 

0-87 

0-82 

0-83 

o-8o 

0-82 

078 

o-8i 

0-76 

1  07 

1  02 

about  o-8 


about  0-9 


total  carbon 

dry  weight 

dry    weight, 
removed 

total  phosphorus, 
until  late  in  lar- 
val life 

(total  phosphorus, 
end  of  larval 
life) 

protein  nitrogen 

fresh  weight 

total  water 

total  nitrogen 

extractives 

lipidic 
phorus 

nucleic 
phorus 

ash 

total  heat  of  com- 
bustion 

Oxygen  consump- 
tion at  rest  and 
fasting 

Oxygen  consump- 
tion under  nor- 
mal conditions, 
but  on  a  ration 
permitting  only 
slow 
(flour) 

ditto,  but  fed  a 
ration  permit- 
ting normal 
growth 

total  water,  early 
phase* 

total  water,  late 
phase 

dry  weight,  early 
phase 

dry  weight,  late 
phase 

total  heat  of  com- 
bustion, early 
phase 

late  phase  '  refer  to  the  fact  that  after  a  period 
of  regular  differential  growth  lasting  for  most  of  the  larval  period,  there 
occurs  a  short  phase  of  irregularity,  denoting  rapid  change  in  character  of 
metabolism,  followed  by  a  second  regular  period  resembling  the  first  but  with 
different  quantitative  relations. 


Value  of  k 


(«)  (b) 

fresh         dry 
weight     weight 


(a) 
i-i3 


(b) 
i-o6 


about  0-95 


10 


i-o 


0-96      0-91 


i-o 


i-oS 


i-i3 


i-o 


i-o 


I-OQ 


Early  phase  '  and 


30 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


Animal 

y  =  organ 

x  =  standard  to  which 
organ  is  compared 

Value  of  k 

(a)             (b) 

(«)        (b) 

Wax-moth,  Galleria  mell- 

total  heat  of  com- 

fresh      dry 

I-l6       i-oq 

onella,  larva 

bustion,        late 
phase 
total   phosphor- \ 

weight     weight 

us,  early  phase  1 
total   phosphor-  j 

total  water 

O-Q 

us,  late  phase  / 

total   fat,   early  ~\ 
phase                  [ 

total    fat,    late  1 
phase                 / 

dry  weight 

1-32 

dry  weight,  fat\ 

removed,  early 

phase 

dry  weight,  fat  [' 

»» 

0-82 

removed,    late 

phase                / 

Now  it  is  to  be  observed  that  a  constant  differential  growth- 
ratio,  during  some  at  least  of  the  period  of  growth,  is  not 
merely  an  empirical  rule  found  over  a  large  range  of  organs 
and  groups,  but  is  what  one  would  expect  on  a  priori  grounds. 
For  it  is  the  biologically  simplest  method  we  can  conceive  of 
obtaining  the  enlargement  (or  diminution)  of  an  organ. 

If  an  organ  is  to  begin  its  career  small  and  end  it  large, 
the  obvious  method  is  to  make  it  grow  at  a  higher  rate  than 
the  rest  of  the  body  ;  the  difference  once  initiated  (by  what- 
ever physiological  means)  there  is  no  a  priori  reason  why  it 
should  not  be  maintained  at  approximately  the  same  relative 
level  throughout,  since  changes  which  affect  the  growth  of  the 
body  will  be  expected  to  have,  within  narrow  limits,  a  pro- 
portionate effect  on  the  growth  of  the  organ  (and  see  p.  6). 

We  shall  later  consider  certain  special  cases  where  growth 
of  organ  and  body  appear  not  to  be  equally  affected  in  cer- 
tain circumstances  (pp.  200,  259)  ;  others  which  show  that 
the  formula  for  constant  differential  growth-ratio  can  only  be 
an  approximation  when  we  are  dealing  with  an  organ  as  a 
whole  (p.  81)  ;  and  still  further  facts  which  rule  out  some  of 
the  early  stages  of  an  organ's  development  from  the  operation 
of  the  law  (p.  139,  seq.).  However,  both  empirical  facts  and 
theoretical  considerations  warrant  us  in  regarding  a  constant 
differential  growth-ratio,  operating  over  a  longer  or  shorter 
period  of  time,  as  the  primary  law  of  the  relative  growth  of 
parts,  once  they  have  reached  the  stage  of  full  histological 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS    31 

differentiation.  It  may  (like  Boyle's  law)  prove  only  to  be 
an  approximation,  and  to  be  capable  of  modification  in  cer- 
tain circumstances  ;  yet  (again  like  Boyle's  law)  it  may  remain 
fundamental. 

We  may  now  proceed  to  consider  a  little  more  in  detail 
some  of  the  cases.  In  the  first  place,  we  can  utilize  our  formula 
to  deduce  the  moment  of  onset,  in  male  Uca  pugnax,  of  the 
large  chela's  heterogony.  To  do  this  we  must  first  know  the 
weight  of  the  small  claw.     This  in  males  is  identical  in  form 

mqr. 
100 


50 


I 

•      10 

k   5 


1  2  5  10         20  50       100      200  mgr. 

body  -  weight 

Fig.  20. — Increase  of  water-content  with  total  weight  in  the  larva  of  the 

wax-moth,  Galleria  ;  logarithmic  plotting. 
k  for  fresh  weight,  early  phase  i-o,  late  phase  i-o  ;   for  dry  weight,  early  phase  0-96,  late  phase  0-91. 

with  both  claws  of  females,  and  does  not  change  its  relative 
weight  with  increasing  body-size  :  at  all  stages  it  weighs,  as 
does  a  single  female  chela,  almost  precisely  0-02  of  the  rest- 
of-body  weight.  If  we  make  the  assumption  that  our  formula 
for  the  first  phase  holds  from  the  first  moment  of  increase  of 
the  large  chela,  we  have  simply  to  extrapolate  from  our  formula 
and  find  the  point  on  the  curve  at  which  rest-of-body  weight 
is  fifty  times  chela  weight.  This  is  found  to  be  close  to  5  mg. 
body- weight,  when  the  chela  should  weigh  o-i  mg. 


32  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

We  can  now  proceed  to  check  this  deduction.  Morgan 
(1923A,  1924)  has  found  that  the  very  youngest  post-larval 
U.  pugnax  he  could  obtain  have  both  claws  alike,  of  female 
or  small  type,  in  both  sexes.  In  this  stage,  the  chelae  are 
autotomized  very  readily  ;  and  only  when  one  is  thus  thrown 
off  does  the  other  proceed  to  transform  into  a  large  chela. 
After  this  has  once  happened,  the  fates  of  the  two  chelae  are 
irreversibly  determined,  though  initially  either  may  become  a 
large  chela  through  the  accident  of  the  other's  autotomy. 
The  moment  of  determination  of  the  large  chela  appears 
normally  to  take  place  very  early,  during  the  first  or  second 
instar  of  post-larval  life. 

Accordingly,  I  collected  and  weighed  a  number  of  the 
smallest  fiddler-crabs  to  be  found  on  the  beach,  in  which  the 
sexes  could  not  be  determined  by  casual  inspection  of  either 
chela-size  or  abdomen-shape.  Their  mean  weight  was  about 
6-7  mg. — an  excellent  approximation  to  the  5  mg.  prophesied 
on  theoretical  considerations. 

Then  again,  we  can  compare  relative  growth  in  different 
species  of  the  same  genus.  Uca  minax  is  much  scarcer  near 
Wood's  Hole,  and  the  comparatively  few  specimens  available 
were  all  of  a  size  to  be  in  the  second  phase  of  U.  pugnax. 
However,  they  yielded  one  or  two  interesting  results.  The 
double  logarithmic  plot  of  chela  against  rest-of-body  clearly 
approximated  to  a  straight  line  ;  but  owing  to  the  smaller 
number  available  it  was  impossible  to  determine  the  growth- 
coefficient  of  the  chela  so  accurately.  It  was,  however,  cer- 
tainly between  1-58  and  1-66 — in  other  words,  almost  exactly 
the  same  as  that  of  U.  pugnax  for  the  first  phase.  Either 
U.  minax  has  no  change  in  the  growth-coefficient  of  the  chela 
at  or  near  maturity,  or  at  all  periods  its  chelar  growth-coeffi- 
cient is  higher  than  in  pugnax.  U.  minax  also  differs  from  its 
relative  in  the  greater  size  which  it  attains ;  the  biggest 
specimens  found  weighed  17-8  g.  as  against  3-6  g.  for  U.  pugnax. 
Correlated  with  this,  as  was  to  be  expected,  was  the  greater  rela- 
tive weight  of  the  large  chela  to  be  found  in  minax.  This  in  one 
specimen  amounted  to  no  less  than  77  per  cent,  of  rest-of-body 
weight,  as  against  a  maximum  of  65  per  cent,  in  U.  pugnax. 

It  is  clear  that  the  large  chelae  of  big  specimens  of  U.  minax 
must  be  getting  close  to  their  maximum  limit  of  relative  size. 
A  claw  as  big  as  the  rest  of  the  body  would  not  be  very  prac- 
ticable, and  these  are  already  over  three-quarters  this  relative 
size.     In    U.  pugnax,  where  our  figures   are  more    accurate, 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS    33 


the  large   chela   has 
attained     half     the 
rest-of-body       size 
when  the  total  weight 
is  about  1-65  g.     If 
the  animal  could  grow 
to   24  g.    (less   than 
30   per  cent,   bigger 
than  the  biggest  U. 
minax) ,  its  large  chela 
would  be  the  same 
weight    as    all    the 
rest   of   it  together. 
Twenty-four    grams 
is  a  very  small  weight 
for  many  crabs,  in- 
cluding forms  of  sim- 
ilar    semi-terrestrial 
and  burrowing  habits 
to  Uca,  such  as  Ocy- 
poda,  yet  no  species 
of    fiddler-crab    has 
grown  to  a  size  much 
over     that     of      U. 
minax.     It  may  thus 
be     plausibly     sug- 
gested that  the  exist- 
ence of  this  continu- 
ously  high    growth- 
ratio    in    the    large 
claws    of    the    male 
fiddler-crabs      may 
have     acted     as     a 
limiting     factor     in 
their    size-evolution, 
any  possible   advan- 
tage to  be  obtained 
by  increase   in   size 
not  countervailing  to 
cause     selection     to 
alter    the     chela's 
growth-mechanism . 
Analysis     of     the 
3 


3  4         5       6      7     8 

carapace  length,  cm. 
A 


zzo 


2-00 


/■BO 


1-60 


/■40 


I  20 


100 


log  carapace  length,  mm. 


120 

B 


1-60 


Fig.  21. — Relative  growth  of  male  and   female 

chelae.  (A)  in  Palaemon  carcinus,  (B)  Palaemon 

bengalensis  ;    logarithmic  plotting. 

(From  data  of  Kemp,  I9i3-X5-) 


34  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

relative  growth  of  homologous  organs  next  shows  that 
the  same  organ  may  behave  very  differently,  as  regards 
its  growth-behaviour,  in  different  forms.  For  instance,  the 
chela  of  male  Uca  pugnax  shows  heterogony  on  one  side 
of  the  body  only,  but  shows  it  throughout  all  but  the  first 
instar  of  post-larval  life,  with  a  decrease  in  its  growth-coefficient 
apparently  at  the  time  of  sexual  maturity.  In  the  spider- 
crab  Maia  squinado  (Huxley,  1927  ;  and  unpublished),  both 
chelae  are  heterogonic,  but  heterogony  does  not  set  in  until 
quite  late  in  life,  presumably  at  sexual  maturity,  and  then 
continues  till  death.  The  same  appears  to  be  the  case  with  the 
large  prawn  Palaemon  carcinus  (Tazelaar,  1930),  though  here 
the  chelipeds  are  the  second  and  not  the  first  pereiopods ; 
and  with  the  spider-crabs  of  the  genus  Inachus.  But  in  the 
latter  the  male  chelae  revert  more  or  less  completely  to  the 
female  type  in  the  non-breeding  season  ;  this  reversion  is 
much  less  marked  in  I.  dorsettensis  (Shaw,  1928)  than  in 
7.  mauritanicus  (Smith,  1906A).  In  various  other  crabs,  and  in 
lobsters,  crayfish  and  pistol-crabs  (Alpheus),  both  chelae  are 
heterogonic,  but  with  different  growth-coefficients,  leading  to 
the  condition  of  heterochely.  Furthermore,  the  sex-difference 
as  regards  the  growth-coefficient  of  the  chela  may  vary,  some 
forms  having  equal  positive  heterogony  in  both  sexes,  others 
showing  positive  heterogony  in  both  sexes,  but  with  a  lower 
growth-coefficient  in  the  female,  and  still  others  showing  male 
heterogony  but  female  isogony.  This  variability  is  particu- 
larly well  shown  in  prawns  (Palaemonidae)  ;  in  these,  further, 
the  large  chela  is  the  second,  not  the  first  pereiopod.  Finally 
in  Gammarus  chevreuxi,  Kunkel  and  Robertson  (1928)  have 
shown  that  the  marked  heterogony  of  the  male  gnathopod 
begins  shortly  before  sexual  maturity  and  ends  shortly  after, 
its  growth  being  roughly  isogonic  for  the  much  longer  previous 
and  subsequent  periods.     (Cf.  also  birds'  wings,  p.  263.) 

A  similar  state  of  affairs  is  seen  in  regard  to  the  abdomen 
of  female  Brachyura.  This  must  always  be  heterogonic  for 
some  part  of  its  development,  since  it  is  always  broad  in  the 
adult,  always  narrow  and  of  male  type  in  the  young  juvenile. 
A  state  of  affairs  similar  to  that  of  the  large  male  chela  of  Uca  is 
found  in  the  female  abdomen  of  Carcinus  maenas — it  is  hetero- 
gonic (with  a  late  increase  in  intensity)  from  the  earliest  stages 
until  the  end  of  life.  The  details  for  both  sexes  at  all  ages  are 
shown  and  described  in  Fig.  7.  In  female  Uca,  on  the  other 
hand,  while  heterogony  is  initiated  at  the  beginning  of  post- 


B 

Fig.  22. — Variation  in  relative  growth  in  the  female  abdomen  of  fiddler-crabs 

(Uca  pugnax). 


(A)  Left,  medium-sized  crab  (carapace  breadth,  10  mm.  ;  abdomen,  6  mm.,  broad  and  reaching 
the  bases  of  the  legs).  Right,  medium-sized  crab  (carapace  breadth,  n  mm.  ;  abdomen,  5J  mm., 
broad,  not  reaching  the  bases  of  the  legs). 

(B)  Means  (A — A)  and  extremes  (B — B  and  C — C)  of  relative  abdomen  breadth  in  female  crabs 
between  4  and  14  mm.  carapace  breadth.  There  is  a  clear  bimodality  of  mean  abdomen  size,  with 
marked  heterogony  between  8  and  11  mm.  carapace  breadth. 

35 


36 


PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 


larval  life,  a  state 
of  equilibrium 
(adult  female  pro- 
portions) is  event- 
ually attained, 
when  the  lateral 
margins  of  the 
abdomen  have 
reached  the  bases 
of  the  legs  (Mor- 
gan, 1924 ;  Huxley, 
1924A)  (Fig.  22). 

(In  passing,  it 
may  be  noted  that 
Morgan  was  led  to 
postulate  female 
intersexuality^  in 
this  species  on 
rinding  certain  ap- 
parently mature 
females  with  ab- 
domens propor- 
tionately narrower 
than  the  full 
female  type.  Hux- 
ley, however  (I.e.), 
was  able  to  show 
that  these  were 
merely  the  ex- 
treme minus  vari- 
ants  for  the 
normal  variation 
curve  of  female 
abdomen  -  growth, 
and  that  the  sup- 
position of  inter- 
sexuality  was  un- 
called for  —  an 
interesting  appli- 
cation of  the  study 
of  heterogony.) 

That  the  equili- 
brium-position   is 


Carapace 


Carapwce 


Relative  abdomen  breadth,  % 


Fig.  23. — Relative  growth  in  the  male  and  female 
abdomen  in  the  spider-crab,  Inachus  dorsettensis. 

(A)  Left,  mature  female  abdomen  ;  right,  mature  male  abdomen. 
Abdominal  breadth  was  taken  on  the  6th  segment  (n  —  o  ;  v  —  w). 

(B)  Change  of  means  and  extremes  of  relative  abdomen  breadth 

with  increase  of  carapace  length  in  males  and  females. 


CONSTANT  DIFFERENTIAL  GROWTH-RATIOS    37 

not  in  any  way  automatically,  and  still  less  mechanically, 
brought  about  when  the  sides  of  the  abdomen  reach  the 
legs   is  shown  by   Pinnotheres,   the  pea-crab   (Atkins,  1926) 


8         10        12         14-        16         IS        20       22       ZA- 

LtriGTri -Cns, 

Fig.  24. — Relative  growth  in  the  teleost  fish,  Orthopristis. 

The  abscissae  represent  total  length.  The  ordinates  represent  (above)  the  length  of  the  head,  trunk 
(body),  and  tail ;  the  division  between  head  and  trunk  is  taken  at  the  hind  end  of  the  opercular  bone, 
between  trunk  and  tail  immediately  above,  or  below,  the  end  of  the  hindmost  median  fin  ;  (below) 
maximum  depth  and  width  of  body. 


38  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

in  the  adult  female  of  which  the  abdominal  margins  far  over- 
lap the  leg-bases. 

Then  we  have  the  quite  different  case  of  Inachus  (Fig.  23) 
which  resembles  that  of  the  male  gnathopod  in  Gammarus, 
only  here  all  the  marked  heterogony  appears  to  be  achieved 
in  a  single  moult-period.  And  finally  we  have  the  fact  first 
discovered  by  Geoffrey  Smith  (1906A),  that  parasitization  of 
Inachus  with  Sacculina,  while  reducing  or  abolishing  the 
heterogony  of  the  male  chela,  actually  increases  the  growth- 
ratio  of  the  female  abdomen,  to  remind  us  that  the  differential 
growth-ratios  are  only  constant  in  certain  conditions. 

Similar  relations  would  doubtless  be  found  for  other  organs, 
but  these  are  the  best  analysed.  They  show  that  the  dif- 
ferential growth-coefficient  of  an  organ,  though  it  may  remain 
constant  throughout  post-larval  or  post-embryonic  life,  may 
equally  well  be  confined  to  the  beginning,  the  end,  or  the 
middle  (and  here  sometimes  to  a  very  small  period)  of  the 
life-history,  or  may  change  its  value  slightly  but  definitely. 
Since,  however,  it  is  justifiable  to  regard  isogony  as  a  special 
case  of  heterogony,  with  growth-coefficiency  unity,  it  remains 
true  that  in  all  cases  the  growth-coefficients  of  parts  or  organs 
remain  constant  over  definite  periods,  and  that  these  periods 
are  in  the  great  majority  of  cases  few  in  number  and  long  in  time. 
(See  Hecht,  1916,  on  the  proportions  of  fishes  for  a  case  of 
long-continued  isogony  in  all  measured  dimensions :  Fig.  24.) 1 

§  4.    Inconstancy  of  Form  and  Constancy  of 

Form-change 

In  concluding  this  chapter,  it  may  be  pointed  out  that  the 
constancy  of  growth-ratio  over  considerable  periods  of  the 
life-history  in  spite  of  environmental  fluctuation,  is  of  very 
considerable  importance  for  analytical  morphology.  Where- 
ever  it  obtains,  it  implies  that  the  form  of  an  animal,  as  given 
by  the  proportions  of  its  parts,  depends  (naturally  within  the 

1  Even  here,  the  isogony  is  not  permanent.  Up  to  a  length  of  30  cm. 
— i.e.  about  a  year  old — Kearney  (reference  in  Robbins,  Brody  et  al., 
1928,  p.  123)  shows  that  there  is  heterogony.  Hecht  further  points 
out  that  so  far  as  known,  all  vertebrates  with  determinate  growth 
change  their  proportions  continuously  up  to  the  adult  phase.  It  is 
only  in  forms  with  indeterminate  growth  like  fishes  that  there  exists 
a  long-continued  period  with  no  change  in  external  proportions  (though 
even  here  the  relative  size  of  the  viscera  changes).  The  work  of  Keys 
(p.  259),  however,  indicates  that  Hecht's  conclusions  are  riot  strictly 
accurate.     Compare  also  Olmsted  and  Baumberger  (p.  261). 


INCONSTANCY   OF   FORM  39 

limits  of  normal  variation,  of  which  more  later)  solely  upon 
its  absolute  size,  not  upon  the  length  of  time  it  has  taken 
to  reach  that  size,  nor  upon  changes  in  any  other  external 
variable.  The  modifications  of  and  exceptions  to  this  statement 
we  shall  consider  later ;  here  we  can  accept  it  as  our  first 
general  rule. 

As  immediate  corollary  of  this  we  have  the  fact  that  only 
animals  in  which  all  organs  are  growing  at  the  same  rates 
will  preserve  their  form  unchanged  with  increase  of  size  ;  and 
this  is  as  much  as  to  say  that  no  animal  will  keep  its  form 
identical  while  increasing  in  size,  for  it  appears  highly  improb- 
able that  any  animal  will  be  found  in  which  some  organs  do 
not  grow  at  a  different  rate  from  the  body  as  a  whole.  And 
even  if  for  the  moment  we  stick  to  external  form,  and  further 
if  we  only  consider  quite  large  differences  in  growth-activity, 
we  shall  find  many  animals  in  which,  as  in  the  male  fiddler- 
crab,  the  only  constancy  of  form  is  the  constancy  of  its  mode 
of  change.  This  is  less  obvious  and  in  some  ways  less  important 
in  the  higher  animals  (notably  almost  all  mammals  and  birds 
among  vertebrates  and  almost  all  insects  and  spiders  among 
arthropods),  in  which  growth  ceases  at  a  definite  size,  and 
there  supervenes  an  adult  stage  of  constant  size  and  often 
of  long  duration.  For  here  we  can  often  afford  to  consider 
only  the  adult  forms,  in  which  the  proportions  of  form  have 
been  fixed  by  the  cessation  of  growth.  It  is  the  limitation 
of  form  at  a  fixed  absolute  size  which  confers  this  convenience 
upon  the  systematist  and  the  morphologist. 

Even  here,  however,  as  we  shall  see  in  detail  later,  the  rule 
has  many  applications.  To  take  the  most  obvious  case,  the 
absolute  size  at  which  growth  ceases  may  be  altered  by  treat- 
ment such  as  feeding  ;  in  such  case,  the  permanently  stunted 
individual  will  approximate  in  proportions  to  a  normal  juvenile 
stage,  the  well-fed,  abnormally  large  specimen  will  have  pro- 
portions not  met  with  at  all  among  the  normal  population  of 
adults.1  It  is,  in  other  words,  a  mere  biological  accident  that 
adult  proportions,  even  in  species  with  limited  growth,  are 
relatively  fixed  ;  and  to  neglect  the  fundamental  fact  of  change 

1  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  degree  of  development  (including  growth) 
of  a  higher  vertebrate  appears  to  be  simultaneously  dependent  upon 
at  least  two  variables,  size  and  age.  This  is  well  shown  by  Appleton 
(1925,  see  his  chart  3)  as  regards  the  degree  of  ossification  in  new- 
born rabbits  ;  and  by  Jackson  (1925)  for  young  rodents  stunted  by 
underfeeding.  Jackson's  results  are  discussed  further  in  Chapter  VI. 
See  also  the  work  of  Adolph  (p.  258). 


40  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

of  proportions  with  absolute  size,  and  to  proceed  as  if  certain 
arithmetic  (percentage)  proportions  were  immutable  '  charac- 
ters '  of  the  species,  may  lead  to  serious  error. 

But  we  must  remember  that  the  limitation  of  growth  and 
the  consequent  establishment  of  a  small  range  of  stable  adult 
size  is  a  late  and  specialized  feature  in  evolution.  The  majority 
of  animals  show  unlimited  growth  :  they  continue  growing, 
though  usually  at  a  constantly  diminishing  rate,  until  they 
die,  or  in  asexually-reproducing  forms,  until  they  divide.  A 
lobster  or  a  plaice  may  increase  its  linear  dimensions  several 
fold  after  the  attainment  of  sexual  maturity.  In  such  types, 
there  is  no  fixed  or  adult  form  ;  the  change  of  proportions 
continues  unabated  throughout  life,  and  may  be  as  obvious 
during  post-maturity  as  during  pre-maturity.  An  excellent 
example  of  this  is  provided  by  the  detailed  studies  of  Mrs. 
Sexton  (1924)  on  the  successive  instars  of  Gammarus  chevreuxi, 
supplemented  by  the  work  of  Kunkel  and  Robertson  (1928) 
on  the  same  species.1 

Even  among  mammals  a  change  of  proportions  may  con- 
tinue throughout  life.  In  the  voles  (Microtinae)  Hinton  (1926, 
Chap.  II,  8-14,  Pis.  Ill,  IV,  IX)  finds  that  slow  growth  occurs 
long  after  the  adult  state  has  been  arrived  at,  the  epiphyses 
of  the  long  bones  never  uniting.  This  continuous  growth  is 
accompanied  by  continuous  change  of  proportions.  With 
increasing  size  of  the  skull,  for  instance,  the  rostrum  becomes 
relatively  narrower  and  slightly  longer,  the  interorbital  region 
narrower  and  the  molars  relatively  smaller.  Unfortunately 
the  measurements  given  do  not  permit  of  any  accurate  state- 
ment as  to  the  changes  involved,  or  as  to  the  distribution  of 
growth-potential  in  different  regions.  Here  is  an  interesting 
field  for  the  student  of  relative  growth.  It  would  be  par- 
ticularly interesting  to  discover  whether  the  relative  growth- 
rates  of  tail  and  parts  of  skull,  limbs,  etc.,  remained  the  same 
after  the  attainment  of  sexual  maturity  as  they  did  before. 
It  would  be  easier  to  investigate  this  on  the  limb-segments 
than  on  the  skull,  which  undergoes  complex  distortions  and 
curvatures.     It  would  also,  of  course,  be  necessary  to  keep 

1  Sexton  states  that  sexual  maturity  occurs  at  the  seventh  instar, 
that  proportions  continue  to  change  for  two  further  instars  in  the 
male,  one  in  the  female,  but  after  this  no  further  proportion-changes 
occur  (though  the  males  at  least  may  increase  about  40  per  cent,  in 
length).  That  this  statement  is  not  accurate  is  shown  by  Kunkel  and 
Robertson,  whose  graphs  demonstrate  a  change  in  the  proportions  of 
several  organs  up  to  the  largest  sizes  found. 


INCONSTANCY  OF  FORM  41 

the  animals  under  standard  conditions,  since  the  work  of 
Sumner  and  of  Przibram  has  shown  that  increased  temperature 
causes  an  increased  relative  size  of  appendages  in  rodents. 

It  is  true  the  change  will  not  usually  be  of  the  same  extent 
after  sexual  maturity,  for  although  the  changes  in  absolute 
size  may  be  greater  between  maturity  and  death  than  in 
the  period  from  the  post-embryonic  or  post-larval  phase  to 
maturity,  yet  the  fraction  of  total  growth  which  takes  place 
after  maturity  is  always  a  good  deal  less,  if  measured  by  the 
true  criterion,  namely  the  amount  of  multiplication  of  initial 
size.  For  the  fiddler-crab,  for  instance,  the  pre-maturity 
multiplicative  increase  in  weight  is  about  250-fold,  the  post- 
maturity increase  about  three-  to  four-fold,  though  the  absolute 
(additive)  increases  are  roughly  as  1  to  2-5.  None  the  less, 
the  post-mature  alterations  may  be  very  considerable.  In  the 
male  fiddler-crab,  after  his  attainment  of  sexual  maturity,  the 
proportion  of  the  weight  of  the  large  chela  increases  from 
43  per  cent,  of  rest-of-body  weight  to  nearly  62  per  cent. — 
an  increase  of  nearly  45  per  cent,  in  relative  size. 

No  two  male  Uca  pugnax  have  the  same  proportions  unless 
they  happen  to  be  of  the  same  absolute  size  :  any  diagnosis 
made  on  the  basis  of  percentage  measurements  of  chelae  (and 
also,  though  much  less  markedly  so,  for  other  organs  such 
as  the  pereiopods)  would  be  valueless.  But  in  spite  of  the 
fact  that  the  form  of  the  animal  is  continually  changing,  it 
does  so  in  an  orderly  way ;  and  though  percentage  values 
for  the  limbs  have  no  diagnostic  significance,  the  constants 
in  the  growth-ratio  formula  are  true  specific  characters.  In 
a  word,  the  systematist  needs  algebra  as  well  as  arithmetic 
in  making  any  diagnoses  based  upon  the  size  of  parts  of  the 
body. 

Note. — S.  A.  Allen  (1894),  Amer.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  Bull.,  6,  233,  also 
finds  a  progressive  change  of  proportions  in  a  rodent  (see  p.  40). 
Neotoma  shows  a  steady  increase  of  dolichopy  and  dohchocephaly 
with  increase  of  absolute  size. 


CHAPTER   II 

THE   COEFFICIENT   OF   CONSTANT   GROWTH- 
PARTITION ;    AND   SOME   SPECIAL   CASES 

§  i.    The  Heterogony  of  Deer  Antlers 

THERE  are  certain  special  cases  so  important  to  a 
study  of  relative  growth  that  they  deserve  a  chapter 
to  themselves. 

The  first  is  that  of  the  antlers  of  deer.  As  is  well  known, 
these  are  shed  each  year,  and  replaced  the  year  after  by  a 
totally  new  growth.  Usually,  each  new  growth  is  larger  than 
the  preceding  growths,  but  in  old  age,  illness,  or  other  especially 
unfavourable  conditions,  the  weight  (and  number  of  '  points  ') 
may  decrease.  An  analysis  of  the  normal  growth  of  the 
antlers  of  a  number  of  individual  red  deer  (Cervus  elaphus) 
and  of  the  factors  affecting  that  growth,  is  given  in  Huxley 
(1926). 

Further,  casual  inspection  is  sufficient  to  indicate  that 
relative  antler-weight  increases  with  absolute  body-weight, 
as  is  stressed  by  Champy  (1.  c).  To  obtain  quantitative  data, 
however,  was  not  easy.  After  much  search,  I  hit  on  the 
papers  of  Dombrowski  (1 889-1 892)  published  many  years  ago 
in  an  obscure  periodical — the  only  papers  to  my  knowledge  to 
contain  the  body-weights  and  antler-weights  of  large  numbers 
of  Red  deer  and  Roe  deer.  These  data,  supplemented  by 
those  of  Rorig  (1901),  by  scattered  cases  in  the  literature,  and 
by  information  privately  supplied  to  me  by  sportsmen,  have 
now  been  analysed  by  me  (Huxley,  1927,  and  1931).  It 
appears  quite  definitely  that  although  there  may  be  much 
individual  variation  even  in  one  locality,  and  though  extraneous 
agencies  such  as  the  amount  of  lime  in  the  soil  affect  relative 
antler-weight  considerably,  yet  when  the  mean  of  considerable 

42 


¥-&- 

■G 

p 

f\*l 

V 

/  Gi 

cpw 

70  I0O 

Kg    Body   wt 


\5Q 


20  0         250 


Fig.  25. — Antler-weight  against  body-weight  in  527  adult  red  deer  (Cervus 
elaphus)  ;    logarithmic  plotting.     See  Table  II. 

k,  except  for  the  last  two  points,  is  close  to  i-6. 


43 


44 


PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 


numbers  is  taken,  the  results  approximate  to  the  formula  for 

constant  differential  growth-ratio.1 

This  applies  to  adult  ani- 
mals. When  antler-growth 
is  taken  by  age  for  single 
individuals,  it  will  be  seen 
that  the  differential  growth- 
ratio  of  the  antler-weight  is 
not  constant,  but  declines 
steadily  with  age,  being  first 
about  3-0,  and  declining  to 
close  to  i-o.  (When  regres- 
sion of  body-weight  occurs, 
it  appears  certain  that  regres- 
sion in  antler-weight  accom- 
panies it,  though  it  cannot 
yet  be  stated  whether  the 
regression  is  heterogonic.) 

It  is  doubtless  affected  also 
by  numerous  subsidiary  fac- 
tors such  as  abundance  of 
food    and    specific    dietary 

1  A  discrepancy  occurs  as  re- 
gards the  antlers  of  those  beasts 
with  highest  body-weight ;  the 
weights  of  these  when  expressed 
as  relative  (percentage)  weights, 
fall  below  those  of  the  body-size 
class  next  below.  This  appears 
to  be  merely  a  classificatory 
phenomenon.  There  being  con- 
siderable individual  variation  as 
to  what  we  may  call  the  par- 
tition-coefficient of  material  be- 
tween antlers  and  body,  those 
animals  with  the  very  largest 
body- weights  are  likely  to  repre- 
sent extreme  variants  in  the 
direction  of  heavy  body  but 
light  antlers.  Further,  and  poss- 
ibly more  important,  since  body- 
weight  is  extremely  variable 
owing  to  fluctuations  in  amount  of  fat,  most  very  heavy  beasts  are 
likely  to  owe  their  exceptional  weight  to  exceptional  nutritive  con- 
ditions ;  and  therefore  their  relative  antler-weight  will  go  down  rela- 
tively to  this  excess  of  fat,  which  is  presumably  without  immediate 
significance  in  determining  antler-size. 


/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

n 

/ 

5 

// 

tj 

/  f 

4 

/ 
/  i 

t   / 

/© 

3 

/ 

/  J 

So' 

/ 

i   2 

c 

t       i 

■s 

i 

So 

/ 
/ 

1 

/ 

/ 
t 

0-5 

r 

60 


80 


ICO  130 

Kg.  Body  wt. 


170 


Fig.     26. — Red     deer,     antler-weight 

against  body-weight  at  various  ages ; 

logarithmic  plotting. 

The  antler-  and  body-weights  for  the  first  7 
years  of  life  (in  stags  from  Warnham  Park,  Sus- 
sex) are  plotted.  The  curve  (solid  line)  bends  over 
and  approximates  to  the  straight  line  curve  (dotted 
line)  for  an  tier- weight  against  body- weight  in  adults 
(see  Fig.  25). 

k  begins  with  a  value  of  3-0  or  over,  and  declines 
to  i-6  or  under. 


HETEROGONY  OF  DEER  ANTLERS 


45 


TABLE   II 

Body-weight,  Antler-weight,  Point-number  and  Relative  Antler- 
weight  of  527  Red  Deer  shot  in  various  parts  of  Europe 
(392  collected  by  Dombrowski  ;  10  by  Baillie  Grohman  ; 
125  by  Huxley.     Analysed  by  Huxley,  1931A) 

Arranged  by  body-weight  classes,  all  of  20-kg.  interval  (except  the 
last  class,  of  40-kg.  interval) .  Note  that  for  Classes  2  to  8  (comprising 
over  90  per  cent,  of  the  animals)  the  relative  antler-weight  rises  steadily 
with  increasing  body-weight,  k  for  antler-weight  (except  for  the 
last  two  classes)  is  about  i-6  ;    b  =  -00162. 


kg. 
Class      body- 
weight 

No.  of 
specimens 

Mean 
body- 
weight 
kg. 

Mean 
antler- 
weight 
kg. 

Mean 
point- 
number 

Relative 
antler- 
weight 

per  cent. 

of  body 

Relative 

pt.  no. 

•  pt.  no.     n 

Vbody-wtJ 

I      60-  80 

19 

74-4 

1-64 

7-50 

2-20 

o-ioi 

2      80-100 

119 

93-4 

2-03 

820 

2-17 

0-088 

3    100-120 

106 

110-4 

3-16 

9-81 

2-86 

0-089 

4    120-140 

113 

130-6 

3-96 

11-64 

303 

0-089 

5    I40-160 

65 

1489 

478 

1 1 74 

3-21 

0-079 

6    160-180 

29 

1707 

6-21 

13-10 

364 

0-077 

7    180-200 

33 

191-1 

7-28 

14-77 

3-8i 

0-077 

8   200-220 

18 

2II-8 

8-91 

I5-4I 

4-21 

0-073 

9   220-240 

H 

231-7 

879 

13-62 

379 

0059 

IO    240-280 

11 

259-1 

863 

1378 

3*33 

0-053 

TABLE   III 

Body- weight,  Antler-weight,  Point-number  and  Relative  Antler- 
weight  of  405  Roe  Deer  shot  in  various  parts  of  Europe 
(data  from  Dombrowski  ;    analysed  by  Huxley,  1931A) 

k  for  antler- weight  =  about  0-57  ;   b  =  -0455. 


Class,  Body-weight 

No.  of 
specimens 

Mean 
body- 
weight 
kg. 

Mean 
antler- 
weight 
g- 

Mean 
point- 
number 

Relative 
antler- 
weight 
per  cent, 
of  body 

1-5       (13-18   kg.) 
6-12     (19-25  kg.) 
13-15  (26-39  kg.) 

127 

254 

24 

16-6 
20-9 
28-3 

225-7 
257-0 
306-5 

5-92 
6-05 
6-21 

1-36 
1-23 
1-08 

46 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


factors.  The  reason  that  the  weights  for  adults  fall  upon  the 
line  corresponding  to  a  constant  growth-ratio  with  k  =  about 
i-6  appears  simply  to  be  that  during  the  decline  of  the  antler's 
growth-ratio,  a  rather  narrow  range  of  values  for  the  growth- 
coefficient  is  attained  during  adult  life  (see  Fig.  26),  the  great 
majority  falling  between  say  i-8  and  1-4. 


o-4 


0-3 


SJ 


0-2 


1 > 

/ 
/ 

/ 

f 
/       ^ 
/    S^ 

js£ 

s  / 

_^£L y 

^^  / 

/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 

/ 

/ 

. L 


30 


40 


Fig.  27. 


15  20 

Kg    Body-  wi 

-Relative  size  of  antlers  in  adult  Roe-deer  (Capreolus  caprea). 


Solid  line,  antler-weight  against  body-weight  in  405  Roe-deer  ;  k  =  0-57.     Dotted  line,  prolongation 
of  corresponding  curve  for  adult  Red  Deer  (see  Fig.  25).    Logarithmic  plotting.    See  Table  III. 


Corresponding  data  for  the  Roe  deer  (Capreolus  capreolus) 
gave  what  at  first  sight  appeared  a  quite  paradoxical  result — 
namely  a  decrease  of  relative  antler-weight  with  increase  of 
absolute  body- weight  among  adult  males  (Fig.  27).  There  is 
thus  negative  heterogony  of  the  antlers,  with  a  growth-co- 
efficient of  about  0-57.  Reflection  suggests  the  probable  ex- 
planation. There  is  no  reason  why  the  decline  in  the  antler's 
growth-coefficient  with  age  should  not  in  another  species 
proceed  much  faster  than  in  the  Red  deer,  and  reach  a  stage 


HETEROGONY  OF  DEER  ANTLERS 


47 


where  by  the  attainment  of  maturity  it  was  normally  below 
i*o.  This  purely  quantitative  difference  in  the  rate  of  change 
with  age  would  suffice  to  explain  the  apparently  contradictory 
results  (Fig.  28).     As  to  the  biological  causes  underlying  this 


Kg.  Body  wt 


o-i 

hO-08 
0-06 

1-0O4 


8     10       10       30   40      60    80  100      150  200 


Fig.  28. — Diagram  to  compare  probable  method  of  antler-growth  in  Red  and 
Roe-deer  ;  logarithmic  plotting. 

X — X,  the  curve  for  adult  red  deer  (see  Fig.  25).  A — A  and  B — B,  probable  curves  for  individual 
antler-growth  with  age  in  a  small  and  a  large  specimen  respectively.  Y — Y,  the  curve  for  adult 
roe-door  (see  Fig.  27).  C — C,  probable  curve  for  individual  antler-growth  in  a  typical  roe-deer 
specimen,  rising  at  first  more  rapidly,  but  then  sinking  much  lower  than  the  corresponding  curve  for 
red  deer. 


48 


PROBLEMS   OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 


quantitative  difference  we  can  only  speculate  :  it  would  seem 
probable  that  the  Red  deer  type  of  slow  decrease,  with  positive 
heterogony  throughout,  is  the  normal  course  of  events  in 
Cervidae,  but  that  it  was  for  some  reason  biologically  desirable 
for  the  Roe  deer  to  have  small  antlers. 


12   13   14 


Fig.  29. 

Solid  line,  body-weight  against  age  in  212  male  red-deer  from  Wamham  Park.  Dotted  line,  antler- 
weight  against  age  in  a  smaller  and  selected  group  of  stags  from  the  same  locality.  The  thin  continuous 
lines  below  the  curve  for  antler-weight  represent  diagrammatically  the  actual  growth  and  shedding 
of  the  antlers  year  by  year.  The  fact  that  the  antler  curve  inflects  later  than  that  for  body-weight 
is  probably  due  to  the  antlers  being  from  a  selected  group  of  beasts,  of  size  above  the  average. 

After  this  digression,  we  will  return  to  the  general  problem 
involved  in  the  growth-ratio  of  the  antlers.  We  have  seen 
that  the  apparent  constancy  of  their  growth-ratio,  obtained 
by  plotting  antler-weight  against  body-weight  in  adults,  is 
shown  to  be  a  particular  consequence  of  the  steady  decline  of 


THE  COEFFICIENT  OF  GROWTH-PARTITION     49 

individual  growth-ratio  with  age.  But  even  this  does  not 
exhaust  the  complexity  of  the  phenomenon.  The  curve  for 
age-change  of  growth-ratio  is  obtained  by  plotting  the  weights 
of  fully-formed  antlers  of  known  age  against  body-weight  for 
the  same  age.  It  will  be  at  once  clear  that  the  actual  growth- 
ratio  of  the  antlers  can  never  be  the  same  as  that  thus  obtained, 
but  must  always  be  higher  (Fig.  29).  For  the  points  on  the 
curve  are  those  which  would  be  obtained  if  the  antler  grew 
with  a  constant  differential  growth-coefficient  from  its  incep- 
tion ;  whereas  actually,  it  has  to  begin  its  growth  anew  each 
year  from  zero. 

Now  this  is  of  considerable  importance,  since  it  indicates 
that  it  is  not  necessarily  the  actual  rate  of  growth  which  is 
regulated  in  accordance  with  our  formula,  but  the  limitation 
of  the  total  amount  of  growth  achieved.  What  our  results  tell 
us  is  that  at  any  given  body-size  the  total  amount  of  material 
which  can  be  incorporated  in  the  organ  is  proportional  to  the 
body-size  raised  to  a  power  (the  exact  value  of  the  power  also 
varying  with  age).  The  mechanism  of  this  relation  is  at 
present  obscure.  We  do  not  know  whether  the  total  bulk 
of  material  in  the  body  imposes  the  relation  directly,  which 
is  unlikely  ;  whether  some  substance  is  formed  in  the  body 
in  this  particular  quantitative  relation,  as  an  exponential 
function  of  body-weight,  and  the  final  size  of  the  organ  is  then 
directly  proportional  to  the  amount  of  this  substance  ;  or 
whether  there  be  after  all  a  true  constant  differential  growth- 
ratio  between  organ  and  body,  determined  by  some  peculiarity 
of  the  organ,  but  that  this  growth-ratio  represents  a  limiting 
value,  higher  values  being  possible  and  indeed  necessary 
whenever  the  relative  size  of  the  organ  is  below  its  limiting 
amount.  The  last  supposition  is  perhaps  the  most  probable, 
on  the  close  analogy  with  regeneration  (see  below) ,  but  experi- 
ment alone  can  decide  the  point. 

§  2.    The  Coefficient  of  Constant  Growth-partition 

In  any  case,  to  speak  simply  of  growth-coefficients  in  such  a 
case  is  misleading  ;  yet  we  require  a  term  for  the  exponent 
of  body-size  according  to  which  relative  organ-size  is  limited. 
Two  terms  are  possible — either  coefficient  of  growth-limitation, 
or  else  growth-partition  coefficient ;    I  shall  adopt  the  latter.1 

1  Since  writing  this  passage,  I  find  that  Robb  (1929)  had  previously 
suggested  the  same  idea  of  growth-partition,  which  has  later  been 
adopted  by  Twitty  and  Schwind  (193 1). 

4 


50 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


In  general,  it  would  appear  that  the  existence  of  a  growth- 
partition  coefficient  is  the  most  fundamental  fact  in  consider- 
ing relative  growth  of  parts,  and  that  when  true  constant 
growth-coefficients  or  constant  differential  growth-ratios  are 
found,  they  represent  special  limiting  cases  of  this  more  general 
conception. 

Let  us  now  consider  three  further  examples  which  support 
this  conclusion.  I  have  mentioned  regeneration.  I  shall  deal 
with  this  more  fully  in  a  later  chapter.  Here  it  suffices  to 
recall  the  fact  that  in  an  animal  capable  of  full  regeneration, 
any  organ,  heterogonic  or  not,  will,  after  amputation,  be 
restored  in  favourable  conditions  to  its  normal  proportionate 

II  III         IV         V         VI       VII       VIII        IX        x       XI        XII 


50 
40 
3  0  - 
20- 
10 


126 


Fig.  30. — Decrease  of  growth-coefficient  during  regeneration  in  the  legs  of 

Sphodromantis  bioculata. 

The  abscissae  represent  moult-stages.     The  ordinates  are  growth-quotients  :    i.e.  the  ratio  of  the 
length  of  the  leg  at  a  given  moult  to  its  length  at  the  preceding  moult.     The  dotted  line  represents 

the  mean  growth-quotient  (1-26  =  V  2)  for  normally-growing  limbs.     The  solid  line  is  the  curve  for 
a  middle-leg  amputated  before  the  Illrd  moult  (mean  of  3  specimens). 


size.  In  other  words,  during  the  process  of  regeneration  its 
growth-ratio  will  be  much  higher  than  normal,  and  will  gradu- 
ally sink  until  it  reaches  the  normal  value,  at  which  it  will 
then  continue.  This  emphasizes  the  generally  accepted  idea 
that  regeneration  is  simply  a  special  case  of  growth,  and 
furthermore  makes  it  clear  that  here  at  least  the  normal  growth- 
ratio  of  an  organ  merely  represents  a  limiting  value.  Thus, 
as  was  suggested  above  with  regard  to  deer-antlers,  relative 
size  of  organs  appears  to  be  determined  in  the  first  instance 
as  an  equilibrium  between  amount  of  material  in  the  organ 
and  amount  of  material  in  the  body,  the  equilibrium  being 
determined  according  to  our  general  formula  y  =  bxk.     If  the 


THE  COEFFICIENT  OF  GROWTH-PARTITION     51 

equilibrium  be  upset,  regulation  towards  the  equilibrium 
position  will  occur  during  later  growth.  The  particular 
mechanism  by  which  the  equilibrium  is  attained  does  concern 
growth-ratio  ;  the  more  the  organ  is  below  equilibrium-size, 
the  higher  will  be  its  growth-ratio.1     (See  Fig.  30.) 

These  conclusions  are  supported  by  various  lines  of  evidence. 
In  the  first  place,  in  cases  of  grafting  of  organs  we  should 
expect  the  organ  of  a  young  animal  grafted  on  to  an  older 
and  larger  animal  to  be  accelerated  in  its  growth  until  it 
reached  a  size  prescribed  by  its  growth-partition  coefficient, 
and  the  organ  of  an  older  animal  grafted  on  to  a  younger 
and  smaller  animal  to  be  correspondingly  retarded  in  its 
growth.  For  the  first,  we  may  turn  to  the  results  of  Wachs 
(1914).  When  he  inserted  the  lens  of  a  young  Urodele  larva 
into  the  eye  of  an  older  larva  from  which  the  lens  had  been 
previously  removed,  the  small  lens  was  accelerated  in  its 
growth.  For  the  second,  as  well  as  the  first,  we  have  an 
example  in  the  work  of  Twitty  (1930).  Here  cross-trans- 
plantation was  made  between  larvae  of  Ambly stoma  tigrinum 
and  A.  punctatum.  The  latter  species  grows  much  more  slowly 
than  the  former.  Twitty  removed  the  eye  of  a  punctatum 
larva  and  replaced  it  by  one  of  the  same  size  from  a  tigrinum 
larva ;  owing  to  the  higher  growth-rate  of  tigrinum,  the  age 
of  the  donor  was  much  less  than  that  of  the  host.  Even 
when  the  host  was  fed  only  minimally,  the  grafted  eye  now 
increased  in  size  much  more  rapidly  than  that  of  the  host  : 
in  one  case  it  increased  50  per  cent,  in  diameter  while  the 
host  remained  stationary  in  length.     (See  p.  197.) 

The  converse  experiment  consisted  in  removing  the  eye 
from  a  tigrinum  larva  and  engrafting  in  its  place  an  eye  of  the 
same  size  from  a  considerably  older  punctatum  larva.  In  this 
case,  the  grafted  eye  made  very  slow  growth.  Here  the  rate 
of  growth  could  be  compared  with  that  made  by  punctatum 
eyes  grafted  into  A.  tigrinum  during  the  embryonic  period. 

1  In  some  cases  at  least  the  change  in  growth-ratio  will  occur  accord- 
ing to  the  law  enunciated  for  Sphodromantis  by  Przibram,  1917  : 
When  Z  is  the  normal  final  length  of  the  regenerating  limb,  n  the 
length  after  amputation,  r  its  length  at  the  beginning  of  a  given  period 
of  time  t,  R  the  length  at  the  end  of  the  time  t,  Va  the  normal 
coefficient  of  increase  of  the  limb  between  one  moult  and  the  next, 

then   Z   —  n   —  y  =  — — ;  and   the    growth-partition    coefficient 

represents  the  limiting  value  of  the  growth-ratio  when  equilibrium  is 
established. 


52 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


It  can  at  once  be  seen  (Fig.  31)  that  the  growth  of  the  older 
eyes  slowly  approaches  the  normal  growth-curve  (see  also 
Figs.  85  to  87,  and  especially  88). 


2.0 

mm. 


i.TS 


ISO 

UJ 
> 

UJ 

IL 
O 

arm 

UJ 

i- 
uJ 
Z 
d 


1.0 


•is 


20  30  HO  SO  60 

BODY  LENGTH 


70 


£0 


90  mm 


Fig.  31. — Regulation  of  eye-size  in  eyes  of  one  species  of  Amblystoma  grafted 

on  to  another. 

Dotted  lines,  curves  for  two  cases  when  embryonic  eyes  were  grafted  to  a  host  of  the  same  stage 
of  development  as  the  donor.  Solid  lines,  curves  for  two  cases  when  eyes  were  taken  from  an  older 
larva  and  grafted  on  to  a  younger  host  larva  ;  in  this  case  the  eyes  hardly  grow  at  all  until  they 
reach  the  correct  relative  size. 


We  thus  are  driven  to  the  conclusion  that  though  the  eyes 
of  the  two  species  have  different  specific  growth-intensities, 
and  therefore  different  coefficients  of  growth-partition  when 
both  are  present  in  the  same  body,  there  is  for  each  body-size 


THE  COEFFICIENT  OF  GROWTH-PARTITION    53 


carapace    length,  mm 
13  16  20 


a  characteristic  eye-size  towards  the  attainment  of  which  the 
rate  of  eye-growth  is  regulated.1 

In  general,  as  is  well  known, 
the  rate  of  regeneration  is  higher 
the  more  material  is  removed. 
This  fits  in  with  the  ideas  here 
presented  and  with  the  concep- 
tions of  Przibram  (1.  c),  but  it 
throws  into  relief  the  very  real 
difference  between  the  idea  of 
a  constant  differential  growth- 
ratio  and  a  constant  coefficient 
of  growth-limitation.  Let  us 
consider  a  Planarian  worm,  in 
which  according  to  Abeloos  (I.e.) 
the  trunk  grows  heterogonically 
with  reference  to  the  head. 
During  normal  growth  the  rela- 
tion is  one  of  a  constant  differ- 
ential growth-ratio.  But  dur- 
ing regeneration,  the  more  is 
cut  off,  the  more  rapidly  regen- 
eration takes  place  :  i.e.  the 
smaller  the  fraction  of  the  body 
left,  the  more  rapid  is  the 
growth-ratio  of  the  regenerate. 
What  is  constant  is  the  final 
partition-coefficient  between 
head-material  and  trunk- 
material  ;  the  normal  constant 
differential  growth-ratio  is  the 
special  case  of  growth  during 
which  the  partition-coefficient 
is  always  of  this  limiting  value. 

Finally,  the  case  of  Inachus, 
investigated  by  G.  Smith  (1906A) 
whose  data  have  been  further 
analysed  by  me  (unpublished) 
also  supports  this  view-point.  At  Naples,  /.  mauritanicus ,  the 
species  of  Inachus  studied  by  Smith,  shows  three  forms — '  low  ' 

1  Further  details  as  to  the  specific  growth-intensities  of  eyes  and 
other  organs  when  heteroplastically  transplanted  are  recorded  in 
Chapter  VI. 


Fig.  32.- — Chela  breadth  against 
carapace  length  in  the  male  of  the 
spider-crab,  Inachus  mauritanicus  ; 
logarithmic  plotting.  (See  Table 
IIIa.) 

The  '  low  '  males  (below  about  14  mm.  cara- 
pace length)  and  the  '  high  '  males  (above  about 
20  mm.)  fall  on  a  single  curve  with  diminishing 
growth-coefficient  (mean  value  of  k  over  2-3  ; 
for  '  low  '  males,  about  2-6;  for  'high'  males, 
about  1-4).  Between  these  sizes  the  chela 
regresses  to  a  narrow  female  type,  then  enlarg- 
ing again  with  a  very  high  growth-coefficient. 

(Constructed  from  the  data  of  G.  W.  Smith,  1906A.) 


54 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


00 

s 
s 

53 

s 

53 


oo 
S 

<o 

5S 

s 

< 

o 

i 


o 

« 

O 

w 
> 

I— I 

H 

< 


o 

O 


ty> 


p 

CD 

»— i 

l-l 

eu 

* 

tfl 

o 

CD 

H 

O 

X 

H 

o 

i— i 

In 

i— i 

o 

to 

o 

vO 

Ph 

fa 
o 

vO~ 

H 

4) 

W 

rQ 

H 

cd 

Q 

H 

< 

W 

w 

1 

a 

o 

<; 

i-l 

T) 

W 

<D 

u 

+-> 
O 

P 
i-i 

In 

-t-> 

o 

H 

o 
U 

o 

vO    iO  " 
CM  M 


<N      H      £ 

M    M    O 


ro 
CO  ^oo 

O* 

M 
N    N    n 

N    ■*"  ~ 

On 

On 
cs   co^ 

o 

O    ff)m 
CN    CN     • 

vO 

M    N     • 

in 
vo 

CO    fON 

M      <N      ^ 

K.        -.        ^ 

M     CN      • 

rO 

o  o  r^ 

m    co  • 
ro 

iooo    § 
m   ro  • 


tJ-  On 

lO 

-t- 

M 

Tf 

to 
ro. 

ro 

M 

On 

H 

vO 

<N 

o 

H     t' 
CM 

w    N    o 

H     M      ■ 

CM 
O    N    ^ 


O 
o  CM    9 


■    CO       - 

g   P   i- 

eK 

■>  -i-i    Co 
co    o  — ' 

!2  <"  22 
o   <"   u 


-i    O 


a 
a 


5£  S 


1 


On 

o°P 

co 

m    ■ 
CO 

ST* 

co 


VO  8 

<°cO 


HI      • 

to 

o> 
3  9 

to 

o  "9 


lO 


53 


00      00     CO 


53 


P    U 
cd  _q 

I- 

O  •— " 
-    CU    £ 
^  53    CUXi 
oTt^    CO    O 

*-•*>   s   o 
S  -O  .o 


■5V 


a  s£ 


k;-? 


p 

CD 


oo    to 

co 

^^      Co 

53    <A 

P    in 

CU  £) 

S    53 

H  _, 

^  *^~ 

■P   rt 

<->  TJ 

<»  -o 

cd  « 

^rS 

a-i-1 

^^ 

CO     CJ 

•V1  O 

*•"<    _, 

°  s 

»Si    .^ 

.    rt 

O    CD 

o 

l-( 


o 


CO 


ro 


M  CO 


VO 


>o 

CO 


ro 


ro       m 


O  M 


lO  (N 


■^"      o> 


CO 


N        vO 


co" 

CO 

CO 

p 

rt 

CD 

-*oi 

-•  O 

a 

53 

0i 

11 

«  b 

Ph 

hQ 

s  -° 

CO 

« 

5^   M 
<U     CO 

a 

O 

a 

6 

o 

u 

14 

"53 


HOLOMETABOLOUS  INSECTS  55 

males,  of  small  size  with  relatively  small  but  male-type  chelae, 
'  high  '  males  of  large  size,  with  relatively  large  male-type 
chelae,  and  those  of  intermediate  size,  which  have  extremely 
small,  female-type  chelae. 

When  chela-size  is  plotted  double-logarithmically  against 
body-size,  it  is  found  that  the  means  for  the  '  low  '  and  '  high  ' 
males  fall  on  two  segments  of  a  single  simple  curve,  thus  con- 
firming Smith's  view  that  these  two  types  are  merely  breeding 
males  in  their  first  and  second  seasons  respectively,  and  that 
those  with  female-type  chelae  are  males  in  the  non-breeding 
phase,  during  which  the  secondary  sexual  characters  of  their 
chelae  have  regressed  to  the  female  or  neuter  type. 

Further,  on  the  double  logarithmic  plot,  the  curve  for  these 
intermediate  males  first  actually  declines,  and  then  mounts 
very  steeply  until  it  meets  the  prolongation  of  the  straight-line 
curve  for  the  low  males,  upon  which  it  bends  over  and  con- 
tinues as  the  line  for  the  '  high  '  males.  In  other  words,  after 
the  regression  period,  the  growth-ratio  of  the  claw  is  much 
higher  than  normal,  but  becomes  normal  as  soon  as  the  theor- 
etical equilibrium-size  is  reached.1  (Table  IIIa  and  Fig.  32). 
It  is  also  seen  that  the  frequency  for  chela-breadth  is  bimodal : 
this  will  be  discussed  in  §  5. 

§  3.      HETEROGONY   IN   HOLOMETABOLOUS   INSECTS 

A  somewhat  different  set  of  special  cases  is  that  provided 
by  holometabolous  insects.  Many  of  these  possess  organs 
(usually  of  secondary  sexual  character,  and  these  usually 
in  the  male  sex),  which  increase  in  relative  size  with  increase 
of  absolute  size  of  body.  The  most  familiar  of  these  are  the 
mandibles  of  the  stag-beetles  (Lucanidae)  and  the  '  horns ', 
cephalic  or  thoracic  or  both,  of  various  other  beetles  such  as 
the  Dynastidae  ;  but  Champy  (1.  c.)  has  collected  numerous 
other  examples,  ranging  from  antennae  (e.g.  Acanthocinus  : 
Champy,  1924,  p.  167)  and  forelegs,  to  the  '  tail'  on  the  hind 
wing  of  Papilios  and  the  swollen  segments  of  the  hindlegs  in 
certain  Hemiptera,  such  as  Anoplocnemis  (Champy,  1924, 
p.  173).     See  Figs.  33,  34,  91. 

Analysis  shows  (Huxley,  1927  and  1931)  that  the  relation 
between  the  dimensions  of  the  organ  and  the  body  here  too 

1  It  is  interesting  to  find  that  in  I.  dorsettensis,  studied  by  Shaw 
(1928),  the  regression  towards  female  type  in  the  non-breeding  season, 
though  present,  appears  to  be  much  less  marked. 


56 


HOLOMETABOLOUS   INSECTS 


57 


approximates  closely  to  the  formula  for  a  constant  differential 
growth-ratio  (Table  IV,  Fig.  35).  Again,  however,  there  can  be 
no  growth-ratio  in  the  literal  sense  in  which  we  have  found 


Fig.  34. — Heterogony  of  the  '  tail  '  in  the  male  of  the  swallow-tail  butterfly, 

Papilio  dardanus  (the  heterogony  is  stated  by  Champy  not  to  occur  in  species 

in  which  the  '  tail  '  occurs  in  both  sexes). 


it  apply,  e.g.,  to  the  partition  of  growth-potential  between 
the  large  chela  of  Uca  and  the  rest  of  the  body.  There  cannot 
be,  for  the  simple  reason  that  in  holometabolous  insects  the 
organ,  as  regards  its  imaginal  characters,  is  not  formed  until 


58 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


the  pupal  instar,  to  emerge  at  the  final  moult  in  its  definite 
shape  and  size.  And  as  there  are  no  further  moults,  it  is 
incapable  of  further  growth  or  form-change. 

We  are  thus  driven  to  suppose  either  that  all  the  processes 
connected  with  the  organ's  heterogonic  growth  are  confined 
to  a  very  brief  period,  presumably  just  before  and  just  after 

the  moult  from  last 
larval  in  star  to  pupa  ; 
or  else  that,  although 
the  visible  growth  of 
the  organ  is  confined 
to  this  short  period,  it 
depends  for  its  amount 
on  some  substance 
whose  chemical  ac- 
cumulation during  the 
larval  phase  has  had 
a  constant  differential 
growth  -coefficient 
relative  to  body- 
weight  (see  e.g.  Teiss- 
ier, 1 93 1,  for  a  confir- 
mation of  this  latter 
possibility). 

As  we  shall  see  later 
in  considering  dimor- 
phism (p.  68)  the  for- 
mer hypothesis  is  the 
more  probable  ;  but  in 
any  case  we  have,  as 
in  deer's  antlers,  the 
fact  that  the  amount 
of  growth  attained  is 
proportional  to  body- 
size  raised  to  a  power, 
the  value  of  the  power 


30   40  50607080 

Total  length,  mm. 

Fig.  35. — Relative  growth  of  male  mandibles 
in  three  species  of  stag-beetles  (Lucanidae). 

-f ,  Lucanus  lunifer ;  X ,  L.  cervus ;  0,  Cyclommatus  laran- 
dus.  '  Total  length  '  is  true  total  length  for  Cyclommatus  ;  for 
the  others  it  is  represented  by  (elytron  length  +  mandible 
length).  All  the  curves  inflect  at  large  absolute  sizes  (see 
text)  ;  for  the  remainder  of  the  curves  k  is  about  1-6  for 
L.  lunifer,  2-3  for  L.  cervus,  and  nearly  2-0  for  C.  tarandus. 


being  equivalent  to 
that  of  the  constant  differential  growth-ratio  in  cases  where 
visible  growth  is  continuous  over  long  periods.  Thus  the  true 
growth-ratio  of  the  organ  during  its  short  growth-period  is  far 
more  rapid  than  indicated  by  the  value  found  for  the  '  growth- 
coefficient  '  by  the  method  of  comparing  organ  and  body 
at  different  absolute  sizes.     We  are,  in  fact,  again  in  the  same 


HOLOMETABOLOUS  INSECTS 


59 


predicament  as  with  the  deer's  antlers,  the  chelae  of  male 
Inachus,  or  any  heterogonic  organ  which  is  regenerating,  and 
are  driven  to  think  of  a  limiting  factor  to  growth,  which  we 
have  defined  as  the  growth-partition  coefficient. 


TABLE   IV 

Mandibles  in  Lucanidae 


(a)  Cyclommatus  tarandus 

(data  from  Dudich,   1923  :    ana- 
lysed Huxley,  1927) 


2 

k 


x 
20-38 
24-01 
26-38 
27-76 
29-65 
32-20 

33-n 
35-oi 
36-13 
37-32 

38-44 
39-26 

41*34 
43-22 

45-51 
46-32 
47-28 
48-40 
50-04 
5i-5o 
52-50 
54-23 
56-01 

62-06 

66-06 

69-00 

74-00 

178 

1-97,  b 


y 

3-88 
5'3i 
6-33 
7-32 
8-17 

9-73 
10-71 
11-49 
12-08 
12-73 
14-11 
14-70 

15-84 
17-39 
18-83 
19-19 
19-92 
20-79 

21-53 
22-54 

23-25 
23-96 

25-38 

28-49 
30-69 

32-00 

34-50 

=  just  over  o-oi 


(b)  Lticanus  cervus 

(data  from  Bateson  and  Brindley, 
1892  :    analysed  Huxley,  1927) 


x 

(3i-o) 

38-65 

40-50 

42-55 
45 -oo 

46-93 
49-18 

53-6o 

2  =  48 


y 

(6-o) 

7-75 
9-00 

io-oo 

II-20 

n-86 
12-82 
14-40 


k  =  about  2-3 

Lucanus  lunifer 
(data  and  analysis,  Huxley,  1927 ) 


X 

y 

(38-6) 

(16-8) 

42-4 

19-9 

45-6 

22-4 

49-3 

24-5 

5i-9 

26-0 

57-3 

28-8 

2  = 

18 

k   = 

aboul 

:  i-55 

Figures  in  brackets  (  )  indicate  insufficient  number  of  individuals 
in  class. 

In  L.  cervus  and  L.  lunifer,  x  =  'total'  length  =  (elytron  length  + 
mandible  length),  mm. 

In  C.  tarandus,  x  =  true  total  length  =  (body  length  +  mandible 
length),  mm. 

y  —  mandible  length,  mm. 

k  =  growth-partition  coefficient  :  the  values  given  do  not  hold  at 
high  values  of  x  (see  text). 


60  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

There  is  a  further  point  to  consider  in  regard  to  heterogony 
in  holometabolous  forms.  In  other  organisms — a  fiddler-crab, 
for  example — the  growing  system  is  an  open  one,  in  that  it 
is  continuously  taking  in  food  as  it  grows.  The  beetle  or 
other  holometabolous  insect,  however,  during  most  of  the 
period  when  the  form  of  its  adult  organs  is  being  laid  down, 
is  a  closed  system,  taking  in  no  further  food,  but  depending 
on  accumulated  reserves  and  on  the  material  derived  from 
the  breaking  down  of  larval  organs.  This  has  two  conse- 
quences for  our  problem.  In  the  first  place,  in  other  forms 
the  fairest  comparison  of  relative  size  would  seem  to  be  between 
heterogonic  organ  and  rest-of-body,  since  the  size  of  the 
ingestive  and  digestive  systems  are  functions  of  the  size  of 
the  rest  of  the  body,  not  of  total  size,  as  may  easily  be  realized 
by  reference  to  the  fiddler-crab.  Here  two  large  specimens, 
male  and  female  respectively,  of  equal  rest-of-body  weight 
and  therefore  presumably  equal-sized  alimentary  systems,  will 
be  of  very  different  total  weight,  since  in  the  female  either 
chela  will  weigh  only  2  per  cent,  of  the  rest-of-body,  while  in 
the  male  the  large  chela  may  weigh  up  to  70  per  cent,  or  more. 
But  in  a  stag-beetle,  for  example,  the  conditions  are  quite 
different.  Larvae  of  both  sexes  have  jaws  and  guts  of  the 
same  relative  size.  A  male  and  a  female  larva  of  the  same 
total  size  will  have  the  same  amount  of  reserve  material,  but 
during  the  pre-pupal  and  pupal  period,  say  1  per  cent,  of 
this  is  converted  into  imaginal  female  mandible,  while  perhaps 
10  or  15  per  cent,  has  to  be  converted  into  imaginal  male 
mandible.  Since  the  amount  of  reserve  material  is  here  the 
important  factor  for  growth,  it  is  total  bulk,  and  not  rest-of- 
body  bulk,  which  should  be  here  used  as  the  standard  against 
which  to  plot  the  bulk  of  the  heterogonic  organ  (see  Huxley, 
1931c). 

This  is  a  minor  methodological  point ;  but  it  has  further 
consequences.  To  continue  the  example  of  stag-beetles,  we 
should  accordingly  expect,  in  an  exceptionally  large  male 
specimen  where  the  theoretical  relative  size  of  the  mandibles 
would  be  huge  (as  long  as  the  rest  of  the  body  in  some  speci- 
mens of  Cyclommatus  tarandus :  Dudich,  1923  ;  see  Fig.  91),  that 
during  the  longer  time  necessary  to  lay  down  this  large  organ, 
the  limited  reserve-supply  would  come  to  an  end,  used  up  by 
other  competing  organs,  and  therefore  that  the  organ  would 
fall  below  the  theoretical  size  expected  on  the  formula  for  a 
constant  coefficient  of  growth-partition.     Thus,  owing  to  the 


POLYMORPHISM  IN  NEUTER  INSECTS  61 

limitation  of  raw  material  due  to  the  system  being  a  closed 
one,  we  should  expect,  from  a  certain  absolute  size  upwards, 
the  actual  values  for  the  size  of  the  heterogonic  organ  to  fall 
progressively  more  and  more  below  the  theoretically  expected 
value.  And  this  is  what  we  actually  find.  When  organ-size 
is  plotted  against  total  size  on  a  double  logarithmic  grid,  the 
first  part  of  the  curve  is  a  good  approximation  to  a  straight 
line,  but  the  end  portion  curves  over  so  as  to  be  concave  to 
the  x-axis.  This  is  so  for  all  cases  so  far  investigated,  includ- 
ing the  mandibles  of  three  species  of  two  genera  of  stag-beetles, 
the  horn  of  Xylotrupes,  the  heads  of  polymorphic  neuter  ants, 
etc.1;  Figs.  35,  37,  92. 

§  4.    Heterogony  and  Polymorphism  in  Neuter  Social 

Insects 

We  shall  later  note  some  further  complications  introduced 
into  the  situation  by  the  fact  of  moulting.  Here  we  may  refer 
to  the  particularly  interesting  case,  just  mentioned,  of  poly- 
morphic neuter  ants.  It  is  well  known  that  in  what  are 
apparently  the  more  primitive  examples  of  such  polymorphism, 
there  is  an  unbroken  array  from  smallest  to  largest  neuters, 
the  continuous  series  being  quite  arbitrarily  divided  up  into 
'  worker  minimae  ',  '  worker  mediae  ',  and  so  on  up  to  '  soldier 
mediae  '  and  '  soldier  maximae  '  ;  and  some  myrmecologists 
have  introduced  even  more  elaborate  terms  (see  Wheeler, 
1920).  Now  these  series  are  invariably  characterized  by  a 
relative  increase  of  head-  and  especially  mandible-size  with 
an  absolute  increase  of  total  size.  Measurements  of  the 
weights  of  head  and  rest-of-body  in  species  of  two  genera 
(the  huge  Camponotus  gigas,  from  Borneo  ;  and  a  driver  ant 
of  the  genus  Anomma  from  Africa)  show  that,  over  the  major 
portion  of  the  size-range,  the  formula  for  constant  growth- 
partition  coefficient  is  nicely  adhered  to 2  (Huxley,  1927 ; 
Huxley  and  Bush  unpublished)  (Table  IVa  and  Fig.  37). 

1  Teissier,  193 1  (p.  97),  using  weight  and  not  linear  measure,  shows 
in  his  Fig.  20  no  curving  over  of  this  type  for  the  mandibles  of  Lucanus 
cervus.  This  might  mean  that  my  interpretation  is  wrong,  and  that 
mechanical  reasons  are  interfering  with  great  growth  in  length  rather 
than  nutritive  reasons  with  growth  in  mass.  On  the  other  hand,  the 
curvature  in  my  material  does  not  begin  until  elytron-length  33  mm., 
and  Teissier  has  hardly  any  specimens  as  large  as  this. 

2  The  Anomma  curve  bends  over  at  high  sizes,  as  described  for  stag- 
beetle  mandibles,  etc.  This  may  presumably  be  accounted  for  as 
suggested  earlier  in  this  chapter.     But  the  formula  is  also  not  obeyed 


62  PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 

TABLE   IVa 

Anomma  nigricans 

Data  from  Huxley  and  Bush  (unpublished) 

Analysed  in  Huxley  (1927) 

(1383)  (165-3) 

176-0  223-7 

220-3  300-2 

272-7  427-6 

324-2  567-3 

367-5  661-9 

2  =  267 

k  =  about  1-55  (after  first  2  points) 

x  =  abdomen-length 

y  =  head-breadth 

(in  arbitrary  units) 
Figures  in  brackets  (     )  indicate  insufficient  numbers  in  class. 

Camponotus  gigas 

Data  from  E.  Banks  (unpublished) 

Analysed  in  Huxley  (1927) 

x  y 

75-0  9-6 

in-5  24-3 

241-0  82-0 

346-8  142-0 

S  =357 

ft  —  about  i-6  (after  first  point) 

x  =  total  weight,  mg. 

y  =  head-weight,  mg. 

The  obvious  suggestion  is  that  these  series  of  workers  and 
soldiers  do  actually  represent  nothing  more  than  a  series  of 
size-forms  of  a  single  genetic  type,  possessing  a  mechanism 
for  heterogony  of  the  mandible  and  head.  The  difference 
from  the  other  holometabolous  cases  hitherto  considered  is  that 
the  absolute  size-range  is  much  greater,  and  that  the  differ- 
ences in  size  can  only  be  supposed  to  be  brought  about  by 
definite  treatment  of  the  larvae  by  their  nurses,  the  largest 
types  being  fed  to  the  limit,  the  smallest  types  being  deprived 
of  food,  and  so  forced  to  pupate,  while  still  quite  small  larvae. 
That  enormous  differences  in  size  may  be  produced  by  cutting 
down  or  cutting  off  the  food  supply  of  insect  larvae  is  estab- 
lished through  experimental  work  on  blowflies  (Smirnov  and 

at  very  small  absolute  sizes,  where  the  double-logarithmic  curve  is 
distorted  in  the  opposite  sense,  with  concavity  upwards  :  the  meaning 
of  this,  if  not  merely  statistical,  is  unknown. 


POLYMORPHISM  IN  NEUTER  INSECTS 


63 


Zhelochovstev,  1926),  housefiies  (Herms,  1928),  Drosophila 
(Gause,  1931),  etc.  And  the  postulated  differential  treatment 
of  different  worker  larvae  by  their  nurses  is  well  within  the 
known  range  of  complexity  of  ant  behaviour  (see  also  Emery, 
1921). 


Fig.  36.- 


-Increase  of  relative  size  of  head  with  absolute  size  of  body  in  the 
neuters  of  the  ant,  Pheidole  instabilis. 


That  the  effect  of  size-changes  may  be  differential  is  also 
known ;  e.g.  Eigenbrodt  (1930)  finds  that  the  increase  of  total 
size  in  Drosophila  caused  by  low  temperature  is  accompanied  by 
a  decrease  in  wing-size,  which  is  somewhat  greater  for  breadth 


-zoo 


(A)  Heterogony  of  the  head  in  neuter 
ants;  logarithmic  plotting.  © — ©, 
Anomma  nigricans,  head-breadth  against 
abdomen-breadth  (in  arbitrary  units :  scale 

below  and  to    the  right).     H h  Cam- 

ponotus  gigas,  head-weight  against  total 
weight,  in  mg.  (scale  above  and  to  the 
left). 


(B)  Relative  head-size,  Anomma  nigri- 
cans. Increase  in  percentage  head-breadth 
with  increase  in  absolute  abdomen-breadth. 
(In  this  figure  the  classes  into  which  the 
specimens  were  classified  were  delimited 
on  the  basis  of  [abdomen-breadth  +  head- 
breadth].) 


140  ZOO 


% 

180 


170 


160 


140 


130 


Anomma 
nigricans 


B 


200  250  300 

cubdomen  breadth 


350 


Fig.  37, 


-Graph  showing  the  increase  of  size  of  head  with  absolute  size  of 
body  in  neuter  ants. 

64 


POLYMORPHISM   IN   NEUTER   INSECTS  65 

than  for  length  ;  Alpatov  (1930)  rinds  the  same  phenomenon. 
Smirnov  and  Zhelochovstev  (I.e.)  for  the  blowfly  Calliphora  find 
a  differential  effect  in  different  regions  of  the  wing  when  total  size 
is  reduced  by  cutting  off  larval  food-supplies  after  a  given  time. 
On  the  other  hand,  Alpatov  (1.  c.)  in  flies  of  the  same  species 
reduced  in  size  by  depriving  larvae  of  food  before  they  reached 
full  growth,  also  finds  a  decrease  in  relative  breadth  of  the 
wings,  showing  that  absolute  size  is  not  the  only  factor  deter- 
mining proportions. 

When,  as  in  some  more  specialized  forms,  the  neuter  series 
is  not  continuous,  but  there  exist  only  two  or  a  few  fairly 
sharply  defined  types — e.g.  only  large  and  relatively  large- 
headed  soldier  and  small  and  relatively  small-headed  worker — 
we  need  only  suppose  a  slight  specialization  of  the  nurses' 
behaviour.  An  adumbration  of  this  is  seen  in  the  fact,  elicited 
by  unpublished  work  of  Miss  Edmonds,  of  Sydney,  that  even 
in  forms  with  a  continuous  series  of  neuters,  the  frequency 
curve  for  body-size  is  definitely  multimodal  (see  also  Palen- 
itschenko,  1927). 

It  is  to  be  hoped  that  those  familiar  with  the  technique 
of  rearing  ants  in  captivity  will  attack  this  problem  experi- 
mentally. If  my  suggestion  be  verified,  it  will  materially 
simplify  the  evolutionary  problems  connected  with  the  poly- 
morphism of  ant  neuters,  for  instead  of  having  to  postulate  a 
large  number  of  genetically  distinct  types,  we  need  only  assume 
one  single  genetic  type  of  neuter,  but  provided  with  a  heter- 
ogenic mechanism  for  head-growth,  which  will  produce  all 
the  different  head-types  as  secondary  by-products  of  the 
animals'  absolute  size. 

In  termites,  the  case  is  somewhat  different.1  Within  the 
soldier  caste  of  primitive  termites,  we  do  sometimes  meet 
with  phenomena  which  appear  to  be  quite  parallel  with  what 
I  have  discussed  for  ants — considerable  variation  in  absolute 
body-size  accompanied  by  a  progressive  alteration  in  relative 
head-  and  jaw-size.  This  is  well  shown  in  the  figures  given  by 
Heath  (1927) ;  see  Fig.  38.  Heath  also  (see  his  p.  402)  demon- 
strates fairly  conclusively  the  interesting  fact  that  the  poly- 
morphism is  due  to  the  presence  of  forms  which  have  gone 
through  different  numbers  of  moults  ;  a  fact  which  strengthens 
our  hypothesis  that  there  is  but  one  genetic  type  with  a  heter- 

1  For  much  of  the  information  concerning  termites  I  am  indebted 
to  Professor  A.  E.  Emerson,  of  Chicago  University,  to  whom  I  should 
here  like  to  express  my  thanks. 

5 


66 


PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 


ogonic  mechanism  as  regards  head-size.  The  different  soldier 
forms  are  discontinuous  as  regards  size  and  head-proportions, 
which  provides  us  with  a  further  case  of  di-  or  poly-morphism 
due  to  a  combination  of  heterogony  with  moulting  (§  5). 
Reference  may  also  be  made  to  some  of  the  results  given  in 
the  important  paper  by  Kalshoven  (1930),  and  in  that  by 
Hare  (1931).  Such  a  method  of  arriving  at  polymorphism  of 
neuters  would,  of  course,  be  impossible  in  the  holometabolous 
ants.     (See  also  the  work  of  Light,  p.  258.) 

There  are  however  other  termite  cases  in  which  my  hypo- 
thesis would  not  seem  to  apply.  For  in- 
stance, A canthotermes  acanthothorax  (Sjostedt, 
1925  :  his  Fig.  21,  p.  61)  has  certainly  two 
qualitatively  different  types  of  soldiers,  which 
it  would  appear  necessary  to  regard  as  differ- 
ent genetic  types,  or  at  least  as  produced  by 
qualitative  differences  in  feeding.  Sjostedt 
himself  figures  no  less  than  five  kinds  of 
soldiers,  the  largest  number  of  types  decribed 
for  any  species  of  Termite.  Two  of  these, 
his  Nos.  4  and  5,  would  appear  to  be  growth- 
forms  of  one  main  type.  To  inspection,  his 
Nos.  1-3  look  as  if  they  were  growth-forms 
of  another  qualitatively  different  type  ;  but 
Dr.  Emerson  informs  me  that  he  has  found 
that  the  smaller  forms  (Sjostedt's  Nos.  2  and 
3)  are  both  infested  with  an  insect  larva  which 
inhabits  the  head,  and  disproportionately 
reduces  its  size  ;  these  forms  are  not  found 
in  nests  from  which  the  parasites  are  absent. 
The  differential  retardation  of  the  head  might 
be  due  to  the  existence  of  a  true  heterogony- 
mechanism  for  the  head,  which  is  not  nor- 
mally manifested,  but  is  revealed  when  the  parasite  produces 
general  size-reduction  of  the  imago  ;  or  it  might  be  due  merely 
to  the  fact  that  the  head  is  the  seat  of  the  infestation.1 
The  difference  between  worker  and  soldier  would  appear 

1  In  passing,  we  may  note  that  the  effects  of  such  parasites  may 
be  very  striking  ;  e.g.  in  Termes  gilvus,  Silvester  (1926)  figures  extra- 
ordinary qualitative  changes  in  shape  of  head  and  jaws,  as  well  as  a 
general  size-reduction  and  a  highly  disproportionate  reduction  in  jaw- 
size,  as  result  of  the  presence  of  a  similar  parasite  in  the  head.  And 
see,  for  a  discussion  of  the  corresponding  problem  in  ants,  Wheeler 
(1928)  and  Vandel  (1930). 


Fig.  38. — Heads  of 
largest  and  smallest 
workers  in  a  colony 
of  the  termite  Ter- 
mopsis  angusticollis, 
showing  heterogony 
and  change  of  pro- 
portions with  in- 
crease of  absolute 
size. 


POLYMORPHISM   IN   NEUTER   INSECTS  67 

to  be  of  another  nature.  Recent  work  such  as  that  of  Emerson 
(1926),  John  (1925),  Heath  (1927,  1928),  etc.,  makes  it  highly- 
probable  that  in  all  primitive  termites,  the  forms  which  do  the 
work  of  the  colony  are  not  a  distinct  caste,  but  are  the  juvenile 
forms  of  the  soldiers.  There  is  thus  a  marked  heterogony 
of  the  head  and  jaws  between  the  last  worker  instar  and  the 
first  soldier  instar  (we  have  already  seen  that  there  may  be 
more  than  one  soldier  instar  :    Heath,  1927  :    see  also  Hare, 

I93I-) 

In   more   specialized   forms,   however,   while   some   of   the 

workers  are  juvenile  soldiers,  a  true  worker  caste,  distinguish- 
able by  large  size  and  different  proportions,  also  exists 
(Emerson,  1926,  etc.)  It  would  be  extremely  interesting  to 
measure  the  head  and  body  of  these  two  types  throughout 
their  growth. 

These  results,  combined  with  the  fact  that  in  some  primitive 
forms,  fertile  soldiers  are  met  with  (Heath,  1928  ;  Imms,  1920), 
and  that  soldiers  with  wing-buds  are  not  unknown,  whereas 
no  true  workers  are  known  ever  to  be  fertile  or  to  possess 
wing-buds,  indicates  that  workers  have  been  derived  from 
soldiers  by  a  suppression  of  their  final  development  into  the 
normal  big-jawed  type — that,  in  fact,  they  are  neotenic.  This 
neoteny,  however,  possibly  at  first  facultative,  must  at  least 
in  higher  forms  have  been  fixed  as  a  constant  caste-character- 
istic, either  by  differential  feeding  or  perhaps  more  probably 
by  some  genetic  mechanism  (see  Thompson,  1917). 

This  has  a  bearing  on  our  problem,  since  the  main  feature 
in  the  evolution  of  the  worker  from  the  soldier  would  simply 
be  the  delay  in  the  onset  of  the  head's  heterogony,  a  delay 
which,  when  it  exceeded  the  time  to  the  final  instar,  would 
eventually  lead  to  the  total  absence  of  soldier  characteristics. 
A  less  degree  of  delay  would  give  rise  to  forms  of  intermediate 
soldier-worker  type  ;  these  are  known  to  exist  in  various 
genera,  e.g.  Armitermes  and  related  genera. 

Thus,  although  heterogony  appears  to  play  its  part  in  the 
origin  of  polymorphism  both  in  ants  and  termites,  its  role  is 
different  in  the  two  groups.  In  ants,  the  control  of  absolute 
size  through  the  feeding  of  the  larvae  appears  to  be  the  main 
method.  In  termites  true  heterogonic  polymorphism  is  rare, 
and  when  present  seems  due  to  irregularity  of  moult-number  ; 
but  neoteny  due  to  postponement  of  the  onset  of  heterogony 
also  plays  a  role  in  the  differentiation  of  castes. 


68  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

§  5.     Heterogony,  Moulting,  and  Dimorphism 

Finally,  certain  quite  different  special  problems  arise  from 
the  interaction  of  constant  differential  growth-ratios  with  the 
characteristic  Arthropod  process  of  moulting.  It  will  be  clear, 
since  growth  in  a  typical  Arthropod  only  occurs  between  the 
shedding  of  one  exoskeleton  and  the  hardening  of  the  next, 
that  in  the  life-history  of  any  single  specimen  the  theoretical 
growth-curve  relating  organ-size  with  body-size  will  never  be 
realized.  Instead,  growth  of  both  organ  and  rest-of-body  will 
take  place  in  a  series  of  jumps,  but  the  points  thus  arrived  at 
will  all  lie  on  the  theoretical  curve. 

Although  moulting  in  Crustacea  and  some  insects  tends  to 
take  place  at  each  doubling  of  weight  (Przibram,  1930),  the 
large  variations  encountered,  together  with  the  variation  in 
the  initial  post-larval  weight,  are  often  sufficient  to  obscure 
any  recurrent  modality  in  the  sizes  at  which  moulting  occurs. 
In  a  large  population  of  such  species,  moulting  thus  occurs 
at  random  at  any  size,  and  measurements  of  a  heterogonic 
organ  whose  growth-ratio  is  constant  over  long  periods  accord- 
ingly fall  on  to  a  continuous  curve  when  made  on  such  a 
population. 

The  state  of  affairs,  however,  is  entirely  different  if  (a)  the 
organ's  high  growth-coefficient  is  confined  to  one  or  a  few 
instars  and  (b)  is  initiated  in  a  more  or  less  constant  phase 
of  an  instar — e.g.  always  immediately  after  moulting.  As 
the  simplest  case,  let  us  take  one  in  which  the  high  growth- 
ratio  lasts  but  one  instar,  as  occurs  with  the  female  abdomen 
of  Inachus  (Shaw,  1928).  When  the  data  are  grouped  into 
classes  by  body-size,  and  then  simply  the  means  of  the  various 
size-classes  taken,  a  curve  is  obtained  which  merely  indicates 
two  periods  of  approximate  isogony,  separated  by  a  short  phase 
of  intensive  heterogony  (Figs.  22,  23).  But  when  frequency- 
curves  for  relative  abdomen-size  are  prepared  for  each  body- 
size  class,  the  true  state  of  affairs  is  revealed  (Fig.  39).  All 
female  Inachus  are  then  seen  to  fall  into  one  or  other  of  two 
sharply  non-overlapping  groups  as  regards  relative  abdomen- 
size.  Those  below  a  certain  absolute  body-size  all  have  narrow 
abdomens,  those  above  another  higher  body-size  all  have 
broad  abdomens.  The  curves  for  the  short  intervening  range 
of  body-size,  however,  are  all  bimodal,  some  individuals  having 
narrow,  others  broad  abdomens,  but  none  being  of  intermediate 
type.     When  the  curves  for  all  the  classes  are  summed,  we 


Inachus   ? 


22 
21 
20 
19 
18 
17 
16 
15 
14 
13 
12 
II 
10 


-     T     T 


T   T 


T   T   . 


T     T 


35   40  45   50    55    60    65    70    75    80°/ 
-40-45-50-55 -60-65-70-75-80-85 /t> 


30 



-   r   T   T 

29 

28 

27 

26 

-    T    T 

2  b 

— 

24 

- 

23 

- 

22 

T     T    T    T 

21 

20 

19 

- 

T    ,    . 

18 

- 

17 

_ 

T 

T  _ 

16 

- 

11 

T 

T 

14 

- 

13 

- 

T 

12 

- 

11 

- 

10 

- 

9 

8 

3^- 

T 

1 1 1 — — 1 — 

— I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 

0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10    II    12    13    14    15    16 


Fig.  39.  —  Dimor- 
phism due  to  moult- 
ing in  (A)  female 
abdomen  (breadth 
of  6th  segment) 
and  (B)  male  chela 
(breadth  of  propus) 
in  the  spider-crab, 
Inachus  dorsetten- 
sis. 

The  values  are  relative, 
expressed  as  percentages 
of  carapace  length.  The 
frequencies  for  each  value 
of  abdomen  and  chela 
are  given  for  various 
values  of  carapace  length, 
and  also  for  all  specimens 
taken_together. 


70  PROBLEMS   OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 

again  of  course  obtain  a  bimodal  curve  for  the  whole  population 

(Fig-  39)- 

This  can  only  mean  that  the  change  from  narrow  to  broad 

type  is  effected  during  a  single  instar;  and  further  that  it 
must  be  initiated  at  a  relatively  constant  phase  of  the  instar, 
for  otherwise  there  would  be  greater  variability  in  the  broad- 
type  abdomen  than  is  actually  found.  Finally,  the  fact  that 
the  bimodal  curves  are  found  over  a  considerable  range  of 
body-size  indicates  that  there  is  not  one  particular  serial 
number  of  moult,  or  one  limited  body-size,  at  which  the 
transformation  (which  presumably  is  associated  with  sexual 
maturity)  is  initiated.  If  the  high  growth-ratio  of  the  abdomen 
had  extended  over  two  instars,  we  should  have  had  a  trimodal 
instead  of  a  bimodal  curve  ;  but  the  more  instars  over  which 
it  extended  and  the  greater  the  variation  in  the  body-size  at 
the  initiation  of  heterogony,  the  more  obscured  would  the 
curve's  multimodality  become,  owing  to  the  variation  in  the 
amount  of  growth  at  each  moult,  which  becomes  cumulative 
with  the  increase  in  the  number  of  moults  concerned. 

A  similar  but  less-marked  bimodality  occurs  in  this  species 
as  regards  chela-size  in  males,  and  is  doubtless  to  be  explained 
in  the  same  way  ;  see  also  Table  IIIa,  p.  54,  for  a  similar 
phenomenon  in  /.  mauritanicus . 

The  important  point  to  notice  is  that  the  unusual  and 
apparently  abnormal  fact  of  dimorphism  in  one  sex  has  here 
been  brought  about  by  a  combination  of  the  two  normal  and 
common  processes  of  moulting  and  heterogony. 

It  will  at  once  be  seen  that  this  type  of  dimorphism  is 
quite  different  from  that  noted  by  G.  Smith  (1.  c.)  which  we 
have  just  considered  in  regard  to  the  chelae  of  males  of  the 
same  genus.  The  '  low  '  and  '  high  '  males  in  this  case  were 
simply  the  groups  of  small  and  large  body-size  in  what  would 
have  been  a  case  of  continuous  heterogony  resembling  that 
of  the  chela  of  male  Uca,  if  it  had  not  been  for  the  intercalation 
of  a  non-breeding  period  in  which  the  claw  reverted  to  female 
type.  This  dimorphism  has  nothing  to  do  with  moulting, 
but  is  due  to  an  interruption  of  a  long-continued  heterogony 
by  a  non-breeding  phase  ;  while  that  of  the  female  abdomen 
of  the  same  genus  is  due  to  the  restriction  of  heterogony  to 
a  single  moult-period.  Both,  however,  are  dimorphisms  of 
developmental  origin,  and  have  nothing  in  common  with 
genetic  dimorphisms  like  those  of  '  diphasic  '  mammals  or 
birds  such  as  arctic  fox,  certain  squirrels,  herons,  owls,  etc., 


butterflies.     They    also    differ 


HETEROGONY,   MOULTING,   AND   DIMORPHISM   71 

or  the  genetic  polymorphism  of  the  females  of  various  mimetic 

from  the  environmental  di- 
morphisms, the  best-known 
case  of  which  is  that  of  the 
wet-season  and  dry-season 
forms  of  certain  tropical 
butterflies,  where  the  differ- 
ence between  the  two  types 
is  elicited  by  different  envir- 
onmental conditions  bring- 
ing out  different  expres- 
sions of  the  same  gene- 
complex. 


O 


I      I 


J_Jj. 


■  ■   --  1  I  I 


J-.. 


All 


L 


a 


I  I-  1  --T     . 


,_L 


17 


16 


15 


14 


m  m 
8 


13 


,+ 


4 


12 


h 


+JL 


3-5      4-5 


—r- 

5-5 


6-5       7-5      8 

forceps-length,  mm 


■5      9-5  10-0 


10 


10  11   12131415l61718Mm 

Fig.  40. — Bimodality  and  hetero- 

gony   of  the  male  forceps  in  the 

earwig,  Fovficula. 

Left,  absolute  frequency  of  different  forceps- 
length  at  various  body-lengths  in  a  random 
sample  of  445  specimens.  Right,  logarithmic 
plot  of  means  of  '  high  '  forceps  {h — h),  '  low  ' 
forceps  (I — I),  and  both  together  (dotted), 
against  body-length  in  1,519  specimens,  k 
for  all  specimens,  about  i-6. 


Can  we  apply  the  results  found  in  the  abdomen  of  female 
spider-crabs  to  the  classical  cases  of  dimorphism  in  holometa- 
bolous  insects — those  of  the  earwig  Forficula  and  the  beetle 


72 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


Xylotrupes  (Bateson  and  Brindley,  1892)  ?     I  think  that  we 

can.     Let  us  begin  with  the  clearer-cut  case  of  Forficula,  in 

which  there  is  a  definite  dimorphism  of  the  male  forceps,  but 

no  dimorphism  of  female  forceps,  or  of  the  body-size  of  either 

sex.1 

TABLE   V 

Measurements  of  1,519  Earwigs  collected  by  Djakonov  :  ana- 
lysed in  Huxley,   1927B,  Table  I   (see  Fig.  40) 


fcuD 

,d" 

-t-> 

Low  type 

High    type 

d 

d 

, 

in  +-» 

</i  ^j 

.— 1 

cue 

a  c 

>> 

in 
en 

O 

0  3 

.0  d 

d 

6 
d 

"rt 

cxd 

££ 

0    . 

O    !-c 
4-1     4J 

>    - 

6 

0   - 

0  >-i 

0 
d.5 

£> 

d 

rt 

O 

d  ko 

■43-d 

0 

S  5P 

■BtS 

0 

<r. 

(A 

0 

6 

H 

rt  d 

5    M 

05  .s 

H 

-2  b£ 

0)    d 

055 

In 

0) 

10 

5 

_ 

370 

5 

370 

37'° 

. 



. . 

o-o 

II 

40 



4-15 

38 

404 

367 

2 

6-25 

56-8 

5-o 

12 

160 



4-4i 

139 

4'°5 

33-8 

21 

6-8i 

56-8 

i3-i 

13 

363 



5-24 

219 

4-18 

32-2 

I44 

6-86 

52-8 

397 

14 

481 



5-80 

216 

4-26 

3o-4 

265 

7-06 

50-4 

55-i 

15 

326 



6-6i 

69 

4-32 

28-8 

257 

7-23 

48-2 

78-8 

16 

129 



7-28 

15 

477 

29-9 

II4 

7-61 

47-6 

88-4 

17 

15 



8-17 

■ — ■ 

■ ■ 



15 

8-17 

48-1 

ioo-o 

Total 

1,519 

I3-87 

5-80 

701 

4-19 

— 

818 

7-17 

— 

53-9 

Analysis  of  Djakonov's  results  (Huxley,  1927B)  has  shown 
that  when  the  data  are  tabulated  by  body-size,   the  mean 

1  Recently  Kuhl  (1928)  has  attempted  to  show  that  the  dimorphism 
of  the  forceps  of  male  earwigs  is  apparent  only,  due  to  unconscious 
selection  of  largest  and  smallest  specimens  in  collecting.  This,  how- 
ever, does  not  account  for  the  monomorphism  of  male  body-size  or 
of  female  forceps  ;  and  in  any  case  is  quite  unable  to  account  for  the 
degree  of  dimorphism  found  by  Bateson  and  Brindley,  Djakonov  (1925), 
etc.  If  apparent  dimorphism  is  so  easily  produced  by  such  means, 
existing  collections  should  demonstrate  it  for  large  numbers  of  species  ; 
instead  it  is  quite  exceptional. 

It  would  appear  that  the  absence  of,  or  slight  tendency  to,  bimodality 
shown  in  Kuhl's  material  (his  pp.  362-3)  is  to  be  accounted  for  by  the 
almost  total  absence  of  '  high  '  forms  in  his  material,  which  again  is 
to  be  correlated  with  low  body-size.  The  maximum  forceps-lengths 
in  his  four  samples  are  6-5,  6-5,  7-5  and  8-o  mm.  respectively.  As 
my  figures  show,  the  '  high  '  mode  only  occurs  at  7-5  to  8-o  mm.  In 
Djakonov's  material  the  maximum  forceps-length  is  10  mm.,  and 
Brindley  (referred  to  on  my  p.  313)  records  a  maximum  of  12-25  mm.  ! 


HETEROGONY,   MOULTING,   AND   DIMORPHISM   73 


values  for  forceps-length  against  body-length  give  a  good 
approximation  to  the  formula  for  constant  differential  growth- 
ratio  between  forceps-length  and  body-length.  When,  how- 
ever, frequency  curves  for  forceps-length  are  plotted  for  each 
class  separately,  a  situation  is  revealed  analogous  to  that  for 
Inachus  female  abdomen.  The  smallest  specimens  show  uni- 
modal  curves,  their  forceps  being  all  of  '  low  '  type  ;  the 
largest,  also  uni- 
modal  curves, 
with  forceps  all  of 
'  high  '  type  ;  and 
the  medium-sized 
show  b  i  m  o  d  a  1 
curves,  the  num- 
bers of  low  forceps 
diminishing  and 
high  forceps  in- 
creasing with  in- 
crease of  body- 
size.  It  should  be 
noted  that  low  and 
high  types,  as  with 
Inachus  chela  and 
abdomen,  d  i  ff  e  r 
only  in  size ;  fur- 
ther, that  in  this 
case  there  is  slight 
overlapping  of  the 
two  modal  types 
(Figs.  40,  42.) 

Przibram  (1927) 
has  suggested  that 
the  bimodality  is 
due  to  some  male 
earwigs  having 
one  or  more  extra  moults ;  but  his  contentions,  as  they  stand, 
will  not  explain  the  facts,  for  they  should  give  bimodality  of 
body-length  as  well  as  of  forceps,  and  they  do  not  take  account 
of  the  overlap  of  '  low  '  and  '  high  '  types,  between  which  there 
is  neither  qualitative  nor  quantitative  difference,  but  merely  a 
modal  distinction  depending  on  their  frequency  distribution. 

Furthermore,  it  is  difficult  to  see  how  more  than  one  extra 
moult  can  ever  occur  without  leading  to  tri-  or  multi-modality. 


Y 

' 

/ 

,C 

c 

;           L 

5? 

/ 

"> 

/    / 

O 
J, 

A     / 

e 

'b 

A 

yx 

L 

M 

L 

M 

L 

/ 

M 

2     n  —  1  n         n  -j-  1 

Moult-stages  {and  Body-size) 


Fig. 


— Diagram  to  show  the  possible  origin  of 

dimorphism  of  the  male  forceps  in  earwigs,  Forjicula. 

LM,  LM  .  .  .  sizes  of  larval  forceps  at  successive  moults ; 
growth  isogonic.  X,  point  at  which  heterogonic  growth  of  forceps 
is  supposed  to  be  initiated.  If  the  change  to  the  imago  occurs  at 
the  nth  moult,  the  modal  level  of  adult  forceps-size  is  at  A — A 
('low'  males)  ;  if  at  moult  (n  +  i),  the  forceps,  after  continuing 
of  larval  type  for  one  more  instar  (B — B),  would  reach  the  modal 
size-level,  C — C  ('  high  '  males). 


74  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

The  hypothesis  of  an  extra  moult  may  however  be  used  to 
account  for  the  facts,  along  the  following  lines.  The  processes 
responsible  for  the  heterogony  of  the  male  forceps  begin 
operating,  we  will  suppose,  late  in  larval  life,  and  usually  at 
a  fairly  definite  phase  of  an  instar.  They  cannot,  however, 
be  expressed  in  the  form  and  size  of  male-type  forceps  until 
the  imaginal  instar  is  reached.  This  may  be  reached  either 
at  the  next  moult  after  the  initiation  of  the  heterogonic  process, 
or  only  at  the  second  moult.  The  result  is  that  the  heterogonic 
processes  have  either  been  operating  for  less  than  one  instar, 
or  for  a  period  more  than  double  as  long,  with  resultant 
bimodality.  Variation  in  the  intensity  of  the  heterogony, 
and  in  the  time  after  moulting  at  which  it  is  initiated,  will 
bring  about  the  overlap  of  high  and  low  ;  there  is,  however, 
no  qualitative  difference  to  be  expected  between  the  two 
forceps-forms  (Fig.  41). 

The  interesting  fact  discovered  by  Djakonov  (1.  c.)  should 
be  noted,  namely  that  unfavourable  nutritive  conditions 
cause  a  decrease  in  mean  and  modal  body-size,  both  for  the 
population  as  a  whole,  and  for  the  '  low  '  and  '  high  '  groups 
considered  separately.  As  regards  forceps-length,  however, 
the  main  effect  is  to  cause  a  shift  in  the  distribution  of  the 
forceps,  there  being  fewer  high-type  and  more  low-type,  but 
without  alteration  of  either  modal  value  (Fig.  42).  Furthermore, 
though  in  unfavourable  conditions  there  are  fewer  large  indi- 
viduals in  both  high  and  low  series,  yet  for  classes  of  the  same 
mean  body-size,  whether  we  consider  the  population  as  a 
whole  or  the  high  and  low  groups  separately,  the  mean  forceps- 
size  is  actually  greater  for  the  animals  which  have  grown  up 
in  the  unfavourable  conditions. 

This  apparently  paradoxical  fact  may  be  explained  in  terms 
of  our  previous  discussion.  The  unfavourable  conditions 
reduce  the  total  body-size.  But  the  initial  growth-ratio  of 
the  heterogonic  forceps,  starting  at  a  late  moult,  will  always 
be  the  same  ;  it  is  only  its  final  value  which  will  tend  to  a 
limit  imposed  by  the  growth-partition  coefficient.  For  most 
body-sizes  therefore  we  should  expect  that  the  absolute  size 
of  the  forceps  would  depend  only  on  the  time  for  which  it  had 
grown,  not  on  the  body-size  at  which  it  began  to  grow,  and 
therefore  with  stunting  of  total  bulk,  a  given  body-size  will 
show  an  absolutely  as  well  as  a  relatively  greater  forceps- 
size.  It  is,  further,  quite  possible  that  the  equilibrium-size 
and  final  theoretical  growth-ratio  is  in  practice  never  attained, 


HETEROGONY,   MOULTING  AND   DIMORPHISM    75 

the  imaginal  stage  with  its  cessation  of  growth  supervening 
before  this  point  is  reached.  (This  is  perhaps  supported  by 
the  fact  that  the  double-logarithmic  plot  for  all  forceps  taken 


7 

to 


20 
15 
10 


&  5 

K 

I   020 


15 

10 

5 


X 

I       s  / 

D, 

\ 

\ 

,* 

/c 

— 

/    / 

/         / 

D\ 

\c 

- 

D, 

/--%  \ 

/ 

/c 

\ 

\c 

1  -< 

•**    s 

1        1 

D 

1 

1 

"-J^ 

-j      1 

10  11   12  13  14  15   16   17   18 

body -length,  mm. 


•St 


5 


35     4-0  5-0  60  7-0 

forceps-length,  mm. 

B 


80 


90      9-5 


Fig.  42.— Different  types  of  changes  produced  by  unfavourable  conditions 
(D — D)  as  against  favourable  conditions  (C — C)  on  (A)  body-length  and 
(B)  forceps-length  in  male  earwigs.  The  modal  body-length  is  reduced  ;  the 
frequency  of  forceps  of  low  or  high  modal  lengths  is  altered,  but  the  modal 

length  remain  the  same. 


76  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

together  does  not  curve  over  downwards  at  high  body-sizes, 
as  with  various  other  holometabolous  forms.)  If  so,  then 
with  earwigs  within  the  known  range  of  body-size,  those  with 
stunted  body  will  always  have  larger  forceps,  though  this 
should  not  hold  if  we  could  produce  individuals  of  a  much 
larger  body-size. 

A  further  peculiarity  of  the  curves  is  that  those  for  high 
and  low  forms  taken  separately  (Fig.  40)  both  show  a  pheno- 
menon the  reverse  of  that  found  in  most  holometabolous 
insects — namely  that  they  are  concave  upwards  at  their  upper 
ends ;  in  addition,  they  are  concave  downwards  at  their 
lower  ends,  indicating  a  rapid  growth-coefficient  at  either 
end.  This  may,  perhaps,  be  accounted  for  if  we  suppose  that 
growth-ratio  is  accelerated  during  the  period  just  before  and 
just  after  a  moult.  The  high-sloping  early  portion  of  the  '  low  ' 
curve  would  be  due  to  the  normal  initial  high  growth-ratio 
of  the  forceps-rudiment  at  the  first  onset  of  heterogony,  and 
would  comprise  those  individuals  which  started  their  forceps- 
heterogony  late  in  the  instar  prior  to  the  imago.  The  high- 
sloping  end  portion  of  the  same  curve  would  include  those 
which  started  their  heterogony  relatively  early  in  the  same 
instar.  But  those  in  which  heterogony  was  initiated  towards 
the  middle  of  the  instar  would  only  have  one  period  of  accelera- 
tion at  the  end  of  a  period  of  slow  growth-ratio,  and  therefore 
would  show  less  change  of  forceps-size  for  a  given  increase  of 
body-size.  If  an  extra  instar  is  added,  the  rapid  growth- 
periods  are  repeated,  with  corresponding  results  on  the  curve. 
This  is,  of  course,  purely  speculative,  but  may  serve  as  the 
basis  for  further  work.1 

The  case  of  Xylotrupes  (Huxley,  1927c)  has  been  less 
thoroughly  analysed.  It  presents  various  complications,  most 
notable  being  a  tendency  to  trimodality  over  a  certain  range 
of  body-size. 

In  Lucanidae  (Huxley,  1931c)  analysis  of  Dudich's  paper 
(1923)  and  other  data  show  several  interesting  facts.  First, 
that  in  Cyclommatus  the  range  of  male  body-length  (without 
mandibles)  is  much  greater  than  in  other  stag-beetles,  being 
about  as  much  as  the  mean  body-size,  whereas  in  Lucanus 
cervus  and  L.  lunifer  it  is  less  than  half  the  mean.  (The  ratio 
of  largest  to  smallest  body-length  in  Dudich's  Cyclommatus 
specimens  is  2-47  ;  in  Bateson  and  Brindley's  Lucanus  cervus, 

1  Most    of   the    suggestions    here    advanced    concerning    Forficula 
modify  or  extend  those  put  forward  in  my  paper  on  the  subject  (1.  a). 


HETEROGONY,   MOULTING,   AND   DIMORPHISM   77 

the  corresponding  ratio  for  elytron-length  is  i-6.)     Secondly, 
the  range  of  the  male's  body-size  is  much  greater  than  that 


Fig.  43. — Heterogony  and  moulting  of  the  3rd  pair  of  legs  of  the  mite,  Analges 

accentor  inns. 

Above  :  (1)  large  male  with  relatively  huge  3rd  legs  ;  (2)  small  male  with  3rd  legs  of  the  same 
relative  size  as  in  females  ;  (3)  small  male  in  which  the  onset  of  heterogony  has  apparently  taken 
place  earlier,  giving  slightly  enlarged  3rd  legs.     Below  :   the  3rd  legs  of  the  3  forms,  showing  details. 


of  the  female's,  though  both  start  at  the  same  minimum  size 
(16  mm.)  :    the  largest  males  have  bodies  40  mm.  long,  the 


78  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

largest  females  only  25  mm.  As  the  mandibles  of  the  male 
are  highly  heterogonic  (ranging  up  to  88  per  cent,  of  body- 
length),  the  disparity  in  total  size  is  even  greater.  This  differ- 
ence would  appear  only  to  be  obtained  on  the  basis  of  possible 
extra  moults  in  the  male.  In  this  form  the  frequency  curve 
for  all  mandibles  is  again  multimodal,  with  two  main  and  one 
or  more  subsidiary  modes.  But  the  multimodality  is  not  so 
well  defined  when  curves  for  separate  body-size  classes  are 
plotted.  There  is  also  a  slight  tendency  to  multimodality  or 
at  least  irregularity  in  the  male  body-length  frequency  curve. 
No  multimodality  is  apparent  in  the  Lucanus  curves.  Thus 
here  again  the  insect  with  the  presumption  of  a  facultative 
extra  moult  is  characterized  by  multimodality  of  heterogonic 
organ. 

A  case  of  male  dimorphism  in  the  Acarine  mite  Analges 
accentorinus  which  would  appear  to  be  due  to  similar  causes 
has  been  described  by  Jucci  (1924).  Here  the  large  adult 
males  are  characterized  by  a  great  hypertrophy  of  the  third 
pair  of  limbs.  There  further  exist  small  but  also  adult  males 
whose  third  limbs  are  almost  identical  with  those  of  the  female. 
From  the  scale  drawings  given  by  Jucci,  we  can  say  that  the 
size-difference  between  the  two  forms  is  very  close  to  what 
we  would  expect  (on  the  supposition  that  bulk  is  approxim- 
ately doubled  at  each  instar)  if  the  larger  had  had  one  more 
instar  in  its  development  than  the  smaller  (Fig.  43). 

In  addition,  occasional  small  males  are  found  with  slightly 
enlarged  third  limbs  :  these  would  be  specimens  in  which  the 
onset  of  heterogony  had  taken  place  slightly  earlier  than 
usual.  The  case  is  thus  very  similar  to  the  earwig,  save  that 
the  normal '  low  '  type  is  more  like  the  female  than  in  Forficula. 

Having  concluded  this  survey  of  special  cases,  I  shall  in  the 
next  chapter  pass  to  a  more  detailed  analysis  of  the  empirical 
laws  of  relative  growth  in  heterogonic  organs  or  regions. 


CHAPTER   III 

GROWTH-CENTRES   AND   GROWTH- 
GRADIENTS 

§  i.    Growth-gradients  within  Single  Organs 

SO  far  we  have  only  dealt  with  the  question  of  relative 
growth  in  whole  organs  or  regions  of  the  body  ;  and  in 
our  first  chapter  we  have  found  an  approximation  to  a 
simple  mathematical  formulation  of  relative  growth,  which 
we  have  called  the  law  of  constant  differential  growth-ratio. 
This,  as  we  have  further  seen,  is  what  we  should  have  expected 
if  we  had  worked  on  the  problem  a  priori.  It  teaches  us  the 
striking  fact  that  relative  growth-rates  of  different  parts  of 
the  body  may  stay  constant  over  long  periods  of  growth, 
which  clearly  is  important  as  a  contribution  to  the  problem 
of  form  co-ordination  and  the  orderliness  of  form-change,  but 
it  sheds  little  light  upon  any  aspect  of  the  growth-process 
itself. 

In  this  chapter,  however,  we  shall  deal  with  certain  further 
empirical  laws  or  rules  which  will,  I  think,  have  to  be  taken 
into  careful  consideration  in  any  future  investigation  of  the 
biology  and  physiology  of  growth.  It  is  of  some  interest  that 
these  rules,  which  to  my  mind  constitute  the  most  important 
part  of  any  contribution  made  by  me  to  the  study  of  relative 
growth,  emerged  quite  incidentally  out  of  the  investigations 
on  differential  growth-rates.  In  studying  these  latter,  I  had 
a  perfectly  clear-cut  aim — to  see  whether  change  of  propor- 
tions could  be  envisaged  as  the  result  of  any  simple  laws  of 
relative  growth.  But  of  the  growth-gradients  to  be  discussed 
in  this  chapter,  I  had  no  suspicion  :  their  existence  thrust 
itself  upon  me  as  a  new  empirical  fact,  any  explanation  of 
which  is  for  the  moment  entirely  problematical.  I  say  a  new 
empirical  fact,  for  although  D'Arcy  Thompson  (1.  c.)  had 
already  adumbrated  a  similar  view,  for  one  thing  he  had  not 
fully  generalized  it  or  pursued  its  consequences  to  their  limit, 
and  for  another,  it  was  new  to  me,  as  I  had  not  at  first  grasped 

79 


8o 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


ilea  pugnax 
6  large  claw 


i> 


the  full  implications  of  his  ideas,  which  only  became  clear  on 
re-reading  his  book  after  obtaining  certain  empirical  results 
for  myself. 

The  starting-point  of  these  investigations  was  afforded  by 
the  fact,  obvious  to  simple  inspection,  that  whereas  the  pro- 
portions of  the  separate  joints  of  the  female-type  chelae  in 
the  sexes  of  Uca  do  not  change  appreciably  during  growth, 
those  of  the  joints  of  the  large  or  male-type  chela  do  change, 

and  very  markedly. 
The  most  obvious  alter- 
ation is  a  relative  in- 
crease of  the  size  of  the 
propus  with  absolute 
increase  of  the  size  of 
the  whole  chela.  How- 
ever, when  the  weights 
o  f  different  chela- 
regions  were  accurately 
determined,  it  was 
found  that  there  existed 
within  the  limb  what 
we  may  call  a  growth- 
gradient,  the  distal  re- 
gion (chela  +  propus) 
having  the  highest  rela- 
tive growth-rate,  the 
central  region  (carpus) 
the  next  highest ,  and  the 
basal  region,  nearest  the 
breaking-joint,  (merus 
+  part  of  ischium)  the 
lowest,  although  its 
relative  growth-rate 
was  still  above  that  of 
the  body. 
If  we  put  this  crudely  into  graphic  form,  using  growth- 
coefficients  as  ordinates  and  spacing  the  different  regions 
arbitrarily  along  the  *-axis,  we  obtain  a  curve  representing 
the  distribution,  along  the  main  axis  of  the  limb,  of  what  we 
may  for  brevity's  sake,  without  introducing  any  theoretical 
ideas,  speak  of  as  growth-potential.  This  curve  is  inclined  to 
the  horizontal,  and  is  therefore  the  graphic  representation  of 
a  growth-gradient  within  the  appendage,  the  inclination  of  the 


carpus 


Fig.   44. — Graph  to    show  different  relative 

growth-rates   of  different  parts   of  the  large 

claw  of  the  fiddler-crab,    Uca  pugnax. 

Weights  in  mg.  of  dactylus  +  propus  (o,  scale  on  right) 
and  merus  +  ischius  (+,  scale  on  left)  against  weights  of 
carpus ;  logarithmic  plotting.  The  distal  region  shows 
positive  heterogony  (k  about  1-05)  relative  to  the  inter- 
mediate region  (carpus)  ;  the  proximal  region  shows  nega- 
tive heterogony  {k  about  0-9).     (See  Table  VI.) 


GROWTH-GRADIENTS  81 

curve  representing  the  steepness  of  the  gradient,  or  in  other 
words  the  difference  in  absolute  growth-potential  between  the 
two  ends  of  the  gradient  (as  measured  by  growth-coefficients, 
which  for  our  present  purpose  afford  the  only  comparable 
standard  for  measuring  intensity  of  growth-potential  in  a 
number  of  different  regions  or  forms)  in  relation  to  length  of 
the  gradient — i.e.  the  relative  length  of  the  appendage.  Such 
a  graph,  however,  is  as  I  say  only  a  crude  representation  of 
the  true  growth-gradient.  The  most  obvious  reason  for  this 
is  the  impossibility  of  assigning  fixed  points  along  the  abscissa- 
axis  to  the  several  joints,  since  the  very  fact  of  their  differential 
growth  is  causing  their  centres  (or  ends)  to  shift  differentially 
with  increase  in  absolute  size. 

And  secondly,  we  have  the  difficulty  that  the  values  we 
have  obtained  for  the  growth-coefficients  are  merely  mean 
values  for  large  regions  of  the  organ,  whereas  if  the  idea  of 
a  growth-gradient  be  really  justified,  we  should  expect  a  pro- 
gressive change  of  the  growth-coefficient  from  point  to  point 
along  the  axis,  even  within  the  limits  of  a  single  joint — a 
theoretical  consideration  supported  by  certain  actual  evidence 
in  other  forms  (pp.  98,  261-2). 

The  full  solution  of  the  problem,  so  as  to  obtain  a  quantita- 
tively accurate  picture  of  the  graded  change  in  growth-potential 
along  an  organ,  will  be  a  matter  of  considerable  difficulty, 
partly  owing  to  the  formal  difficulties  arising  from  the  con- 
stant change  of  the  relative  size  of  the  parts  measured,  partly 
owing  to  the  practical  difficulty  of  finding  sufficient  distinctive 
points  within  the  limits  of  a  region  such  as  the  segment  of  a 
limb,  on  which  to  take  measurements  to  determine  the  detailed 
form  of  the  gradient  empirically  and  not  by  mere  extrapolation 
from  a  few  mean  values. 

Finally,  there  is  still  another  difficulty.  As  pointed  out 
to  me  by  Mr.  J.  B.  S.  Haldane,  if  y  be  the  value  of  the 
weight  (or  linear  measurement)  of  the  organ  as  a  whole,  and 
if  y  1}y2,  .  .  .  yn  be  the  corresponding  values  of  its  constituent 
joints  or  segments,  then  if  y  =  bxk  be  a  correct  expression 
for  the  limb  as  a  whole,  then  yx  =  b^1,  y2  =  b2xkt,  and  so 
forth  cannot  be  accurate  expressions  for  the  separate  parts 
(or  vice  versa),  since  the  sum  of  the  several  expressions  for 
the  parts  will  not  exactly  fit  the  expression  for  the  whole. 
On  the  other  hand,  within  certain  limits  of  the  value  of  k, 
the  discrepancy  will  only  be  slight,  and  we  are  justified,  from 
the  actual  figures  obtained,  in  taking  an  expression  of  the 
6 


82 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


above  general  form  as  giving  a  close  approximation  to  the  truth, 
and  therefore  in  using  the  values  of  the  growth-coefficients 
(k)  as  obtained  from  this  type  of  expression  as  standards  of 
growth-intensity. 


UCA  PUGNAX    c?  . 


Region 


TABLE   VI 

Mean  Weights  (mg.)  of  Three  Regions  of  Large 
Chela  (57  Specimens) 


Distal  (dactylus  +  propus) 
Intermediate  (carpus) 
Proximal  (merus  +  ischium 


to  breaking- joint) 


Class  1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

114 

179 

222 

280 

344 

17-5 

257 

33-9 

40-6 

507 

28-8 

42-2 

557 

63-1 

76-9 

515 
70-8 


103 


TABLE   VII 

Growth-coefficients  of  Different  Regions  of  the  Large  Male 
Chelae  in  Different  Crustacea  (based  on  Huxley,  1927  and 
unpublished,  and  dean,  unpublished,  analysis  of  kemp) 


Units  of  Measurement. 


Species 


Weight,  relative  to  total :  Uca  pug- 
chela  weight   (distal  !         nax 
to  breaking-joint) 

Maia 
squinado 


Weight,     relative     to 
body-weight 


Length,  relative  to  total    Palaemon 


cheliped  length  (dis 
tal  to  breaking-joint) 


rudis 


Merus  + 
ischium 

Carpus 

1 

0-89 

0-97 

o-8i 

o-93 

I-5I 

172 

ischium 

1-04 

0-83 

merus 

1-02 

1-19 

2-22  2*IO 


Investigations  are  now  in  progress  which  have  for  their  aim 
the  clearing  up  of  some  of  the  practical  and  theoretical  diffi- 
culties in  the  way  of  obtaining  a  quantitatively  accurate 
picture  of  the  growth-gradient  within  an  organ.  Until  these 
have  been  completed,  I  shall  here  content  myself  with  estab- 
lishing the  fact  that  a  gradient  of  some  sort  exists  ;  and 
in    the   graphic    representation    of   growth-gradients    I    shall 


GROWTH-GRADIENTS    &    GROWTH-INTENSITY    83 

arbitrarily  represent  the  centres  of  homologous  regions  as 
equidistant  along  the  abscissa  axis,  and  shall  use  the  ^-values, 
as  obtained  from  the  formula  for  constant  differential  growth- 
ratios,  as  reasonable  approximations  for  the  values  of  growth- 
intensity. 

§  2.    Steepness  of  Growth-gradient  within  an  Organ 
and  Growth-intensity  of  the  Organ  as  a  whole 

The  fact  of  a  growth-gradient  once  established  for  the 
heterogonic  chela  of  Uca,  the  next  step  was  to  see  if  similar 
growth-gradients  occurred  in  other  heterogonic  organs.  This 
proved  to  be  the  case.  We  will  first  take  other  examples 
from  Crustacean  appendages.  The  weights  of  the  separate 
joints  of  the  chela  (five  of  them  distal  to  the  breaking- joint) 
were  taken  for  both  male  and  female  Maia  squinado  (Huxley, 


-10 
c  // 

£  10 


OS 


0 
§>*« 


•a-""     ^ 


merits  + 
ischium 


carpus 
axis  of  chela.  — 


dactylus 
+ propus 


Fig.  45. — Growth- gradient  in  the  large  chela  (x)  of  the  fiddler-crab,   Uca, 

(©)   of  the  spider-crab,  Maia. 

The  growth-coefficients  of  the  different  regions  are  here  taken  relative  to  the  total  weight  of  the 
chela  distal  to  the  breaking-point,  not,  as  in  Fig.  44,  to  the  carpus-weight. 


1927,  and  unpublished).  It  was  found  that  while  the  pro- 
portionate weight  of  the  joints  of  the  female  chela  remained 
approximately  constant  within  the  limits  of  variation  at  all 
absolute  sizes, — i.e.  their  growth-coefficients  relative  to  the 
chela  as  a  whole,  like  that  of  the  chela  relative  to  rest-of- 
body,  were  all  =  i-o, — those  of  the  male  chela  during  its  period 
of  heterogony  were  all  greater  than  unity  and  were  arranged 
in  a  regular  growth-gradient.  This  was  double  in  form,  with 
high  point  in  the  propus,  a  slight  fall  towards  the  tip  (dactylus), 
and  a  more  rapid  and  more  prolonged  fall  towards  the  body. 
The  high  point  of  the  gradient  we  will  call  the  growth-centre. 


84 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


Presumably  the  growth-gradient  in  the  large  chela  of  Uca  was 
of  the  same  form,  but  this  was  not  apparent,  owing  to  the 
propus  and  dactylus  having  been  lumped  together  for  purposes 
of  measurement.     (See  Table  VII ;  Fig.  45.) 

The  gradient  is  steeper  in  the  chela  of  Maia  than  in  that 
of  Uca.  This  appears  to  be  due  to  the  fact  that  though  the 
c?  chela  of  Maia  begins  its  period  of  heterogony  much  later 


10     20     30      40      50      60      70      BO     90     100 


120 


140  160  160  200 


I 

<*. 

,   30 
■u 

g    28 

I 
<0    26 

°    24 


.-&■ 


O 


•&■ 


10      20     30     40      50     60 


80  100  120  140 

cheliped  length,   mm. 


160 


180 


200 


Fig.  46. — Changes  in  relative  length  of  different  segments  of  the  cheliped  of 
the  prawn,   Palaemon  ritdis,  with  increase  of  cheliped  length. 

Solid  lines,  males  ;  dotted  lines,  females.  From  above  downwards :  merus;  dactylus;  ischium (0), 
and  propus  (v->).  The  ischium  decreases  markedly,  the  merus  and  the  carpus  are  almost  constant; 
the  propus  increases  markedly  (growth-centre),  the  dactylus  slightly. 


in  life  than  that  of  Uca,  and  therefore  never  attains  the  same 
enormous  relative  size,  yet  during  this  period,  its  growth- 
coefficient  is  higher  than  that  of  Uca  (about  1-85  as  against 
i-6  in  Uca's  first  phase  and  1-3  in  its  second).  It  would  appear 
natural  that  the  greater  is  the  growth-coefficient  of  an  organ 
as  a  whole,  the  steeper  will  be  the  growth-gradient  of  its  parts  ; 
this  is  confirmed  by  all  the  evidence  so  far  collected. 


GROWTH-GRADIENTS   &   GROWTH-INTENSITY      85 

The  only  references  I  can  find  to  these  striking  changes  in 
the  proportions  of  heterogonic  Crustacean  limbs  are  those  of 
Kemp  and  his  fellow-workers  (Kemp,  1913,  1914,  1915  ;  Hen- 
derson and  Mathai,  1910).  But  they  only  draw  attention  to 
the  change  in  percentage  length  of  the  joints,  and  have  not 
proved  the  existence  of  constant  differential  growth-ratios,  or 
propounded  the  idea  of  a  growth-gradient.  The  figures  for 
Palaemon  rudis  have,  however,  been  analysed  by  Miss  I.  Dean 
(unpublished)  and  in  both  series  show  a  definite  growth- 
gradient  with  growth-centre  in  the  propus  (Table  VII ;  Fig.  46). 

In  general,  measurements  of  crustacean  limbs  show  that 
wherever  there  is  marked  heterogony,  there  is  a  comparatively 
steep  growth-gradient  within  the  limb,  with  well-marked 
growth-centre  near  the  tip  (apparently  always  in  the  propus)  ; 
when  the  heterogony  is  only  slight,  the  growth-gradient  is  far 
less  steep,  and  its  centre  usually  near  the  middle  of  the  limb  : 
in  most  cases  examined  either  in  the  merus  or  carpus.  Thus, 
although  the  joints  of  the  small  (female-type)  chela  of  male 
Uca  do  not,  to  simple  inspection,  appear  to  alter  in  propor- 
tionate size,  measurement  shows  that  in  respect  at  least  of 
linear  dimension,  they  do  so,  albeit  slightly  ;  the  growth- 
centre  here  is  in  the  carpus  (Huxley  and  Callow).  (It  will 
later  be  shown  that  precisely  similar  relations  hold  for  those 
brachyuran  abdomens  which  have  been  measured.) 

Benazzi  (1929)  has  given  results  on  the  regeneration  of  the 
limbs  of  the  larva  of  the  dragonfly  Aesckna  grandis  from  which 
it  can  be  calculated  that  for  regeneration  during  two  instars, 
the  growth-coefficients  (k)  of  femur,  tibia  and  tarsus,  relative 
to  the  sum  of  the  three  parts,  are  as  follows  :  femur,  1-12  ; 
tibia,  1-02  ;  tarsus,  072.  There  is  thus  a  regeneration-gradient 
in  the  limb  with  high  point  proximally. 

Whereas  the  gradients  of  most  organs  appear  to  be  of 
the  simple  form  above  described,  there  are  some  of  unusual 
type  in  which  part  of  the  organ  has  growth-coefficients 
above  unity,  the  rest  below  unity.  This  is  the  case  with 
the  first  antennae  of  certain  copepods  (Seymour  Sewell, 
1929)  (see  Fig.  47).  There  is  a  positive  growth-centre  at 
the  eighth  or  ninth  segment,  and  a  negative  growth-centre 
at  the  extreme  tip.  The  change  from  positive  to  negative 
heterogony  of  the  segments,  relative  to  total  antenna-length, 
occurs  close  to  the  joint  between  the  eighteenth  and  nine- 
teenth segments.  It  is  worth  noting  that  when  a  hinge  is 
developed  in  the  male's  grasping  antenna,  it  is  formed  at  this 


86 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


joint.  In  almost  all  cases  relative  growth  again  falls  off 
steadily  on  the  proximal  side  of  the  positive  growth-centre.1 
The  first  and  sometimes  a  few  more  of  the  basal  segments 
usually  exhibit  negative  heterogony,  but  occasionally  show  a 
very  low  positive  heterogony.  The  first  antenna  as  a  whole 
shows  a  slight  negative  heterogony  relative  to  total  length 
(I.e.,  p.  g).2 

We  may  suggest  that  it  is  biologically  desirable  for  the 
terminal  portion  of  the  antenna  to  decrease,   the  proximal 


10      II       12       13      /■»       IS       16      17      IB       19      20      21      22      23      24      2i 


antennal  segments 

Fig.  47. — Change  in  proportions  of  segments  of  first  antenna  of  Copepods 
during  growth.  Constructed  from  the  data  of  Seymour  Sewell,  1929.  He 
gives  the  proportionate  sizes  of  the  antenna  segments  relative  to  total  antenna 

length  at  various  sizes. 

The  graph  gives  the  percentage  change  in  proportionate  size  between  the  smallest  and  largest 
stages  measured  (the  segments  have  been  grouped  as  indicated,  and  the  means  taken  for  the  groups). 
In  every  case  the  growth-rate  of  the  basal  region  is  low,  usually  negatively  heterogonic  ;  there  is  a 
centre  of  maximum  growth  at  the  8th  or  9th  segment,  and  a  centre  of  minimum  growth  at  the  distal 
end.  The  transition  from  positive  to  negative  heterogony  occurs  at  about  the  18th  or  19th  segment. 
X  Nannocalanus  minor.         +  Eucalanus  subcrassus. 


region  to  increase  in  relative  size.  Since  changes  in  relative 
size  appear  to  operate  by  means  of  growth-gradients,  the  nega- 
tive growth-centre  in  the  tip  of  the  antenna  will  be  connected 

1  Seymour  Sewell's  data  for  Undulina  vulgaris  indicate  that  in  this 
species,  after  a  low  point  of  no  change  in  proportions  in  the  fourth 
segment,  the  growth-gradient  again  turns  upward  as  we  pass  towards 
the  body,  which  would  give  a  still  more  complex  growth-gradient. 

2  The  increase  in  total  body-length,  however,  is  due  partly  to  the 
formation  of  new  segments  in  the  growing  zone  in  the  sub-terminal 
region  of  the  abdomen.  As  I  shall  attempt  to  show  in  a  later  chapter, 
growth  during  early  stages  of  the  process,  during  which  differentia- 
tion from  embryonic  tissue  is  actively  proceeding,  obeys  different  laws 
from  those  concerned  with  heterogony  of  parts  which  are  already 
differentiated.  It  would  be  better  to  compare  the  growth-rate  of  the 
antenna  with  some  definitely-formed  part  of  the  body,  e.g.  cephalo- 
thorax-length,  in  which  case  it  would  probably  show  slight  positive 
heterogony. 


GROWTH-GRADIENTS  IN  NEGATIVE  HETEROGON Y  87 

by  a  continuous  growth-gradient  with  the  positive  centre  in 
the  region  of  the  ninth  segment.  Further,  we  may  safely 
assume  that  the  copepods,  in  common  with  almost  all  other 
animals,  show  a  negative  heterogony  of  the  head  region  : 
accordingly  this  centre  of  low  growth-intensity  will  again  be 
connected  via  a  continuous  growth-gradient  with  the  positive 
growth-centre  of  the  antenna.  Since  the  gradient  is  of  the 
same  type  in  both  sexes,  the  functional  differentiation  of  the 
terminal  region  of  the  male  antenna  as  a  clasping  organ  cannot 
have  any  causal  significance  in  determining  the  low  growth- 
rate  of  this  region.  On  the  other  hand,  the  fact  that  the 
heterogony  passes  from  positive  to  negative  at  about  the 
eighteenth  or  nineteenth  segment  may  have  had  something  to 
do  with  the  fixing  of  the  hinge- joint  between  the  clasping 
region  and  the  rest  of  the  male  antenna  at  this  spot ;  such 
a  suggestion  must,  however,  be  regarded  for  the  moment  as 
purely  speculative. 

§  3.    Reversal  of  the  Sign  of  the  Growth-gradient  in 

Negative  Heterogony 

Those  pereiopods  which  are  used  as  walking  legs  appear 
usually  to  show  slight  but  distinct  positive  heterogony,  and 
to  have  a  definite  but  slight  growth-gradient  with  centre  in 
the  merus  (Bush,  1930).  It  is  of  interest  that  in  the  actively- 
running  shore-crab  Ocypoda,  the  young  (like  the  active  young 
of  Ungulates)  must  be  provided  from  the  start  with  relatively 
large  legs  if  their  speed  is  to  be  sufficient,  so  that  their  pereio- 
pods show  a  definite  negative  heterogony,  or  decrease  in  rela- 
tive size  with  increase  of  absolute  size  :  and  that  here  the 
low  point  of  growth,  or  '  negative  growth-centre  ',  is  also  in 
the  merus1  (Cott,  I.e.;    Huxley,  1931B). 

A  similar  reversal  of  gradient-sign  appears  to  occur  in  the 
individual  development  of  Ungulates.  D'Arcy  Thompson  (1.  c.) 
gives  a  figure  (Fig.  48),  of  the  proportions  of  the  foot  in  ox, 

1  This  is  from  length-measurements  kindly  supplied  in  answer  to  a 
query  of  mine  by  Mr.  Cott  ;  unfortunately,  he  only  had  a  few  speci- 
mens available  for  measurement,  and  the  results,  while  clearly  showing 
the  merus  as  the  joint  of  lowest  growth-ratio,  are  not  sufficient  to 
construct  a  growth-gradient.  The  indication  is  that  the  gradient  is 
complex,  first  rising  above  the  level  for  the  body-standard  (carapace 
length),  then  sinking  well  below  it  in  the  merus,  then  rising  again. 
It  would  be  of  great  interest  to  establish  this  by  obtaining  statistically 
adequate  data,  as  this  is  the  only  indication  so  far  obtained  of  a  com- 
plex growth-gradient  with  two  points  of  inflexion  within  a  single  limb. 


88 


PROBLEMS   OF    RELATIVE   GROWTH 


sheep  and  giraffe  which  together  with  inspection  of  skeletons 
makes  it  fairly  clear  that  in  the  phylogenetic  elongation  of  the 
giraffe's  leg,  the  growth-centre  has  lain  in  the  cannon-bone, 
with  a  steep  gradient  distally,  a  less  steep  one  proximally. 
Meanwhile  actual  weight  (and  length)  measurements  made  by 
Hammond  (1927,  1929)  and  analysed  by  Huxley  (1931B)  on 
the  individual  growth  of  the  hind-limbs  in  sheep,  show  that 
in  regard  to  the  pelvis  and  the  three  segments  femur,  tibia 
and  cannon-bone  (unfortunately  the  digits  were  not  measured) 
there  is,  correlated  with  the  negative  heterogony  of  the  whole 

limb  relative  to  the  body,  a  reversed 
growth-gradient  with  low  point  dis- 
tally (Table  VIII ;  Fig.  49).  Though 
these  constitute  but  two  isolated  bits 
of  evidence,  they  indicate,  so  far  as 
they  go,  that  the  growth-mechanisms 
underlying  all  heterogony  are  similar, 
and  that  when  heterogony  is  negative, 
the  sign  of  the  gradient  is  simply 
reversed. 

Hammond  (1928,  see  also  1921) 
has  also  shown  that  the  growth- 
gradients  in  the  limbs  and  elsewhere 
affect  the  muscles  as  well  as  the  bones, 
so  that  the  study  is  of  practical  as 
well  as  theoretical  importance.  An 
important  point  made  by  Hammond 
may  be  given  in  his  own  words. 


Sheep 


Fig.  48. — Comparison  of  the 
skeleton  of  the  foot  in  Ox, 
Sheep  and  Giraffe,  to  show- 
graded  alteration  in  propor- 
tions of  parts. 

To  effect  the  transformation  form 
a  typical  (e.g.  ox)  form  to  that  in 
the  giraffe,  y — c  has  been  enlarged, 
c — b  has  remained  nearly  constant, 
b — a  has  been  decreased,  and  a — o 
markedly  decreased.  In  addition, 
the  length  :  width  ratio  has  been 
increased. 


"As  the  animal  grows,  it  changes  its 
conformation  ;  at  birth  the  calf  or  lamb 
is  all  head  and  legs,  its  body  is  short  and 
shallow,  and  the  buttocks  and  loin  are 
comparatively  underdeveloped  ;  but,  as  it 
grows,  the  latter — buttocks,  loin,  etc. — grow  at  a  faster  rate  than  the 
head  and  legs,  and  so  the  proportions  of  the  animal  change.  .  .  . 
The  extent  to  which  these  proportions  change  determines  its  con- 
formation ;  those  which  develop  most  for  their  age  have  the  best  meat 
conformation,  while  those  which  develop  least  have  the  worst  .  .  . 
Breed  improvement  for  meat,  therefore,  means  pushing  a  stage  fur- 
ther the  natural  change  of  proportions  as  the  animal  matures.  .  .  . 
The  adult  wild  Mouflon  ewe  is  in  its  proportions  but  little  in  advance 
of  the  improved  Suffolk  lamb  at  birth,  although  it  is  much  larger. 

What  this  means  to  the  butcher  and  consumer  is  that  of  100  lbs. 
live  weight  of  an  animal  shpaed  like  the  Suffolk  lamb  four  days  old 
the  butcher  can  hang  up  as  carcase  in  his  shop  53  lbs.,  and  the  cus- 


GROWTH-GRADIENTS  IN  NEGATIVE  HETEROGONY  89 


tomer  can  eat  as  flesh  only  30  lbs.  ;  on  the  other  hand,  when  the 
animal  is  shaped  like  that  of  the  adult  Suffolk  ram,  from  100  lbs.  live 
weight  67  lbs.  of  carcase  is  obtained,  and  of  this  61  lbs.  is  flesh  which 
can  be  eaten — more  than  double  that  from  of  the  badly  shaped  animal." 


Phase  1 

(Smallest    to    largest 

new-born 


Phase  2 

(Largest   newborn 
to   medium  sized 


-J* 

o 

-i 

S-j 

o 
txo 


08 


0-6 


C4 

12  3*3  12345 

Axis  of  limb :  distal  — > 

Fig.  49. — Reversed  growth-gradient  in  organs  showing  negative  heterogony 

(limbs  of  sheep). 

The  figures  on  the  abscissa  represent  :  i,  limb-girdle  ;  2,  humerus,  or  femur  ;  3,  radius  +  ulna,  or 
tibio-fibula  ;  4,  carpals,  or  tarsals  ;  5,  metacarpals,  or  metatarsals,  (solid  line,  forelimb  ;  dotted  line, 
hind-limb).  The  ordinates  denote  growth-coefficients  (k),  those  below  i-o  signifying  negative  hetero- 
gony :  they  are  taken  relative  to  vertebral  column  weight.  Size-phase  1  includes  smallest  to  largest 
new-born  specimens  (100  to  256  g.  vertebral  column  weight)  ;  size-phase  2,  largest  new-born  to  half- 
grown  (256  to  690  g.  vertebral  column  weight).  The  growth-gradient  is  at  first  flat,  with  slight 
positive  heterogony  ;    then  steeply  tilted  downwards  distally,  upwards  proximally. 


TABLE   VIII 

Relative  weights  of  parts  of  the  skeleton  of  Suffolk  sheep  at  three 
different  ages  (c?  Hammond,  1929;  $  Hammond,  1927),  reduced  to 
proportions  of  weight  of  cannon-bone  taken  as  100.  From  Huxley, 
1931B. 


</l 

Vertebrae 

c   • 

°  tao 
1    v 

§1 

Us 

3 

6 
IS 

In 
286 

U 

s 

a 

Is 

a*— 

a 

a 
~3 
0 

3 

cu 

3 
X 

"3 
O, 
nj 

0 

T3 
C 
a 

~5 

0 

"> 
u 

0 

'0 
« 
u 

0 

a   t- 
-s    a 

"3 

S3 

■2  •> 

u 
100 

212 

O 

^4 

O 

H 

J 

Birth  .      . 

220 

IOO 

187 

150 

75 

1097 

404 

489 

330 

1230 

722 

6"  5  months 

100 

352 

320 

420 

IOO 

213 

241 

169 

1 1 79 

58l 

564 

633 

1778 

1205 

i  4  years    . 

100 

380 

361 

619 

IOO 

276 

280 

257 

1235 

854 

775 

794 

2423 

1706 

Ratio  4  vrs.: 

I -00 

1  -3° 

i- 70 

2-8i 

— 

i-47 

I-Q3 

V43 

IIS 

2-II 

1 -.58 

2-34 

i-97 

236 

birth 

Birth 

IOO 

147 

217 

142 

9  5  months 

IOO 

245 

285 

430 

?  4  years    . 

IOO 

272 

324 

'Sfc'Q 

Ratio  4  vrs.: 

birth 

I -00 

1-38 

1-50 

4-07 

go  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

Thus  it  would  appear  that  one  of  the  chief  advances  made 
by  man  in  creating  improved  breeds  of  sheep  and  other  meat 
animals  has  been  simply  to  steepen  growth-gradients  which 
already  operate  during  post-natal  development  in  the  wild 
ancestral  forms.  Hammond  himself  (1927)  has  expressed  a 
similar  idea.  '  The  improver  of  meat-producing  animals  has 
apparently  not  chosen  mutations  occurring  in  isolated  points 
independently,  but  rather  has  based  his  selection  on  the 
generalized  correlated  changes  of  growth  '.  (See  also  Fig.  96, 
p.  223.) 

In  consequence  of  the  gradient,  there  will  be  much  less 
difference  in  the  size  of  the  metatarsal  between  a  semi-wild 
and  an  improved  breed  than  in  the  size  of  the  femur,  This 
is  well  brought  out  by  Hammond  (1927)  in  his  Fig.  4. 

In  this  connexion,  it  is  well  to  remember  that  during  em- 
bryonic life,  the  limbs  of  sheep  must  show  a  growth-gradient 
precisely  opposite  in  sign  to  that  of  their  post-natal  period. 
Lambs  are  born  with  relatively  long  legs,  as  an  adaptation 
to  accompanying  their  dams  almost  from  birth.  To  achieve 
these  unusual  proportions,  the  leg  must  have  exhibited  posi- 
tive heterogony  during  foetal  life  ;  and  to  allow  for  the  fact 
of  the  later  centre  of  negative  heterogony  in  the  cannon-bone, 
this  same  region  must  have  been  the  positive  growth-centre 
in  the  earlier  period.  The  same  reasoning  applies  to  Ocypoda, 
whose  young  are  similarly  precocial. 

§  4.    The  Form  of  Growth-gradients 

Analysis  of  the  data  of  Kemp  and  his  co-workers  on  Palae- 
mon  spp.  undertaken  by  Miss  I.  Dean  (unpublished)  gives 
a  further  interesting  result.  In  these  prawns,  both  male  and 
female  have  obviously  heterogonic  chelae,  but  the  male's 
heterogony  is  considerably  higher.  Thus  a  male  and  a  female 
of  the  same  absolute  size  will  possess  chelae  of  very  different 
sizes,  the  female's  being  considerably  the  smaller.  But  if  we 
take  a  male  chela  and  a  female  chela  of  the  same  absolute 
size  (which  will  of  course  be  borne  by  a  small  male  and  a 
large  female  body)  the  proportions  of  the  separate  joints  will 
be  found  to  be  fairly  similar.  This  indicates  that  whenever 
marked  heterogony,  or  at  any  rate  heterogony  designed  to 
give  rise  to  a  large  chela,  is  present,  it  must  operate  by  essen- 
tially the  same  growth-mechanism  within  the  limb  (and  a 
mechanism  quite  different  from  that  in  a  slightly  heterogonic 
pereiopod),  whether  the  growth-coefficient  of  the  whole  limb 


THE   FORM   OF   GROWTH-GRADIENTS  91 

relative  to  the  body  be  moderate  or  high.  The  growth- 
gradient  of  the  female  is  not  quite  so  steep  as  that  of  the 
male,  a  fact  also  brought  out  by  Tazelaar  on  P.  carcinus 
(p.  92) ;  but  the  male  and  female  chela-gradients  are  much  more 
like  each  other  than  they  are  to  the  gradients  of  any  of  the 
pereiopods. 

Still  further  proof  of  the  radical  difference  of  the  growth- 
gradients  leading  to  pereiopod  and  to  large  chela  is  afforded  by 
the  male  hermit-crab  Eupagurus  (Bush,  1930  ;  Bush  and 
Huxley,  1930).  Here  the  right  chela  during  early  life  is  not 
much  enlarged,  and  its  growth-coefficient  is  no  greater  than 
that  of  the  pereiopods  ;    only  later  does  it  begin  the  marked 

1,6 

1,5 

1,4 

1*. 

1,0 

I  TTL  C 

dJstaJ  - 


-■  1 

1 

1                            1 

—  B 

- 

- 

-B^<7 

- 

/ 

*^ 

• 

^ 

/ 

/ 

Ax' 

■ 

1 

1                                         ' 

-xA 

1 

Fig.  50. — Change  in  form  of  growth-gradient  with  increase  of  growth-rate  in 
large  (right)  male  claw  of  the  hermit-crab,  Eupagurus. 

i,  ischium  ;  m,  merus  ;  c,  carpus  ;  p.  propus  ;  d,  dactylus.  A — A,  juvenile  phase  ;  the  growth- 
gradient  resembles  that  of  a  pereiopod.  B — B,  phase  of  heterogony  of  right  chela  ;  the  main  growth- 
centre  shifts  distally. 

heterogony  which  provides  its  definitive  enlargement.  And 
during  the  earlier  period  its  growth-gradient  is  similar  to  that 
of  a  pereiopod,  with  centre  in  the  merus  ;  while  so  soon  as 
the  final  heterogony  becomes  marked,  the  main  growth-centre 
shifts  to  the  propus  (Fig.  50). 

Tazelaar  (unpublished)  has  also  collected  facts  bearing  on 
this  subject.  In  Palaemon  carcinus,  there  is  a  change  in  the 
growth-coefficient  of  the  chela  in  both  sexes  at  about  4-5  cm. 
carapace  length.  In  the  female,  before  this,  the  chela  has 
been  growing  less  rapidly  than  the  neighbouring  pereiopods  ; 
after  this  it  exhibits  a  considerable  heterogony.  During  the 
first  of  these  phases  its  growth-gradient  is  almost  flat,  like 
those  of  the  pereiopods,  but  with  a  slight  growth-centre  in 


92  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

the  propus.     Later  it  exhibits  a  marked  growth-gradient  with 
centre  in  the  dactylus. 

In  the  male,  the  chela  in  the  first  phase  shows  definite 
heterogony,  about  the  same  as  the  female  chela  in  the  second 
phase.     During  this   phase  it   shows  a  growth-gradient   with 


isch.  merus  carpus  prop  dact     isch.    merus  carpus  prop  dact.  isch    merus  carpus  prop,  dact 
1st.  pereiopod  Cheliped  (2nd  pereiopod)        Cheliped(  2nd. pereiopod) 

Fig.  51. — Growth-gradients  in  the  1st  pereiopod,  and  the  chela  of  the  prawn, 

Palaemon  carcinus. 

,  male  ; ,  female,     (a)   1st  pereiopod  ;   the  gradient  is  flat  and  close  to  unity  throughout  ; 

(b)  and  (c)  2nd  pereiopod  (chela).  (6)  1st  phase  ;  female  with  slight  initiation  of  growth-centre 
distally  ;  male  with  regular  growth-gradient  (distal  growth-centre),  (a)  2nd  phase;  female  with 
definite  growth-gradient  but  incomplete  proximally  ;  male  with  very  marked  growth-gradient  (sub- 
termunal  growth-centre). 

centre  in  the  dactylus.  During  the  second  phase,  the  male  chela 
shows  extremely  marked  heterogony  ;  and  it  now  possesses  a 
striking  growth-gradient,  with  centre  in  the  propus  (Fig.  51). 
It  would  seem  as  if  the  steepening  of  the  gradient  began  near 
the  top,  and  then  gradually  extended  centripetally  (cf.  p.  168). 

§  5.     Growth-gradients  in  Regions  of  the  Body 

Precisely  similar  gradients  to  these  found  in  appendages 
may  be  traced  in  the  growth  of  whole  regions  of  the  body. 


REGIONAL   GROWTH 


93 


The  most  clear-cut  examples  concern  the  abdomen  of  crabs, 
which  in  all  cases  are  narrow  in  the  male,  broadly  expanded 
in  the  female.  A  large  series  of  measurements  has  been  made 
by  Sasaki  (1928)  on  both  sexes  of  the  Japanese  species  Tel- 
messus  cheiragonus.  Analysis  of  these  data  shows  that  whereas 
the  growth-gradient  for  breadth  in  the  male  abdomen  is  nearly 


2.5 


© 

id 
4) 


a 

"aS-d    2.0 

s  — 
.2  a. 

4J 


1.3 


o 
u 

O 

3  4 

Segments  of  abdomen:  distal  — > 

Fig.  52. — Growth-gradients  in  the  abdomen  of  crabs. 

Solid  lines,  for  breadth  of  abdominal  segments:  ©,  Telmessus  cheiragonus,  <$  ;  X,  Telmessus 
cheiragonus,  9  :  +,  Pinnotheres  pisum,  $.  Dotted  line,  for  length  of  abdominal  segments  in 
Pinnotheres  pisum,    ? . 


flat,  with  its  growth-centre,  if  so  it  may  be  called,  near  the 
centre  of  the  region,  in  the  female  it  is  steeper,  with  its  centre  (as 
in  the  typical  male  chela)  in  the  penultimate  segment  (Fig.  52). 
These  figures  may  be  compared  with  those  cited  for  the 
edible  crab,  Cancer  pagurus,  by  Pearson  (1908,  p.  21)  in  two 
large  specimens  of  the  same  size  but  opposite  sex  (Table  IX). 

TABLE    IX 

Cancer  pagurus;  from  data  of  Pearson,   1908. 


Carapace-breadth  235  mm. 

9/6"  ratic 

per  cent. 

Abdomen 

1 

segment 

Length 

Breadth 

Length 

Breadth 

Length 

Breadth 

mm. 

mm. 

mm. 

mm . 

I 

17 

22 

17 

25 

IOO 

114 

2 

8 

17 

8 

22 

100 

129 

3 

7 

23 

7 

30 

IOO 

130 

4 

8 

20 

8 

32 

IOO 

160 

5 

9 

17 

10 

35 

III 

206 

6 

13 

16 

20 

35 

154 

219 

7 

13 

13 

18 

21 

138 

162 

94 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


I  have  (last  column)  calculated  the  ratios  of  ?  to  £. 
These  indicate  clearly  that  both  for  length  and  breadth  there 
exists  a  growth-gradient  in  the  ?  abdomen,  with  high  point 
in  the  sixth  segment,  though  the  two  gradients  must  be  of 

very  different 
slope  and  shape. 
Precisely  simi- 
lar results  have 
been  obtained  for 
the  female  ab- 
domen of  the 
common  Carci- 
nus  maenas  (un- 
published). That 
the  growth- 
centre  need  not 
be  in  the  pen- 
ultimate seg- 
ment, however,  is 
shown  by  the 
Pea-crab,  Pin- 
notheres pisum. 
Scale  drawings  of 
this  at  different 
stages  of  its 
growth  are  given 
by  Atkins  (1926) ; 
I  have  measured 
these,  and  al- 
though the  num- 
ber of  specimens 
is  very  small,  it 
is  quite  enough 
to  demonstrate 
the  gradient.  The 
gradient  is  first 
of  all  interesting 
because  of  its  steepness.  The  growth-coefficients  of  the  separ- 
ate segments,  relative  to  carapace  length,  range  up  to  2-3 
and  over,  a  very  high  figure.  In  passing,  this  remarkable 
heterogony  is  doubtless  correlated  with  the  small  absolute  size 
to  which  the  crab  is  restricted  within  its  host's  shell ;  the 
animal  has  to  attain  its  full  female  proportions  at  a  much 


Fig.  53. — Changes  of  shape  in  the  female  abdomen  of 
the  pea-crab,  Pinnotheres,  during  growth. 

Above,  stage  I,  late  (carapace  width  about  3  mm.)  ;  centre,  stage 
II 16  (carapace  width  6  mm.)  ;  below,  final  form,  stage  V  (carapace 
width  1 1 -5  mm.).  Thp  abdomen  is  at  first  male-type,  but  shows 
marked  heterogony,  with  terminal  growth-centre,  until  it  overtakes 
the  bases  of  the  legs. 


INTENSITY    IN   DIFFERENT   PLANES   OF   SPACE    95 

smaller  absolute  size  than  is  necessary  in  most  crabs.  (Fig. 
52.)     (See  Huxley,  1931B.) 

During  growth,  the  young  female  type  of  abdomen,  which 
with  its  flat  or  concave  margins  resembles  the  male's,  is  con- 
verted into  an  almost  circular  structure,  with  the  fourth  and 
fifth  segments  the  broadest.  Casual  inspection  would  indicate 
that  one  of  these  segments  must  contain  the  growth-centre  ; 
but  casual  inspection  is  wrong — the  terminal  segment  (telson) 
is  so  small  in  the  young  female  that  for  it  to  achieve  its  only 
moderate  definitive  size  it  must,  and  does,  contain  the  growth- 
centre  (Figs.  52,  53). 

In  the  heterogenic  growth  of  the  face  of  mammals,  which 
we  have  noted  in  Chapter  I,  it  would  appear  from  the  work 
of  Todd  (1926)  that  in  the  palatal  region  the  centre  of  maximum 
growth  lies  in  the  palatal  processes  of  the  maxillae  ;  there 
is  a  moderate  amount  of  growth  in  the  premaxillae  and  very 
little  in  the  palatals.  It  is  impossible  to  arrive  at  quantitative 
expression,  but  the  facts  are  consonant  with  the  idea  of  a 
double  gradient  culminating  within  the  maxillae. 

§  6.    Graded  Growth-intensity  in  the  Different  Planes 

of  Space 

So  far,  we  have  been  considering  growth-gradients  referring 
either  to  weight,  or  to  linear  measurements  in  one  axis. 

In  Pinnotheres,  measurements  were  taken  both  for  the 
length  and  breadth  of  the  abdominal  segments  (Fig.  53)  ; 
when  we  consider  the  two  sets  of  measurements  in  relation 
to  each  other,  we  find  that  the  ratio  between  growth-coefficient 
for  breadth  and  that  for  length  is  as  follows  for  the  distal 
half  of  the  female  abdomen  : 


4 

5 

6 

7 

.      growth-coefficient  for  breadth 
'  growth-coefficient  for  length 

1-62 

1-46 

1-40 

1-36 

Thus  the  difference  between  male-type  and  mature  female- 
type  abdomen  is  brought  about  (1)  by  greater  growth  in  the 
female,  both  in  length  and  in  breadth  ;  (2)  by  the  breadth- 
growth  being  throughout  higher  than  the  length-growth ; 
(3)  by  the  excess  of  breadth-growth  over  length-growth  being 


96 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


greatest,  in  the  segments  measured,  in  the  fourth  segment, 
and  decreasing  distally.  Without  further  measurements  it  is 
impossible  to  state  whether  the  high  point  in  breadth-growth 
predominance  is  really  in  the  fourth  segment,  or  further 
basally  ;  but  at  least  the  orderly  and  graded  relation  between 
the  intensity  of  growth  in  the  two  planes  of  space  is  clearly 
brought  out. 

But  a  more  complex,  and  perhaps  more  interesting  problem 
is  afforded  by  the  two  chelae  of  markedly  heterochelous  Crus- 
tacea of  which  the  lobster  (Homarus)  is  the  most  familiar, 
and  the  pistol-crab  (Alpheus)  the  most  extreme  example.  In 
all  of  these,  the  heavier  (crusher)  claw  is  broader  and  alto- 
gether bulkier  in  build  ;  and  the  lighter  (nipper)  claw  always 
has  a  relatively  and  often  an  absolutely  longer  dactylus 
(Huxley,  unpublished :  see  figures  in  Przibram,  1930).  It 
would  seem  to  mere  inspection  that  the  fundamental  difference 
between  the  two  claws  lies  in  the  difference  of  their  growth- 
gradients  in  the  three  planes  of  space,  the  growth-coefficients 
for  breadth  and  depth  being  relatively  as  well  as  absolutely 
much  higher  in  the  crusher,  and  the  growth-centre  as  regards 
length  being  more  distal  in  the  nipper. 

A  few  measurements  have  been  made  on  the  chelae  of 
lobster  (Homarus)  to  check  this  (Huxley,  unpublished).  So 
far  as  they  go,  they  confirm  the  impression  made  by  inspec- 
tion. The  (only  very  approximate)  value  of  the  growth- 
coefficients  are  as  follows  (relative  to  carpus  length  as  standard) : 

TABLE   X 

Approximate  Growth-coefficients  (k),  relative  to  carpus-length, 
of  the  linear  dimensions  of  the  segments  of  the  chelae  of 
the  European  Lobster 


Crusher 

Nipper 

Length 

Breadth 

Depth 

Length 

Breadth 

Depth 

Dactylus 
Propus    . 
Carpus    . 
Merus 
Ischius    . 

0-6 

o-95 
(i-o) 
0-85 
0-85 

1-2 
1-2 

o-95 
09 

o-85 

I-i 
I-I 
II 
I-o 
0-9 

o-85 

o-8 

(i-o) 

0-85 

o-8 

1-05 
1-05 
1-05 

115 
I  05 

i-o 
0-9 

i-i 
1-05 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  chief  difference  between  the  two 
claws  is  in  the  distal  region.     In  the  crusher  dactylus,   the 


INTENSITY  IN  DIFFERENT  PLANES  OF  SPACE    97 

length-growth  falls  off  notably  to  a  much  greater  extent  than 
it  does  in  the  nipper  dactylus.  In  the  nipper,  breadth-growth 
is  approximately  constant  in  all  joints,  while  depth-growth 
decreases  distally.  In  the  crusher,  on  the  other  hand,  depth- 
growth  increases  steadily,  and  breadth-growth  markedly,  from 
ischium  to  propus,  to  fall  slightly  in  the  dactylus  ;  (it  should 
be  recalled  that  the  rates  of  growth  are  taken  relative  to  the 
claw's  own  carpus-length,  not  to  an  independent  standard  in 
the  body).     Perhaps  the  most  interesting  point  is  the  change 


20 


Homarus: 

crusher 


10 


0  8 


nipp 


en 


14- 


10 


m. 


c 

distal 


m 


c 

distal 

B 


Fig.  54. — Probable  change  in  the  ratio  between  growth-intensity  in  depth 

and  that  in  length  (solid  line)   and  the  ratio  between  growth-intensity  in 

breadth  and  that  in  length  (dotted  line)  along  the  axis  of  (A)  the  crusher-claw 

and  (B)  the  nipper  claw  (right)  of  the  Lobster. 

i,  ischium ;    m,  merus  ;    c,  carpus  ;    p,  propus  ;    d,  dactylus. 


in  the  ratios  between  the  growth-intensities  in  breadth  and 
depth  to  that  in  length,  as  we  pass  along  the  axis  of  the  limbs. 
The  present  figures  are  based  only  on  a  few  specimens,  and 
curves  constructed  directly  from  them  are  rather  irregular. 
I  have  therefore  ventured  to  prepare  smoothed  curves  which 
represent   to   my   mind   the   most   probable   state   of  affairs 

(Fig-  54)- 

Thus  the  main  difference  between  crusher  and  nipper  is  not 
merely  one  of  total  growth-potential,  but  also  of  the  different 
7 


98 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


distribution  of  growth-potential  in  the  three  planes  of  space. 
The  minor  differences,  e.g.  number  and  form  of  '  teeth  '  are 
presumably  due  to  specific  gene-differences,  not  correlated 
directly   with  growth. 

A  further  point  of  interest  was  elicited  in  these  chelae  by 

making  measurements  not 
only  of  whole  segments,  but 
to  intermediate  points  marked 
by  spines,  etc.  (notably  the 
four  large  spines  on  the  median 
side  of  the  propus).  These 
measurements  indicate  that, 
as  suspected,  the  growth-co- 
efficient of  a  given  whole  seg- 
ment merely  represents  a 
mean  value,  the  growth- 
gradient  being  real  and  con- 
tinuous, and  that  the  values 
of  the  growth-coefficients  are 
altering  continuously  and 
regularly  along  the  segment. 
Many  more  measurements, 
however,  would  be  necessary 
before  the  true  gradients  could 
be  plotted  in  detail,  and  to 
obtain  these  would  be  a  very 
difficult  task,  as  fixed  points 
to  measure  are  not  numerous 
enough.  (See  also  Locket,  p. 
261.) 

Tucker  (1930)  has  made 
measurements  on  the  chela  of 
the  anomuran  Upogebia  lit- 
toralis,  for  normal  specimens 
of  both  sexes  as  well  as  for 
those  parasitically  castrated 
by  the  Bopyrid  Gyge  branch- 
ialis.  The  length  measure- 
ment chosen  was  (propus  -f  dactylus)  while  the  breadth  measure- 
ment was  propus-breadth.  The  results  for  normal  specimens  are 
shown  in  Fig.  55.  For  both  males  and  females,  two  distinct 
phases  of  growth  are  found,  the  alteration  occurring  at  12-13 
mm.  carapace  length.     In  the  first  phase  of  both  sexes  there  is 


6  8         10  13        16      19 

carapace  length,  mm. 

Fig.  55. —  Upogebia  littoralis  (Deca- 
poda,  Reptantia,  Anomara).  Chela 
(dactylus  +  propus)  length  and  chela 
(propus)  breadth  against  carapace 
length  ;  logarithmic  plotting.  Ste 
Table  XI. 

X  ,  males  ;    0,   females; .parasitized 

males ;   ,  parasitized  females.     The  male 

chela,  as  in  Uca,  begins  by  being  distinctly 
heterogonic  and  then  becomes  less  heterogenic. 
For  details,  see  text. 

(From  data  of  Tucker,  1930.) 


INTENSITY  IN  DIFFERENT  PLANES  OF  SPACE    99 

a  good  approximation  to  constant  differential  growth-ratio  ; 
this  exists  also  in  the  males'  second  phase,  with  a  slight 
falling  off  in  the  last  point.  The  male  chela  shows  positive 
heterogony  in  both  phases.  In  the  female,  there  is  a  pro- 
gressive falling  off  in  the  growth-coefficient  during  the  second 
phase,  more  marked  for  breadth  than  for  length.  The  female 
chela  is  positively  heterogonic  in  the  first,  negatively  hetero- 
genic in  the  second  phase.  If  the  growth-coefficients  are 
calculated  for  the  whole  of  the  first  phase,  and  between  the 
first  and  third  points  of  the  second  phase,  we  obtain  the 
following  result  : 

TABLE   XI 

Growth-coefficients  for  Length  and  Breadth  of  Chela  in 
Upogebia  littoralis,  calculated  from  the  data  of  Tucker, 
1930 


k  for 
chela  breadth 

k  for 
chela  length 

_    ..       r  k  breadth 

Ratio  of  7— ; tt— 

k  length 

Males,  first  phase 
Males,  second  phase  . 

1-82 

1-47 

1-37 
I-I3 

i-33 
1-30 

Females,  first  phase   . 
Females,  second  phase     . 

i-37 
0-72 

1-05 
0-90 

1-30 
o-8o 

I.e.  the  ratio  of  growth-intensity  for  breadth  to  that  for  length 
remains  the  same  within  the  limits  of  experimental  error  so 
long  as  the  chela  is  positively  heterogonic.  When,  however, 
as  in  the  females'  second  phase,  it  becomes  negatively  hetero- 
gonic, the  situation  is  reversed,  and  growth-intensity  for 
breadth  falls  below  that  for  length.  This  reversal  would 
appear  to  be  analogous  to  the  reversal  of  sign  of  the  growth- 
gradients  in  negatively  heterogonic  organs  (p.  87).  Logarith- 
mic plots  (see  Fig.  55)  as  well  as  Tucker's  graphs  indicate 
some  interesting  points  with  regard  to  the  action  of  the  para- 
site upon  chela  growth.  The  parasite  has  a  general  feminizing 
action,  very  similar  to  that  of  Sacculina.  In  males,  the  effect 
in  reducing  the  growth-coefficient  of  chela-length  is  slight  up 
to  10-5  mm.  carapace-length,  for  chela-breadth  up  to  8  mm. 
carapace-length.  From  then  on  the  growth-coefficient  for 
length  remains  just  above  that  for  females  throughout ;  that 
for  breadth,  after  approximating  closely  to  that  for  females 
until  the  second  phase,  fails  to  be  as  much  reduced  as  the 


ioo  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

females  during  the  remainder  of  life  (k  =  about  0-95  instead 
of  072). 

In  the  parasitized  females,  k  for  length  is  throughout  just 
below  that  of  normal  specimens,  whereas  k  for  breadth  descends 
well  below  the  normals  between  10-5  mm.  and  13-5  mm. 
carapace-length,  then  gradually  ascending  almost  to  the  level 
of  the  normals.  This  latter  fact  would  seem  to  indicate  that 
in  females  the  parasite  (as  in  Sacculina)  acts  as  would  a  pre- 
cociously functioning  ovary,  but  that  the  value  for  normal 
chela-breadth  in  the  larger  normal  specimens  represents  a  final 
partition-coefficient  towards  which  parasitized  as  well  as  nor- 
mals tend  to  approach.  It  is  further  clear  that  breadth-growth 
is  more  sensitive  than  length-growth  to  ovarian  influence  and 
to  the  parasite's  pseudo-ovarian  influence,  and  reacts  to  them 
both  earlier  and  to  a  greater  degree.  The  failure  of  the  chela 
of  parasitized  males  to  respond  in  breadth-growth  to  the 
influence  of  the  parasite  as  much  as  the  normal  female  chelae 
to  the  influence  of  the  ovary  may  be  due  to  a  specific  difference 
in  male  and  female  chela-tissue,  but  it  is  more  probably  due 
to  the  fact  that  the  degree  of  feminization  effected  by  the 
parasite  is  variable.  As  breadth-growth  is  more  sensitive  than 
length-growth  to  feminizing  influences,  this  variability  will  be 
reflected  more  markedly  in  the  curves  for  breadth-growth. 

Finally,  the  work  of  Hecht  (1916)  on  the  growth  of  Teleost 
fish  is  of  some  interest  here.  He  finds  in  a  number  of  species 
of  markedly  differing  body-form  that  the  relation  of  the  maxi- 
mum width  of  the  body  to  total  length  remains  fairly  constant 
(to  about  ±  16  per  cent.)  whereas  the  relation  for  depth  is 
highly  variable  (by  over  ±  55  per  cent.).  The  form  of  fish 
appears  thus  to  be  determined  much  more  by  changes  in  the 
growth-coefficient  for  depth  than  by  changes  in  that  for  width. 

§  7.    Gradients  in  Growth-rate  of  Epidermal 

Structures 

Another  extremely  interesting  case  of  growth-gradients  is 
provided  by  the  work  of  Juhn,  Faulkner  and  Gustavsen  (1931). 
Working  on  the  domestic  fowl,  they  find  in  the  male  (normal 
and  castrated)  definite  regional  gradients  in  the  rate  of  growth 
of  feathers  which  are  regenerating  after  plucking.  The  most 
marked  of  these  regional  gradients  is  in  the  breast,  and  has 
its  high  point  posteriorly  (Fig.  56). 

In  addition,  there  is  in  normal  and  castrated  males  a 
dorso-ventral  gradient  in  breast,  back,  and  saddle,  with  high 


EPIDERMAL  STRUCTURES 


101 


point  dorsally,  e.g.  the  regenerating  saddle  feathers  of  capons 
grow  more  slowly  than  the  breast  feathers.  A  similar  gradient 
exists  in  the  breast,  but  not  in  the  saddle. 

Two  further  points  demand  special  attention  :  one  is  a  quite 
new  one,  of  obviously  first-class  physiological  importance — 
viz.  that  in  all  feathers  low  rate  of  growth  is  associated  with 
a  low  threshold  of  sensitivity  to  the  sex-hormone,  as  our 
authors  have  demonstrated  by  means  of  an  ingenious  series 
of   experiments.     Accordingly,    saddle    feathers   respond    by 


Fig.  56. — Gradients  in  feather-growth  in  fowls  ;    constructed  from  the  data 

of  Juhn,  Faulkner  and  Gustavsen,   1931.     The  ordinates  represent  rates  of 

feather-growth  per  day,  in  mm. 

In  A,  the  abscissa  axis  represents  the  anteroposterior  axis  of  the  breast  region  in  a  capon  (0,  points 
for  single  feathers  ;  ©,  means).  In  B  and  C,  it  represents  the  gradient  downwards  from  the  mid- 
ventral  line  (in  B,  in  both  anterior  and  posterior  breast  regions  of  a  cock  ;  in  C  in  the  anterior  breast 
region  of  a  capon).  In  D,  the  rates  of  growth  of  anterior  and  posterior  regions  of  the  breast  of  a 
cock  and  a  hen  are  compared. 


feminization  to  small  doses  of  female  hormone  which  have 
no  effect  upon  breast  feathers  :  or  again,  a  single  injection 
of  female  hormone  capable  of  inducing  a  large  feminized 
pattern  on  the  slowly  regenerating  feathers  of  the  anterior 
breast  produce  smaller  bars  of  feminized  pattern  on  the  more 
rapidly-growing  feathers  of  the  posterior  breast.  (And  see 
p.  260.) 

The   other   point  is   a   confirmation   from   this    quite   new 
quarter    of    the   principle   we  found   to   hold   in   crustacean 


102  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

limbs,  etc.,  that  increase  in  relative  rate  of  growth  in  an 
appendage  or  region  was  accompanied  by  a  steepening  of  the 
growth-gradient.  This  holds  even  for  the  type  of  growth- 
gradient  affecting  feather-growth  only,  which  we  are  here 
considering.  In  females  and  feminized  males,  the  absolute 
rate  of  growth  of,  e.g.,  the  breast-feathers  is  reduced,  and  the 
feathers,  growth-gradient  in  this  region  is  at  the  same  time 
almost  flattened  out  (Fig.  56D). 

Mr.  Miller,  of  the  Animal  Breeding  Research  Department, 
Edinburgh,  has  pointed  out  to  me  that  similar  gradients 
affecting  the  growth  of  epidermal  structures  occur  in  mammals. 
For  instance,  in  (untrimmed)  manes  of  horses,  the  length  of 
the  hairs  increases  steadily  from  the  ears  to  the  middle  of  the 
mane,  then  sinks  steadily  to  the  hind  end  of  the  mane.  A  similar 
gradient  in  hair-length  occurs  in  the  human  beard,  with  high 
point  medially.  In  such  cases  we  are  only  dealing  with  total 
amount  of  growth  as  given  by  the  definitive  length  of  the 
hair  :  I  do  not  think  anything  is  known  about  the  rate  of 
growth  or  of  regeneration.  In  the  fowl,  Juhn  and  her  collabora- 
tors (1.  c.)  find  the  following  interesting  facts.  In  breast,  and 
also  in  the  back-and-saddle  region,  there  exists  a  distinct 
antero-posterior  gradient  in  definitive  feather-length.  In  the 
breast,  this  is  correlated  with  the  above-mentioned  gradient 
in  regenerative  growth-rate,  but  also  with  the  fact  that 
regeneration  continues  for  a  longer  time  in  the  posterior 
feathers.  Presumably  the  same  two  factors  are  at  work  in 
normal  growth.  In  back  and  saddle  (information  in  a  letter 
from  Dr.  Juhn)  there  is  no  gradient  in  regeneration-rate,  but 
only  a  gradient  in  the  length  of  time  for  which  regeneration 
proceeds.  We  thus  have  two  distinctive  methods  of  growth, 
both  capable  of  gradation,  affecting  the  size  of  epidermal 
structures. 

§  8.    Conclusion 

The  chief  points  brought  out  in  this  chapter  are  the  follow- 
ing. Differential  growth  of  a  limb  or  appendage  or  a  well- 
marked  region  of  the  body  appears  never  to  be  brought  about 
by  an  equal  distribution  of  excess  growth-potential  throughout 
the  organ  or  region.  On  the  contrary,  the  growth-potential 
of  the  organ  or  region  is  distributed  in  the  form  of  a  growth- 
gradient,  normally  with  a  single  high  point  or  growth-centre, 
from  which  growth-intensity  grades  downwards  in  both  direc- 
tions (or  in  one,  if  the  growth-centre  be  terminal).     In  general, 


CONCLUSION  103 

the  less  the  difference  between  the  growth-coefficient  of  the 
organ  or  region  and  that  of  the  rest  of  the  body,  the  less 
marked  and  flatter  is  the  gradient,  so  that  in  isogonic  organs 
there  is  scarcely  any  gradient,  but  all  the  parts  grow  at  approxi- 
mately the  same  rate  as  the  body  as  a  whole.  There  are, 
however,  some  unusual  gradients,  as  in  the  first  antennae  of 
certain  copepoda,  in  which  the  growth-coefficients  of  part  of 
the   organ   are   above,   the  rest   below   unity. 

When  one  of  two  corresponding  organs  is  positively,  the 
other  negatively,  heterogonic,  the  growth-gradients  of  the  two 
appear  to  be  similar  but  reversed  in  sign,  the  same  joint 
being  in  one  a  centre  of  maximum,  in  the  other  a  centre  of 
minimum  growth. 

In  most  markedly  heterogonic  organs  so  far  investigated 
(chelae  of  Crustacea,  abdomens  of  female  crabs,  limbs  of 
ruminants)  the  growth-centre  is  terminal  or  sub-terminal. 

When  an  organ  is  markedly  heterogonic  in  both  sexes,  then, 
even  though  the  growth-coefficient  of  the  whole  organ  may 
differ  considerably  in  male  and  female,  the  growth-gradient 
within  the  organ  appears  to  be  essentially  similar — i.e.  there 
is  a  certain  qualitative  type  of  growth-gradient  needed  to 
produce  an  organ  of  a  certain  morphological  type,  though 
quantitative  details  may  be  different.  This  is  confirmed  by 
the  change  from  a  growth-gradient  with  sub-basal  centre  (as 
in  the  pereiopods)  to  one  with  a  sub-terminal  centre  (as  in  other 
large  chelae),  when  the  chela  of  the  male  Eupagurus  passes 
from  a  slight  heterogony,  no  greater  than  in  the  walking  legs, 
to  the  marked  heterogony  of  maturity. 

The  gradients  for  growth  in  the  three  planes  of  space  may 
be  different  ;  applications  of  this  are  seen  in  the  abdomen 
of  male  and  female  crabs,  and  still  more  in  the  crusher  and 
nipper  claws  of  heterochelous  Crustacea. 

The  existence  of  growth-centres  and  growth-gradients  is  an 
empirical  fact,  whose  physiological  explanation  is  quite  un- 
known but  may  prove  to  be  of  importance  for  the  study  of 
growth  in  general. 


CHAPTER  IV 

GROWTH-GRADIENTS  AND  THE  GENERAL 
DISTRIBUTION  OF  GROWTH-POTENTIAL 
IN   THE   ANIMAL   BODY 

§  i.    General    Growth-gradients  :     D'Arcy    Thompson's 

Graphic  Method 

THE  next  step  is  to  inquire  whether  the  growth- 
gradient  mechanism  may  not  underlie  the  general 
growth  of  the  body  as  well  as  the  growth  of  specialized 
appendages  or  regions.  In  other  words,  we  want  to  see  whether 
the  sharply-marked  growth-gradients  of  a  chela  or  an  abdomen 
are  not  merely  special  cases  of  a  more  general  but  still  orderly 
mechanism  underlying  the  distribution  of  what  we  may,  for 
want  of  a  better  term,  call  growth-potential,  throughout  the 
whole  organism. 

A  strong  indication  that  this  is  so  was  afforded  by  D'Arcy 
Thompson  (1.  c,  chap.  17)  through  his  ingenious  application  of 
the  principle  of  Cartesian  co-ordinates  to  the  problem  of 
animal  form.  Let  us  take  the  most  spectacular  and  at  the 
same  time  one  of  the  simplest  of  his  instances.  The  strange 
fantastic  sun-fish,  Orthagoriscus,  is  a  close  relative  of  such 
types  as  Diodon  ;  but  its  adaptation  to  an  almost  planktonic 
life  at  the  surface  of  the  sea  has  led  to  a  change  of  form  so 
radical  that  it  is  at  first  sight  difficult  to  see  how  it  could  have 
been  brought  about  within  any  short  space  of  evolutionary 
time.  D'Arcy  Thompson,  however,  pointed  out  that  if  you 
inscribed  the  outline  of  a  Diodon  in  a  framework  of  rectangular 
co-ordinates,  and  then  distorted  this  in  a  certain  perfectly 
regular  way,  you  would  obtain  a  very  close  approximation  of 
the  outline  of  an  Orthagoriscus  (Fig.  57).  From  the  figure 
it  will  be  immediately  obvious  that  the  essence  of  the  trans- 
formation, considered  biologically  and  not  merely  as  an 
exercise  in  higher  geometry,  must  have  been  the  origin  of  a 
very  active  growth-centre  in  the  whole  of  the  hind-region  of 
the  body,  whence  the  intensity  of  growth  diminished  regularly 

104 


GENERAL  GROWTH-GRADIENTS 


105 


towards  the  front  end.  In  other  words,  superposed  on  what- 
ever growth-mechanisms  may  be  necessary  to  generate  a  form 
similar  to  that  of  Diodon,  there  has  arisen  a  steep  and  unitary 
postero-anterior  growth-gradient  extending  throughout  the 
entire  body,  with  high  point  almost  or  quite  at  the  extreme 
hind  end. 

The  diagram,  however,  also  illustrates  the  serious  limitations 
of  the  method.     In  the  first  place, 
two  adult   forms   are  contrasted.  ,e 

What  should  rather  be  contrasted 
are,    phylogenetically,  the  young 

form  of  the  presumed  Diodon-like  A  \d 

ancestor,  and  the  adult  Ortha- 
goriscus ;  or,  ontogenetically,  a 
young  Diodon-like  stage  of  Ortha- 
goriscus  with  the  adult  condition. 


Fig.  57. — Cartesian  transformation  of  the 

outline  of  the  teleost  fish  Diodon  (left)  to 

give   the   outline   of   the  sun-fish,  Ortha- 

goriscus  (right). 


But  this  is  not  so  serious  as  the  following  point  :  that  even 
should  you  compare  the  correct  two  stages,  this  graphic 
method,  if  interpreted  in  terms  of  growth,  can  only  give  a 
general  and  qualitative  picture  of  the  mechanism  at  work, 
in  place  of  a  specific  and  quantitative  one.  For  if,  as  D'Arcy 
Thompson  points  out,  the  transformation,  so  difficult  to  under- 
stand at  first  sight,  becomes  readily  comprehensible  on  the 
idea  of  an  orderly  change  in  the  distribution  of  growth-activity 


106  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

along  the  axis  of  the  body,  then  clearly  the  proportions  of  the 
animal  must  be  continually  changing  so  long  as  it  is  increas- 
ing in  absolute  size,  or  at  least  over  a  long  space  of  time. 
But  the  fish's  outline  and  the  system  of  co-ordinates  drawn 
to  fit  it,  represent  the  state  of  affairs  only  at  one  particular 
moment  of  its  life-history.  If  the  fish  had  grown  to  twice 
the  bulk,  its  proportions  would  have  changed,  and  the  co- 
ordinate grid  would  have  to  be  altered  ;  yet  the  underlying 
growth-gradient  might  have  remained  wholly  unaltered. 

An  improvement  would  be  effected  if  the  absolute  sizes  of 
the  two  outlines  which  mark  the  onset  and  stoppage  of  orderly 
differential  growth  could  be  given  :  but  even  so,  the  real 
invariable,  namely  the  growth-gradient  expressing  the  values 
of  the  growth-coefficients  along  the  body,  could  only  be 
obtained  from  this  by  calculation,  and  is  not  deducible  by 
inspection. 

For  this  reason,  the  co-ordinate  method,  while  of  the  utmost 
importance  as  affording  a  graphic  and  immediate  proof  of 
the  need  for  postulating  regularities  in  the  distribution  of 
growth  throughout  the  body,  is  of  little  use  for  detailed  analysis, 
because  by  its  nature  it  neglects  the  fundamental  attribute 
of  differential  growth,  namely  the  change  of  relative  propor- 
tions with  absolute  size  :  it  is  static  instead  of  dynamic,  and 
substitutes  the  short  cut  of  a  geometrical  solution  for  the  more 
complex  realities  actually  underlying  biological  transformation. 

None  the  less,  it  is  invaluable  as  demonstrating  the  need 
for  thinking  in  terms  of  growth-gradients  and,  in  general,  of 
an  orderly  system  in  the  distribution  of  growth-activity 
throughout  the  body  :  and  this  whether  we  are  considering 
individual  or  evolutionary  change  of  form.  We  have  only  to 
glance  at  D'Arcy  Thompson's  figures  of  brachyuran  carapaces, 
ungulate  limbs,  and  so  forth,  to  realize  immediately  its  utility 
in  this  respect  (Figs.  48,  58). 

Another  interesting  use  has  been  to  deduce  the  course  of 
evolution  over  gaps  where  actual  fossil  data  are  missing.  It 
is  easy  to  say  that  we  can  do  this  by  common-sense,  simply 
inserting  hypothetical  intermediate  stages  between  known 
end-points.  But  this  is  insufficient.  There  are,  for  instance, 
hundreds  of  possible  ways  of  bridging  the  gap  between  the 
pelves  of  Archaeopteryx  and  the  cretaceous  bird  Apatornis, 
to  take  an  example  worked  out  by  Thompson  ;  but  if  the 
evolutionary  modification  of  such  a  structure  be  due  to  growth- 
changes,  and  if  orderly  and  regular  growth-gradients  be  the 


GENERAL  GROWTH-GRADIENTS 


107 


mechanism  by  which  growth-changes  must  operate,  then  you 
can  deduce  the  precise  course  of  evolution  within  comparatively 
narrow  limits  (see  Fig.  59). 

As  showing  the  validity  of  the  method,  D'Arcy  Thompson 
has  applied  it  to  the  evolution  of  the  skeleton  of  the  horse, 


Fig.  58. — Carapaces  of  various  crabs  to  show  how  they  may  be  readily  derived 
from  one  form  by  simple  Cartesian  transformation. 


and  then  compared  his  deduced  results  with  the  known  fossil 
forms  (Fig.  60). 

The  agreement  of  actual  with  deduced  skull-form  is  very 
close  for  Protohippus,  Miohippus  and  Mesohippus.  But  the 
species  of  Parahippus  figured  by  Thompson,  as  he  points  out, 


r  3  "» 


6  7  8 


— | 

^ 

)ft 

^ 

j> 

1  J  L 

*  -. 

/v 

y 

s 

/ 

1 

1Xi*Si769 

A 


Fig.  59. — B,  C,  and  D,   Hypothetical  intermediate  stages,  constructed  by- 
applying   the   method   of   Cartesian   transformation,    between   A,    pelvis   of 
Archeopteryx  and  E,  that  of  Apatornis. 


108 


:  \  \  LA.... 

7"!    "i     t       5      *      T    9     ■)       '0        " 


Fig.  6o. — Comparison  of  hypothetical  forms  of  the  skull  in  the  ancestry  of 
the  horse  (C — E),  constructed  by  applying  the  method  of  Cartesian  trans- 
formation (A — H)  with   actual   forms  ;    (M)    Mesohippus ;    (Mi)    Miohippus ; 

(Pa)  Parahippus  ;  (P)  Protohippus. 

109 


no  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

has  a  straighter  skull,  with  higher  nasal  region,  than  demanded 
by  theory  :  and  he  therefore  suggests  that  this  form  is  not  on 
the  direct  line  of  equine  descent.  The  genus  Parahippus  is 
generally  recognized  as  ancestral  to  Equus  (see  Matthew,  1926), 
but  it  contains  a  number  of  '  widely  varying  distinct  species  ' 
(Matthew,  1.  c,  p.  160).  We  may  therefore  agree  with  Thomp- 
son that  the  particular  species  he  has  figured  is  an  aberrant 
type.  This  is  a  remarkable  achievement,  and  clearly  provides 
a  new  method  in  detailed  paleontological  research,  which  is 
clearly  of  real  value. 

If,  however,  a  way  could  be  found  of  taking  account  of  the 
changes  in  absolute  size  which  so  frequently  accompany  direct- 
ive evolution,  and  automatically  induce  changes  in  proportions 
of  limbs,  etc.,  a  further  analysis  might  be  possible,  which  would 
enable  us  to  distinguish  what  we  might  call  the  consequential 
changes  in  form  from  the  strictly  adaptive,  meaning  by  the 
former  those  changes  in  proportions  which,  unless  counter- 
acting growth-mechanisms  are  evolved,  automatically  accom- 
pany change  of  size,  and  by  the  latter  such  changes  as  are 
specifically  related  to  mode  of  life,  and  presumably  are  brought 
about  by  natural  selection  (which,  of  course,  in  such  case  must 
act  via  the  genes  which  control  the  growth-gradients).  But 
of  these  and  other  evolutionary  bearings  of  the  existence  of 
growth-centres  and  growth-gradients  I  shall  deal  more  fully 
in  a  later  chapter. 

The  graphic  method  of  D'Arcy  Thompson  enables  us  to 
postulate  that  orderly  growth-gradients  must  exist  in  the 
body  as  a  whole,  though  from  his  figures  it  is  further  clear 
that  the  main  system  of  gradients  need  by  no  means  be  so 
simple  as  in  the  case  of  Orthagoriscus,  but  that  a  number  of 
gradients  may  be  combined  even  along  a  single  axis  of  the 
body  ;  further,  that  minor  gradients  may  be  locally  super- 
posed upon  major  ones  ;  and  that  the  various  components  of 
the  system  as  a  whole  appear  to  interact  with  and  modify 
each  other. 

§  2.    General  Growth-gradients  :  Quantitative  Analysis 

Our  further  task  is  to  try  to  find  out  whether  these  growth- 
gradients  can  be  expressed,  even  approximately,  in  quanti- 
tative terms,  and  whether  we  can  discover  any  empirical 
rules  concerning  the  nature  of  the  influence  exerted  by  one 
gradient  upon  another.  To  do  this  is  no  easy  task,  for  it 
demands  quantitative  measurements,  either  of  mass  or  linear 


QUANTITATIVE  ANALYSIS  in 

dimensions,  of  numerous  parts  of  the  body  ;  and  these  must, 
for  one  thing,  be  made  at  a  considerable  number  of  absolute 
sizes,  to  make  sure  that  the  gradients,  etc.,  do  not  change 
with  age,  and  for  another  be  made  on  a  considerable 
number  of  specimens  within  each  size-group,  to  exclude  the 
effects  of  random  sampling.  Such  a  body  of  measurements 
only  exists  for  very  few  animals,  and  even  there  not  for 
sufficient  points  or  organs  to  give  a  complete  picture  of 
the  growth-gradients  ;  but  in  spite  of  these  limitations,  the 
results  are  of  considerable  interest.  We  will  begin  with 
the  case  of  the  hermit-crab,  Eupagurus,  analysed  under 
my  direction  by  S.  F.  Bush  (Bush,  1930  ;  Bush  and 
Huxley,  1930).  Measurements  were  made  of  the  eyestalks, 
first  and  second  antennae,  third  maxillipeds,  chelae  (=  first 
pereiopods),  pereiopods  2-5,  and  uropods,  as  well  as  of  median 
pre-thorax  length  as  standard ;  (in  some  appendages  the 
length  of  an  arbitrary  portion  was  taken  in  place  of  total 
length).  When  groups  of  small  and  large  body-size  were 
compared,  the  following  significant  facts  emerged.  We  will 
first  consider  males,  and  in  them  the  left  side  of  the  body, 
where  matters  are  not  complicated  by  the  pronounced  asym- 
metric heterogony  of  the  right  chela.  Here  we  find  a  quite 
definite  double  growth-gradient,  with  growth-centre  in  the 
third  pereiopod,  whose  growth-coefficient  is  considerably  higher 
than  that  of  the  body  (pre-thorax)  ;  from  this  point  growth- 
activity  falls  off  both  anteriorly  and  posteriorly,  until  it  is 
about  equal  to  that  of  the  body  in  the  third  maxillipeds  and 
fourth  pereiopods  respectively,  while  less  in  the  cephalic 
appendages  and  uropod  (Fig.  61).  There  is  a  slight  irregularity 
in  the  region  of  the  last  pereiopods  ;  otherwise  the  gradient 
is  quite  regular. 

This  is  remarkable,  since  the  organs  measured  are  not  only 
of  very  different  shape,  but  differ  vastly  in  absolute  size  ;  yet 
the  short  eyestalk,  first  antenna  and  third  maxilliped,  the 
long  second  antenna,  the  large  first  to  third  pereiopods  and 
the  small  fourth  and  fifth  pereiopods,  all,  as  regards  their 
growth-ratios,  fall  into  this  regular  graded  series.1 

The  further  significant  fact  emerges  that  although  we  are 
only  considering  the  growth  of  localized  appendicular  organs; 

1  This  appears  doubly  surprising,  since  the  size  of  an  appendage 
must  in  the  long  run  depend  upon  its  relative  growth  (growth-ratio)  ; 
we  shall  meet  with  the  probable  explanation  of  this  paradox  later 
(§3.  P-  118). 


112 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


60 


Left  Side 
w 


20 


Right  Side 
W  60 


the  gradient  appears  to  be  a  continuous  one.  In  other  words, 
although  appendicular  growth  can  only  take  place  in  relatively 
small,  pre-localized  regions,  yet  the  gradient  determining  the 
amount  of  that  growth  is  continuous.  The  growth-gradient 
is  thus  probably  something  of  a  very  fundamental  nature, 
akin  to  those  gradients  (of  equally  recondite  nature)  which 
Boveri,  Child,  von  Ubisch,  Weiss  and  others  have  found  it 

necessary  to  pos- 
tulate in  the  early 
development  of  the 
egg  and  in  regenera- 
tion to  account  for 
polarity  and  certain 
orderly  phenomena 
of  morphogenesis  ; 
the  gradients  hap- 
pen to  exist,  and 
where  growth  is  pos- 
sible, they  influence 
the  amount  of  that 
growth.  We  shall 
be  forced  to  draw 
similar  conclusions 
in  Chap.  V  (p.  152). 
(And  see  p.  262.) 

However,  that 
such  a  general  body- 
gradient  can  be 
locally  modified  is 
clearly  shown  by 
looking  at  the  curve 
for  the  right-hand 
side  of  the  males, 
where  a  second  high 
point  is  made  by 
the  chela. 
Further  proof  of  the  graded  regularity  of  the  changes  in 
growth-intensity  is  seen  when  we  investigate  the  asymmetry 
of  the  hermit-crab  in  the  two  sexes  (Bush's  Fig.  9).  Males  and 
females  are  approximately  symmetrical  in  the  head  region 
(though  females  appear  to  be  slightly  right-handed  anteriorly, 
slightly  left-handed  rather  more  posteriorly).  The  male  be- 
comes markedly  right-handed  in  the  chela  region,  and  then 


Egestatks 


Antenna  f 


Antenna  2 


Maxil/iped3 


Cheia 


PereiopodZ  — 


Pereiopod3 
Pereiopodt 


Pereiopod5 


Uropod 


60  W  20  W  60% 

Percentage  increase  in  iengths  of  Appendages 

Fig.    61. — Growth    profile    of    the    hermit-crab. 

Growth-gradients  along  the    body    of    male   and 

female  hermit-crabs  (Eupagurus  prideauxi). 

The  figures  give  percentage  increases  of  appendage  length  for  a 
given  percentage  increase  of  prothorax  length  (marked  as  dotted 
line). 


QUANTITATIVE   ANALYSIS  113 

progressively  more  left-handed.  The  same  is  true  for  females, 
but  the  right-handedness  is  less  in  the  right-handed  region, 
the  left-handedness  greater  in  the  left-handed  region.  In 
accordance  with  this  greater  right-handedness  of  the  males 
(which  is  doubtless  correlated  with  the  extreme  right-handed- 
ness of  the  male  chela),  the  male  is  still  slightly  right-handed 
at  the  level  of  the  fourth  pereiopod,  while  the  female  is  here 
symmetrical ;  i.e.  the  change  from  right-  to  left-handedness 
is  not  associated  with  a  particular  appendage,  but  takes  place 
in  relation  with  a  graded  distribution  of  growth-intensity. 

An  extremely  interesting  case  of  a  large-scale  growth-gradient 
extending  through  much  of  the  body  is  provided  by  the  stag- 
beetles  (Lucanidae).  It  is  well  known  to  Coleopterists  that 
large  males  are  characterized,  not  only  by  relatively  large 
mandibles,  as  we  have  already  seen,  but  also  by  relatively 
large  heads,  prothorax  and  prothoracic  legs,  although  the 
relative  increase  for  these  is  much  less  than  for  the  highly 
heterogenic  mandibles.  So  far  as  I  am  aware,  however,  no 
measurements  have  been  available  until  those  recently  made 
by  Mr.  Edwards  at  my  suggestion  and  analysed  by  me  (Edwards 
and  Huxley,  unpublished).     They  refer  to  L.  cervus. 

The  partition-coefficients  of  various  organs,  against  elytron- 
length,  in  males  are  as  follows  (between  elytron  lengths  15 
and  21  mm.). 


TABLE  XI 

A 

landible  1 

Antenna  1. 

Head  1. 

Head  br.            Prothorax  1. 

2-35 

I.38 

1-62 

1-59                      i-oo 

3r.                    Wing  1. 

I-OO 

First  leg  1. 

Prothorax  1 
I-I2 

Femur                        Rest  of  leg 
1-09                             i-oi 

Second  leg  1. 

Third  leg  1. 

Femur 
I -04 

Rest  of  leg 
0-97 

Femur                      Rest  of  leg 
0-95                             0-98 

There  is  thus,  in  general,  a  decrease  in  growth-intensity  from 
front  of  head  to  hind  limb,  in  other  words,  a  growth-gradient 
with  centre  in  the  mandibles.  Heterogony  changes  from 
positive  to  negative  between  the  first  and  second  leg.  (It  may 
be  noted  in  passing  that  the  gradient  is  a  little  steeper  in  the 
femora  than  in  rest-of-leg — evidence  of  a  graded  effect  within 
the  legs.) 

The    data    for    the    females    are    not    so    full,    but    indi- 
8 


H4 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


cate    a    gradient    of    wholly 
nearly    flat,   with    very    low 


head,      pro  thorax    elytron 


Fig.  62. — Growth-gradients  in  the  stag- 
beetle,  Lucanus  cervus. 

(A)  Ratios  of  the  growth-coefficients  of  the  male 
to  those  of  the  female  for  various  organs  and  regions. 
For  head,  prothorax  and  elytron,  the  ratios  are 
calculated  from  the  mean  between  the  coefficients 
for  length-growth  and  for  breadth-growth  (B) 
Ratios  between  growth-intensity  in  breadth  and 
growth-intensity  in  length  in  3  regions  of  the  body. 


different    shape,    much    more 
values    for    the    head    appen- 
dages,   but    higher    values 
for   the    legs,  which    show 
positive  heterogony.     It  is 
worth  noting  that  the  dis- 
tribution of   growth-inten- 
sity in  length  and  in  breadth 
differs    in    the    two    sexes 
(Fig.  62).     In  both  the  in- 
tensity  of   breadth-growth 
diminishes  faster  than  that 
of  length-growth  as  we  pass 
forward  along  the  body,  but 
the   diminution   is   greater 
in  females  (cf.  p.  98). 

The  best  way  of  compar- 
ing the  two  sexes  is  to  take 
the  ratios  of  the  partition- 
coefficients      of      different 
organs  in  males  and  females, 
and   plot   these    (Fig.   62). 
It  would  appear  that  the 
main   change   involved    in 
transforming  the  female  to 
the  male  type  has  been  the 
formation   of  a  very  high 
growth-centre  in  the  man- 
dible   region.     With    this 
are     correlated    positively 
heterogonic   effects   in  the 
immediately    neighbouring 
regions.     But  further  pos- 
teriorly, in  the  leg  region, 
the  gradient   is    continued 
into  a  phase    of    negative 
heterogony.     It  would  thus 
appear  that  not  only  may 
a  growth-gradient  be  steep- 
ened,    but     that     marked 
steepening  of    one   end    of 
a    gradient    may    actually 
somewhat  depress  its  other 


QUANTITATIVE  ANALYSIS 


ii5 


end  :  the  gradient  is  not  only  steepened  but  tilted  round  a 
point  within  its  length  (cf.  Hammond's  sheep  limbs,  p.  88). x 

Fig.  62  shows  the  essential  facts.  It  will  be  seen  that  besides 
the  parts  mentioned,  there  is  also  a  slight  heterogony  of  the 
male  antennae  and  prothorax  (and  see  Table  XIa)  ;  further, 
that  in  the  regions  of  the  body  measured,  heterogony  in 
length  and  breadth  is  quantitatively  different.  The  most 
significant  point  is  that  the  heterogony  of  the  three  pairs  of 
legs  is  graded  in  an  antero-posterior  direction.  The  facts  in 
general  support  the  conception  that  there  exists  a  growth- 
gradient  with  centre  in  the  mandibles,  grading  down  pos- 
teriorly 2  (Fig.   63). 

Theoretically,  two  further  points  appear  to  me  particularly 
interesting.  The  first  is  this, 
that  we  can  exclude  functional 
hypertrophy  as  the  cause  of 
the  correlated  increase  of  the 
other  parts.  In  fiddler-crabs, 
for  instance,  and  other  Crus- 
tacea, it  might  be  suggested 
that  the  increased  weight  of 
the  large  chela  caused  extra 
strain  to  be  put  on  neigh- 
bouring limbs,  which  then  re- 
sponded by  functional  hyper- 
trophy. It  would  be  difficult 
to  reconcile  this  with  the 
correlated  decrease  of  the  limbs 
anterior  to  the  highly  heter- 
ogenic appendage,  which  will 

be  discussed  later  in  this  chapter,  but  the  interpretation  is 
wholly  ruled  out  in  a  holometabolous  insect,  in  which  the 
male  legs  have  never  had  to  support  the  weight  of  the 
enlarged    mandibles    before    they  appear  in    their  definitive, 

1  Champy's  figure  (1929,  p.  198)  of  the  beetle  Oryctes  rhadama 
indicates  a  similar  gradient  with  high  point  anteriorly,  but  here  affect- 
ing {inter  alia)  two  sexual  heterogonic  organs,  the  two  '  horns  '  of  the 
male.  The  heterogony  of  the  more  anterior,  cephalic  horn  is  clearly 
greater  than  that  of  the  thoracic  horn. 

2  Some  of  the  quantitative  data  for  the  thorax  do  not  fit  in  with  the 
idea  of  a  uniform  gradient.  It  will  be  necessary  to  make  additional 
measurements  on  other  species  to  clear  up  this  point :  as  previously 
indicated,  however,  there  is  no  necessity  to  suppose  that  such  gradients 
are  always  uniform  and  not  complex  in  shape. 


k 

2  Z 

\° 

■ 

2  0 

■ 

18 

■ 

1-6 

• 

1-4 

: 

1? 

Head  \ 

1     Thorax      \   Abdomen 

10 

08 

?,'" 

"XT""---  ; 

/ 

\^~  ^ 

Fig.  63. — Probable  growth-gradients 
in  the  body  of  male  and  female  stag- 
beetles  (Liicamts  cervus). 


n6 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


enlarged  form.  And  further,  even  if  functional  hypertrophy 
of  the  legs  were  possible  in  a  beetle,  it  is  impossible  to  see  how 
it  could  come  into  play  in  regard  to  the  antennae. 

The  second  point  is  this — that  the  gradient  is  concerned 
with  spatial  position,  not  with  morphological  position.  The 
mandibles  are  spatially  the  most  anterior  portion  of  the  body. 
Although  the  antennae  are  morphologically  anterior  to  them, 
they  are  spatially  posterior,  and  are  affected  not  by  a  correlated 
decrease,  as  appears  to  be  the  rule  for  organs  anterior  to  a 
growth-centre  (p.  122),  but  by  a  correlated  increase. 

Another  case  in  which  analysis  of  existing  measurements 
has  permitted  us  to  plot  the  growth-gradients  along  the  body- 
axis,  giving  us  what  may 
D  e^f   be    called     the    growth- 

profile  of  the  animal  as  a 
whole,  is  that  of  the 
metamorphosing  herring, 
Clupea  harengus  (Hux- 
ley, 193 ib  ;  data  of  Ford, 
partly  unpublished, 
partly  in  E.  Ford,  1930). 
In  this  case  the  growth- 
gradients  are  distinctly 
complex.  Their  nature 
will  be  seen  from  Fig.  64. 
Through  their  operation, 
the  elongated  larval  her- 
ring is  converted,  while 
considerably  increasing 
in  absolute  size,  to  its 
post-larval  form.  Doubtless  if  measurements  had  been  made 
vertebra  by  vertebra,  instead  of  at  a  few  points  only  along 
the  body,  the  graded  effect  would  have  been  more  obvious, 
and  interesting  results  would  have  emerged  as  to  what  happens 
at  the  boundaries  of  regions  marked  by  different  growth- 
coefficients.  We  may  perhaps  assume  that  each  region  would 
possess  its  own  growth-gradient.  This  seems  clearly  so  in 
regard  to  the  head. 

Later  work  by  Ford  (1931A)  indicates  that  changes  similar 
in  principle  but  different  in  quantitative  detail  are  at  work 
in  the  metamorphosis  of  two  other  species  of  the  same  genus, 
the  pilchard  {Clupea  pilchardus)  and  the  sprat  (C.  sprattus)  ; 
but  growth-profiles  have  not  been  constructed  for  these.     In 


Fig.  64.- 


-Growth-profile  of  metamorphos- 
ing herring. 

Above,  outline  of  larval  herring  at  onset  of  metamor- 
phosis, showing  regions  measured  (after  Ford,  1930)  ; 
below,  its  growth-profile,  dorsal  and  ventral :  the  values 
are  growth-coefficients  (k),  relative  to  body-length. 


QUANTITATIVE  ANALYSIS  117 

addition  the  same  author  (Ford  1931B)  gives  data  on  the 
metamorphosis  of  the  common  eel  (Anguilla  vulgaris).  Here 
the  tail  shows  positive  heterogony  during  the  process.  An 
analysis  of  Ford's  table  (p.  989)  shows  that  when  tail  length 
is  plotted  against  rest-of-body  length,  its  growth-coefficient 
is  at  first  over  1-4,  then  falls  at  first  rather  rapidly,  then  more 
slowly  to  about  i-i.  It  is,  however,  probable  that  it  exhibits 
a  growth-gradient  with  centre  of  maximum  growth  anteriorly, 
so  that  to  get  accurate  figures  for  growth-coefficients  we  should 
need  data  on  a  number  of  separate  regions. 

It  is  clear  that  regions  of  different  growth-coefficients  will 
often,  though  not  necessarily  always,  be  characterized  by 
special  morphological  differentiations.  Each  such  region  would 
be  characterized  both  by  the  possession  of  its  own  growth- 
gradient  and  its  own  morphogenetic  field  (Guyenot).  When 
this  is  so,  we  may  expect  the  region  to  be  capable  of  extension 
over  more  or  fewer  body-segments,  and  to  cover  a  different 
serial  region  of  the  body-segments  in  different  individuals  or 
species.  This  would  appear  to  be  the  case  in  regard  to  different 
regions  of  the  vertebral  column  (e.g.  thoracic,  sacral,  cf.  Bateson 
1894).  A  good  example  of  such  a  shift  during  individual 
development  is  provided  by  the  Copepods  (cf.  Caiman,  1909, 
p.  89),  in  which  a  broad  cephalothoracic  region  is  sharply 
marked  off  from  a  narrow  abdominal  region.  The  delimitation 
of  these  two  regions  is  not  at  a  constant  position  in  the  body, 
but  moves  back  one  segment  at  each  moult,  either  for  two 
or  for  three  successive  moults.  It  would  be  interesting  to 
study  the  growth-relations  of  the  segments  which  are  thus 
transferred  from  one  region  to  the  other  :  we  may  hazard 
that  they  would  be  found  to  show  a  sudden  alteration  of 
growth-intensity  after  their  morphological  changes,  so  as  to 
fit  in  with  the  growth-gradient  of  the  anterior  instead  of  the 
posterior  region. 

An  interesting  example  of  a  general  growth-gradient  is 
described  by  Faure-Fremiet  (1930)  for  Zoothamnium  alternans. 
In  this  colonial  ciliate  there  are  two  kinds  of  zooids,  large  and 
small,  the  latter  being  in  the  majority.  The  multiplication 
of  the  small  zooids  is  not  uniform  ;  but  to  use  our  author's 
own  words,  '  decreases  according  to  a  kind  of  gradient  in  pro- 
portion with  its  removal  from  the  main  strain.'  It  is  this 
growth-gradient  which  gives  the  colony  its  characteristic 
form.  The  details  are  complex,  and  must  be  consulted  in 
the  original  paper  ;   but  the  existence  of  a  gradient  in  power 


n8  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

of  multiplication  among  the  cells   of  a   Protozoon  colony  is 
noteworthy. 

§  3.    The  Two  Phases  of  Growth 

Before  going  further  we  must  consider  the  difficulty  men- 
tioned on  a  previous  page — that  it  is  hard  to  understand  how 
a  regular  growth-gradient  could  produce  anything  but  a  series 
of  appendages  regularly  graded  in  size,  instead  of  the  irregular 
alternation  of  large,  small  and  medium-sized  appendages  which 
is  what  we  actually  find.  The  answer  appears  to  be  that  it 
would  inevitably  produce  such  a  regular  series  if  it  were  the 
only  factor  concerned  in  appendage-growth,  but  that  it  is  not 
the  only  factor. 

I  base  this  assertion  on  a  study  of  the  figures  given  by 
Herrick  (191 1)  for  the  development  of  the  American  lobster, 
by  Giesbrecht  (191 1)  for  that  of  various  Stomatopoda,  and  by 
Schmalhausen  and  Stepanova  (1926)  for  that  of  the  appendages 
of  the  embryo  chick. 

In  all  three  cases,  there  appear  to  be  two  successive  and 
quite  distinct  phases  of  growth.  In  the  first,  the  general 
form  of  the  part  is  being  laid  down,  and  this  process  is  accom- 
panied by  very  rapid  alterations  of  form,  and  by  marked 
histological  changes  ;  in  the  second,  histological  changes  are 
absent  or  of  an  entirely  secondary  nature,  and  the  form- 
changes  are  confined  to  quantitative  alterations  in  the  pro- 
portions of  the  definitive  structural  plan.  And  it  would  appear 
that  the  regular  growth-gradients  we  have  been  considering 
are  manifested  only  (or  mainly)  in  the  second  of  these  two 
phases,  some  quite  other  mechanism  being  at  work  in  the 
first.  Thus  not  only  definitive  form-plans,  but  also  marked 
differences  in  size,  are  established  in  the  short  first  phase, 
and  effects  of  growth  during  the  second  phase  are  confined  to 
a  quantitative  modification  of  the  already  diversified  organiza- 
tion given  at  the  close  of  the  first  phase.1 

The  second  phase  is  thus  in  general  of  less  morphological 
importance  than  the  first,  although  occasionally  it  exhibits 
differences  of  growth-potential  great  enough  to  effect  very 

1  The  matter  is  still  further  complicated  by  the  so-called  law  of 
antero-posterior  differentiation  of  appendages  (and  by  the  exceptions 
to  it !)  ;  this,  however,  merely  means  that  the  onset  of  the  second 
phase  is  not  synchronous  throughout  the  body.  It  is  also  quite  pos- 
sible that  in  the  first  phase,  second-phase  growth-effects  are  present, 
but  are  masked  by  the  much  more  radical  first-phase  effects  (see  §§  6,  7) . 


THE  TWO  PHASES  OF  GROWTH  119 

striking  transformations,  as  in  the  chelae  of  Uca,  or  the  abdo- 
men of  Pinnotheres.  None  the  less,  it  is  of  considerable 
theoretical  importance  as  revealing  the  existence  of  deep-seated 
and  regular  growth-gradients  which  appear  to  be  in  the  first 
instance  correlated  with  fundamental  properties  of  the  animal 
body,  such  as  polarity. 

Thus  the  original  effects  of  such  gradients  upon  growth 
would  be,  relative  to  the  growth-process  itself,  secondary  ; 
but  since  all  changes  of  proportions  that  occupy  a  considerable 
time  must  depend  on  its  agency,  in  certain  cases  its  growth- 
affecting  properties  become  modified  so  as  to  become  of  direct 
importance  to  the  process  of  growth  of  parts. 

My  meaning  will  be  clearer  with  the  aid  of  an  example. 
There  is  (Fig.  61)  a  progressive  decrease  in  relative  growth-ratio 
as  we  pass  forward  along  the  head-appendages  of  Eupagurus, 
which  obviously  results  in  a  slight  and  continuous  change  in 
their  proportionate  size,  relative  to  the  body  and  to  each  other, 
as  life  goes  on  ;  I  cannot  conceive,  however,  that  these  par- 
ticular changes  in  relative  size  are  of  any  biological  significance, 
but  am  forced  to  regard  them  as  accidental  consequences  of 
the  existence  of  a  growth-affecting  gradient  in  the  body.  The 
comparatively  enormous  increase  in  relative  size  of  the  male 
right  chela,  however  (as  of  the  female  swimmerets),  does 
appear  to  have  biological  significance  ;  and  here  therefore  we 
must  consider  that  the  form  of  the  gradient  has  been  modified 
so  that  its  growth-affecting  properties  become  utilized  to 
alter  bodily  proportions  in  an  adaptive  way. 

Although  clearly  much  more  work  must  be  done  before 
the  laws,  properties  and  physiological  mechanisms  of  these 
two  growth-phases  are  properly  understood,  general  considera- 
tions as  well  as  the  limited  special  analysis  I  have  been  able 
to  undertake  make  me  feel  that  their  existence  is  real  enough. 

If  that  is  so,  we  may  enshrine  the  distinction  in  specific 
terminology,  and  say  that,  following  the  period  of  chemical 
predetermination  at  which  the  specific  fates  of  different  regions 
of  the  embryo  (or  regenerating  part)  are  invisibly  determined, 
there  occur  two  further  phases,  one  of  tissue  differentiation 
and  the  assumption  of  the  definitive  general  form-plan,  and 
one  of  subsequent  quantitative  growth-changes  in  proportions 
(and  presumably  also  changes  due  to  functional  activity). 
To  the  first  of  these  the  term  chemo-differentiation  has  already 
been  applied  (Huxley,  1924c)  and  adopted  by  others  (Gold- 
schmidt,  1927 ;    Needham,  1931)  ;    for   the   next   I   propose 


120  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

to  use  the  term  histo-differentiation,  since  histological  change 
would  here  appear  to  be  the  most  decisive  factor  ;  and  for 
the  last,  the  term  auxano-diff eventration,  since  quantitative 
growth-changes  are  now  the  most  significant.1 

Histo-differentiation  would  obviously  be  at  work  not  only 
in  the  first  formation  of  organ-rudiments,  but  also  during  any 
radical  metamorphosis.  This  appears  to  be  the  case  even 
when  limbs  are  converted  from  one  structural  plan  to  another 
during  development  :  e.g.  when  in  a  lobster  a  limb  is  con- 
verted from  a  biramous  swimming  appendage  to  a  jaw,  or 
even  when  the  pereiopods  lose  their  exopodites.  In  this  latter 
case,  it  is  possible  that  negative  heterogony  of  the  auxano- 
differentiative  type  is  at  work,  but  acts  so  quickly  that  between 
one  moult  and  the  next  the  whole  exopodite  disappears,  but 
the  presumption  appears  the  other  way.  It  would  be  interest- 
ing to  study  the  histology  of  the  different  parts  of  the  limb 
during  the  instar  prior  to  the  exopodite's  disappearance. 

§  4.    Growth-changes  Correlated  with  High  Local 

Growth-intensity 

Another  indication  of  the  real  existence  of  these  fundamental 
growth-gradients  is  afforded  by  the  fact  that  it  appears  im- 
possible to  effect  a  marked  change  in  the  growth-ratio  of  one 
appendage  without  at  the  same  time  effecting  slight  changes 
in  the  growth-ratios  of  the  neighbouring  appendages — in  other 
words,  that  a  localized  growth-change  is  not  in  reality  fully 
localized,  but  must  operate  within  the  framework  of  the  main 
growth-gradient  of  the  body,  and  affect  its  working.  The 
proof  of  this  is  afforded  by  the  changes  in  relative  size  of 
neighbouring  appendages  which  are  to  be  found  correlated 
with  marked  heterogony  of  a  particular  appendage.  The 
'  control ',  by  the  difference  from  which  the  magnitude  of  the 
correlated  change  is  deduced,  may  be  provided  by  contrasting 
corresponding  organs,  either  those  of  the  opposite  side  of  the 
body  in  cases  of  asymmetrical  heterogony  of  a  part,  or  those 
of  the  opposite  sex  when  there  is  heterogony  of  an  organ  in 
one  sex  only.  As  examples  of  the  former  we  can  take  the 
male  fiddler-crab  (Uca)  ;  and  of  the  latter,  those  numerous 
Crustacea  in  which  one  of  the  pereiopods  is  enlarged,  in  the 
male  only,  to  form  a  powerful  chela. 

1  Most  significant,  that  is,  for  our  present  purpose.  If  we  were 
more  interested  in  the  changes  directly  brought  about  by  function, 
another  term  would  be  needed. 


CORRELATED   GROWTH-CHANGES  121 

In  Uca,  it  has  been  known  for  some  time  that  other  parts 
besides  the  chelae  are  asymmetrical  in  males,  notably  the 
carapace  and  the  walking  legs,  which  also  are  enlarged  on  the 
side  of  the  large  chela.  The  only  quantitative  data  on  this 
subject  appear  to  be  those  of  Yerkes  (1901),  which  have  been 
further  analysed  in  this  laboratory  (Huxley  and  Callow, 
unpublished).  Unfortunately  Yerkes'  measurements  apply 
only  to  large  specimens  (10-15  mm.  carapace-length).  Over 
this  range,  the  large  chela  is,  of  course,  enormously  much 
larger  than  the  small  (at  least  twenty  times  as  heavy,  from 
my  data  on  U.  pugnax)  :  the  merus,  measured  by  Yerkes,  is 
about  60  per  cent,  greater  in  length.  The  only  other  relevant 
measurements  taken  by  Yerkes  are  (1)  the  merus-length  of 
the  first  walking  leg,  which  is  about  eight  per  cent,  larger 
on  the  large  chela  side,  and  (2)  the  lateral  margin  of  the  cara- 
pace, which  is  rather  over  5  per  cent,  larger  on  this  side. 

What  most  concerns  us  is  that  for  the  merus  of  the  first 
walking  legs,  the  excess  of  the  large-chela  side  increases  dis- 
tinctly, over  the  size-range  measured,  with  absolute  increase 
in  size  of  the  animal,  from  below  7-5  per  cent,  to  over  9  per  cent. ; 
and  that  for  the  carapace  margins,  in  spite  of  some  irregularity, 
appears  to  increase  slightly  (from  below  5  per  cent,  to  5-5  per 
cent.),  i.e.  the  asymmetry  is  progressive. 

Work  is  in  progress  by  Miss  Tazelaar  in  this  laboratory  on 
this  subject.  Her  preliminary  data  indicate  clearly  that  all 
the  walking  legs  are  implicated  in  the  increase  of  size  on  the 
side  of  the  large  chela,  that  the  first  after  the  chela  (second 
pereiopod)  is  most  affected,  the  second  next,  while  the  effect 
on  the  last  two  is  slight  and  somewhat  irregular  ;  e.g.  six 
males  of  mean  carapace-length  14-3  mm.  gave  the  following 
result  for  the  percentage  excess  of  the  limb  of  the  large  side 
over  that  of  the  small  side  : 

Pereiopod 

. A . 

Second     Third     Fourth 

Excess  on  large  side,  per  cent.        .     2-6         0-9         0-2 

A  graded  effect  is  clearly  visible. 

In  Uca,  measurements  have  unfortunately  not  yet  been 
taken  of  the  appendages  lying  just  anterior  to  the  chelae. 
This  has,  however,  been  done  in  several  cases  of  sexual  differ- 
ence in  heterogony,  and  in  every  case  we  meet  with  the  sur- 
prising fact  that  whereas,  as  in  Uca,  marked  heterogony  of 
an  organ  is  associated  with  a  slight  increase  of  relative  size 


122 


PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 


in  the  appendages  just  posterior  to  the  special  growth-centre, 
there  is  a  slight  decrease  of  relative  size  in  those  immediately 
anterior  to  it. 


•5? 
o 


°     Aft- 


•2? 


60 

- 

- 

50 
4  0- 

■r 

V 
A 

- 

30 
20 

i 

t    i r 

\\ 

r        ■    i 

3rd- 
Maxilliped 

(aid) 


2nd.        3rd. 


4th. 


5th. 


-  60 


-50 


-  40 


30 


20 


Chela 


Pereiopod 


3rd.     Chela     2nd. 
mxpd  propus      s* 
(xlO)     (X6) 

B 


Zrd. 
Pereiopcds 


Fig.  65. — Graph  of  changes  in  relative  size  of  parts  associated  with  a  local 

region   of   high    growth-intensity    (male   chela)    in    spider-crabs,    (A)    Maia 

squinado,   (B)  Inachus  dorsettensis. 


CORRELATED  GROWTH-CHANGES  123 

This  was  first  discovered  in  regard  to  weight-measurements 
on  the  spider-crab  Maia  squinado  (Huxley,  1927)  ;  and  next 
confirmed,  this  time  in  regard  to  linear  measurements,  on 
another  spider-crab,  Inachus  dorsettensis  (Shaw,  1928).  I  then 
felt  that  the  phenomenon  might  be  due  to  one  of  two  rather 
different  causes.  In  both  these  cases,  the  organ  diminished 
in  size  in  the  male  was  the  third  maxilliped,  the  pereiopod 
which  was  enlarged  as  the  male  chela  being  the  first  of  the 
walking-leg  series.  It  was  thus  possible  that  the  effect  had 
nothing  to  do  with  the  main  growth-gradient,  but  was  in 
some  way  due  to  the  nature  of  the  appendages  concerned, 
maxillipeds  for  some  reason  responding  differently  from 
pereiopods. 

To  decide  between  these  two  alternatives,  it  was  necessary 
to  find  an  organism  in  which  some  other  pereiopod  than  the 
first  was  enlarged  to  produce  a  large  chela.  The  true  prawns 
provide  a  case  in  which  the  second  pereiopod  is  so  enlarged ; 
but  unfortunately  in  the  common  British  species  there  is  little 
difference  between  the  sexes  in  the  size  of  the  large  chelae. 
Eventually,  through  the  kindness  of  Dr.  Seymour  Sewell,  of 
the  Indian  Museum,  a  number  of  specimens  were  obtained  of 
the  magnificent  Indian  prawn,  Palaemon  carcinus,  a  species 
with  marked  sexual  dimorphism  in  the  chelae,  and  measure- 
ments on  these  established  the  fact  that  the  effect  is  a  true 
positional  effect,  since  in  the  male,  whereas  the  relative  size 
of  third,  fourth  and  fifth  pereiopods  were  increased,  that  of 
the  first  pereiopod  as  well  as  of  the  third  maxilliped  were 
decreased. 

In  general,  male  Crustacea  appear  to  have  relatively  larger 
pereiopods  than  females.  But  here  the  difference  between  rela- 
tive size  of  pereiopods  in  the  two  sexes  is  much  reduced  in  the 
pereiopod  anterior  to  the  chela,  showing  an  inhibiting  effect 
of  chela-growth.  Another  method  of  studying  this  pheno- 
menon is  to  take  the  relative  growth-rate  of  the  male  and 
female  appendages.  When  this  is  done,  it  may  occur,  over 
a  given  size-range,  that  the  relative  growth-rates  of  the  organs 
anterior  to  the  chela  are  actually  lower  in  the  male  than  the 
female  (see  Figs.  66,  67). 

The  explanation  of  this  curious  effect  is  for  the  moment 
completely  obscure,  though  there  can  be  little  doubt  that  it 
is  connected  with  the  fact  that  any  fundamental  growth- 
gradient  along  the  body-axis  must  be  polarized. 

Effects  presumably  of  the  same  general  nature,  though  not 


3rd.     1st.   2nd.    3rd.    4th.    5th.  Abd. 
Mxpd  Ppd 


a 

a 

I 

1 

y 

— 

-C 

■*-> 

n 

•5 

V 

2 

s 

bo 

u 

£ 

£ 

bo 

X 

<l 

MH 

O 

a 
o 

'bo 

O 
& 

Q 
C 
"g 

in 

3 

S 

o 

0) 

6i 

ft 

tH 

en 

t/1 

a 

3 

en 

rt 

M 

rj 

o 

o 

J3 

1 

■M 

t-i 

Cfl 

C/J 

yi 

£ 

O 

>. 

>. 

0 

c/i 

Ih 

<L> 

H-1 

R 

O 

•d 

c 

g 

bo 

c 

J3 

-4-> 

p 

R 

cd 

O 

br. 

& 

nt 

TJ 

an 

bo 

■d 

(3 

J3 

bo 

X. 

rrt 

-1 

ft 

J3 

q 

ft 

Ih 

"i  i 

O 

O 

:-) 

Ih 

d 

a 

0 

"En 

rt 

■+J 

o 
'5 

s 

CD 

O 

i-i 

g 

O 

_c 

,4 

03 

Ih 
ft) 

IT 

••s 

a 

o, 

^ 

s 

o 

*4H 
O 

8 

— 1 

et 

4) 

■§ 

u 

l-l 

-4-> 

d 

Ih 

I 

bp 

^3 
O 

« 

a 

>-< 

s 

2 

C 
o 

0) 

ft 

Ih 

HO 

««t 

pq 

ID 

■ — * 

* — 

a 

en 

0J 

<u 

<D 

be 
C 

0) 

rt 

u 

,£ 

tf) 

1 

& 

Ih 
60 

vO 

O 

A 
H 

o 

t-t 

fe 

124 


CORRELATED   GROWTH-CHANGES 


125 


upon  growth,  have  been  recorded  by  Gabritchevsky  (1930) 
in  his  experiments  on  regeneration  in  spiders.  In  successive 
moults,  the  legs  of  the  species  used  by  him  pass  through  a 
r  e  ad  i  1  y  -char- 
acterized series 
of  develop- 
mental  stages. 
If  a  leg  be 
amputated,  its 
regeneration  is 
accompanied  by 
alterations  in 
this  sequence  in 
the  neighbour- 
ing legs.  Some- 
times the  nor- 
mal sequence 
is  accelerated, 
sometimes  re- 
t  ar ded ;  in 
either  case, 
compensa  t  o  r  y 
effects  in  the 
other  direction 
may  be  subse- 
quently pro- 
duced. Gabri- 
tchevsky's  re- 
sults to  date  do 
not  permit  us 
to  say  why 
either  of  these 
two  opposed 
effects  may  be 
found ;  we  may 
anticipate  that 
the  cause  will 
prove  to  lie  in 
the  rapidity  of 

regeneration  and  the  time  before  moulting  at  which  the  oper- 
ation was  carried  out. 

Przibram  (1917)  carried  out  an  elaborate  investigation  on 
regeneration  of  legs  in  the    Mantid  Sphodromantis  bioculata. 


a 


s 

o 

i». 

o 
o 


k. 

o 


<3 

•a 

K 
Si. 

n. 

a 

Q 

O 

k. 
&o 

<u 

a 

^-. 

s 

<u 
Si. 


260 

- 

A 

©=  9 

240 

- 

220 

- 

200 

- 

180 

- 

1    ® 

160 

' 

/   /  '' 

140 

I 

1 

120 

/  1 
I  1 

l   1 

1 00 

90 

1 

» 

1 i__ 

r=»--« 

3rd. 

Mxpd 


1st. 


2nd. 


3rd. 


4th. 


5th. 


pereiopods. 


Fig.  67. — Correlated  changes  of  growth-rate  in  struc- 
tures  immediately   anterior  and  posterior  to  a  local 
region  of   high  growth-intensity   (male  chela)   in   the 
prawn,  Palaemon  cardials. 

The  graph  represents  the  growth-rate  (%  increase  for  100%  increase 
in  carapace  length)  of  various  appendages  in  males  and  females. 


126  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

His  results  can  be  analysed  (Huxley,  unpublished)  to  shed 
some  light  on  our  problem,  although  not  so  much  as  if  the 
experiments  had  been  designed  for  that  purpose. 

His  results  are  particularly  valuable  in  one  respect,  as  the 
growth-rate  of  the  regenerating  and  normal  limbs  was  followed 
during  a  number  of  moult-stages,  until  the  animals  became 
adult  (or  died).  In  general  it  appears  that  after  amputation 
of  the  fore  or  middle  leg,  the  normal  growth  of  the  next  pos- 
terior legs  is  first  depressed  during  the  period  of  most  active 
regeneration  ;  then  accelerated  ;  and  finally,  as  the  rate  of 
regeneration  approximates  to  that  of  normal  growth,  sinks 
again,  usually  below  normal.  (The  rate  of  growth  of  the 
regenerating  limb  also  frequently  sinks  below  normal  at  about 
the  same  time.)  The  effect  on  the  unoperated  leg  of  the 
opposite  side  of  the  same  segment  as  the  amputated  leg  appears 
to  be  similar,  but  is  less  pronounced.  After  amputation  of 
the  hind-leg,  the  effect  on  the  next  anterior  (middle)  legs  is 
of  the  same  general  form,  but  the  initial  depression  is  greater, 
the  later  acceleration  less.  (I  have  no  data  for  the  effect  of 
amputation  of  the  middle  leg  on  the  growth  of  the  fore-legs.) 
When,  as  sometimes  happens,  no  regeneration  occurs,  the  effect 
of  amputation  appears  to  be  a  temporary  acceleration  of 
normal  growth  in  other  legs,  without  any  marked  depression 
at  all.  The  effect  on  limbs  in  other  segments  is  always  identical 
on  both  sides  ;  the  effect  is  no  greater  on  the  side  where  regen- 
eration is  in  progress  (Fig.  68). 

Thus  the  effects  depend  partly  upon  the  rate  of  growth  in 
the  regenerating  limb  ;  but  there  appears  to  be  also  a  positional 
effect,  the  depressant  effect  of  a  regenerating  (rapidly-growing) 
limb  being  more  marked  on  the  limb  anterior  to  it,  the  stimu- 
lative effect  more  marked  on  the  limb  posterior  to  it.  This 
fits  in  with  the  facts  of  normal  growth  in  Palaemon,  Maia  and 
Inachus. 

Von  Ubisch  (1915)  carried  out  somewhat  similar  experi- 
ments on  the  larva  of  the  insect  Cloe  diptera.  Unfortunately 
his  method  of  recording  his  results  does  not  permit  of  a  satis- 
factory analysis  of  the  question  which  here  interests  us,  namely 
the  effect  of  regeneration  on  the  normal  growth  of  neighbour- 
ing unoperated  structures,  but  only  of  effects  on  the  rate  of 
regeneration  itself.  However,  some  of  his  results  are  of 
relevance.  All  operations  were  made  directly  after  one  moult, 
and  the  final  measurements  made  directly  after  the  next 
moult.     He  finds  that  when  two  different  legs  are  removed, 


syudiicmb  -  i/jmojS 


S3 

o      «i      5 

53        <JJ        <y 

§ 

§                  1 

A 
\ 
\ 
i 

f 

+ 

Cv  t 

>v    \ 

\> 

\  \ 

\  \ 

\  v. 

•' »      / 

\      \. 

'   »      / 

■ 

t      > 

... 

*■     +      < 

\   >^ 

\        \ 

.*+** 

\            N 

\\^ 

\           \ 

■ 

I         \ 

«-§!« 

\           \ 
9           \       / 

1-      \* 

,       *■  i          t 

«lo| 

1-  v 

UJ 

u.    oi!L 

-15 

IS 


u 


o 

4) 

.£ 
+-> 

6 

o 


4) 


3 

o 


6 


bo   . 

(3   tn 

■—  i— < 

tO    ll 

'53 -P 

c 

O    4> 


Q 

1 

S               £ 

!£} 

Q           JO           S>          IT) 

bo 

02                  5j 

§ 

si 

5      cy      ^      =; 

I 

'/  ' 

V        v 

A          * 

+ 

^..^ — — " 

\    » 

V 

>  + 

\ 

/        \ 

V       \ 

^> 

— ■— -« — L 

\     \ 
\     7 

\    / 

«♦- 

\    "— ~ — 
\ 

\  / 

o-> 

*          Ser 

.§      vA 

1      \ 

b              ^» 

!      \ 

< 

8.-*      \ 

CQ 

§--*               N 

I 


siudiicmb  -  i/imojB 
127 


o 

•c 


XI 

P 


3 

o 


+3    4) 
fe    4> 

lH 

to 

4> 


0 

S      3 


6 

bo 

a 

1-. 

4) 

a 

4) 

bO 
a> 
u 


If)       W> 

■+J 

o 

4) 
W 


U) 


CO 

o 


•3 

a 


4) 


Ut 

9 
o 


c  >. 

a  & 


■a- 

a  a 


o 

o. 
a 
o 

V 
J3 


ico 


I  •"  >, 


•I 


h     1     ,rw 


•a  a  as 


>. 
^ 


a>  u 


•a  a  o  «f  a  o 
5  S  S  u  •-§ 

l-H'-uoS 
ra  oj  O  a)  —  li 

.s-i  o.aST 

o  +ii   a   O  VI 

■9  a  «  °  .-§ 


SH      »*-    OJ  T3 


*2  -a  rt 


u 


'■S  J2  «  S.  e  a 

O  rt  XI  >  &  o 
3  g-  Ma,         . 

is  g  o  gS  v% 


m'cs  c-a  3 


5J  T3    4J  .     4)   f  I 

O   d^  O         o 

a c  a d  — ^ 

s  —  c3  u  c      a 

•S.9  5  v  o  a  « 

xi -9  o  °  0—  a 

a—  2-"  2  2T 

c  o  «  o  «  a 


CU   ui 


t/i  3  vi 


M 


»s  a  S  a.S 

„'*i  «3  ct*1  B 
S   O^   O^^   4J 

J3~    U'S    4)    4)    O 

rt  felc  >!ttiC^2 
V  oW  oWW rt 
£  bi      &  .« 

l.gm'.Sdfebo 

4>      a  g< 


128  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

their  rate  of  regeneration  is  greater  when  both  are  on  one 
side  of  the  body  than  when  they  are  on  opposite  sides  ;  and 
the  same  holds  good  when  three  different  legs  are  removed.  The 
mean  difference  amounts  to  nearly  5  per  cent,  of  the  lower  figure. 

Further,  if  two  legs  are  removed,  regeneration  of  a  given 
leg  is  greater  (by  nearly  3-5  per  cent.)  if  the  other  leg  is  the 
opposite  member  of  the  same  pair  than  if  it  is  a  leg  of  another 
pair,  whether  on  the  same  or  the  opposite  side.  On  the  other 
hand,  when  only  one  leg  of  a  pair  was  amputated,  its  normal 
partner  on  the  opposite  side  was  not  accelerated  in  growth, 
but  if  anything  slightly  retarded  (mean,  0-4  per  cent,  retarda- 
tion— a  figure  which  may  however  well  fall  within  the  limits 
of  experimental  error).  This  result  cannot  be  compared 
directly  with  the  corresponding  results  in  Przibram's  Sphodro- 
mantis,  since  it  only  concerns  growth  during  one  instar. 

Going  through  his  tables,  however,  I  have  come  across  one 
fact  which  appears  to  be  significant  for  our  problem.  When 
legs  belonging  either  to  two  or  three  different  segments  were 
amputated,  whether  on  the  same  or  opposite  sides,  the  amount 
of  their  regeneration  can  be  compared  with  the  amount  made 
by  the  same  legs  when  only  a  single  leg  is  amputated.  It  is 
then  found  that  the  anterior  of  the  regenerating  legs  always 
regenerates  relatively  less  rapidly  than  the  posterior  (only  one 
exceptional  result  in  eight  series  of  experiments)  ;  in  five  out 
of  the  seven  concordant  series,  the  regeneration  of  the  anterior 
limb  is  actually  below  the  '  normal '  amount  for  regeneration 
of  the  corresponding  single  limb,  and  that  of  the  posterior 
limb  equal  to  or  greater  than  normal.  This  again  points  to 
a  depressant  effect  of  rapid  growth  on  anterior  structures, 
and  a  stimulative  effect  on  posterior  ones. 

It  will,  however,  be  necessary  to  carry  out  systematic  experi- 
ments, using  repeated  regeneration,  before  clear-cut  results 
can  be  obtained. 

§  5.    Some  Cases  of  Teratological  and  Abnormal  Growth 

In  this  connexion,  the  measurements  made  by  Nanagas 
(1925)  on  human  anencephalic  foetuses  are  of  interest.  In  such 
monsters,  the  size  and  proportions  of  the  trunk  and  especially 
of  the  lower  limbs,  are  practically  normal,  but,  while  the  cranial 
region  is,  of  course,  markedly  underdeveloped,  the  fore-limbs 
are  hypertrophied  (by  about  12  per  cent.).  Furthermore,  the 
hypertrophy  is  graded  (Nanagas'  Table  I)  :  the  upper  arm 
shows  an  increase  over  the  normal  of  24  per  cent.,  the  fore- 


ABNORMAL  GROWTH  129 

arm  of  16  per  cent.,  the  hand  of  7-1. 1  The  length  of  the  middle 
ringer  is  actually  decreased  relative  to  normal.  There  is  thus 
not  only  a  growth-gradient  in  the  arm,  but  an  indication  that, 
as  in  male  stag-beetles  (p.  115),  the  excessive  tilting  of  one 
end  of  the  gradient  above  normal  has  led  to  a  slight  depression 
of  the  other  end  below  normal.  The  fact  that  the  proportions 
of  the  segments  of  the  lower  limb  are  not  affected  is  interpreted 
by  Nanagas  as  meaning  that  the  disturbance  to  growth  occurred 
very  early,  before  the  differentiation  of  the  hind-limb  had 
begun.  There  appears, to  be,  further,  a  slight  graded  effect 
upon  the  trunk.  The  arm  circumference  is  13-0  per  cent., 
the  chest  circumference  at  the  nipples  7-5  per  cent.,  at  the 
tenth  rib  1-3  per  cent,  above  normal.  In  any  case,  the  corre- 
lation of  poor  development  of  head  with  increased  development 
of  the  region  next  behind  it  is  interesting.  It  may  be  inter- 
preted as  due  primarily  to  the  excess  growth  of  the  forelimb 
region  ;  or  more  probably  the  primary  factor  is  the  failure 
of  the  head  to  develop,  which  then,  in  accordance  with  the 
views  of  Child  and  of  Stockard,  permits  a  higher  development 
of  regions  posterior  to  it  in  the  body-gradient  (Fig.  69,  left). 
A  further  teratological  study  which  is  also  relevant  to  our 
purpose  is  that  of  Mead  (1930),  based  on  a  single  monster  of 
34-8  cm.  crown-heel  length.  When  the  measurements  were 
compared  with  those  computed  for  a  normal  embryo  of  the 
same  crown-heel  length,  it  was  found  that  the  head  was  very 
much  enlarged  ;  likewise  the  arms,  in  diameter  more  than  in 
length.  The  trunk  was  enlarged  in  breadth,  more  so  anteriorly 
than  posteriorly  ;  its  anterior  portion  was  markedly  reduced 
in  length,  its  posterior  portion  slightly  increased.  And  the 
hind-limbs  were  slightly  increased  in  length,  but  considerably 
reduced  in  diameter.  (The  proportions  of  the  segments  of 
the  limbs  were  not  disturbed.)  This  can  most  simply  be  inter- 
preted as  due  to  (1)  an  abnormally  high  growth-centre  anteri- 
orly with  growth-gradient  extending  backwards.  But  (2)  this 
is  complicated  by  differences  in  growth-intensity  in  the  different 
planes  of  space.  From  the  shoulder  region  posteriorly  there 
is  an  abnormal  growth-gradient  in  the  breadth-dimension, 
above  normal  anteriorly,  below  normal  posteriorly  (cf .  the  arm 
of  Nanagas'  specimen,  supra)  ;  and  growth  in  the  length- 
dimension  is  inversely  correlated  with  growth  in  the  breadth- 

1  This  is  the  statement  in  Table  I,  and  appears  to  be  correct.  On 
p.  477,  however,  the  value  is  given  as  i-i  per  cent.,  and  on  p.  485 
as  2  per  cent.  ! 

9 


130 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


dimension,  so  that  the  chest  is  much  shortened,  the  legs 
slightly  lengthened.1  For  some  reason,  this  inverse  correla- 
tion between  breadth-  and  length-growth  does  not  seem  to 
have  affected  the  head  region  (Fig.  69,  right). 

While  many  details  remain  obscure,  these  cases  at  least 
provide  excellent  examples  of  graded  abnormalities  of  growth- 
intensity.  Professor  C.  R.  Stockard  has  drawn  my  attention 
to  a  similar  case,  but  affecting  an  isolated  organ  only.     Streeter 


Fig.  69. — Graded-growth  effects  in  two  human  monsters. 
(See  text  for  details.) 

(1930),  in  his  Plate  12,  figures  a  case  of  isolated  hypertrophy 
of  a  single  human  finger.  The  point  which  interests  us,  how- 
ever, is  that  the  proportions  of  the  phalanges  appear  to  be 
abnormal,  and  to  have  been  affected  in  a  graded  way. 

While  on  the  subject  of  abnormal  growth,  we  may  refer  to 
some  cases  of  dwarfing  and  gigantism.  Sir  Arthur  Keith  has 
kindly  let  me  see  some  MS.  notes  on  this  subject.     There  are 

1  This  interpretation  is  not  identical  with  that  of  Mead,  who  pre- 
fers to  think  mainly  in  terms  of  the  '  law  of  developmental  direction  '. 


ABNORMAL  GROWTH  131 

also  numerous  cases  scattered  in  the  Nouvelle  Iconogmphie  de 
la  Salpetriere,  and  Stockard  (1931)  treats  of  the  question  in 
a  comprehensive  way.  In  general,  it  appears  that  simple 
pituitary  gigantism  is  associated  with  relatively  long  limbs, 
but  within  the  limbs  there  is  not  much  proportionate  change, 
or  a  slight  defect  in  hand  and  foot.  In  acromegaly,  however, 
whether  associated  or  not  with  gigantism,  the  relative  sizes 
of  hand  and  foot  are  increased. 

In  ateliotic  dwarfs,  the  proportions  of  the  limbs  to  the 
trunk  and  of  the  limb-segments  to  each  other  are  not  affected. 
In  achondroplastic  dwarfs,  however,  not  only  are  the  limbs 
abnormally  short,  but  the  segments  are  differentially  affected  ; 
the  proximal  segments  are  markedly  reduced,  the  hand  and 
foot  scarcely  at  all.  (In  mongoloid  dwarfs,  on  the  other  hand, 
relatively  short  fingers  and  toes  are  among  the  most  striking 
differential  characters  (Davenport  and  Swingle,  1927).)  The 
hind-limb  is  usually  less  abnormal  than  the  fore-limb.  In 
breeds  of  dogs  with  markedly  reduced  limbs,  which  Stockard 
(1.  c,  p.  228,  etc.)  compares  with  human  achondroplasia,  ascrib- 
ing both  to  abnormalities  in  the  thyroid,  we  get  a  similar 
modification  of  the  proportionate  size  of  the  limb-segments. 
In  the  basset-hound  he  states  that  the  hind-feet  are  dispro- 
portionately enlarged,  which  would  indicate  a  tilting  of  the 
whole  gradient  so  that  the  proximal  region  is  below,  the  distal 
region  above  the  normal  level  (cf.  pp.  89,  115).  Unfortun- 
ately he  gives  no  precise  details. 

The  relatively  large  size  of  limbs  in  giants  can  only  be  due 
to  their  increased  heterogony  during  growth  ;  while  achondro- 
plastic types  afford  evidence  of  a  disturbance  in  the  growth- 
gradient  as  well  as  the  general  growth-coefficient  of  the  limbs. 
From  Stockard's  work  it  is  clear  that,  in  dogs,  the  achondro- 
plastic short  type  of  limb  may  be  inherited  separately;  it 
depends  upon  a  single  Mendelian  gene.1 

1  The  apparently  genetic  achondroplasia  (chondrodystrophy)  found 
in  fowls  (Landauer,  1927)  differs  in  its  results  from  that  of  mammals 
in  various  ways.  In  the  first  place  it  does  not  affect  the  fore-limb, 
while  the  hind-limb  and  most  other  parts  of  the  body  are  markedly 
affected.  Secondly,  in  the  hind-limb  the  tibia  is  more  affected  than 
the  femur.  In  the  pelvis,  growth  in  length  is  little  affected,  but  many 
breadth-measurements  are  enlarged.  In  a  dwarf  six-months-old 
chicken  whose  dwarfism  was  apparently  of  myxoedematous  origin, 
Landar  (1929)  comes  to  the  conclusion  that  its  deviations  from  normal 
proportions  (which  were  negligible  in  the  wing,  but  marked  in  the  leg, 
skull  and  pelvis)  can  mainly  be  attributed  to  a  suppression  of  the 
later  phases  of  growth. 


132  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

§  6.    The   Law   of  Antero-posterior  Development  and 
its  Effect  upon  Growth 

In  this  connexion,  we  have  the  important  work  of  Scammon 
(references  in  Scammon  and  Calkins,  1929)  on  the  growth  of 
the  human  foetus,  from  about  5  cm.  length  to  birth.  He  there 
finds  definite  evidence  of  gradients  as  regards  growth,  proceed- 
ing antero-posteriorly  along  the  main  axis,  and  centripetally 
along  the  limb  axes.  This  main  gradient  is  found  for  internal 
organ-systems  (gut,  vertebral  column,  etc.)  as  well  as  for 
external  form.  There  are  a  few  exceptions  (e.g.  the  sacral 
region  of  the  vertebral  column)  which  apparently,  like  in- 
tercalated centres  of  high  growth-ratio  in  Crustacea,  such 
as  the  large  chela  of  male  Uca,  are  concerned  with  special 
adaptive  growth  of  particular  organs. 

However,  he  asserts  that  practically  all  parts  so  far  measured 
grow  in  linear  proportion  to  crown-heel  length,  according  to 
the  simple  formula  y  =  ax  +  b.  He  further  points  out  that 
when  b  is  zero,  the  percentage  measurements  of  the  organ, 
relative  to  standard  length,  remain  constant  throughout  the 
period.  If,  however,  b  is  positive,  the  percentage  measure- 
ments decrease  with  increase  of  absolute  size,  while  the  converse 
is  the  case  if  b  is  negative.  Since  the  anterior  regions  have  b 
positive,  while  in  the  posterior  regions  it  is  negative,  there 
is  the  appearance  of  a  growth-gradient.  However,  this  would 
not  be  brought  about,  as  in  my  previous  examples,  by  differences 
in  growth-intensity  of  the  various  parts,  as  measured  by 
constant  differential  growth-coefficients,  but  according  to 
whether  the  organ  in  question  had  made  much  or  little  growth 
during  the  embryonic  period  (below  5  cm.  length).  This  he 
would  interpret  as  due  to  the  Law  of  Developmental  Direction, 
according  to  which  anterior  (and  proximal)  regions  are  formed 
first,  are  soonest  through  with  their  origin  and  histological 
differentiation,  and  can  embark  earlier  on  their  main  growth- 
period.  As  we  may  presume  that  the  growth  of  each  separate 
organ  follows  the  usual  rule  for  the  body  as  a  whole,  namely 
that  the  (compound  interest)  growth-rate  slows  off  progres- 
sively from  the  beginning  of  growth,  we  should  expect  that 
there  would  be  a  lag  between  anterior  and  posterior  regions, 
such  as  that  at  any  given  moment  the  anterior  ones  would  be 
at  a  later  and  therefore  slower  phase  of  their  growth  than 
those  lying  more  posteriorly  (and  see  §7). 

It  remains  to  be  seen  whether  this  will  account  for  the  whole 


ANTERO-POSTERIOR  DEVELOPMENT  133 

of  the  difference.  Unfortunately,  Scammon's  final  extensive 
data  have  only  recently  come  into  my  hands,  and  time  has 
not  yet  been  available  for  their  full  consideration  and  further 
analysis  in  relation  to  the  ideas  set  forth  in  this  book. 

I  incline  to  the  view,  after  preliminary  inspection,  that 
some  of  Scammon's  data  would  be  much  better  fitted  by  an 
expression  of  the  heterogonic  type,  y  =  axk,  than  by  the  linear 
formula  he  adopts.  (It  must,  of  course,  be  remembered  that 
his  linear  formula,  when  b  =  o,  is  a  special  case  of  the  heter- 
ogonic formula.)  In  any  case,  his  analysis  is  valuable  in  show- 
ing that  the  time-relations  of  development  during  the  early 
embryonic  period  of  histo-differentiation,  can  exert  a  marked 
effect  on  the  percentage  changes  of  parts  in  the  later  foetal 
stage  when  auxano-differentiation  is  in  progress. 

Latimer  and  Aikman  (1931),  in  a  study  of  the  prenatal 
growth  of  the  cat  from  total  weight  0-3  g.  (264  specimens, 
including  35  newborn),  give  further  interesting  data. 

The  formula  for  the  growth  of  the  weights  of  various  organs 
(y)  against  total  weight  (x)  are  found  to  be  as  follows  (all  in 
grams)  : 

Head  .  y  =  x°  '97  —  0-69^ 

Trunk        .  y  =  0-59^  —  0-36  from  1  to  70  g.  total  wt. 

y  =  x108  —  0-84*  +  0-9    from  70  g.  on. 

Fore-limbs  (2)    .     y  —  o-o8#  from  1  to  90  g. 

y  =  0-053^  -j-  2-43  from  90  g.  on. 

Hind-limbs  .     y  =  o-i*11  —  0-053  from  1  to  100  g. 

y  =  0-07,1;  -f  3-5  from  100  g.  on. 

Unfortunately  in  their  tables  the  authors  only  give  values 
calculated  on  these  empirical  formulae,  and  the  percentage 
curves  for  relative  weights  in  their  figures  do  not  appear 
always  to  be  consonant  with  the  formulae.  The  percentage 
curves  are  reproduced  herewith.  The  constant  decrease  in 
relative  weight  of  the  head,  constant  increase  of  that  of  the 
trunk,  and  increase  to  a  maximum  followed  by  a  decrease 
for  the  limbs,  is  clearly  brought  out  (Fig.  70). 

For  an  analogous  case  on  invertebrates  of  the  marked 
effect  which  the  law  of  antero-posterior  development  can  exert 
upon  bodily  proportions,  reference  may  be  made  to  the  measure- 
ments of  Seymour  Sewell  (1929)  on  Copepods.  During  the 
later  free-living  copepodid  stages  of  development,  before  the 
adult  phase  is  reached,  the  number  of  abdominal  segments  is 
increasing  owing  to  the  division  of  the  less-differentiated  sub- 
terminal  region  of  the  abdomen.     Growth  is  proceeding  at 


134 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


160     180    EOOgm 


X 
75 
70 

60 

50 
40 
30 


120    140     IbO     ISO   200jm 


100     120     140     160     IBO    ZOOjm 

D 
Fig.  70. — Changes  in  relative  weight  of  vari- 
ous organs  of  the  cat  during  pre-natal  life. 
(A)    Head ;     (B)    trunk  ;     (C)    fore-limbs ;     (D)    hind- 
limbs  ;  all  against  total  weight. 


the   same   time,   and  in 
such  a  way  that,  as  Sey- 
mour Sewell,  says  (1.  c., 
p.  9),  '  when  a  segment 
of  the  body  divides  into 
two,  as  for  example  in 
the  development  of  the 
abdomen,  the  total  pro- 
portional  length  of   the 
two     daughter-segments 
is    always    greater   than 
the   proportional  length 
of   the  parent-segment '. 
As    result,    the    propor- 
tional length  of  the  ab- 
domen increases  steadily. 
But  this  change  in  rela- 
tive size  is  quite  distinct 
in    character    from    the 
change    in    proportional 
size  in  different  regions 
of  the  antennae   of   the 
same    animals     (p.    85), 
in  which   the    definitive 
number  of  segments  has 
been  differentiated  before 
the   growth-changes   oc- 
cur.     Many    ontogenies 
would  undoubtedly  yield 
interesting  results  if  ana- 
lysed   quantitatively    in 
the  light  of  the  principle 
of  heterogony  on  the  one 
hand    and    of    that    of 
antero-posterior  develop- 
ment on  the  other.     This 
would    apply    especially 
to  ontogenies   of    primi- 
tive   type  showing   con- 
tinuous gradual  change, 
such   as   those  of  Trilo- 
bites  (cf.  Raw,  1927). 
It  is  possible  that  the 


ANTERO-POSTERIOR   DEVELOPMENT  135 

facts  obtained  by  Przibram  (1917)  for  the  growth  of  limbs 
in  Sphodromantis  are  also  a  consequence  of  the  law  of  antero- 
posterior development.  His  Table  B  gives  the  growth-quotients 
for  the  middle  and  hind  limbs  at  each  instar — i.e.  the  ratio 
of  the  length  at  one  instar  to  the  length  at  the  instar  pre- 
ceding. If  these  are  averaged  for  groups  of  three  moult-stages, 
we  obtain  the  following  result  : 

Growth-quotients 
Moults  Mid-leg  Hind-leg 

2-5  .  .  .  .  .  .1-211  I-2o6 

5-8      ......   I-26o        1-266 

8-11    ......   1-293      1-297 

i.e.  not  only  is  there  a  steady  increase  in  the  growth-quotient 
during  life,  but  the  growth-quotient  for  the  mid-leg  begins 
higher  but  ends  lower  than  that  for  the  hind-leg.  There  are, 
however,  considerable  irregularities  in  the  values  for  single 
instars,  and  it  is  possible  that  this  result  is  not  significant. 

That  the  law  of  antero-posterior  development  depends  upon 
some  fundamental  gradient  within  the  body  as  a  whole  is 
indicated  by  the  work  of  Ruud  (1929)  who  found  that  the 
growth  of  a  urodele  leg-bud  rudiment  transplanted  to  the 
arm-region  was  markedly  accelerated,  that  of  an  arm -bud 
rudiment  transplanted  to  the  leg  region  retarded. 

Regeneration  as  well  as  growth  may  be  affected  by  this  law. 
For  instance,  Von  Ubisch  (1923)  finds  that  if  three  equal 
V-shaped  pieces  are  cut  out  of  the  dorsal  fin  of  Urodele  larvae, 
the  regeneration  of  the  anterior  piece  is  almost  always  less 
than  that  of  the  posterior.  This  latter  result  he  ascribes  to 
the  capacity  for  regeneration  being  inversely  proportional  to 
tissue-differentiation,  and  to  differentiation  proceeding  in  an 
antero-posterior  direction. 

In  Cloe,  the  capacity  for  regeneration  remains  unimpaired 
throughout  life,  independently  of  differentiation  which  is  com- 
plete in  all  three  limbs,  so  that  we  presumably  obtain  a  direct 
effect  of  the  main  axial  gradient  of  the  body  upon  rate  of 
regeneration. 

However,  that  the  law  of  antero-posterior  development,  as 
regards  growth-effects,  need  not  hold  even  in  mammals  is 
shown  by  the  measurements  of  whales  given  by  Mackintosh 
and  Wheeler  (1929  :  see  especially  pp.  277-95).  In  these 
animals  the  head  is,  of  course,  enlarged  to  carry  out  the  highly 
specialized  straining  function  of  the  baleen  on  the  jaws  :  and 
accordingly  we  find  that  its  percentage  length  relative  to  total 


136 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


length  increases  steadily  from  small  foetuses  to  large  whales 
25  metres  long  (at  extreme  sizes  it  appears  to  fall  again  slightly). 
Similarly,  the  relative  tail-length  decreases  with  absolute  size, 
from  the  juvenile  stage  onwards.  The  results  are  essentially 
similar  in  Blue  and  Fin  whales  (Balaenoptera  musculus  and 
B.  physalis).  Measurements  of  two  dimensions  are  herewith 
given  for  male  Blue  whales. 

TABLE   XII 

Relative  Head-  and  Tail-lengths  in  Male  Blue  Whales  (Balaen- 
optera musculus)  from  S.  Georgia  (from  Mackintosh  and  Wheeler, 
1929 


Relative 

Length, 

No.  of 

Relative 
head-length 

Absolute 
head-length 

No.  of 

tail-length 
per  cent. 

metres 

specimens 

per  cent. 
(tip  of  snout 
to  blowhole) 

(calculated) 
metres 

specimens 

(notch  of 

flukes  to  end 

of  ventral 

grooves) 

(r 2 

5 

J4-45 

0-215 

5 

45-67 

Foetus  a 

7 

1476 

0-369 

8 

44-06 

|3-  4 

3 

1536 

o-537 

3 

43-28 

U-  5 

1 

15-16 

0-683 

1 

4379 

17-18 

13 

15-81 

277 

9 

44-95 

18-19 

14 

16-04 

2-97 

12 

44^5 

19-20 

18 

16-58 

3-24 

13 

45-09 

20-21 

14 

17-16 

3"52 

8 

43'8i 

21-22 

16 

17-49 

376 

15 

43-32 

22-23 

21 

17-72 

3'99 

18 

43-43 

23-24 

38 

18-44 

433 

26 

42-91 

24-25 

56 

19-06 

4-67 

39 

41-24 

25-26 

25 

18-72 

4-78 

19 

41-85 

26-27 

3 

19-01 

5-04 

3 

41-98 

This  is  precisely  the  opposite  of  what  is  found  by  Scammon. 
Clearly  the  head  is  endowed  with  a  specific  heterogony  which 
counteracts  the  effect  of  its  precocious  development,  and,  from 
the  foetal  stage  on,  overrides  the  effect  of  the  tail's  later 
differentiation. 

In  passing,  it  may  be  mentioned  that  the  measurements 
given  by  Mackintosh  and  Wheeler  could  furnish  a  rich  mine 
of  information  for  constructing  growth-profiles  for  both  sexes 
of  the  two  species  of  whale.  Unfortunately,  only  percentage 
measurements  are  given  for  the  means,  and  without  mean 
absolute  measurements  for  the  total  length  classes.  For 
accurate  work  it  would  accordingly  be  necessary  to  recalculate 
the  original  absolute  data  in  the  appendices. 


ANTERO-POSTERIOR  DEVELOPMENT 


137 


total  length,  m. 

17  20  23 


To  obtain  accuracy  I  have  recalculated  the  absolute  data 
for  head-length  on  the  assumption  that  the  mean  total  length 
for  Class  1-2  m.  is  1-5  m.,  and  so  on  ;  the  figures  appear  in 
Column  4  of  the  table.  A  log-log  graph  from  these  (for  post- 
natal life)  is  given  in  Fig.  71.  Up  to  25  m.  total  length,  it 
shows  a  remarkable  approximation  to  a  straight  line,  giving 
a  growth-partition  coefficient  of  head-length  relative  to  total 
length  of  about  1-55.  When  the  figures  for  foetal  life  are 
plotted,  they  also  show  a 
straight  line,  but  indicating 
a  growth-coefficient  of  only 
about  1-05.  The  two  lines 
intersect  at  about  17  m. 
total  length  ;  if  this  gives  a 
correct  indication,  it  means 
that  the  marked  heterogony 
of  the  head  does  not  begin 
until  long  after  birth,  which 
appears  to  occur  at  6-7  m. 
length,  but  before  sexual  "« 
maturity,  which  comes  on 
at  22-23  m-  length. 

Numerous  further  excep- 
tions can  be  found  among 
the  limbs  of  Arthropods. 
As  a  simple  example,  we 
find  that  in  primitive  Cope- 
pods  both  the  first  appear- 
ance and  the  subsequent 
growth  of  the  appendages 

occur  in  strict  antero-posterior  sequence  ;  but  in  many  of  the 
more  specialized  members  of  the  group,  while  the  appear- 
ance of  the  rudiments  still  takes  place  in  this  sequence, 
the  swimming  feet  of  the  anterior  thoracic  segments  then 
grow  rapidly,  while  the  more  anterior  maxillae  and  maxil- 
lipeds  remain  for  some  time  in  a  rudimentary  bud-like  con- 
dition (see  Caiman,  1909,  p.  89).  Scammon  himself  mentions 
some  exceptions  to  the  purely  linear  growth  of  parts.  The  work 
of  Schultz  (1926,  1930) 1  on  other  Primates  refers  to  various 

1  Schultz  presents  his  results  almost  entirely  in  the  form  of  percentage 
values  (ratios)  and  their  changes  with  age.  It  would  be  of  considerable 
interest  to  undertake  an  analysis  of  his  absolute  data  to  see  whether 
they  conformed  toScammon's  linear  or  to  my  heterogonic  formula. 


Fig.  71 . — Head  length  against  total  length 
in  male    Blue-whales  ;    logarithmic  plot- 
ting,     k  =  1-55   (except  for   last  point). 
(From  Data  of  Mackintosh  and  Wheeler,  1929.) 


138  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

evolutionary  changes  in  proportion  of  parts  which  are  difficult 
to  account  for  solely  on  variations  in  the  time-relations  of  early 
development.  (E.g.  increase  in  relative  length  of  arm  without 
a  corresponding  change  for  the  leg  :  the  fact  that  the  ratio 
of  radius/humerus  increases  during  ontogeny,  and  increases 
most  in  those  animals  in  which  it  is  highest  in  adult  life,  which 
are,  further,  those  with  the  greatest  relative  length  of  the 
arm).  Further,  the  work  of  Hammond  on  sheep  previously 
cited  (p.  88)  is  conclusive  proof  that  growth-gradients  as  defined 
by  me  do  exist  in  vertebrates  and  may  even  change  their 
sign,  late  in  development,  long  after  the  embryonic  period 
is  over  ;  while  the  disturbances  of  proportions  which  occur 
in  conditions  due  to  glandular  abnormality  (e.g.  acromegaly) 
cannot  originate  in  the  embryonic  period  when  there  are  no 
functional  ductless  glands,  but  must  be  due  to  changes  in 
growth-intensity  of  parts  during  foetal  and  post-natal  life. 

And  the  analysis  of  Lapicque  (1907)  and  Dubois  (1922)  shows 
that  the  growth  of  some  organs  at  least,  such  as  the  brain, 
do  not  take  place  according  to  a  linear  but  to  an  exponential 
function  of  body-size.  My  tentative  conclusion  would  there- 
fore be  that  in  man  as  in  other  forms,  the  law  of  developmental 
direction  is  of  great  importance,  exerting  effects  on  propor- 
tionate size  of  parts  long  after  it  has  actually  ceased  to  be 
at  work  in  the  early  embryonic  period,  but  that  heterogony 
of  parts  associated  with  gradients  in  actual  growth-intensity 
also  operate  during  the  whole  of  the  later  period  of  auxano- 
differentiation.  It  must  suffice  here  to  point  out  the  simi- 
larity between  these  and  the  results  obtained  by  Abeloos  (1.  c.)  on 
Planaria.  The  existence  of  an  identical  type  of  growth-gradient 
in  two  such  remote  types  as  a  flatworm  and  a  mammal  is  striking. 

It  should  also  be  pointed  out  that  the  gradients  revealed 
by  Scammon's  figures  are  capable  of  modification  and  even 
reversal.  In  the  limbs  of  man,  the  gradient  in  male  and 
female  must  clearly  be  quantitatively  different,  in  order  to 
produce  the  relatively  smaller  hands  and  feet  of  the  female. 
In  women,  further,  the  main  body-gradient  is  clearly  altered 
by  the  accentuation  of  growth  in  the  pelvic  region,  apparently 
associated  with  diminished  growth  in  the  region  of  the  shoul- 
ders ;  and  the  partition  of  growth-potential  between  trunk 
and  extremities  appears  to  be  shifted  slightly  in  favour  of 
the  trunk  in  the  male  as  in  Crustacea,  e.g.  Eupagurus  (Bush,  1.  c.) 
and  Gammarus  (Kunkel  and  Robertson,  I.e.).  A  case  of 
reversal  of  the  limb-gradient  has  already  been  referred  to  in 


EMBRYONIC   GROWTH  139 

Hammond's  sheep  (p.  88)  :  here,  before  birth,  the  normal 
effect  must  have  been  proceeding  ;  but  after  birth  the  distal 
regions  increase  least,  the  proximal  regions  most,  with  a  graded 
effect  in  between. 

Thus  in  the  vertebrate  body  again,  we  would  appear  to 
be  dealing  with  a  primary  gradient  effect,  doubtless  correlated 
with  Child's  physiological  or  axial  gradients,  which  auto- 
matically has  an  effect  upon  growth,  and  secondary  modi- 
fications of  this,  imposed  to  effect  growth  in  biologically 
advantageous  ways.     (See  also  Bray's  work,  p.  259.) 

§  7.     The  Mathematical  Formulation  of  Relative 
Growth  in  Embryonic  Life 

Organs  developing  according  to  the  law  of  antero-posterior 
development  are  special  cases  of  the  more  general  rule  that 
during  early  development  different  organs  do  not  originate 
at  the  same  time.  They  constitute  the  most  abundant  of 
such  cases,  and  have  particular  interest,  e.g.  in  relation  to 
gradient  theories.  But  from  the  point  of  view  of  formulating 
qualitative  rules  of  relative  growth,  they  remain  special  cases 
of  the  more  comprehensive  rule. 

This  problem  has  only  been  adequately  attacked  by  Schmal- 
hausen  (1927A,  1927B,  1930),  and  in  what  follows  I  can  do  little 
save  summarize  his  views  and  to  comment  briefly  upon  them. 

It  is  an  obvious  fact  of  observation  that  organs  or  parts 
of  the  body  in  general  grow  more  rapidly  when  first  formed, 
and  that  their  absolute  growth-rate  (when  external  factors 
such  as  temperature  are  kept  constant)  diminishes  progress- 
ively with  time.  Our  previous  method  of  establishing  the 
coefficient  of  relative  growth  for  an  organ  by  comparing  its 
size  with  that  of  some  standard  representing  the  measure  of 
the  rest  of  the  body  at  different  absolute  sizes,  is  completely 
valid  only  on  the  assumption  that  the  organ  and  the  standard 
part  begin  their  careers  simultaneously,  so  that  the  decrease 
of  absolute  growth-intensity  proceeds  pari  passu  in  both, 
and  time  can  therefore  be  neglected.  Even  when  the  origins 
are  not  simultaneous,  it  will,  however,  usually  provide 
a  close  approximation  when  we  are  dealing  with  the  later 
stages  of  growth,  for  then  the  difference  in  time  of  origin 
between  organ  and  standard  will  be  negligible  in  comparison 
with  the  time  that  has  since  elapsed.  This  point  is  brought 
out  by  Schmalhausen  himself,  who  gives  some  theoretical 
calculations  on  the  subject  (1927B,  p.  41,  etc.). 


140  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

But  during  the  early  stages  of  development,  the  effect  of 
different  time  of  origin  will  be  relatively  large,  and  will  com- 
pletely vitiate  the  method  of  comparing  absolute  sizes  (I.e., 
p.  59).  What  we  require  to  do,  if  the  organ  x  is  first  formed 
n  days  after  the  standard  part  y,  is  to  compare  the  size  of  the 
organ  at  n,  n  +  I,  n  +  2  .  .  .  days  with  the  size  of  the 
standard  at  o,  1,  2  .  .  .  days  :  from  these  sizes,  the  growth- 
coefficient  of  the  organ  could  be  correctly  calculated  according 
to  our  heterogony  formula.  But  to  arrive  at  these  values,  we 
require  to  know  the  time-relations  of  early  development,  which 
is  precisely  what  we  have  been  able  to  neglect,  with  such 
economy  of  time  and  labour,  in  our  previous  approach. 

Unfortunately,  owing  firstly  to  the  difficulty  of  estab- 
lishing the  true  time  of  origin  of  development,  and  secondly 
to  variations  of  developmental  rate  among  individuals,  which 
make  different  embryos  arrive  at  the  same  developmental 
stage  at  different  absolute  times,  accurate  time-relations  are 
hard  to  establish  for  embryonic  life,  and  not  always  service- 
able even  when  established.  These  difficulties  are  extreme  in 
the  chick,  but  serious  even  in  mammals,  where,  e.g.,  litter- 
size  has  a  marked  effect  on  foetal  size  and  consequently  upon 
foetal  differentiation.  For  these  reasons,  Schmalhausen  uses 
an  indirect  method  for  estimating  true  developmental  age. 

In  his  previous  papers,  Schmalhausen  was  able  to  show 
that  in  the  chick  and  apparently  in  various  other  vertebrates, 
the  linear  growth  of  the  embryo,  measured  by  the  cube  root 
of  its  weight,  typ,  remained  approximately  constant  through- 
out embryonic  life.  Since  the  specific  gravity  of  the  embryo 
is  very  close  to  1,  then  if  the  weight  p  is  taken  in  milligrams, 
typ  can  be  taken  as  giving  a  value  in  millimetres  ;  and  the 
constant  rate  of  growth  can  be  expressed  in  mm.  per  day. 
Thus  the  cube  root  of  the  weight  of  the  embryo  can  be  taken 
as  giving  a  measure  of  its  age. 

This  approximate  constancy  of  linear  growth-rate  holds  also, 
according  to  Schmalhausen,  for  the  separate  organs  of  the 
body.  In  all  cases,  there  are  considerable  oscillations  in  the 
value  of  linear  growth  per  day  ;  and  sometimes  the  value  alters 
progressively  during  development,  so  that  the  method  can  only 
be  considered  an  approximate  one.  None  the  less,  for  studies 
of  relative  growth,  the  method  appears  to  be  at  least  as  suit- 
able, and  certainly  much  less  difficult  to  arrive  at,  than 
accurate  time-measurements. 

Starting  from  these  assumptions,  we  arrive  at  the  following 


EMBRYONIC  GROWTH  141 

line  of  argument.  We  wish  to  find  the  growth-quotient  q  of 
an  organ — i.e.  the  ratio  of  the  growth-rate  of  the  organ  during 
a  particular  phase  of  its  development  to  that  of  the  body, 
or  of  a  standard  part  representing  the  body,  not  during  the 
same  period  of  time,  but  during  the  corresponding  phase  of 
its  development. 

Schmalhausen  had  previously  established  the  following 
formula  for  finding  what  he  calls  the  true  growth-rate  (C„)  of 
an  organ  for  a  period  from  time  t  to  time  tu  during  which 
the  weight  (or  volume)  of  the  organ  has  increased  from  v 
to  vx.     His  formula  is 

_log^x  -log  v  .. 

U~  0-4343  Ci-*) W 

Correspondingly  the  true  growth-rate  of  the  body  during 
the  same  period  will  be 

log^-log* (la) 

0-4343  (h-t)  K    ' 

If  organ  and  body  are  in  the  same  phase  of  development 
during  this  period,  then  the  growth-quotient  q  is 

Q,  =  logtti  -logy       .      .      .      .     (a) 

This  is  simply  another  method  of  writing  the  heterogony 
formula  already  arrived  at  by  me,  and  his  q  is  the  same  as 
my  k. 

For  purposes  of  dealing  with  embryonic  organs,  we  should 
take  t  as  t0,  the  time  at  which  the  organ  and  the  body  begin 
their  growth,  which  in  this  case  we  have  assumed  to  be  at  the 
same  moment.  We  should  then  write  v  and  w,  v0  and  w0 
respectively.     Formula  (2)  can  then  be  written  : 

Log  vt=  q  log  w1  +  (log  v0  —  q  log  w0)       •      .     (3) 

Now  log  Vo  —  q  log  Wo  will  always  be  the  same  ;  let  us  call 
this  expression  b. 

Then  vx  =  bw^. 

As  stated  above,  q  is  here  identical  with  k  in  my  formula  ; 
but  we  now  have  a  further  analysis  of  my  constant  b,  which 
however  can  only  be  arrived  at  if  we  know  the  initial  size  of 
the  organ  and  the  body-standard. 

But  if  the  organ  and  the  body  begin  their  growth  at  different 
times,  then  the  matter  is  more  complex.  We  want  to  com- 
pare the  growth  of  the  organ  with  that  of  the  body  during 
corresponding  periods  of  their  development.     Let  tx  be  the 


142 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


time  which  elapses  between  the  origin  of  the  body  and  that 
of  the  organ.  Then  the  length  of  this  period  is,  by  Schmal- 
hausen's  method,  measured  by  the  linear  increase  of  the  body  : 
let  this  be  denoted  by  Lx.  Then  if  the  weight  of  the  organ 
at  times  t  and  tx  be  v  and  vlf  the  linear  dimensions  of  the 
body,  not  for  the  same  time,  but  for  the  corresponding  phase 
of  its  development,  will  be  (L  —  Lj.)  and  (Lx  —  Lx)  ;  and  the 
corresponding  body-weights  (since  the  linear  dimension  is 
derived  directly  by  taking  the  cube  root  of  the  weight)  will  be 
as  the  cubes  of  these  values. 

Thus  the  growth-quotient  q  for  the  organ  for  this  period 
of  time  can  be  written 

a= log  Pi -log* _      (     () 

*       3[log  (U  -  U)  ~  log  (L  -  Lx)]  w 

The  corresponding  formula  for  linear  measurements  of  the 
organ  will  of  course  be  the  same,  but  with  the  omission  of 
the  3  in  the  denominator.1 

As  example  Schmalhausen  takes  the  length  of  the  parts 
of  the  hind-limb  of  the  developing  fowl.  Here  the  develop- 
ment begins  proximally,  so  that  e.g.  the  most  distal  (4th) 
phalanx  of  the  3rd  digit  begins  to  develop  two  days  later  than 
the  1st  or  most  basal. 

Taking  simply  the  initial  and  final  values  for  length  between 
the  8th  (or  9th)  and  the  21st  day,  he  arrives  at  the  following 
result. 


Femur 

{Phalanx  1 
3 
4 


Origin  at  linear 

size  (L)  of  embryo 

mm. 


377 
5-20 

6-87 

8-25 

8-89 


k  calculated  from 

Huxley's  hetero- 

gony  formula 


q  calculated  from 
the  linear  modifi- 
cation of  formula 
(4)  above 


1-43 
i-65 

1-75 
1-64 
1-85 


i-li 

i-oo 
0-84 
o-86 


1  If  we  knew  the  time-relations  precisely,  the  proper  formulation  of 
the  growth  quotient  would  be 

= log  vt  -  log  v 

^  " "  log  (w1  —  wx)  —  log  (w  —  wx) 

where  wx  is  the  amount  of  weight  added  by  the  body  in  the  period  tx, 
between  the  time  of  its  origin  and  that  of  the  origin  of  the  organ. 
Mathematically,  it  may  be  pointed  out,  this  is  not  identical  with 
expression  (4)  ;    but  the  latter  gives  a  reasonable  approximation. 


EMBRYONIC   GROWTH 


143 


It  is  seen  that  there  is  in  actual  fact  (q  values)  a  growth- 
gradient  in  the  3rd  digit  dropping  distally  (with  possible  slight 
rise  quite  terminally  again)  ;  while  if  we  do  not  take  account 
of  the  difference  in  time  of  origin,  the  gradient  (k  values)  is 
quite  obscured  and  the  terminal  digit  comes  to  have  the 
largest  '  growth-coefhcient  '. 

The  change  in  relative  size  of  various  organs  of  the  chick 
during  embryonic  life  is  shown  in  Fig.  72,  and  the  actual 
growth  of  some  others  has  been  plotted  from  Schmalhausen's 


7      8     3     10    II     12     13     14    15     16     17    18    19    20  21  days 


Fig.   72. — Changes  in  relative  size  in  various  organs  of  the  chick  during 

embryonic  life. 

B,  brain ;    H,  heart ;    F,  fore-limb  ;    M,  metanephros. 

Note  the  very  different  shapes  of  the  curves.     This  depends  (a)  on  the  time  of  origin  of  the  organ, 
(fc)  on  its  relative  growth-rate. 


data  in  Fig.  73.  The  value  of  Schmalhausen's  method  is 
clearly  evident.  It  means  that  we  cannot  discover  the  true 
growth-coefficient  of  an  organ  during  its  early  stages  without 
precise  information  as  to  the  time-relations  of  development. 

Somewhat  unfortunately  from  our  point  of  view,  Schmal- 
hausen  prefers  in  general  not  to  work  with  growth-quotients, 
which  are  our  growth-coefficients  corrected  for  difference  in 
time  of  origin,  but  with  growth-constants.  These  are  obtained 
by  multiplying  the  growth-rate  Cv  of  an  organ  (see  equation  1) 
for  a  given  period  by  the  mean  age  of  the  organ  during  that 


144 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


period,  since  he  believes  that  he  has  established  in  his  earlier 
papers  the  fact  that  during  development,  growth-rate  sinks 
in  simple  inverse  ratio  to  time. 


8       10     12      14     16     18     20    22     24    26    28     30     32     34    36mm. 


4      6      8/0/2/4     16     18    20    22    24    26    28    30    32    34    36  mm 

A 
Fig.  73. — Weight-growth  of  various  organs  in  the  embryo  chick,  plotted  on 
growth-rate,  A,  against  age  as  determined  by  increase  of  v'embryo  volume 

various  organs  are  indicated  in  the  legend.     In 
In  A,  x  is  weight  of  lens  ;   and  +  (continued  to  the  right  and  below)   weight  of  fore-limb.     In 
the  portions  of  development  shown  the  lens  increases  from  8  x  10-6  g.  to  0-0088  mg.  ;   the  fore-limb 
from  7-5  X  10-4  g.  to  0-54  mg. ;    the  embryo  from  0-87  to  41  g. 

{Constructed  from  the  data  of  Schmalhausen,  1927A,  Tables  9,  15,  18  ;    1927B,  Table  7. 


EMBRYONIC   GROWTH 


145 


We  need  not  enter  into  a  discussion  of  this  point  here,  which 
concerns  the  problem  not  of  relative  but  of  absolute  growth. 
In  any  case,  the  growth-constants  thus  arrived  at  will  give  us 
some  real  measure  of  growth-rate  ;  and  further,  the  relative 
growth-constant,  which  he  uses  for  comparative  purposes,  is 
arrived  at  directly  from  the  growth-quotient  above  discussed. 
However,  for  our  purpose  we  may  stick  chiefly  to  the  growth- 


10     II     12    13     14    15     16    17    18     19    20    21  days 


arith-log  paper  so  that  the  slopes  of  the  curves  is  directly  proportional  to 

(see  text) ;  B,  against  actual  age  of  embryo.     The  scales  of  weight  for  the 

both,  0  denotes  weight  of  embryo. 

In  B,  +  denotes  brain-weight  (from  001  to  1-02  g.)  ;  +  metanephros  weight  (from  00014  to 
0-13  g.).  The  lens  and  the  fore-limb  originate  nearly  together,  but  the  latter  grows  much  faster. 
The  brain  starts  growth  early  and  then  grows  more  slowly  than  the  whole  embryo,  the  metanephros 
starts  late  and  throughout  grows  much  faster  than  the  embryo. 

IO 


146 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


quotients,  or,  as  I  prefer  to  call  them  in  accordance  with  the 
terminology  of  this  book,  the  corrected  growth-coefficients. 

These  corrected  growth-coefficients  for  various  organs  of 
five  species  of  birds  are  as  follows  (recalculated  from  Schmal- 
hausen's  Table  9)  : 


Growth-quotients 

Relative  mass-factor 

Brain 

Giz- 
zard 

1-20 
o-95 

1-27 
0-94 
1-14 

Fore- 
limb 

Hind- 
limb 

Brain 

1-27 
1-26 

i-8i 

I-I2 

1-97 

Giz- 
zard 

Fore- 
limb 

Hind- 
limb 

Chick    (G  alius  domes- 

ticus)      .... 
Duck  (Anas  moschata) 
House-sparrow  (Passer 

domesticus) 
Sand-martin     (Cotyle 

riparia) 
Rook    (Corvus    frug- 

ilegus) 

0-62 
0-67 

0-51 

o-58 

o-55 

0-94 
o-93 

0-94 
079 
0-84 

I-I2 
1-19 

1-05 
o-95 

1-02 

0-244 
0-324 

0-369 

0-491 

o-353 

0-316 
0-316 

o-343 
0-456 
0-438 

0-371 
0-294 

0-371 

0-414 

0-386 

The  heterogony  of  the  brain  is  always  markedly  negative, 
that  of  the  fore-limb  slightly  negative  ;  that  of  the  hind-limb 
is  always  higher  than  that  of  the  fore-limb  ;  while  that  of 
the  gizzard  is  the  most  variable. 

The  right-hand  part  of  the  table  concerns  another  constant 
arrived  at  by  Schmalhausen.  On  the  assumption  previously 
arrived  at  by  him  that  the  growth  of  an  organ  can  be  repre- 
sented by  the  formula 

v  =  (at)k (6) 

where  v  is  the  weight  or  volume  of  an  organ,  t  is  the  time  elapsed 
since  its  origin,  and  a  a  constant  (if  the  rate  of  linear  growth 
of  the  body  or  organ  is  constant,  then  of  course  k  =  3),  then 
a  is  what  Schmalhausen  calls  the  extension  factor  (Extensit- 
atsfaktor).  The  constant  a  can  also  be  calculated  for  a  given 
interval  of  time  (tx  —  t).  A  derivative  constant  is  what 
Schmalhausen  calls  the  mass  factor,  m.  This  he  takes  as  ah. 
It  can  be  derived  from  (6)  thus  : 


,fc  — 


v 


m  =  cr  —  -7. ,  or  v 


tk' 


mtk 


(7) 


This  constant  m  characterizes  the  initial  size  of  the  organ- 
rudiment.  Schmalhausen's  exposition  is  here  exceedingly 
obscure,    especially   as   to   how   he   transforms   his   absolute 


CONCLUSION  147 

extension-factor  m  into  what  he  styles  his  relative  extension- 
factor  r,  which  alone  makes  comparison  possible  between 
different  species.  It  is  clear,  however,  that  if  his  general 
argument  is  correct,  the  two  factors  here  recorded  will  serve 
to  give  a  complete  description  of  the  facts  concerning  the 
relative  growth  of  an  organ  from  its  first  inception. 

We  see,  for  instance,  that  the  brains  of  chick  and  duck 
start  of  nearly  the  same  relative  size,  but  that  that  of  the 
duck  then  grows  relatively  more  rapidly.  The  gizzard  is  laid 
down  of  larger  size  in  the  duck  than  in  the  chick,  but  then 
grows  much  more  slowly,  so  that  it  ends  up  considerably 
smaller.  Similarly,  the  sand-martin,  which  in  the  adult  is 
characterized  by  very  small  hind-limbs,  has  large  hind-limb 
rudiments  which  then  proceed  to  grow  very  slowly.  It  is 
interesting  to  find  that  the  growth-quotient  of  the  hind-limbs 
is  in  all  species  investigated  higher  than  that  of  the  fore-limbs. 

I  feel  that  some  of  the  formulae  advanced  by  Schmalhausen 
are  open  to  criticism  and  will  need  some  further  corroboration. 
However,  his  method  for  arriving  at  the  true  corrected  growth- 
coefficient  for  embryonic  organs  is  of  real  value,  and  if  possibly 
not  always  fully  accurate,  is  undoubtedly  the  only  way  at 
present  available  by  which  we  can  arrive  at  a  good  first 
approximation.     (See  also  the  work  of  Ford,  p.  260.) 

§  8.    Conclusion 

The  chief  points  in  this  chapter  may  be  briefly  summarized 
as  follows  :  D'Arcy  Thompson's  method  of  employing  Car- 
tesian co-ordinates  to  effect  the  geometrical  transformation 
of  an  organism  or  organ  gives  evidence  of  the  existence  of 
orderly  growth-changes  within  the  body.  These  may  be  of 
complex  nature,  but  can  be  analysed  into  a  series  of  growth- 
gradients.  Confirmation  of  this  is  provided  by  quantitative 
analysis  of  various  organisms  during  their  growth.  A  curious 
effect  is  noted  by  which  the  presence  of  a  centre  of  high  growth- 
intensity  intercalated  in  a  main  growth-gradient  is  correlated 
with  minor  changes  in  the  growth-intensity  of  neighbouring 
parts.  Those  immediately  posterior  are  somewhat  increased 
in  size,  those  immediately  anterior  appear  to  be  somewhat 
decreased  in  size  :  i.e.  the  main  growth-gradient  is  deformed 
in  a  regular  way  by  the  presence  of  the  subsidiary  growth- 
gradient.  Finally,  it  is  pointed  out  that  constant  growth- 
coefficients  of  parts  and  regular  growth-gradients  within  organs 
and  the  body  as  a  whole,  such  as  here  described,  appear  to  be 


148  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

operative  only  during  the  later  phase  of  growth.  During 
the  earlier  phase,  when  histological  differentiation  is  proceed- 
ing, quite  other  quantitative  rules  apply.  To  distinguish 
these  two  phases  of  development,  the  term  histo-differentiation 
is  proposed  for  the  former,  auxano-differentiation  (Greek 
avgaveiv,  to  increase)  for  the  latter. 


CHAPTER    V 

GROWTH-CENTRES  AND  GROWTH-GRADIENTS 
IN   ACCRETIONARY   GROWTH 

§  i.     The  Accretionary  Method  of  Growth 

IN  the  organs  we  have  so  far  been  considering  growth  is 
essentially  of  the  compound-interest  type.  That  is  to  say, 
the  increments  of  new  material  produced  by  growth  are 
alive,  and  themselves  grow  and  produce  new  material  in  their 
turn,  so  that  growth  is  a  multiplicative  process.  The  rate  of 
growth  may,  and  doubtless  does,  slow  down  with  increasing 
size  and  age,  but  this  merely  means  that  the  multiplying  factor 
decreases  as  some  regular  function  of  physiological  age.  The 
growth  remains  of  compound-interest  type,  even  if  the  actual 
rate  of  compound  interest  is  never  constant  but  progressively 
decreases. 

However,  there  are  many  other  organs  whose  method  of 
formation  is  radically  different,  so  that  their  growth  is  essen- 
tially of  the  simple-interest  type.  In  them,  the  increments 
of  new  material  produced  by  growth  are  turned  into  non-living 
material  as  soon  as  formed  and  remain  permanently  (or  until 
cast  off  by  ecdysis  or  other  means)  in  the  state  in  which  they 
were  laid  down.  They  do  not  contribute  any  further  new 
material,  so  that  growth  here  is  not  a  multiplicative  but  an 
additive  process. 

Here  again  the  rate  of  growth  may  alter  with  age,  but  this 
only  means  that  the  amount  of  new  material  added  in  unit 
time  steadily  decreases  ;  and  the  growth  remains  of  simple- 
interest  type  even  though  the  actual  rate  of  simple  interest 
is  continually  altering. 

We  may  accordingly  distinguish  these  two  types  of  growth 
as  the  multiplicative,  intussusceptive  or  compound-interest 
type  on  the  one  hand,  the  additive,  accretionary  or  simple- 
interest  type  on  the  other. 

The  most  familiar  examples  of  organs  growing  by  the  accre- 
tionary method  are  shells  such  as  those  of  molluscs,  brachiopods, 


150  PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 

or  foraminifera  ;  but  the  horns  of  antelopes,  sheep,  oxen, 
rhinoceroses,  etc.,  as  well  as  the  teeth  of  Vertebrates,  also 
fall  into  this  category.  At  first  sight  the  forms  engendered 
by  this  type  of  growth  appear  so  different  from  those  we 
have  hitherto  been  considering  that  we  do  not  even  expect 
to  find  that  the  underlying  growth-mechanisms  have  any- 
thing in  common.  The  differences,  however,  depend  almost 
entirely  upon  the  basic  difference  between  any  multiplicative 
and  any  additive  type  of  growth.  It  is  to  my  mind  one  of 
the  most  interesting  results  of  these  growth-studies  that 
we  are  able  to  demonstrate  the  same  fundamental  fact  of 
growth-gradients  operating  to  produce  these  two  apparently 
unrelated  types  of  organic  form. 

Let  me  first  take  the  horn  of  rhinoceroses  as  example.  It 
has  been  admirably  handled  by  D'Arcy  Thompson  in  his 
Growth  and  Form.  I  here  base  myself  on  his  lucid  analysis, 
which,  like  so  many  other  important  ways  of  thinking  that 
enable  us  to  see  familiar  facts  in  a  new  light,  seems  self-evident 
once  grasped  ;  but  I  add  one  or  two  detailed  points,  and 
link  it  up  with  the  ideas  which  emerged  from  the  study  of 
multiplicative  growth. 

The  horn  of  a  rhinoceros,  then,  is  produced  by  intensive 
production  of  keratin  in  special  form  and  abundance  over  a 
limited  area  of  the  head  epidermis.  The  restriction  of  horn- 
producing  potency  to  a  limited  area  is  doubtless  of  the  same 
nature  as  the  other  restrictions  of  potency  which  occur  during 
early  development  and  sooner  or  later  convert  the  germ  from 
a  plastic  construction  capable  of  marked  regeneration  to  a 
determined  construction  which  we  can  designate  as  a  chemical 
mosaic  (see  Huxley,  1924c).  The  potency  of  producing  eye, 
ear,  brain  or  limb  becomes  similarly  restricted  and  localized 
in  the  amphibian  and  other  embryo,  and  the  restriction  of 
horn-potency  to  a  localized  area  is  only  another  result  of  this 
mosaic-producing  chemo-differentiation. 

On  this  horn-area,  keratin  is  being  produced  so  as  to 
accumulate  at  right  angles  to  the  surface.  In  addition,  the 
horn-area  itself  is  enlarging  over  the  surface  as  the  animal 
grows.  Whether,  as  seems  likely,  it  is  enlarging  somewhat 
more  rapidly  than  the  surface  of  the  head  as  a  whole  cannot 
be  stated  with  certainty  until  detailed  measurements  have 
been  made  ;  but  this  is  immaterial  to  our  present  purpose. 


LOGARITHMIC  SPIRALS  151 

§  2.    Logarithmic    Spirals    as    the    result   of   Growth- 
gradients 

If  the  rate  of  keratin-production  at  any  one  moment  were 
equal  over  the  whole  horn-area,  the  resultant  horn  would 
clearly  have  the  form  of  a  cone,  whose  precise  shape  would 
depend  upon  the  relation  between  the  rate  of  addition  of  new 
material,  and  the  rate  of  spread  of  the  horn-area  over  the 
surface  of  the  head  ;  if  the  two  rates  were  equal,  the  cone 
would  be  a  right-angled  one,  and  so  forth.1  But  as  a  matter 
of  fact,  in  the  common  rhinoceros  growth  is  not  uniform  over 
the  horn-area  :  it  is  at  its  maximum  anteriorly,  and  grades 
steadily  down  to  the  posterior  margin.  As  result,  the  horn 
of  course  curves  backwards ;  and  the  precise  form  of  the  curve 
is  that  known  as  a  logarithmic  spiral. 

The  properties  of  this  type  of  curve  have  been  fully  dealt 
with  by  numerous  authors,  and  the  whole  subject  ably  sum- 
marized by  D'Arcy  Thompson  in  a  series  of  chapters.  I  thus 
need  only  remind  my  readers  that  the  most  essential  character- 
istics of  a  structure  growing  in  a  logarithmic  spiral  are  that 
successive  increments  are  all  of  the  same  form,  though  of 
increasing  bulk  (gnomonic  growth)  ;  that  the  angle  which 
the  tangent  to  the  curve  makes  with  the  radius  vector  of  the 
curve  remains  constant  ;  and  that  if  the  spiral  grows  long 
enough  to  form  a  number  of  whorls,  the  ratio,  along  a  given 
radius,  of  the  breadth  of  each  whorl  to  that  of  the  whorl  suc- 
ceeding, also  remains  constant.  Further,  this  logarithmic 
spiral  form  must  always  result  in  organisms  when  (a)  growth- 
increments  are  converted  into  non-living  material  as  soon  as 
produced  ;  and  (b)  there  is  a  constant  ratio  between  the 
increments  at  the  two  ends  of  the  growing  structure,  with  a 
regular  (though  not  necessarily  uniform)  gradient  of  growth- 
rate  between  the  high  and  low  points.  We  are  thus  confronted 
once  more  both  with  the  principle  of  constant  differential 
growth-ratios  and  with  that  of  growth-gradients.  Since,  how- 
ever, these  here  operate  with  an  additive  instead  of  a  multi- 
plicative growth-mechanism,  the  resultant  structure  remains 
of  constant  (and  logarithmic-spiral)  form  instead  of  continu- 
ously changing  its  proportions  as  with  a  male  Uca  chela  or 
a  female  Carcinus  abdomen. 

But  the  rhinoceroses  teach  us  a  further  highly  important 

fact.     Some  species  possess  two  horns  instead  of  only  one. 

1  The  extinct  Elasmotherium  possessed  a  horn  in  the  shape  of  a 
flattened  cone,  with  the  diameter  of  its  base  greater  than  its  height. 


152  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

And  in  these  the  second  and  hinder  horn  is  both  smaller  than 
the  first  (and  also  less  curved) .  This  implies  that  the  growth- 
gradient  made  visible  in  the  form  of  the  anterior  horn  is 
continued  across  to  the  second  horn-area,  causing  the  growth- 
intensity  to  diminish,  and  therefore  resulting  in  a  smaller  horn  ; 
(and  also  that  the  shape  of  the  gradient  is  not  constant,  but 
flattens  out,  leading  to  less  difference  in  growth-intensity 
between  the  two  ends  of  the  horn-area,  and  consequently  to 
a  decreased  curvature  of  the  second  horn).  These  facts  thus 
lead  to  the  same  important  conclusion  as  did  the  analysis  of 
the  growth  of  the  appendages  of  Eupagurus — namely,  that 
though  intensive  growth  be  restricted  to  specifically  limited 
areas  (there  the  regions  of  the  limb-buds,  here  the  horn-areas), 
yet  the  agency  determining  the  growth-gradients,  whatever 
it  may  be,  is  organismal,  and  extends  throughout  the  body. 
It  can  only  express  itself  where  the  potentialities  for  intensive 
growth  exist,  but  it  is  itself  continuous  (as  in  a  rather  different, 
non-graded  way,  the  hormones  are  distributed  over  the  entire 
system,  but  only  exert  effects  where  they  meet  with  tissues 
specifically  adjusted  to  react  to  them).  Thus  we  must  assume 
that  even  in  the  one-horned  rhinoceroses,  the  growth-gradient 
is  continuous  along  the  head,  but  can  only  reveal  itself  in 
species  where  a  second  specific  horn-area  is  present  ;  and 
similarly,  that  in  hermit-crabs  the  growth-gradient  controlling 
the  relative  growth  of  appendages  is  continuous,  not  merely 
between  the  limb-producing  areas  of  successive  segments,  but 
even  across  large  regions  in  which  the  capacity  for  limb- 
production  has  been  entirely  lost,  as  in  the  anterior  part  of  the 
male  abdomen. 

It  is  worth  recalling  that  we  already  know  of  analogous 
gradients,  and  to  use  a  more  general  term  under  which  gradients 
can  be  included,  fields,  through  the  results  of  experiments  on 
regeneration  and  grafting.  The  mere  fact  that,  normally, 
precisely  what  is  lost  in  amputation  is  restored  in  regeneration 
points  in  this  direction.  The  conclusion  has  been  made  more 
probable  by  the  proof  given  by  Schotte,  Guyenot  and  Weiss, 
proof  that  in  regeneration  (of  the  Amphibian  limb)  the  new 
tissues  are  not,  as  was  long  held,  proliferated  from  the  old,  but 
are  differentiated  from  a  truly  indifferent  tissue,  and  will 
differentiate  normally  even  if  the  corresponding  tissue  has 
been  removed  from  the  basal  stump.  And  finally,  it  has  been 
clinched  by  the  beautiful  experiments  of  Milojevic,  Weiss, 
Locatelli,  Guyenot  and  Schotte  (references  in   Guyenot  and 


LOGARITHMIC   SPIRALS  153 

Ponse,  1930) ;  these  have  shown  that  if  the  regeneration-bud 
from  the  tail  of  a  Urodele  be  removed  while  still  in  the 
indifferent  stage  and  grafted  on  to  the  stump  of  a  freshly- 
amputated  limb,  it  will  grow  not  into  tail  but  into  limb  ; 
whereas  if  it  has  been  left  a  couple  of  days  longer  on  the  tail 
before  being  transplanted,  it  would  have  been  irrevocably 
determined  as  tail,  and  would  have  become  tail  even  in  its 
new  situation.  They  can  only  be  interpreted  as  meaning 
that  what  has  conveniently  been  called  a  '  morphogenetic 
field '  permeates  the  whole  body  even  of  the  adult  Amphibian. 
It  normally  is  without  effect — in  a  sense  a  by-product,  we 
may  say,  of  the  construction  of  the  animal ;  but  so  soon  as 
indifferent  material  is  placed  under  its  influence,  it  reveals 
its  presence  by  the  effect  which  it  exerts  on  that  material's 
differentiation. 

Whether  growth-gradients  and  morphogenetic  effects  on 
differentiation  are  both  results  of  one  and  the  same  organismal 
field,  or  whether  two  essentially  different,  separate  field- 
mechanisms  are  at  work,  is  very  difficult  to  say.  Further 
discussion  of  this  and  related  points  will  be  deferred  to 
Chapter  VI. 

Thus  the  horns  of  rhinoceroses,  when  considered  from  the 
point  of  view  of  relative  growth,  even  without  further  experi- 
mental analysis,  reveal  interesting  and  unexpected  properties 
of  the  animal  body.  The  same  point  of  view,  applied  to  other 
structures  of  the  same  nature,  is  equally  illuminating.  The 
horns  of  rhinoceroses  are  median  ;  we  should  therefore  not 
expect  to  find  a  difference  of  growth  between  their  lateral 
margins.  But  as  soon  as  we  deal  with  non-median  structures, 
we  should  expect,  if  growth-fields  permeate  the  animal  body, 
to  find  a  difference  in  growth-intensity  not  only  between 
anterior  and  posterior,  but  also  between  median  and  lateral 
margins.  If  this  is  so,  the  resultant  growth  will  be  in  what 
is  popularly  called  spiral  form,  i.e.  not  merely  curving  in  a  true 
logarithmic  spiral  in  one  plane,  but  corkscrewing  up  at  right- 
angles  to  the  first. 

This  is  what  actually  occurs  in  almost  all  horns  of  sheep, 
goats  and  antelopes.  Sometimes  the  lateral  growth-difference 
is  very  slight,  and  the  '  shear  '  at  right-angles  to  the  primary 
plane  of  the  horns'  spiral  is  scarcely  perceptible,  as  in  the 
Sable  and  other  antelopes.  At  other  times  it  is  considerable, 
and  we  get  the  horns  of  certain  sheep  corkscrewing  out  at 
right  angles  to  the  side  of  the  head.      It  appears  that  there 


154  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

is  no  constancy  in  the  sign  of  the  difference,  the  excess  growth- 
intensity  being  sometimes  on  the  median,  sometimes  on  the 
lateral  margin.  The  visible  result  is  that  the  horns  are  some- 
times coiled  clockwise,  sometimes  counter-clockwise. 

Complications,  not  present  in  the  homogeneous  rhinoceros 
horn,  arise  in  the  Cavicorn  ruminants  owing  to  the  presence 
of  the  living  bony  horn-core  within  the  non-living  true  horn 
of  keratin.  The  results  of  these  are  analysed  in  detail  by 
D'Arcy  Thompson,  but  are  not  relevant  to  our  present  purpose. 

§  3.    Growth-gradients  and  the  Shells  of  Molluscs 

The  most  numerous,  various  and  striking  of  the  structures 
which  are  based  on  logarithmic-spiral  form  and  are  due  to 
differential  accretionary  growth  are  the  shells  of  molluscs. 
For  the  moment,  we  will  omit  the  special  case  of  the  bivalves. 
The  problems  here  are  identical  with  those  encountered  in 
the  rhinoceros  horn,  except  that  the  horn  is  solid  and  uniform 
throughout,  the  shell  hollow.  In  both  cases,  form  depends 
upon  constant  differential  growth-ratios.  These  are  here  of 
four  types  :  (1)  the  ratio  of  growth  in  length  to  that  in  width  ; 
\J  (2)  the  median  growth-ratio  ;  (3)  the  lateral  growth-ratio  ; 
(4)  the  ratio  of  excess  growth  at  specific  arbitrary  points  to 
that  manifested  in  the  major  growth-gradients. 

(1)  Constant  differential  ratio  of  length-growth  and  width- 
growth.  In  the  absence  of  any  other  differential  growth 
but  that  between  length-growth  and  width-growth,  the  shell 
(or  horn)  would  assume  the  form  of  a  cone.  The  value  of  this 
first  ratio  determines  the  form  of  such  a  cone.  In  the  rhino- 
ceros horn,  the  physiological  mechanisms  at  work  are  (a)  the 
rate  of  production  of  horn-substance,  (b)  the  outward  spread 
,  of  the  horn-producing  area.  In  the  hollow  mollusc  shell, 
conditions  are  quite  different,  and  only  one  factor  is  at  work, 
namely,  the  angle  at  which  the  mantle-edge  is  inclined  to  the 
main  axis  of  forward  growth.  This  angle  is  presumably 
determined  chiefly  by  the  form  of  the  body,  and  may  be 
modified  by  functional  differences  (see  Chapter  VI).  The 
mantle  is  thus  always  laying  on  material  in  a  direction  oblique 
to  the  main  axis  of  the  shell  ;  the  growth-velocities  in  length 
and  in  breadth  are  merely  components  of  this  single  growth- 
function.  A  high  inclination  of  the  direction  of  mantle-growth 
and  consequent  predominance  of  the  lateral  component  will 
naturally  produce  flattened  cones,  to  which  the  shell  of  the 
common  limpet  is  an  approximation.     A  low  inclination,  on 


THE   SHELLS   OF   MOLLUSCS  155 

the  other  hand,  will  produce  elongated  cones,  as  in  many  of 
the  early  paleozoic  Cephalopods. 

(2)  Constant  differential  ratio  as  regards  growth  in  the  median 
plane.  If  the  length-width  growth-ratio  remains  constant, 
but  the  absolute  magnitudes  of  both  components  are  greatest 
at  one  margin,  least  at  the  opposite  margin,  and  are  inter- 
mediately graded  around  the  two  sides  of  the  mantle,  our 
cone  will  be  distorted,  and,  so  long  as  the  growth-ratios  con- 
cerned remain  constant,  will  grow  into  a  true  logarithmic 
spiral  in  a  single  plane.  Examples  are  provided  by  Nautilus, 
the  great  majority  of  Ammonites,  and  Dentalium. 

Our  first  growth-ratio  will  still  decide  the  form  of  the  cone, 
but  now  that  the  cone  is  distorted  this  will  be  measured  by 
the  ratio  of  the  shell-diameter  at  any  place  to  the  length  of 
the  shell  measured  from  its  origin  along  the  curve  of  the  spiral. 

The  first  and  second  ratio  together  will  decide  the  tightness 
with  which  the  spiral  is  coiled.     There  are  six  main  possibilities : 

(1)  As  limiting  factor,  with  median  growth-ratio  =  i-o,  or 
in  other  words,  no  growth-gradient  from  one  end  of  the  median 
plane  to  the  other,  a  cone  results. 

(2)  When  the  growth-ratio  is  low,  only  slightly  above  unity, 
the  curve  is  very  slight.  In  such  cases,  the  mathematical 
properties  of  the  logarithmic  spiral  being  what  they  are,  a 
many-whorled  structure  will  never  be  produced,  as  the  radius 
of  even  the  second  whorl  would  be  of  relatively  immense 
extent,  and  no  organism  could  do  more  than  produce  a  portion 
of  the  first  whorl.  Such  forms  are  realized  in  the  rhinoceros 
horn  or,  among  Molluscs,  in  the  shell  of  Dentalium. 

(3)  With  increasing  values  of  the  ratio,  the  radius  of  suc- 
cessive whorls  rapidly  decreases.  The  next  possibility  is 
therefore  a  shell  with  more  than  one  whorl,  but  with  no  contact 
between  each  whorl  and  the  next.  This  condition  is  rare,  but 
is  realized,  e.g.  in  certain  Ammonites. 

(4)  As  the  ratio  increases  further,  a  specific  value  will  even- 
tually be  reached  which  allows  the  outer  margin  of  each 
whorl  to  be  precisely  in  contact  with  the  inner  margin  of  the 
whorl  following.  This  condition  is  not  infrequently  realized. 
The  precise  value  of  the  median  growth-ratio  needed  to  produce 
this  result  will  of  course  vary  with  the  value  of  the  previous 
(length-width)  growth-ratio.  With  a  narrow  elongated  cone,  a 
much  higher  median  growth-ratio  will  be  required  just  to  effect 
contact  between  whorls  than  with  a  broader,  less  elongated 
cone  (see  Fig.  74). 


156  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

As  in  each  case  only  one  specific  combination  of  these  two 
independent  variables  will  produce  such  a  result,  we  must 
suppose  that  selection  has  controlled  the  precise  values  to 
secure  this  result,  which  obviously  secures  greater  strength 
than  does  one  in  which  the  whorls  do  not  touch. 

(5)  The  commonest  condition,  however,  which  ensures 
even  greater  constructional  strength  than  the  one  preceding, 
is  produced  by  a  further  increase  of  antero-posterior  growth- 
ratio,  which  has  as  result  the  partial  overlapping  of  each  old 
whorl  by  the  whorls  formed  later.  The  degree  of  overlapping 
will  obviously  vary  with  the  precise  value  of  the  ratio  (as  well 
as  with  other  properties  of  the  shell :    see  below). 


A  B 

Fig.  74. • — Diagram  illustrating  the  co-operation  of  two  growth-ratios  in 
determining  the  form  of  the  Molluscan  shell.  The  two  plane  logarithmic- 
spiral  shells  both  have  the  outer  margin  of  one  whorl  just  touching  the  inner 

margin  of  the  next. 

In  A  the  ratio  of  the  distance  along  a  given  radius  from  the  centre  of  the  shell  to  the  margin  of  one 
whorl  to  that  of  the  succeeding  whorl  is  3-0  ;  in  B  it  is  2-0.  If  there  were  no  lateral  growth-ratio 
(i.e.  if  the  shells  were  uncoiled).  B  would  be  a  more  elongate  cone  than  A;  correspondingly,  the  lateral 
growth-ratio  in  B  must  be  higher  than  in  A  to  cause  contact  of  successive  whorls. 

(6)  Finally,  in  some  cases  the  growth-rate  of  the  slower- 
growing  edge  of  the  mantle  becomes  negligible  or  even  zero, 
and  the  growth-ratio  accordingly  rises  towards  infinity.  In 
such  a  case  each  whorl  is  completely  overlapped  by  all  suc- 
ceeding whorls.  This  condition  is  completely  realized  in 
Nautilus  pompilius,  and  nearly  so  in  Nautilus  umbilicatus. 

This  median  growth-gradient  may  be  orientated  either  way 
in  respect  of  the  main  axis  of  the  molluscan  body.  In  Ammon- 
ites, for  instance,  the  high  point  (growth-centre)  seems  to  have 
been  ventral,  so  that  the  shell  curved  upwards  over  the  back. 
In  other  cases  it  is  dorsal.  In  flat-shelled  Gastropods  (e.g. 
Planorbis)  the  orientation  is  complicated  by  the  fact  of  torsion. 


THE   SHELLS   OF   MOLLUSCS 


157 


D'Arcy  Thompson  (1.  c.)  has  treated  the  quantitative  aspect 
of  this  problem  at  greater  length.  Unfortunately,  he  has  not 
analysed  the  whole  process,  as  would  biologically  be  the  ideal 
method,  in  terms  of  two  co-operating  growth-ratios,  but,  as 
regards  part  of  the  problem,  he  has  been  content  to  give  a 
purely  mathematical  description.  An  analysis  entirely  in 
terms  of  growth-ratios  is  being  undertaken  by  Professor  H. 
Levy,  of  the  Imperial  College  of  Science  ;  meanwhile  it  will 
be  useful  to  give  a  brief  summary  of  D'Arcy  Thompson's 
treatment  of  the  matter. 

The  form  of  a  single  curve  following  a  logarithmic  spiral 
is  given  by  the  expression 


.,,    _    pQ  COt  a 

where  r  is  the  radius  of  the  shell  from  centre  to  circumfer- 
ence ;  6  is  the  angle  of  revolution  which  the  spiral  has  de- 
scribed ;  and  a  is  the  angle  between  the  tangent  of  the  curve 
and  the  radius  vector  of  the  curve,  which  remains  constant  :  this 
is  known  as  the  constant  angle  of  the  curve.  In  addition,  the 
ratio  of  the  radii  of  successive  whorls  is  also  always  a  constant. 
The  relation  between  these  two  constants  is  given  in  the 
following  table  (abbreviated  from  D'Arcy  Thompson,  p.  534)  : 

Ratio  of  breadth 

of  each  whorl  to 

the  next  preceding 

1-0 

1-5 
2-0 

3-o 

5-o 

io-o 

50-0 

ioo-o 

10,000 

1,000,000 

100,000,000 

In  Nautilus,  in  all 
shells  of  Gastropods, 
usually  between  8o° 
of  successive  whorls 
decreasing  values  of 
out  very  rapidly.  E 
the  first  whorl  were 


Constant  angle 

of  the 

spiral 

.      900 

.     86° 

18' 

•     83° 

42' 

.     8o° 

5' 

•     75° 

38' 

.     69° 

53' 

•     58° 

5' 

•     53° 

46' 

•     34° 

19' 

•     240 

28' 

160  52' 

ordinary  shells,  and  in  all  typical  spiral 
the  constant  angle  is  rarely  below  8o°, 
and  850,  and  the  ratio  of  the  breadth 
usually  between  3-0  and  175.  With 
the  constant  angle,  the  spiral  flattens 
.g.,  if  the  constant  angle  were  280,  and 
1  in.  broad,  the  next  whorl  would  be 


158 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


about  1 1  miles  broad  :  this  is  what  happens  in  shells  like 
Dentalium,  which  represent  but  a  fraction  of  the  first  whorl, 
and  '  never  come  round  ',  as  D'Arcy  Thompson  puts  it. 

Now  when  we  are  considering,  not  a  single  line  describing 
a  logarithmic  spiral,  but  a  conical  shell  distorted  into  this 
form  by  growth-forces,  the  form  of  the  curves  described  by 
the  inner  and  outer  margin  are  identical,  but  the  inner  margin 
is  retarded  in  its  growth  by  a  constant  fraction — in  other 
words,  the  ratio  of  their  growth-ratios  is  a  constant.1  The 
actual  retardation  can  be  expressed  as  the  ratio  of  the  length 
of  the  inner  margin  from  the  centre  of  the  shell,  to  that  of  the 
outer  margin,  at  any  point.  This  figure  gives  the  median 
growth-ratio  we  have  been  discussing  (or  rather  is  the  reciprocal 
of  it  as  we  have  defined  it) .  This  value  can  also  be  calculated 
by  utilizing  the  mathematical  properties  of  the  logarithmic 
spiral  (D'Arcy  Thompson,  pp.  541  seq.).  We  need  not  go 
into  the  calculations,  but  can  confine  outselves  to  the  results. 
The  median  growth-ratio  needed  to  produce  a  particular  degree 
of  coiling  will  vary  with  the  constant  angle  of  the  spiral. 

We  will  consider  only  two  cases — the  median  growth-ratio 
needed  to  make  consecutive  whorls  just  touch,  and  that  needed 
to  produce  a  shell  with  spaces  between  successive  whorls,  the 
breadth  of  each  space  being  a  mean  proportional  between  the 
breadths  of  the  whorls  which  bound  it. 


Median  growth-ratio,  of  outer  to  inner  border  of 
shell,  needed  to  produce 

Constant  angle 
«  of  spiral 

(a)  Successive  whorls 
just  touching 

(b)  Successive  whorls  sep- 
arated by  a  space  which  is 
a  mean  proportional  be- 
tween the  breadths  of  the 
whorls 

890 

88° 

870 

86° 

850 

8o° 

75° 

700 

65° 

I-II 

l-24 
i-39 
i-55 
i-73 

3-«3 
4-27 
9-84 
18-2 

1-05 
I-I2 

i-i8 

1-23 

i-3i 
i-75 
2-32 
3-12 
4-35 

1  Waddington  (1929)  in  various  Ammonites  finds  that  this  is  not 
strictly  true.  The  ratio  is  slightly  changing  all  the  time,  the  formula 
for  the  spirals  being  of  the  form  r  +  c  =  e&e  instead  of  r  =  e&e. 


THE   SHELLS   OF   MOLLUSCS 


159 


Thus  in  most  Ammonitoid  and  Gastropod  shells  with  con- 
stant angle  between  8o°  and  85 °,  to  produce  contact  between 
the  whorls  the  outer  border  must  be  growing  between  3  and 
17  times  as  fast  as  the  inner.  For  spirals  with  lower  con- 
stant angle  (i.e.  those  with  high  ratio  of  breadth-growth  to 
length-growth),  the  median  growth-ratio  must  be  much  higher. 
In  open-coiled  forms,  however,  the  median  growth-ratio  will 
be  less,  and  does  not  have  to  increase  so  fast  with  decrease 
of  constant  angle  to  preserve  the  same  spacing.  When  the 
median  growth-ratio  is  very  high,  we  shall  get  forms  whose 
whorls  completely  overlap,  like  Nautilus,  if  the  constant  angle 
is  high  ;  but  if  the  constant  angle  is  low  we  shall  then  get 
types  like  Haliotis  (or  most  Lamelli- 
branch  shells). 

(3)  The  lateral  growth-ratio.  If  in 
addition  to  the  preceding  two  differ- 
ential growth-ratios,  we  have  also  one 
in  a  plane  inclined  (usually,  it  appears, 
at  right-angles)  to  the  median,  the  result 
will  be  what  D'Arcy  Thompson  some- 
what loosely  speaks  of  as  a  "  shear  "  in 
the  plane  spiral,  with  as  result  a  '  cork- 
screw '  or  turbinate  spiral — i.e.  a  spiral 
not  confined  to  one  plane.  This  is 
prettily  shown  in  the  accompanying 
sketches  kindly  given  me  by  Miss  M. 
Lebour,  of  the  Plymouth  Laboratory, 
illustrating  the  origin  of  this  complex 
spirality  in  a  larval  Pteropod.  The 
original  shell  is  a  hemispherical  cap, 
produced  by  growth  which  is  uniform 
all  round.  After  a  certain  stage,  how- 
ever, a  marked  difference  appears  in  the  growth  at  the  two 
ends  of  the  median  axis,  and  a  smaller  difference  in  the 
growth  at  the  two  sides  ;  and  the  shell  at  once  begins  to 
'  corkscrew  '. 

In  terms  of  growth-gradients,  what  happens  appears  to  be 
as  follows  (Fig.  76)  :  If  ABCD  in  (a)  be  the  projection  of  the 
growing  edge  of  the  mantle,  with  A  the  region  of  maximum 

(H — h)>    C    of    minimum   ( )    growth,    with    no    lateral 

differential  growth,  then  the  corresponding  gradient  is  shown  in 
(c).  If,  however,  a  lateral  differential  is  established,  the  results 
will  be  as  shown  in  (b)  and  (d).     The  lateral  differential  growth- 


Fig.  75. 


Limacina  retro- 
versa. 

(a)  shell  of  larva  i  day  old  ;  the 
shell  is  hemispherical ;  (b)  shell  of 
larva  3  days  old.  Differential 
growth  has  begun,  (c)  Larva  in 
its  shell,  4  days  old.  Differential 
growth  has  proceeded  further,  and 
the  spiral  shape  of  the  shell  is 
apparent. 


i6o 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


ratio  is  always  smaller  than  the  median  (if  it  were  larger,  it 
would  of  course  decide  the  main  spiral,  and  the  other  would 
become  the  subsidiary  differential,  concerned  with  distortion 
of  the  main  spiral). 

Whereas  the   value   of  the  main   or  median  growth-ratio 
decides  the  tightness  of  the  coiling  of  the  main  spiral,  that  of 


—  c 


--  c 


© 


® 


Fig.  76. — Diagram  to  illustrate  the  growth-gradients  operating  to  produce 
the  plane  and  the  turbinate  spiral  shells  of  Molluscs. 

(a)  and  (6)  Projections  of  the  growing  edge  of  the  mantle  ;  (c)  and  (d)  corresponding  elevations, 
the  ordinates  representing  growth-intensities,  the  abscissae  distance  across  the  shell-opening,  (a)  and 
(c)  gradients  operating  to  produce  a  plane  logarithmic  spiral  shell.  There  is  a  centre  of  maximum 
growth  at  A,  of  minimum  growth  at  C.  The  growth-gradients  between  A  and  C  are  identical  on  both 
sides  of  the  mantle,  through  B  and  through  D. 

(b)  and  (d)  gradients  operating  to  produce  a  turbinate  spiral.  The  growth-gradient  ABC  is  ofa 
different  shape  from  ADC  ;  thus  a  secondary  growth-ratio  is  established  between  B  and  D.  The 
growth  ratio  AP/CS  <  BQ/DR. 


the  secondary  or  lateral  growth-ratio  decides  the  degree  of 
distortion  of  this  spiral,  the  proportionate  amount  by  which 
it  is  pushed  out  of  its  fundamental  plane.  When  the  lateral 
ratio  is  unity,  the  shell  is  flat,  in  one  plane,  like  that  of  Plan- 
orbis.     When  it  is  low,  the  shell  is  low  also,  like  the  depressed 


THE   SHELLS   OF  MOLLUSCS  161 

shells  of  Helix.  When  it  is  higher,  the  shell  becomes  more 
pointed,  as  in  Turritella.  Here  again,  D'Arcy  Thompson 
gives  detailed  mathematical  treatment,  although  for  some 
reason  he  has  not  reduced  the  degree  of  '  shear  '  (distortion 
of  the  primary  spiral  in  a  plane  at  right-angles  to  its  own) 
to  terms  of  differences  of  growth-rate,  as  he  has  done  for  the 
degree  of  coiling  (distortion  of  the  primary  cone  into  a  spiral).1 

Typically,  of  course,  the  shape  of  any  structure  produced 
by  accretionary  growth  must  remain  constant  so  long  as  the 
various  growth-ratios  concerned  in  its  production  remain 
constant.  But  as  a  matter  of  fact,  the  various  ratios  often 
alter  with  age  or  size,  in  some  cases  suddenly,  in  other  cases 
progressively.  Thus  certain  Ammonites  have  their  oldest 
portions  uncoiled,  while  the  earlier-formed  part  of  the  shell 
is  of  typical  form — an  example  of  sudden  alteration.  In 
others,  the  ratio  of  the  diameters  of  successive  whorls  does 
not  remain  constant  as  in  the  true  logarithmic  spiral,  but  in- 
creases progressively.  This  gradual  change,  due  to  a  progres- 
sive change  in  the  shape  of  a  fundamental  growth-gradient, 
is  not  infrequent,  and  may  possibly  prove  to  be  associated 
with  senescence.  Among  Gastropods,  the  tapering  of  the 
oldest  part  of  the  shell  in  Pupa,  Clausilia,  etc.,  in  place  of  the 
continued  expansion  to  be  expected  if  the  growth-ratios  remain 
constant,  is  another  case,  and  there  are  numerous  other 
examples. 

(4)  Finally,  there  may  be  excess  or  defect  of  growth-ratio 
at  special  points,  not  in  connexion  with  the  main  growth- 
gradient.  This,  of  course,  has  its  analogy  in  multiplicative 
growth,  e.g.  in  the  development  of  markedly  heterogenic 
appendages  which  break  the  main  growth-gradient  of  the 
body,  as  in  the  right  chelae  of  male  hermit-crabs. 

The  most  obvious  examples  of  such  growth  are  found  in 
lamellibranch  shells.  The  '  ears  '  of  the  shells  of  scallops  and 
other  species  of  Pecten  are  an  excellent  case.  The  general 
growth-gradient  is  of  usual  Molluscan  type,  with  high  point 
directly  opposite  the  hinge,  and  a  uniform  and  symmetrical 
double  gradient  extending  thence  round  both  sides  of  the 
shell.  Just  before  reaching  the  hinge,  however,  the  growth- 
ratio,  after  sinking  very  low,  increases  rapidly  and  then 
abruptly  descends  to  zero,  thus  generating  the  '  ears  '  of  the 
shell. 

1  Interesting    numerical   details    concerning    various    structures    of 
logarithmic-spiral  construction  may  be  found  in  Petersen,  1921. 
11 


162  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

A  rather  different  example  is  provided  by  the  razor-shells 
(Solen).  In  these,  the  normal  symmetrical  gradient  of  the 
lamellibranch  shell,  wrdj^grQAvthrcentre  opposite  the  hinge,  is 
completely  distorted  by  the  development  of  a  second  growth- 
centre  at  the  morphologically  posterior  (siphonal)  margin  of 
the  shell.  This  occurs,  of  course,  in  numerous  other  forms, 
making  the  shell  asymmetrical  along  the  antero-posterior 
axis  ;  but  in  Solen  this  '  secondary  '  growth-centre  has  become 
more  important  than  the  phylogenetically  primary  one,  and 
its  markedly  higher  growth-ratio  converts  the  shell  into  the 
well-known  elongated  blade.1  The  margin  of  the  shell  at 
this  end  is  truncated,  but  the  opposite  margin  is  rounded,  the 
shell  thus  consisting  of  two  markedly  different  but  homologous 
halves,  the  one  conforming  to  the  normal  lamellibranch  shape, 
the  other  pulled  out  to  ten  or  even  twelve  times  the  diameter 
of  the  former.  Still  further  examples,  again  of  a  somewhat 
different  type,  are  seen  in  the  spines  which  beset  the  shell  of 
such  forms  as  the  Spiny  Cockle  {Cardium  acidcatum)  or  various 
Gastropods.  These  represent  localized  centres  of  excess 
mantle-activity,  which,  however,  are  only  active  periodically. 
Permanently^active  fluctuations  in  growth-activity  along  the 
gradient  are  revealed  in  such  forms  which  have  a  crenellated 
margin  to  the  shell  (e.g.  Tridacna).  It  is  not  known  whether 
the  presence  of  such  special  centres  of  high  growth-ratio  is 
correlated,  as  in  Crustacea,  etc.,  with  slight  excess  or  defect 
of  growth  in  adjacent  regions. 

As  in  multiplicative  growth,  these  subsidiary  regions  of 
special  growth-activity  are  themselves  constructed  on  the 
usual  plan,  of  growth-gradients — single  or  double — culminating 
in  a  high  point  or  growth-centre. 

The  bivalve  shell  (Lamellibranch  and  Brachiopod)  demands 
a  few  words  to  itself.  It_Dwes  its  form  to  the  existence  of 
two  separate  gradients  of  accretionary  growth,  each  forming 
a  shell  of  logarithmic-spiral  form.  "Typically,  the  two  gradients 
are  equal  but  of  opposite  sign,  each  symmetrical  about  a  line 
drawn  from  the  hinge  to  the  ventral  margin  ;  the  growth- 
ratio  at  the  hinge  is  so  close  to  zero  as  to  be  negligible,  while 
the  component  of  growth  in  shell-width  is  relatively  so  large 
that  the  spiral  is  a  very  high-angled  one,  and  never  forms 
even  one  complete  whorl. 

1  When  distortion  of  this  type  occurs,  it  is  usually  the  posterior 
half  which  is  enlarged  ;  but  there  are  a  number  of  genera  which  show 
the  opposite  tendency  (e.g.  Donax). 


CONCLUSION  163 

This  last  feature  is  sometimes  carried  to  an  extreme,  as  in 
the  lower  valve  of  Pecten  shells,  where  all  growth  is  in  the 
direction  of  width,  with  a  perfectly  flat  shell  as  resultant. 
Or,  as  in  other  forms  which  habitually  lie  on  one  valve,  the 
original  direction  of  the  gradient  is  reversed,  and  the  curva- 
ture of  the  two  valves  becomes  similar  in  sign,  instead  of 
opposed  (e.g.  Productus,  occasionally  Anomia). 

Still  more  complexity  of  detail  is  shown  in  many  Pteropod 
shells  ;  these,  as  well  as  the  shells  of  Foraminifera,  which 
achieve  logarithmic-spiral  form  by  a  somewhat  different 
method  (the  addition  of  whole  chambers  instead  of  the  mere 
prolongation  of  a  single  shell),  have  been  well  analysed  by 
D'Arcy  Thompson,  and  need  not  detain  us  here.  Mention 
should  also  be  made  of  the  interesting  paper  of  Sporn  (1926), 
who  applies  a  different  set  of  mathematical  ideas  to  the  analysis 
of  growth  in  molluscan  shells.  These  have  been  related  to 
growth  problems  in  a  more  general  way  by  Smirnov  and 
Zhelochovtsev  (1931). 

§  4.     Conclusion 

We  may  sum  up  the  most  important  points  of  the  present 
chapter  as  follows  :  Accretionary  growth,  in  which  the  new 
material  deposited  is  not  itself  capable  of  further  growth, 
gives  rise  to  structures  whose  general  appearance  is  radically 
different  from  those  produced  by  ordinary  intussusceptive  or 
multiplicative  growth.  But  the  differences  turn  out  to  be  due 
only  to  this  difference  in  the  fate  of  the  new  material  added 
by  growth,  as  result  of  which  the  fundamental  law  of  accre- 
tionary growth  is  one  of  simple  interest,  that  of  multiplicative 
growth  one  of  compound  interest.  In  other  respects,  the 
relative  growth  obtaining  in  the  two  kinds  of  structures  is 
similar.  In  both  we  find  growth-centres  and  growth-gradients, 
not  only  major  gradients  extending  through  major  regions  or 
the  whole  body,  but  also  minor  gradients  superposed  upon 
and  locally  overriding  the  main  gradients. 

The  prevalence  of  the  logarithmic-spiral  form  in  nature  is 
due  to  the  fact  that  a  uniform  single  growth-gradient,  com- 
bined with  the  method  of  accretionary  growth,  must  produce 
a  structure  in  the  form  of  a  logarithmic  spiral.  Departures 
from  the  strict  logarithmic-spiral  form  are  due  to  irregularities 
in  the  growth-gradients,  or  to  changes,  either  sudden  or  pro- 
gressive, in  one  or  other  of  the  growth-ratios  concerned. 

The  precise  form  of  the  shell  or  other  accretionary  structure 


164  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

depends  upon  the  numerical  values  of  the  one,  two  or  three 
main  growth-ratios  concerned  in  the  production  of  conical, 
true  logarithmic-spiral,  or  sheared  (turbinate)  logarithmic- 
spiral  form  respectively. 

Thus  the  essential  growth-mechanism  underlying  the  auxo- 
differentiation  stage  of  development  of  a  single  appendage 
(chela,  vertebrate  limb),  a  series  of  appendages  (hermit-crab, 
stag-beetle),  a  region  of  the  body  (brachyuran  abdomen),  a 
rhinoceros  horn,  a  vertebrate  tooth,  or  a  molluscan  shell,  are 
all  of  the  same  fundamental  nature.  In  every  case  we  find 
constant  differential  growth-ratios,  and  these  are  arranged  in 
growth-gradients  culminating  in  growth-centres.  If  we  wish 
to  think  analytically  about  organic  form  and  proportions,  we 
must  think  in  terms  of  constant  differential  growth-ratios  organ- 
ized in  the  form  of  growth-gradients.  And  if  we  are  ever  to 
solve  the  problem  of  growth  physiologically,  we  should  do  well 
to  concentrate  on  discovering  the  biochemical  basis  for  growth- 
centres  and  the  physiological  reasons  for  the  graded  distribution 
of  growth-potential  on  either  side  of  these  centres. 


CHAPTER  VI 

HETEROGONY,   GROWTH-GRADIENTS   AND 

PHYSIOLOGY 

§  i.    Normal  Proportions  as  result  of  a 
Partition-equilibrium 

THIS  chapter  cannot  but  be  an  unsatisfactory  one,  for 
the  simple  reason  that  we  know  so  extremely  little 
about  the  physiological  or  biochemical  processes 
underlying  growth  in  general  and  growth-gradients  in  par- 
ticular. All  that  can  here  be  attempted  is  to  bring  together 
some  of  the  scattered  facts  and  indications  which  are  in  any 
way  connected  with  the  problem. 

In  the  first  place,  as  we  have  seen  in  the  first  chapter,  there 
are  strong  grounds  for  believing  that  the  normal  growth-ratio 
of  a  heterogonic  organ  is  in  some  way  determined  as  result 
of  a  balance  between  its  size  and  that  of  the  body,  equilibrium 
being  attained  when  the  formula  y  =  bxk  is  satisfied.  When- 
ever y  <  bxk,  the  growth-ratio  of  y  (the  heterogonic  organ) 
is  accelerated  (k^.  ^>k),  and  becomes  normal  once  more  (=  k) 
when  the  organ  reaches  the  size  demanded  by  the  original 
formula.  The  organ  can  become  smaller  than  its  size  for 
growth-equilibrium  in  a  number  of  ways.  The  most  obvious 
is  by  amputation  of  the  organ,  in  types  where  regeneration 
is  possible.  Its  regenerative  growth-ratio  is  then  much  more 
rapid  than  its  normal  growth-ratio  would  have  been,  and 
gradually  slackens  down  until  it  becomes  normal  with  the 
attainment  of  proper  relative  size  by  the  organ.  This  is  only 
a  special  case,  for  all  organs,  whether  heterogonic  or  not, 
appear  to  exhibit  the  same  behaviour  during  regeneration. 
Przibram  (1917)  has  in  mantids  given  a  beautiful  analysis  of 
the  way  in  which  the  excess  growth-ratio  falls  away  to  normal 
as  regeneration  proceeds.  The  close  approximation  of  his 
results  (p.  51)  to  the  laws  governing  the  flow  of  E.M.F. 
between  regions  of  differing  electric  potential  is  a  further 

165 


i66 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


justification   for   the   provisional   use   at   least   of   the   term 
'  growth-potential '. 

One  peculiar  fact  demands  notice.  We  have  already  seen 
that  the  chela  of  the  Gulfweed  crab,  Portunus  sayi,  affords 
a  good  example  of  constant  differential  growth-ratio.  Zeleny 
(1905,  analysed  in  Huxley,  1931B),  however,  also  carried  out 
regeneration  experiments  ;    and  these  are  especially  suited  to 


57/0 
carapace  length,  mm. 


15 


Fig.  77. — Graph  to  show  (upper  curve)  simple  heterogony  of  the  large  claw 
in  the  Gulfweed  Crab,  Portunus  sayi,  and  (lower  curve)  the  relation  of  the 
amount  regenerated  during  one  instar  to  normal  size  of  the  claw  (logarithmic 

plotting) . 

(Constructed  from  the  data  of  Zeleny,  1905.) 


our  purpose  since  (a)  he  found  that  moult-period,  not  time, 
was  the  essential  factor  affecting  amount  of  growth  in  re- 
generation, and  (6)  he  always  amputated  a  limb  immediately 
after  one  moult,  and  measured  it  immediately  after  the 
next. 

When  his  figures,  both  for  the  size  of  normal  claws  and  for 


PHYSIOLOGY   OF   GROWTH-GRADIENTS        167 

those  that  had  thus  been  regenerating  for  one  instar,  are  plotted 
on  a  double  logarithmic  grid  against  body-size,  an  interesting 
result  is  obtained.  Both  sets  of  points  approximate  nicely 
to  straight  lines  ;  but  the  line  for  the  regenerates  is  inclined 
at  a  slightly  higher  angle  than  that  for  the  normal  claws — 
k  =  1-20  instead  of  1*15.  In  other  words,  during  the  first  instar 
after  operation,  large  crabs  regenerate  a  slightly  greater  frac- 
tion of  their  claws  than  do  small  ones,  and  the  absolute  amount 
of  increase  is  multiplied  by  a  constant  factor  for  each  unit  of 
multiplicative  increase  in  absolute  size.  The  amount  of  this 
factor  is,  of  course,  obtained  by  dividing  the  '  growth-ratio  ' 
determined  from  the  slope  of  the  line  for  the  regenerating 
claws  by  the  actual  growth-ratio  as  found  for  the  normal 
claws.  This  paradoxical  result  may  possibly  be  accounted 
for  on  the  principle,  which  holds  in  many  cases,  that  the 
rate  of  regeneration  increases  with  the  amount  removed. 

We  have  already  seen  (p.  52)  that  when  a  heterogenic 
organ  is  grafted  on  to  a  body  relatively  too  large  for  it,  its 
growth-rate  is  decreased,  so  that  here  too  it  tends  towards 
its  proper  relative  size.  Thus  here  also  the  idea  of  a  partition- 
coefficient,  representing  an  equilibrium  between  the  amount 
of  material  in  the  organ  and  in  the  body,  is  supported. 

§  2.    The  Initial  Determination  and  Physiological 
Basis  of  Growth-gradients 

An  important  question  is  that  of  the  physiological  and 
biochemical  bases  of  heterogony  and  of  growth-gradients. 
Some  experiments  of  Morgan  (1932A)  on  male  fiddler-crabs 
give  some  indications  on  this  problem.  His  results  may  be 
summarized  as  follows.  Young  male  fiddler-crabs,  at  a  very 
early  instar  of  their  post-larval  existence,  produce  two  claws 
of  male  type.  If  one  of  these  be  amputated,  the  other  is  very 
shortly  afterwards  fixed  as  permanently  male-type,  and  will 
regenerate  male-type  if  later  amputated.  The  amputated 
claw  regenerates  of  female  type  and  is  from  thenceforth  fixed 
in  this  condition.  Normally,  it  is  the  loss  of  one  claw  during 
the  first  few  instars  which  determines  the  right-  or  left- 
handedness  of  the  males. 

If  both  claws  are  cut  off  during  this  early  symmetrical  stage 
when  both  are  of  male-type,  both  regenerate  of  female  type, 
and  remain  so  permanently.  Occasionally,  however,  a  male 
is  found  in  nature  which  has  lost  neither  of  its  claws  during 


i68 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


youth,  and  has  grown  to  a  considerable  size  while  still  the 
possessor  of  two  symmetrical  male-type  claws.1 

When  either  of  these  is  amputated,  it  regenerates  male-type. 
Thus  we  have  the  remarkable  fact  that  while  in  early  youth 
the  amputation  of  both  male-type  claws  is  followed  by  a  loss 
of  all  the  male-type  potentialities,  and  the  amputation  of  one 
by  a  loss  of  male-type  potentialities  on  that  side  of  the  body, 
this  does  not  hold  when  the  symmetrical  double-male-clawed 
stage  has  lasted  to  a  considerably  later  period  of  life. 

One  possibility  that  suggests  itself  is  as  follows.  We  know 
that  during  the  phase  of  chemo-differentiation,   prospective 

potencies  are  sharply  localized. 
It  is  reasonable  to  suppose  that 
the  potency  for  growing  into  a 
large  instead  of  into  a  small 
chela  is  localized  in  the  claw's 
growth-centre,  viz.  the  propus. 
Whatever  the  chemical  substances 
responsible,  they  are  then  wholly 
removed  by  amputation,  just  as 
those  responsible  for  limb-differ- 
entiation in  Amphibia  are  wholly 
removed  if  a  particular  disc  of 
material  be  removed  during  em- 
bryonic life.  But  we  have  seen 
that  in  the  male-type  chelae  of 
Uca  there  is  a  growth-gradient. 
If,  as  a  result  of  this  during  growth, 
the  substance  determining  heter- 
ogony  and  masculine  type  should 
spread  proximally  to  the  breaking- 
joint,  then  amputation  should  now  permit  the  regeneration 
of  a  male-type  chela.2 

1  In  the  only  specimen  of  this  type  which  I  came  across,  the  two 
male  claws  together  weighed  more  than  the  mean  for  a  normal  single 
male-type  claw  for  that  body-weight,  but  considerably  less  than  the 
sum  of  two  normal  single  claws.  The  range  of  individual  variation 
being  considerable,  however,  one  should  have  a  number  of  specimens 
before  attempting  to  generalize. 

2  In  this  connexion,  reference  should  also  be  made  to  the  results 
obtained  by  Haseman  (1907A  and  b)  on  the  direction  of  differentiation 
in  segmenting  Crustacean  appendages.  He  finds  that  some  regenerate 
basipetally,  others  centripetally  ;  further,  there  is  sometimes  (e.g.  in 
many  antennae),  but  not  always,  a  particular  segment  which  produces 


Fig.  78. — Sketch  to  show  asym- 
metry in  the  thoracic  portion 
of  the  central  nervous  system 
of  the  male  fiddler-crab,  Uca 
piiguax.  The  shaded  regions  are 
the  ganglia  supplying  the  chelae. 


PHYSIOLOGY   OF   GROWTH-GRADIENTS        169 

Another  alternative  is  to  suppose  that  the  nervous  system 
is  implicated.  This  is  suggested  by  unpublished  observations 
of  F.  N.  Ratcliffe  on  the  nervous  system  of  male  Uca.  He 
rinds  a  marked  asymmetry  in  the  thoracic  ganglionic  mass, 
naturally  largest  in  the  ganglion  of  the  chelar  segment  but 
visible  in  other  segments  as  well.  There  are  two  classes  of 
cells  in  the  nuclei  associated  with  the  ganglia,  large  and  small. 
The  large  are  usually  of  different  sizes  but  the  same  in 
number  on  the  two  sides  of  the  body.  But  the  small,  at 
least  in  the  ventral  nucleus,  appear  to  be  equally  distributed 
in  number  in  early  stages  and  unequally  distributed  (larger 
number  on  the  side  of  the  large  chela)  in  later  stages.  Ratcliffe 
tentatively  suggests  that  this  condition  is  brought  about  by 
the  permanent  transfer  to  the  side  of  the  large  chela  of  a 
certain  number  of  originally  median  cells  which  could  be 
transferred  to  either  side  of  the  body.  If  this  suggestion  be 
substantiated  (admittedly  it  needs  further  work  for  its  verifi- 
cation), it  would  imply  that  the  normal  fixing  of  the  male- 
type  potentiality  would  be  finally  due  to  a  certain  number 
of  '  neutral '  nerve-cells  being  transferred  to  that  side,  while 
the  capacity  of  both  claws  to  regenerate  of  male  type  in  the 
doubly  male-clawed  older  males  would  be  due  to  a  loss,  with 
age,  of  the  capacity  of  the  median  cells  to  transfer  themselves 
from  one  side  to  the  other. 

This  suggestion  would  obviate  the  need  of  postulating  the 
proximal  spread  of  a  specific  growth-promoting  capacity  in 
the  limb.  It  is,  however,  perfectly  compatible  with  the  idea 
of  an  initial  chemo-differentiative  localization  of  high  growth- 
potential  in  the  male  chela. 

In  this  connexion  also  the  observations  of  Perkins  (1929) 
are  interesting.  In  crabs  (Carcinus,  Cancer)  and  lobsters 
(Homarus)  he  finds  a  gradient  in  the  body  as  regards  the  con- 
tent of  glutathione,  sulphydryl  and  other  reducing  compounds 
known  to  be  associated  with  growth.  And  this  runs  parallel 
with  the  actual  growth-relations  of  the  various  appendages 
and  regions  of  the  body.  He  further  advances  a  biochemical 
hypothesis  to  explain  the  existence  of  growth-gradients  ;  but 
as  this  is  highly  speculative,   and  as   I   do  not  pretend  to 

the  other  segments  by  repeated  fission.  In  certain  cases  (1907B)  he 
was  able  to  show  that  the  normal  directions  of  regenerative  differen- 
tiation could  be  reversed  by  special  conditions.  It  is  probable  that 
these  facts  are  to  be  in  some  way  related  with  those  of  growth-gradients, 
but  for  the  moment  the  connexion  remains  obscure. 


170 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


specialized  biochemical  knowledge,   I   will  merely  refer  the 
reader  to  his  article  (see  Fig.  79). 

It  is  noteworthy  that  in  other  respects  he  has  found  an 
association  of  sulphydryl  with  growth-potential :  e.g.  the 
decline  with  age  both  of  sulphydryl  content  and  growth-rate 
(found  in  Carcinus,  Pandalus,  Sacculina  embryos  and  Peri- 
planeta).  The  coincidence  of  a  gradient  in  this  important 
'  key '    metabolic    agent    with    observed   growth-gradients    is 


Fig.  79. — Gradients  in  content  of  various  sulphur  compounds  and  in  oxygen 
uptake  in  the  Crustacea,  Cancer  and  Homarus  (above),  and  the  earthworm 

(below) . 

obviously  a  fact  of  considerable  interest.  Interestingly  enough, 
the  gradient  in  sulphydryl  content  does  not  coincide  with  the 
gradient  in  oxygen  metabolism  (in  earthworms),  so  that  Per- 
kins concludes  that  the  total  oxygen  uptake,  being  concerned 
more  with  katabolic  than  anabolic  processes,  is  not  a  good 
measure  of  any  gradients  primarily  concerned  with  growth, 
a  fact  which  clearly  has  important  bearings  upon  Child's  work 
on  the  metabolic  basis  of  his  axial  gradients. 

§  3.     Other  Gradient  Theories 

This  brings  us  face  to  face  with  the  relation  between  the 
growth-gradients  here  described  and  other  types  of  gradient- 
effect.     The  existence  of  such  effects  has  been  casually  recorded 


OTHER   GRADIENT  THEORIES  171 

on  a  number  of  occasions,  and  their  importance  for  morpho- 
genesis has  been  emphasized  by  such  workers  as  Boveri,  von 
Ubisch,  D'Arcy  Thompson,  and  notably  Child,1  who  has 
systematized  the  theory  more  thoroughly  than  other  workers. 
The  more  general  conception  of  the  morphogenetic  field,  of 
which  I  believe  gradient  phenomena  to  be  a  particular  case, 
has  been  analysed  from  somewhat  different  points  of  view  by 
Weiss  (1926),  Guyenot  (see  Guyenot  and  Ponse,  1930),  Hirsch 
(1931)  and  Bertalanffy  (1928).  This  is  not  the  place  to  enter 
into  a  general  discussion  of  the  subject,  and  I  propose  merely 
to  refer  to  a  few  relevant  facts  and  ideas. 

In  the  first  place,  two  sets  of  essentially  morphological  facts 
concerning  gradients  have  long  been  known  and  recognized. 
The  first  is  generally  subsumed  under  the  title  of  the  law 
of  antero-posterior  development.  It  points  out  that  during 
development  differentiation  begins  anteriorly  and  gradually 
spreads  posteriorly.  Often  the  development  of  the  head  is 
far  advanced  when  that  of  the  hinder  end  is  not  yet  begun. 
In  some  forms  the  undifferentiated  posterior  region  may  per- 
sist throughout  life  ;  or,  as  in  many  Crustacea,  it  may  persist 
through  a  considerable  phase  of  free-swimming  existence 
although  lost  in  the  adult.  In  addition,  there  exists  in  bilater- 
ally symmetrical  animals  a  similar  gradient  in  time  of  develop- 
ment between  dorsal  and  ventral  surface.  In  Vertebrates  the 
region  which  leads  the  way  is  the  dorsal  mid-line,  in  Inverte- 
brates in  general  the  ventral  mid-line.  Subsidiary  graded 
effects  of  similar  nature  also  occur  within  the  appendages. 

Secondly,  a  gradient  also  almost  invariably  occurs  within 
the  ovum,  along  the  main  axis.  This  may  be  revealed  in  the 
stratification  of  yolk  or  other  materials,  or  in  the  greater  rate 
of  segmentation  at  the  animal  pole,  or  in  both  ways.  It  is 
the  merit  of  Child  that  he  has  linked  up  these  two  sets  of 
facts  in  one  general  physiological  theory.  He  has  further 
shown  that  the  physiological  gradient  effects  of  which  these 

1  I  prefer  not  to  use  the  term  metabolic  gradients,  also  sometimes 
used  by  Child.  Child  has  not  conclusively  demonstrated  that  his 
gradients  are  fundamentally  metabolic  in  character ;  but  he  has 
demonstrated  that,  as  regards  morphogenesis,  gradient-systems  do 
exist  and  are  operative.  The  most  important  facts  about  these  mor- 
phogenetic gradient-systems  are  (a)  that  they  are  field  systems  in 
which  all  the  parts  are  interdependent  within  one  plastic  system,  and 
(b)  that  in  some  respects  at  least  they  are  quantitatively  graded. 
Personally  I  would  prefer  the  phrase  morphogenetic  gradient-fields,  but 
there  is  no  need  at  the  moment  to  complicate  terminology  thus.  For 
an  excellent  discussion,  see  Needham,   1931,  p.  582  seq. 


172  PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE   GROWTH 

are  particular  morphological  expressions  may  continue  through- 
out life.  He  and  his  pupils  have  most  thoroughly  demon- 
strated this  for  hydroid  polyps  and  planarian  worms.  By  this 
work,  certain  important  empirical  laws  have  been  established, 
notably  the  fact  that  the  first  region  to  differentiate  in  re- 
generation normally  acts  as  a  '  dominant '  region  which  has 
a  morphogenetic  effect  on  the  regions  which  differentiate  later. 
This  has  now  been  brought  into  line  with  the  facts  concern- 
ing Spemann's  '  organizer  '  in  Amphibian  development  (see 
Santos,  1929).  Further,  such  experiments  as  Stockard's  cele- 
brated production  of  cyclopia  in  Fundulus,  cannot  be  inter- 
preted except  in  terms  of  axial  gradients.  Many  of  Child's 
empirical  facts  have  been  independently  conformed  by  Abeloos 
(1930),  and  the  existence  of  a  dominant  region  with  morpho- 
genetic effect  by  various  workers,  of  whom  Berrill  (1931)  is 
the  latest.     (See  also  the  work  of  Buchanan,  p.  260.) 

In  regard  especially  to  hydroids  and  planarians,  Child  has 
been  able  to  show  that  the  physiological  gradients  constitute  a 
true  field  system,  e.g  in  regenerating  fragments  of  Planaria  the 
gradient  can  be  either  steepened  (e.g.  by  optimum  tempera- 
ture) or  flattened  (e.g.  by  cold  or  by  narcotics)  :  and  when 
this  is  done,  it  is  found  that  the  dominant  region  whose  activity 
has  been  depressed  induces  smaller  dependent  organs,  at  a 
smaller  distance  than  normal  from  itself,  while  the  converse 
holds  when  it  has  been  heightened.  Analogous  experiments 
have  been  performed  on  developing  eggs,  by  using  stimulatory 
or  depressant  drugs,  or  by  applying  temperature-gradients. 

The  continuance  of  the  gradient  throughout  life  is  shown 
in  many  forms  by  their  graded  capacity  for  regeneration,  e.g. 
the  head-frequency  often  decreases  steadily  in  an  antero- 
posterior direction.  There  exists  also  a  graded  susceptibility 
to  poisons  along  the  main  axis.  In  forms  which  bud  or  divide 
by  transverse  fission,  the  distance  between  the  dominant 
regions  of  old  and  new  zooids  appears  to  be  determined  by 
the  extent  and  steepness  of  the  gradient.  The  production  of 
axial  heteromorphosis  in  regeneration,  such  as  biaxial  heads 
or  tails,  can  also  be  satisfactorily  interpreted  in  terms  of  the 
gradient  hypothesis.  Child  has  attempted  to  explain  these 
facts  in  relation  to  differences  in  metabolic  rate,  but  the  proof 
cannot  yet  be  said  to  be  conclusive.  However,  whether  or 
no  this  metabolic  interpretation  be  correct,  a  set  of  impor- 
tant empirical  principles  remain — notably  that  physiological 
gradients  exist  in  early  stages  of  development,  that  they  may 
persist  throughout  life,  that  their  slope  and  extent  are  deter- 


OTHER  GRADIENT  THEORIES  173 

mined  with  reference  to  a  first-formed  dominant  region  which 
also  has  a  morphogenetic  or  organizing  effect,  and  that  the 
parts  and  organs  involved  in  an  active  gradient  system  are 
bound  up  together  in  a  single  physiological  field,  so  that 
alterations  in  one  part  will  necessitate  correlative  alterations 
elsewhere. 

In  connexion  with  the  persistence  of  gradient  effects  through- 
out life,  we  may  refer  to  some  further  examples  not  cited  by 
Child.  Apart  from  the  continuous  growth-gradients  in  single 
organs,  in  body-regions  and  in  the  body  as  a  whole  which 
we  have  discussed  in  this  book,  we  have  also  discontinuous 
growth-effects  which  we  can  only  understand  on  the  basis  of 
continuous  underlying  gradients  (p.  152).  And  we  have  also 
gradients  affecting  the  rate  of  growth  or  regeneration  of 
epidermal  structures  such  as  feathers  and  hair  (p.  100). 

Clausen  (1929),  by  grafting  methods,  has  shown  the  exist- 
ence in  the  tadpole  tail  of  a  gradient  in  susceptibility  to  the 
autolysing  agencies  which  operate  at  metamorphosis  :  skin 
and  muscle  grafts  from  the  anterior  regions  of  the  tail  when 
transplanted  to  the  back  undergo  more  rapid  histolysis  during 
metamorphosis  than  do  similar  grafts  from  more  posterior 
situations.  This  is  a  significant  fact,  for  it  cannot  well  have 
any  particular  functional  or  adaptive  significance  in  relation 
to  the  metamorphic  process,  and  the  difference,  like  that  be- 
tween the  two  horns  of  the  rhinoceros,  merely  acts  as  an 
indicator  for  the  existence  of  some  fundamental  inherent 
property  of  the  organism. 

To  take  quite  another  example,  Alverdes  has  demonstrated 
the  existence  of  graded  peristaltic  activity  in  regions  of  the 
mammalian  gut,  showing  that  physiological  gradients  may  exist 
even  where  no  morphological  differentiation  is  visible. 

A  gradient  as  regards  regeneration  is  also  seen  in  the  results 
of  von  Ubisch.  From  his  data  (1915)  on  regeneration  of  limbs 
in  the  insect  larva  Cloe  diptera,  we  can  calculate  that  the 
length  of  the  femur  of  regenerated  limbs  after  one  moult- 
interval  is  44-2  per  cent,  of  the  length  of  the  normal  femur 
for  the  fore-limb,  40-6  per  cent,  for  the  middle  limb,  and 
367  per  cent,  for  the  hind  limb.  This  differs  in  sign  from  that 
for  growth  in  Sphodromantis  (p.  135),  but  the  data  are  not 
wholly  comparable. 

In  a  later  paper  (1922)  he  refers  to  the  fact  that  Przibram 
(1919)  and  Krizenecki  (1917)  obtained  a  gradient  of  opposite 
sign  for  the  regeneration  of  the  limbs  of  mantids  and  meal- 
worms and  thinks  that  his  work  on  Cloe  might  have  given 


174  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

different  results  if  extended  over  a  longer  period  of  regenera- 
tion. But  he  adduces  new  and  important  results  from  grafting 
experiments  on  earthworms,  showing  that  a  difference  in 
'  differentiation  potential',  as  when  a  young  head  is  grafted  on 
an  old  body,  gives  much  better  results  than  the  converse 
experiment  or  than  even  autoplastic  grafting  of  young  heads 
on  young  bodies.  From  this  he  deduces  the  existence  of  a 
'  differentiation  gradient '  of  importance  in  morphogenesis  and 
regeneration. 

Sinnott  (1930)  has  elicited  a  curious  fact  in  regard  to  the 
variability  of  cell-size  in  tissues  of  the  petiole  of  maple-leaves 
(Acer).  He  finds  that  there  exists  a  gradient  between  surface 
and  exterior,  variability  being  least  in  the  size  of  epidermal 
cells,  and  increasing  cell-layer  by  cell-layer  towards  the  centre 
of  the  petiole. 

We  have  also  the  well-known  work  of  Lund  (e.g.  1923, 
1928)  who  finds  in  various  organisms  a  system  of  gradients 
in  bio-electric  potential  persisting  throughout  life,  and  has 
shown  that  organic  polarity  and  morphogenesis  can  be  con- 
trolled by  electrical  means.  A  correlation  between  electrical 
and  metabolic  gradients  has  been  shown  by  Purdy  and  Sheard 
(p.  260).  And  on  the  chemical  side,  the  recent  paper  of  Wata- 
nabe  (1931)  may  be  consulted  ;  he  finds  a  gradient  in  amount 
of  oxidizable  substance  in  earthworms,  running  parallel  with 
the  gradients  postulated  by  Child  for  this  organism. 

It  would  doubtless  be  possible  to  multiply  examples  ;  but 
this  deliberately  heterogeneous  list  will  serve  to  emphasize 
the  wide  range  of  gradient  phenomena  which  may  exist  in 
the  adult  animal  body. 

It  next  falls  to  discuss  the  relations  between  the  growth-gradi- 
ents with  which  we  have  been  concerned,  and  other  gradient- 
systems,  notably  the  axial  gradients,  as  I  shall  term  them. 

Here  we  are  on  speculative  ground ;  but  there  are  certain 
indications  which  make  us  suspect  some  real  connexion  be- 
tween the  two.  In  the  first  place,  there  is  the  co-existence 
of  a  growth-gradient  and  an  axial  gradient  in  Planaria  (see 
Abeloos,  1928).  It  would  be  extremely  interesting  to  follow 
this  up  in  greater  detail  and  especially  to  see  whether  changes 
in  steepness  of  the  axial  gradient  were  quantitatively  associ- 
ated with  changes  in  the  growth-gradient.  In  this  case,  it  is 
worth  recalling,  size  is  the  chief  index  of  physiological  age, 
and  growth-partition  is  almost  entirely  a  matter  of  size, 
whether  in  fed  specimens  which  are  increasing,  or  in  starved 
specimens  which  are  diminishing  in  size. 


OTHER  GRADIENT  THEORIES  175 

It  is  important  to  note  that  in  Planarians  the  morpho- 
genetic  effects  associated  with  the  gradient  (induction  of 
pharynx  and  other  organs  by  the  dominant  region)  take  place 
early,  but  do  not  interfere  with  the  persistence  of  physiological 
effects  of  the  gradient  (e.g.  regenerative  capacity,  growth- 
intensity)  throughout  life.  In  a  not  dissimilar  way,  the  realiza- 
tion of  normal  morphological  differentiation  of  a  limb  or  tail 
in  Triton  does  not  interfere  with  the  persistence  of  the  morpho- 
genetic  potency  of  the  surrounding  area  to  produce  a  new  or 
additional  differentiation  of  the  same  type  throughout  life 
(Guyenot  and  Ponse,  1930). 

The  gradient,  though  persisting  throughout  life,  might  be 
altered  in  shape.  It  is  more  natural  on  various  grounds  we 
would  expect  that  it  was  more  likely  to  be  flattened  than 
steepened  with  age.  If  it  were  flattened,  we  should  expect 
that  the  potency  of  differentiation  at  a  given  body-level  would 
be  altered  to  a  potency  originally  characteristic  of  a  more 
posterior  body-level.  This  is  what  appears  actually  to  occur 
in  serially  heteromorphic  regeneration  in  Crustacea  and  insects. 
The  regenerated  heteromorphic  appendage  almost  invariably 
is  of  a  type  which  normally  belongs  to  a  more  posterior  seg- 
ment— e.g.  antenna  regenerated  in  place  of  eye-stalk  (Palae- 
mon),  or  fore-leg  in  place  of  antenna  (stick-insects.)1 

For  these  and  various  reasons  we  may  regard  it  as  probable 
that  the  primary  axial  gradient  of  the  egg  and  early  embryo 
will  normally  persist,  although  doubtless  often  in  somewhat 
altered  form,  in  later  periods  and  probably  throughout  life, 
even  when  we  have  no  ready  means,  such  as  antero-posterior 
differentiation,  heteromorphic  regeneration,  or  head-frequency 
in  regeneration,  of  deducing  its  existence. 

Further,  if  it  does  persist,  we  may  again  regard  it  as  prob- 
able, especially  in  view  of  the  facts  in  Planaria,  that  it  will 
exert  some  influence  upon  growth.  This  influence  may  be 
direct  or  indirect,  but  in  any  case  would  be  graded  in  its  effect. 

Further,  to  reverse  the  approach,  we  may  as  a  matter  of 

speculation    conclude    that    it    is    probable,    when    gradients 

specifically  concerned  with  growth,   like  those  in  the  male 

chelae  or  female  abdomena  of  Crustacea,  are  found,  that  these 

1  Recent  work  by  Przibram  (Akad.  Wiss.,  Vienna,  9.  vii.  1931)  and 
Suster  (ibid.)  confirm  this  view.  In  Dixippus,  antennae  amputated 
in  the  1st  instar  regenerate  as  antennae,  while  in  later  instars  they 
regenerate  leg-like  organs.  In  Sphodromantis,  the  regenerate  forms 
an  antenna  at  25°,  but  a  leg-like  organ  at  lower  temperatures.  In 
both  cases  the  leg-like  organ  is  produced  when  the  axial  gradient  may 
be  presumed  to  be  flattened. 


176  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

have  elements  in  common  with  the  axial  gradients  of  Child — 
viz.  a  dominant  region  (here  the  growth-centre)  which  exerts 
a  graded  effect  on  neighbouring  regions,  so  that  the  whole 
system  is  a  field-system. 

It  is  already  clear  that  in  Child's  scheme,  place  will  have 
to  be  found  for  qualitative  differences  among  gradients.  The 
primary  morphogenetic  gradient  in,  e.g.,  a  worm  must  differ 
qualitatively  from  the  activity-gradient  concerned  with  the 
addition  of  new  segments  throughout  life.  The  primary 
animal-vegetative  axial  gradient  in  an  Amphibian  egg  must 
differ  qualitatively  from  the  latter  field-system  of  which  the 
organizer  (dorsal  lip)  is  the  '  dominant  region  '.  And  specific 
growth-gradients  will  constitute  another  main  type. 

This  section  has  been  admittedly  very  speculative,  but  as 
tentative  conclusion  we  may  suggest  that  gradient-systems, 
all  perhaps  of  essentially  similar  nature,  are  concerned  with 
primary  differentiation,  the  time-relations  of  early  develop- 
ment, certain  physiological  properties  of  parts  of  the  adult 
organism,  certain  regenerative  capacities,  and  with  growth- 
intensity.  These  gradient-systems  will  all  obviously  in  the 
long  run  be  '  metabolic  ',  but  may  be  specialized  in  qualita- 
tively different  ways  according  to  the  type  of  activity  which 
is  graded  within  them. 

The  primary  gradient  of  the  egg  and  early  embryo  may 
be  expected  to  persist  throughout  life  and  to  have  a  minor 
effect  on  the  graded  distribution  of  growth-promoting  sub- 
stances— i.e.  some  growth-gradients  will  be  secondary  effects 
of  the  primary  axial  gradient.  But  in  addition  we  may  expect 
that  gradients  concerned  specifically  with  growth-intensity 
may  come  into  existence  supplementary  to  and  largely  inde- 
pendently of  the  primary  axial  gradient,  but  will  then  exert 
their  indirect  effect  upon  such  proportions  of  the  primary 
gradient  as  still  persist.1 

§  4.    Heterogony  and  Hormones  2 
We  must  also  consider  the  relation  of  hormones  to  hetero- 
gony.    Here  we  must  at   the  outset  remind  ourselves  of  an 
important  point — that  the  action  of  a  hormone  always  demands 

1  The  important  paper  of  Smirnov  and  Zhelochovtsev  (1931)  has 
appeared  too  late  to  receive  the  discussion  it  merits.  It  contains  a 
detailed  mathematical  analysis  of  relative  growth  in  the  leaves  of  the 
Nasturtium  (Tropaeolum  major)  under  conditions  of  normal  and 
reduced  illumination  and  brings  the  results  into  relation  with  a  general 
conception  of  a  '  gradient-field  '  of  growth.     See  also  Werner  (p.  258) . 

2  See  also  the  work  of  Robb  (p.  257). 


HETEROGONY   AND   HORMONES  177 

two  specificities — the  specificity  of  the  hormone,  and  the 
specificity  of  the  tissue  which  reacts  to  the  hormone.  For 
instance,  there  may  or  may  not  be  a  hormone  concerned  in 
the  growth  of  the  fiddler-crab's  large  chela.  Should  there  be 
one,  however,  its  action  would  in  this  case  be  subordinate  to 
the  action  of  the  specific  capacity  for  heterogonic  growth 
possessed  by  the  male  type  but  not  by  the  female  type  of 
chela,  whereas  in  a  case  like  that  of  the  fowl's  comb,  the 
tissue-specificity  is  apparently  the  same  (or  almost  so)  in  both 
sexes,  and  the  sexual  differences  in  comb-size  are  brought 
about  by  the  specificity  of  the  two  sex-hormones. 

So  far  as  we  know,  there  exist  no  sex-hormones  in  insects. 
Accordingly,  in  this  group  any  secondary  sexual  heterogonic 
organs  will  depend  for  their  development  entirely  upon  their 
inherent  growth-capacities,  which  differ  in  the  tissues  of  the 
two  sexes  according  to  the  cellular  metabolism  induced  by 
one  or  other  sex-chromosome  complex.  In  vertebrates,  how- 
ever, the  reverse  is  usually  the  case  :  the  tissue-capacity  is 
the  same  or  highly  similar  in  both  sexes,  and  the  sexual  dif- 
ferences are  due  to  differences  in  sex-hormones.  A  good  deal 
of  work  has  been  done  on  the  growth  of  the  fowl's  comb  by 
Pezard,  Benoit,  Lipschutz  and  others  (references  in  Gold- 
schmidt,  1923) .  It  appears  that  at  the  onset  of  sexual  maturity 
in  males  the  growth  of  the  comb  becomes  highly  heterogonic, 
and  approximates  to  a  constant  differential  growth-ratio.  The 
growth  of  the  comb  in  females  is  also  heterogonic,  but  mildly 
so  ;  while  in  castrates  it  is  isogonic.  The  marked  comb- 
changes  associated  with  the  onset  of  a  laying  period  in  a 
pullet  may  be  associated  with  a  change  in  sex-hormones,  or 
quite  possibly  with  a  change  in  general  metabolism.  Benoit 
(1927B)  has  shown  that  the  growth-coefficient  of  the  comb  in 
growing  fowls  differs  according  to  the  season  at  which  they 
are  hatched.  In  those  hatched  in  March- June,  the  coefficient 
is  high  early,  then  decreases  markedly  in  late  summer,  to 
resume  its  high  level  in  October  or  November ;  in  those 
hatched  after  June,  there  is  no  slackening,  but  the  initial 
coefficient  is  lower.  Benoit  suggests  that  all  the  phenomena 
are  due  to  seasonal  variations  in  testis  activity.  It  is  prob- 
able that  besides  the  sex-hormones,  many  other  factors,  such  as 
nutrition,  influence  the  growth-partition  coefficient  of  the  comb. 

Castration  in  adult  males  is   followed  by  a  regression  in 
comb-size ;    this    takes    place    according    to    a    well-defined 
mathematical  formula.      As  set  forth  by  Pezard    (1921)    the 
12 


178  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

comb's  regression-curve  is  parabolic,  being  represented  by 
the  formula 

L=1  +  |C(0+O2 

where  L  is  the  length  of  the  comb  after  the  lapse  of  time  t 
from  the  onset  of  regression,  I  the  final  length  at  the  end  of 
regression,  6  the  total  time  taken  for  regression,  and  C  a 
constant  (varying  from  individual  to  individual).  This  is  of 
some  interest,  as  body-size  does  not  enter  into  the  formula 
at  all.  The  converse  curve,  of  comb-growth  produced  by 
injection  of  male  sex-hormones  in  capons  has  been  recently 
determined  by  Blyth,  Dodds  and  Gallimore  (1931).  The 
authors  do  not  discuss  this  aspect  of  their  work,  but  plotting 
their  data  shows  that  the  curves  for  re-growth  are  quite 
different  from  Pezard's  curves  for  regression.  They  show  a 
well-marked  point  of  inflexion  and  are  often  very  regular. 
They  could  be  represented  by  an  expression  of  the  form 
x  =  A  +  B#2  —  Cx3,  which  is  equivalent  to  saying  that 
Robertson's  autocatalytic  growth-formula  would  apply  to 
them.  It  is  interesting  to  find  this  difference  between  the 
positive  and  negative  aspects  of  the  same  growth-process. 

Grafts  of  female  comb  or  wattles  on  to  male  hosts  become 
larger  than  similar  grafts  on  hosts  of  their  own  sex  (Kozelka, 
1930).  The  response  of  the  comb  to  the  sex-hormone  is 
brought  about  by  a  specific  mucoid  layer  in  the  dermis 
(Hardesty,  1931)  :  i.e.  this  is  the  true  heterogonic  tissue. 

A  great  deal  has  been  written  as  to  the  '  all-or-none  '  law 
of  the  action  of  the  sex-hormones  on  comb-growth,  some 
writers,  like  Pezard,  maintaining  that  it  holds,  others,  like 
Benoit,  opposing  the  idea.  It  would  appear  that  Benoit  is 
correct,  but  that  the  range  over  which  the  action  of  the  sex- 
hormones  is  proportional  to  its  amount  is  very  limited.  Above 
this  point,  the  maximum  reactivity  of  the  comb  has  been 
reached,  and  increase  of  testis-size  is  not  followed  by  further 
increase  of  comb-size. 

That  the  matter  need  not  be  so  simple  as  this,  however, 
is  shown  by  experiments  on  mammals.  Collip  (1930),  by  in- 
jecting a  particular  fraction  of  placenta-extract  into  rats,  has 
produced  in  both  sexes  accessory  sexual  organs  (seminal 
vesicles,  vagina,  etc.)  far  exceeding  in  absolute  and  relative 
size  anything  normally  found  in  the  species  ;  on  the  other 
hand,  injection  of  anterior  pituitary  (in  females)  causes  an 
acceleration  of  maturity  but  without  disproportionate  size  of 


HETEROGONY  AND   HORMONES  179 

the  accessory  organs  relative  to  the  gonad  (see  references  in 
Parkes,  1929,  pp.  158-9).  Thus  it  would  seem  that  pre- 
pituitary  extract  causes  acceleration  of  the  growth  of  the 
gonad  and  accessory  organs,  but  without  inducing  an  increase 
in  the  final  maximum  size  of  either,  or  a  disproportionate 
development  of  accessory  organs  relative  to  gonads  ;  while 
injection  of  placenta-extract  leaves  the  gonad  of  normal  rela- 
tive size,  but  apparently  induces  a  supernormal  production 
of  sex-hormone,  this  in  turn  resulting  in  supernormal  hyper- 
trophy of  accessory  sexual  organs.  We  may  expect  to  find 
similar  complications  elsewhere  as  regards  the  relation  of 
hormone-producing  organ  and  reactive  organ. 

Champy  (1924)  has  given  us  an  interesting  experiment  on  the 
dorsal  crest  of  male  newts  (Triton).  This  is  a  male  secondary 
sexual  organ,  appearing  at  the  onset  of  the  breeding  season, 
and  exhibiting  marked  heterogony.  Champy  finds  that  it 
shows  a  differential  response  to  starvation,  being  reduced 
relatively  faster  than  other  organs.1  This  may  be  due  to  the 
crest  consisting  of  material  which  is  readily  drawn  upon  in 
starvation,  or  may  point  to  some  more  general  law  of  the 
reversibility  of  heterogonic  growth,  according  to  which  a 
heterogonic  organ  would  always  tend  to  approach  the  size 
appropriate  to  its  partition-equilibrium  whatever  the  bulk  of 
the  body,  and  whether  that  bulk  was  being  increased  by  normal 
growth  or  reduced  by  starvation.  That  something  of  this 
latter  sort  may  occur  is  shown  by  the  well-known  fact  that 
planarian  worms  reduced  in  size  by  starvation  revert  to  juvenile 
proportions  (Child,  1915).  This  relation  has  recently  been 
worked  out  quantitatively  by  Abeloos  (1.  c),  who  finds  not 
only  that  the  change  of  proportions  during  normal  growth  is 
truly  heterogonic  and  approximates  to  that  obtainable  by 
constant  differential  growth-ratio,  but  that  it  is  almost  exactly 
quantitatively  reversed  during  reduction  due  to  starvation. 
In  any  case,  the  example  of  Triton  clearly  demonstrates  the 
co-operation  of  nutritive  and  hormonic  factors  in  determining 
the  size  of  an  organ  (Fig.  80). 

Non-sexual  organs  may,  of  course,  also  show  heterogony, 
and  their  heterogony  may  also  depend  upon  hormones.  This 
is  best  seen  as  regards  the  growth  of  limbs  in  Anuran  meta- 
morphosis, which  depends  upon  thyroid  hormone,  and  is,  up 

1  Unfortunately  no  weight-measurements  of  crest  and  other  soft 
parts  were  made  ;  but  Champy's  illustrations  appear  in  general  to 
bear  out  his  assertion. 


iSo 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


to  a  considerable  dosage,  above  which  no  further  increase  of 
reaction  is  obtainable,  a  function  of  the  amount  of  hormone 
administered.  Champy  (1922),  as  a  result  of  investigations 
on  thyroid-fed  frog  tadpoles,  concludes  that  thyroid,  during 


Fig.  80. — To  show  disproportionate  reduction  by  starvation  of  a  heterogonic 
organ  (male  dorsal  crest)  in  a  male  newt,  Triton  cristatus.  The  drawings  are 
to  scale,  and  were  made  at  o,  5,  9,  16,  24,  32,  and  45  days  from  the  beginning 

of  starvation. 


HETEROGONY  AND  HORMONES      181 

the  few  days  between  its  administration  and  metamorphosis, 
causes  a  progressive  geometric  increase  in  the  number  of 
dividing  cells.  This  would  imply  a  progressive  increase  in 
growth-ratio  during  the  period.  Further  researches  on  this 
interesting  point  are  needed. 

In  any  case,  the  legs  of  Anura  are  of  interest  to  us  in  several 
respects.  First  of  all,  they  emphasize  once  more  the  import- 
ance of  tissue-specificity.  While  their  growth  responds  very 
sensitively  to  thyroid,  the  larval  Urodele  limb  is  wholly  in- 
sensitive to  the  same  hormone.  Next,  they  show  us  that 
even  the  threshold  of  reactivity  to  one  and  the  same  hormone 
may  vary  from  tissue  to  tissue.  Anuran  limb-buds  appear  to 
be  sensitive  to  any  dose  of  thyroid,  starting  from  zero.  But 
the  equally  specific  degenerative  response  of  the  tail-tissues 
does  not  begin  until  a  considerable  concentration  of  thyroid- 
hormone  is  reached  in  the  blood.  Thirdly,  they  show  us  a 
clear-cut  case  of  the  growth-coefficient  of  an  organ  varying 
within  wide  limits  with  the  dosage  of  a  hormone.  Even  the 
normal  growth  of  the  Anuran  tadpole's  limbs  is  slightly  hetero- 
genic, as  is  shown  by  extirpating  the  thyroid  in  the  embryo, 
when  growth  is  much  lower,  and  apparently  isogonic  (Allen). 

Fourthly,  they  show  in  diagrammatic  form  the  interrelation 
of  the  factors  of  growth-coefficient  and  available  time  as  regards 
the  problem  of  relative  size  of  organ.  Normally,  the  slight 
leakage  of  thyroid  hormone  into  the  blood  during  larval  life 
produces  a  mild  limb-heterogony.  By  the  time  the  meta- 
morphic  crisis  occurs  (apparently  due  to  a  specific  change  in 
the  pituitary  which  causes  the  thyroid  to  liberate  most  or  all 
of  its  secretion  suddenly  into  the  blood),  the  hind-legs,  originally 
mere  buds,  have  had  time  to  increase  in  relative  size  until 
longer  than  the  trunk,  although  the  trunk  itself  has  increased 
perhaps  two-  or  three-fold  in  linear  size. 

If,  on  the  other  hand,  a  moderately  strong  dose  of  thyroid 
be  administered  to  small  or  small-medium  tadpoles,  with  limb- 
buds  hemispherical  or  conical  but  not  yet  fully  differentiated, 
then  although  the  growth-ratio  of  the  limb-bud  is  raised  far 
above  normal,  the  accelerated  growth  can  only  operate  for  a 
few  days  before  metamorphosis  supervenes,  with  the  result 
that  the  transformed  froglet  has  relatively  very  small  limbs. 
It  would  be  of  great  interest  to  see  whether  these  proportions 
were  later  regulated  to  or  towards  the  normal,  but  the  experi- 
ment has  not  so  far  been  tried.  As  suggested  in  Chapter  II, 
this  factor  of  the  amount  of  time  available  for  heterogonic 


182  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

growth  appears  to  be  of  importance  in  holometabolous  in- 
sects in  general,  and  in  the  dimorphism  of  male  Forficula  in 
particular.     (See  Fig.  81.) 

Finally,  anuran  limbs  well  illustrate  the  dependence  of 
differentiation  upon  growth.  It  is  often  asserted  that  in 
Amphibia  the  thyroid  hormone  '  favours  differentiation  but 
inhibits  growth  '.  This  is  inaccurate  and  misleading.  Slight 
thyroid  activity,  as  in  the  normal  tadpole,  is  not  incompatible 
with  total  weight-increase.  Excess  thyroid  causes  loss  in  total 
weight,  but  this  is  an  effect  on  balance,  many  organs  losing 
weight,  others,  like  the  limbs  and  skeleton,  gaining  weight. 
As  Champy  (1925)  has  clearly  shown,  the  effect  of  thyroid  on 
some  tissues  is  to  halt  their  growth  (gut)  or  even  to  cause 

their  atrophy  (tail,  gills),  on  others  is  neutral, 
and  on  still  others  is  to  increase  their 
growth  (limbs).  Further,  the  differentia- 
tion of  the  limbs  is  not  a  specific  effect  of 
the  thyroid  hormone,  but  a  secondary  effect 
of  their  growth  in  size.  Differentiation  of 
limb-segments,  digits,  etc.,  occurs  at  certain 
limb-sizes.     And  it  will  do  so  even  when 

Fig.  81. Dispro-     no  thyroid  hormone  is  present,  as  is  shown 

portionately  small  by  Allen's  thyroidectomized  tadpoles  (Allen, 
limbs     caused     by      jqjg    iqiq).     These  grew  to  a  giant  size 

precociously  induced        /r  ,      1     \  a  •       t     1 

metamorphosis      in      (for   tadpoles).      As    result,    their    limbs, 
the    common    frog,      though  growing   isogonically,  attained  an 
JengthSof°the  "frogiet     absolute  size   comparable  to  that  reached 
was  8  mm.  by    the   limbs   of    normal  tadpoles  a  few 

weeks  before  metamorphosis ;  and  they 
showed  a  comparable  degree  of  differentiation.  This  depen- 
dence of  type  of  differentiation  upon  absolute  size  of  organ 
is  frequently  to  be  met  with  (cf.  in  prawns  with  different 
heterogony  of  the  chelae  in  both  sexes,  the  resemblance  of 
the  proportions  of  heterogenic  male  and  female  chelae  of  the 
same  absolute  size,  but  of  very  different  ages  and  attached 
to  bodies  of  very  different  absolute  size  :  see  Chapter  III).1 
In  a  later  chapter  we  shall  see  that  it  has  important  taxonomic 
and  evolutionary  consequences. 

The  work  of  Hutt  (1929)  shows  an  interesting  effect  of  the 
male   sex-hormone   upon   the   proportion   of   limb   bones   in 

1  It  is  however  not  invariable.  Male  and  female  chelae  of  Maia, 
Uca,  etc.,  grow  according  to  quite  different  growth-gradients  (Chap- 
ter III). 


HETEROGONY  AND   HORMONES  183 

fowls.     The  annexed  table,  modified  from  his  Table  5,  shows 

the  chief  results. 

TABLE   XIIa 

Percentage  Change  in  Size  in  Parts  of  the  Limbs  of  Male  Fowls 

Induced  by  Castration 

Carpo-  Phalanges   of 

Humerus          Radius,  Ulna        metacarpus  digit  3  (mean) 

Fore-limb           .         +  2-6               +2-25              +2-2  —  o-i  per  cent 

Hind-limb          .         +3-0               +3-4                 +3-9  +4 -7  per  cent 

Femur               Tibio-                  Tarso-  Phalanges   of 

tarsus              metatarsus  digit  3  (mean) 

It  will  be  seen  that  castration  causes  in  general  an  increase 
in  the  size  of  the  limb-bones.  But  whereas  in  the  hind-limb 
the  increase  itself  increases  as  we  pass  distally,  in  the  fore- 
limb  it  is  graded  in  the  reverse  sense,  leading  to  an  actual  de- 
crease in  the  terminal  segment.  The  existence  of  the  gradients 
is  interesting,  but  the  explanation  of  their  opposite  sign  in 
fore  and  hind  limbs  is  at  present  quite  obscure. 

Hammett  (1929B)  has  published  a  summary  of  our  knowledge 
of  the  effect  of  thyroid  upon  growth.  In  the  first  place,  the 
effect  upon  total  growth  is  an  affair  of  dosage.  In  intact 
young  mammals  (and  probably  many  other  vertebrates)  slight 
excess  of  thyroid  causes  an  increase  of  growth  in  weight,  while 
heavier  doses,  by  a  differential  encouragement  of  katabolism, 
reduce  it.  In  thyroid-deficient  animals  (whose  growth  is 
usually  retarded),  much  greater  doses  will,  of  course,  still 
permit  increased  growth.1 

Our  chief  interest,  however,  concerns  the  differential  effect 
of  thyroid  activity  upon  bodily  proportions,  and  here  Ham- 
mett himself  has  made  elaborate  experiments  upon  albino 
rats.  Groups  of  these  were  thyroidectomized  at  23,  30,  50, 
65,  75  and  100  days  respectively,  and  their  organ  sizes  and 
weights  determined  and  compared  with  those  of  unoperated 
controls  at  150  days.  When  the  increments  made  by  the 
various  organs  measured  in  the  operated  animals  are  calculated 
as  percentage  of  the  increments  made  in  the  same  space  of 
time  by  the  same  organs  of  the  controls,  some  important  facts 
emerge.  First,  in  every  case  the  effect  of  thyroidectomy  in 
retarding  growth  (not  the  absolute  effect,  but  the  relative  effect, 

1  Thyroidectomy  in  some  animals  (anuran  tadpoles,  axolotls,  etc.) 
is  not  accompanied  by  any  change  in  growth-rate.  In  anuran  larvae, 
excess  thyroid  is  usually  accompanied  by  a  decreased  growth  (incipient 
metamorphosis).  Even  here,  however,  very  minute  doses  accelerate 
growth  during  the  early  part  of  the  pre-metamorphic  period. 


184  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

as  measured  in  the  way  described)  increases  with  the  age  of 
the  animal.  To  take  but  a  few  examples,  the  eye,  one  of  the 
organs  least  affected  by  thyroidectomy,  in  males  operated  at 
twenty-three  days,  by  150  days  had  made  nearly  100  per  cent, 
of  the  growth  of  the  eyes  of  the  controls  in  the  same  period. 
For  those  operated  at  100  days,  however,  it  made  less  than 
80  per  cent,  of  the  controls'  growth  between  100  and  150 
days. 

In  regard  to  total  body-weight,  males  operated  at  twenty- 
three  days  showed  about  60  per  cent,  of  the  increment  of  the 
controls,  while  for  those  operated  at  100  days,  the  percentage 
was  below  30  per  cent.  And  as  regards  kidneys,  males  operated 
at  twenty-three  days  showed  under  50  per  cent,  of  the  con- 
trols' increment,  those  operated  at  sixty-five  days  showed  hardly 
any  increase  at  all,  while  those  operated  at  100  days,  had 
before  150  days  lost  in  absolute  kidney-weight  an  imount 
equivalent  to  some  50  per  cent,  of  the  increment  made  by 
the  controls  in  the  same  period.  Thus  the  sensitivity  of 
growth  to  thyroid-deficiency  increases  with  age. 

Secondly,  most  of  the  organs  of  the  body  fall  into  distinct 
groups  as  regards  differential  sensitivity  to  thyroidectomy. 
The  eye-balls,  central  nervous  system,  length-growth  both  of 
body  and  tail  (doubtless  determined  by  growth  of  the  axial 
skeleton),  and  both  length-  and  weight-growth  of  humerus  and 
of  femur  are  relatively  resistant,  being  retarded  less  than  the 
weight  of  the  body  as  a  whole.  On  the  contrary,  the  adrenals, 
spleen,  kidneys,  liver,  heart,  submaxillary  glands,  pancreas 
and  to  a  slighter  extent  the  lungs,  make  less  increment  than 
general  body-weight  (Fig.  82). 

Hammett  points  out  that  these  results  are  all  consistent 
with  the  idea  that  the  influence  of  thyroidectomy  is  greater 
on  growth  by  increase  of  cell-size  than  on  growth  by  cell- 
multiplication  ;  greater  on  that  fraction  of  the  metabolism 
concerned  with  function  (work) — e.g.  secretion,  muscular 
activity,  etc. — than  on  that  concerned  with  growth  ;  and 
greater  on  labile  than  on  stable  chemical  compounds.  The 
last  point  is  a  correlate  of  the  obvious  fact  that  in  conditions 
of  subnormal  nutrition  (as  in  thyroidectomy)  labile  materials, 
such  as  the  contents  of  glandular  tissues,  are  more  readily 
drawn  upon  than  stable  or  inert  substances,  such  as  the  salt- 
deposits  in  the  skeleton,  the  lipoids  of  the  nervous  system, 
or  the  humours  of  the  eye.  The  second  is  a  correlate  of  the 
fact  that  in  malnutrition,  growth  gives  way  to  the  mainten- 


Fig.  82. — Differential  effect  of  thyroid  removal  upon  the  growth  of  various 

organs  in  the  male  Albino  rat. 

The  curves  indicate  the  amount  of  growth  made  by  an  organ,  represented  as  a  percentage  of  the 
amount  of  growth  made  by  the  same  organ  in  unoperated  controls.  For  each  organ  there  are  6  points, 
representing  operations  carried  out  at  ages  from  23  to  100  days  ;  all  the  6  series  were  allowed  to 
grow  until  150  days  of  age  before  final  organ-size  was  determined.  In  all  graphs  the  heavy  line 
represents  the  curve  for  body-weight  in  thyroidectomized  animals.  In  all  cases  the  effect,  relative 
to  the  control,  is  greater  in  animals  operated  later. 

(A)  Organs  of  resistant  type  :    eyes,  spinal  cord,  brain.     All  are  less  reduced  than  body-weight. 

(B)  Organs  of  sensitive  type  :  heart,  lungs.  The  heart  in  particular  is  more  reduced  than  body- 
weight.  In  animals  operated  at  100  days  of  age,  both  heart  and  lungs  actually  lose  weight  (negative 
increment). 

185 


186  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

ance  of  function,  as  shown  by  the  fact  that  young  mammals 
can  live  fairly  healthily  when  kept  at  constant  weight  or  even, 
for  a  time,  decreasing  weight,  and  that  planarians,  etc.,  can 
keep  healthy  though  enormously  reduced  in  bulk  by  starva- 
tion. In  organs  where,  to  use  Hammett's  phrase,  the  work- 
growth  ratio  is  high,  as  in  glands,  heart,  etc.,  since  a  decrease 
of  metabolism  falls  more  heavily  on  the  growth-function  than 
the  work-function,  therefore  the  growth-function  will  be  more 
seriously  impaired  than  in  organs  such  as  C.N.S.  or  skeleton, 
where  the  work-growth  ratio  is  low.  And  the  first  point,  the 
greater  influence  of  thyroid-deficiency  on  growth  by  cell-size 
increase,  is  perhaps  due  to  a  specific  action  of  thyroid,  though 
it  too  could  be  interpreted  in  terms  of  a  greater  effect  of  thyroid- 
depression  on  growth  than  on  function  or  work,  the  cell  which 
is  growing  in  bulk  being  usually  already  differentiated  for  its 
definitive  function. 

Hammett  also  considers  a  '  special  group  '  of  organs.  The 
thymus  is  noted  for  its  sensitivity  to  all  unfavourable  con- 
ditions ;  and  in  general  is  the  most  adversely  affected  of  all 
organs  by  thyroid  removal.  The  testes  are  resistant  because 
continuously  producing  new  cells,  while  the  ovaries,  after 
puberty  at  least,  are  highly  affected.  The  pituitary  is  known 
to  show  compensatory  hypertrophy  on  thyroid  removal,  and  in 
consequence  increases  its  growth,  notably  in  males  (Fig.  83). 

There  is  also  a  specific  sex  difference,  females  showing  a 
greater  effect  of  thyroidectomy  as  regards  body-weight  and 
almost  all  organs.  And  finally,  puberty  accentuates  the 
sensitivity  of  all  the  sensitive  organs. 

The  net  result  of  thyroidectomy  is  the  production  of  an 
absolutely  smaller  150-day  animal,  but  one  which  is  abnormally 
slender,  and  has  relatively  larger  eyes,  testes  and  seminal 
vesicles,  nervous  and  skeletal  systems  than  a  control  of  the 
same  age,  but  relatively  smaller  viscera  and  glands  ;  further, 
the  normal  sexual  size-difference  is  increased.  When  compared 
with  animals  of  the  same  body- weight,  the  resistant  groups  of 
organs  are,  of  course,  absolutely  as  well  as  relatively  larger 
(Hammett,  1929A). 

Hammett  further  states  that  there  is  no  correlation  between 
the  degree  of  sensitivity  to  thyroidectomy  and  the  normal 
growth-rate  (growth-coefficient)  of  organs.  However,  he  has 
for  the  most  part  compared  qualitatively  different  organs,  in 
which  the  work-growth  ratio,  the  cell-multiplication  :  cell-size- 
increase  ratio,  and  the  ratio  of  labile  to  stabile  materials  may 


HETEROGONY   AND   HORMONES 


187 


160 


140 


120 


readily  obscure  differences  due  to  inherent  growth-potential. 
To  detect  the  latter,  it  would  be  necessary  to  compare  the 
effects  on  different  members  or  regions  of  a  single  organ  system 
— e.g.  different  bones — which  have  different  growth-ratios. 
This  interesting  study  at  least  shows  the  complexity  of  the 
factors  by  which  '  normal  proportions  '  are  determined. 

Here  we  may  cite 
the  paper  of  Neva-  male  £ 

lonnyi  and  Podhrad- 
sky  (1930),  which 
does  indicate  a  differ- 
ential result  of  excess 
thyroid  (and  of  ex- 
cess thymus)  on  vari- 
ous parts  of  the 
skeleton  of  fowls. 
Unfortunately  the 
thyroid  results  are 
based  on  only  two 
experimental  and 
four  control  animals, 
so  that  confirmation 
is  required.  It  would 
appear,  however, 
that  on  the  whole 
there  is  a  tendency 
for  excess  thyroid  (in 
this  dosage)  to  pro- 
duce relatively 
thicker  bones  ;  fur- 
ther, to  encourage 
the  total  growth  of 
the  femur,  shoulder- 
girdle  and  hip-girdle, 
but  to  decrease  the 
1  e  n  g  t  h-growth  at 
least  of  the  meta- 
carpals and  metatarsals  ;  the  radius,  ulna  and  tibia  occupying  an 
intermediate  position.  This  is  evidence,  so  far  as  it  goes,  of 
a  graded  centrifugal  effect.  We  may  also  note  that  Hammett 
found  femur  less  sensitive  to  thyroid  defect  than  humerus, 
and  the  Czech  authors  found  it  respond  more  by  excess  growth 
to  thyroid  excess. 


Fig.  83. — Effect  of  thyroidectomy  on  the  growth 
of  the  hypophysis  in  the  male  Albino  rat. 

The  graph  is  constructed  as  described  in  Fig.  82.  The  hypo- 
physis is  the  only  organ  which  increases  more  in  hyroidec- 
tomized  than  in  Control  animals. 


188  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

There  is  one  point  in  Hammett's  discussion  which  needs 
further  consideration.  He  maintains  that  all  the  growth- 
effects  of  thyroidectomy  are  what  we  may  call  non-specific, 
due  to  its  differential  effects  on  different  general  kinds  of 
materials  or  metabolic  activities.  That  this  need  not  always 
be  so,  however,  is  conclusively  shown  by  the  facts  of  Amphibian 
metamorphosis  ;  in  Anuran  larvae  thyroidectomy  has  a  much 
greater  growth-retarding  effect  on  the  limbs  than  on  any  other 
organ,  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  growth  of  these,  normally 
and  under  the  effect  of  excess  thyroid,  is  mainly  due  to  cell- 
multiplication  (see  above).  There  is,  in  fact,  the  possibility 
of  specific  as  well  as  of  general  differential  effects  of  hormones 
upon  growth. 

This  has  been  well  brought  out  by  Keith  (1923),  who  has 
pointed  out  that  the  pre-pituitary  affects  growth  differentially, 
acting  most  of  all  upon  the  extremities  and  on  the  parts  con- 
nected with  jaw-function.  And  similar  specific  sensitivity  is, 
of  course,  abundantly  shown  in  regard  to  the  sex-hormones 
(see  above).  Cushing  (1912)  points  out  that  hyperpituitarism 
is  associated  with  relatively  stout  digits,  hypopituitarism  with 
relatively  slender  ones. 

Although  there  are  no  sex-hormones  in  insects,  reference 
may  be  made  here  to  Champy's  interesting  discussion  (1929, 
pp.  204  seqq.)  of  the  relation  between  heterogony  and  secondary 
sexual  characters.  In  various  genera  of  beetles,  in  which  a 
horn  or  other  excrescence  is  normally  present  in  males  only, 
it  occurs  in  both  sexes  in  certain  species.  When  this  is  so, 
the  organ  appears  almost  invariably  to  be  highly  heterogonic 
when  restricted  to  one  sex,  only  slightly  heterogonic  or  even 
isogonic  when  present  in  both  sexes  (e.g.  the  beetle  Phanaeus 
lancifer  as  against  other  species  of  the  genus).  In  Enema 
infundibulum,  and  other  beetles,  the  female  possesses  a  cephalic 
horn,  but  lacks  a  thoracic  horn  :  in  the  male,  the  latter  is 
highly  heterogonic,  the  former  only  slightly  so. 

The  same  phenomenon  is  found  as  regards  the  '  tails  '  of 
the  swallow-tail  butterfly,  Papilio  dardanus.  In  the  few  sub- 
species where  the  sexes  are  similar,  the  '  tail '  is  isogonic ; 
in  the  rest,  it  is  heterogonic.  He  further  states  that  the  same 
phenomenon  occurs  in  Chameleons,  Sheep,  Antelopes,  and 
Deer  (Reindeer,  as  against  the  other  forms).  Here,  however, 
quantitative  data  are  lacking,  and  the  statement  needs 
confirmation. 

Champy  correctly  stresses  the  frequent  relation  between 


HETEROCHELY  189 

heterogony  of  a  character  and  its  restriction  to  one  sex.  It 
will  be  clear,  however,  from  our  previous  discussion  that 
heterogony  is  a  quite  general  phenomenon,  and  that  it  is 
merely  very  obvious  in  many  secondary  sexual  characters  be- 
cause these  are  frequently  of  an  exaggerated  nature,  demanding 
high  growth-ratios  for  their  development. 

§  5.     Heterochely  and  Relative  Growth-rates 

Some  suggestive  facts  concerning  differential  growth  emerge 
from  the  experiments  on  heterochelous  Crustacea,  which  have 
been  summarized  and  interestingly  discussed  by  Przibram 
(1930).  As  is  well  known,  in  forms  like  Alphaeus,  while  ampu- 
tation of  the  small  or  nipper  claw  is  followed  simply  by  the 
regeneration  of  a  new  nipper,  with  no  change  in  the  crusher, 
amputation  of  the  crusher  is  followed  by  a  reversal  of  the 
type  of  claw,  the  old  nipper  growing  into  the  new  crusher, 
the  claw  which  regenerates  in  place  of  the  old  crusher  growing 
into  the  new  nipper.  (This,  it  may  be  recalled,  is  closely 
parallel  with  the  results  of  Zeleny  (1905)  on  the  polychaete 
Hydroides.  This  sedentary  worm  has  paired  opercula,  of 
which  one  is  large  and  functional,  the  other  rudimentary. 
Amputation  of  the  large  operculum  causes  the  rudiment  to 
grow  into  a  functional  organ,  while  the  amputated  organ 
regenerates  of  rudimentary  type.)  In  certain  other  hetero- 
chelous Crustacea,  such  as  the  lobster  (Homarus),  it  was  long 
supposed  that  amputation  of  the  crusher  was  not  followed  by 
this  reversal.  But  later  work  has  now  shown  that  this  only 
applies  to  later  stages  :  if  the  operation  is  performed  on  quite 
young  animals,  reversal  does  occur.  And  it  now  seems  to  be 
a  general  rule  that  reversal  will  occur  at  small  sizes  in  all 
heterochelous  forms,  although  the  size-range  over  which  it 
occurs  differs  considerably  from  form  to  form.  In  some  cases 
no  reversal  is  possible  after  quite  a  young  stage.  In  others, 
like  Alpheus,  it  can  occur  throughout  life.  In  both  Homarus, 
in  which  the  crusher  (like  the  large  chela  of  male  Uca)  may 
be  either  on  the  right-  or  left-hand  side  at  random,  and  in 
the  crabs  Portunus  and  Eriphia,  in  which  the  crusher  is  nor- 
mally always  on  the  right,  reversal  can  only  take  place  before 
visible  differentiation  of  claws  has  occurred.  The  result  of 
amputation  of  future  crusher  in  such  cases  is  that  the  other 
claw  (as  in  young  Uca,  where,  however,  both  chelae  are  similar, 
of  male  type)  becomes  the  crusher,  while  the  amputated 
claw  regenerates  as  a  nipper. 


igo  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

Further,  in  practically  all  species,  even  in  those  where 
reversal  will  take  place  after  visible  heterochely  has  appeared, 
it  will  be  either  slowed  down  or  totally  prevented  after  the 
attainment  of  a  certain  quite  small  body-size.  Above  a 
cephalo-thorax  length  of  about  I  cm.,  if  the  crusher  be  ampu- 
tated, both  chelae  appear  of  nipper  type  at  the  next  moult 
following  amputation  of  the  crusher  ;  and  in  most  such  cases  the 
regenerating  claw  usually  turns  into  the  crusher  again  after  one 
or  more  further  moults.  (The  only  exceptions  are  hermit- 
crabs,  in  which  asymmetry  of  the  whole  body,  and  consequently 
of  the  chelae,  sets  in  during  the  larval  development,  and 
appears  to  be  invariably  determined  by  the  start  of  post- 
larval  life.) 

Przibram  ingeniously  suggests  that  these  facts  are  due  to 
the  ratio  between  rate  of  regenerative  and  of  normal  growth 
at  the  time  of  operation.  Rate  of  regenerative  growth  is 
always  high.  We  have  little  information  as  to  its  decline 
with  total  size,  but  the  previously  cited  experiments  of  Zeleny 
on  Portunus  sayi  (1.  c.)  show  that  there  need  be  no  falling-off. 
Probably  rate  of  regenerative  growth  remains  about  constant 
where  regeneration  is  possible  at  all.  Normal  growth,  on  the 
other  hand,  falls  off  very  markedly  with  absolute  size-increase. 
Thus  the  growth-ratio  of  regenerating  crusher  to  normally- 
growing  nipper  will  increase  with  increase  of  absolute  size. 
There  is,  further,  some  evidence  which  suggests  that  a  smaller 
organ  (such  as  the  nipper)  can  in  the  absence  of  competition 
from  a  corresponding  larger  organ  (such  as  the  crusher)  draw 
on  the  blood  for  a  greater  amount  of  nutriment. 

Przibram  accordingly  suggests  that  when  the  growth-ratio 
of  regenerating  crusher  to  normal  nipper  is  relatively  low,  the 
impetus  given  to  the  nipper's  growth  by  removal  of  the  crusher 
can  reach  the  threshold  of  growth-coefficient  needed  to  pro- 
duce a  crusher  before  the  regenerate  can  catch  up,  upon  which 
the  regenerate  is  then  partially  inhibited  and  must  remain  as 
a  nipper  ;  but  when  this  growth-ratio  is  high,  the  regenerate 
can  differentiate  as  a  crusher  at  the  next  instar,  because  the 
amount  of  excess  growth  achieved  by  the  nipper  is  relatively 
so  low.  An  intermediate  condition  is  seen  when  at  the  next 
instar  both  chelae  regenerate  as  nippers,  though  the  original 
nipper  is  still  the  larger  ;  the  nipper  has  not  yet  got  sufficient 
impetus  to  differentiate  into  a  crusher  at  the  first  instar  ; 
and  although  the  growth-ratio  of  the  regenerate  has  not  been 
sufficiently  high  to  reach  crusher-type  at  this  instar,  its  growth- 


INTERACTION   OF   GROWTH-RATIOS 


191 


/f>C 
r.  !         n 

r  !         n 

im!      an 

1 
1 
1 
1 
1 

r !          N 

(a) 

(b) 

(c) 

ratio  is  still  considerably  higher  than  the  old  nipper,  and  at 
the  next  moult  it  will  almost  inevitably  overhaul  its  partner 
(Fig.  84).  This  hypothesis  fits  the  facts  very  prettily;  it 
only  remains  to  confirm  it  quantitatively  by  appropriate  ex- 
periments. It  should,  however,  be  pointed  out  that  in  any 
case  it  only  explains  why  one  of  two  alternatives  is  realized 
on  a  given  side  of  the  body  in  each  particular  case  :  it  gives 
us  little  light  on  the  ques- 
tion of  the  nature  and 
determination  of  the  two 
alternative  types  them- 
selves. The  difference  be- 
tween crusher  and  nipper 
is  doubtless  in  part  one  of 
absolute  growth-coeffici- 
ent ;  but  as  we  have  earlier 
seen,  there  are  also  differ- 
ences between  them  in  the 
spatial  distribution  of 
growth-potential,  and 
qualitative  differences  in 
teeth,  etc.  The  changing 
growth-ratio  between  re- 
generating and  normal 
claw  acts  primarily  as  a 
'  realization  factor  ',  to  use 
a  German  term,  just  as 
does  the  female  sex- 
hormone  of  birds  in  effect- 
ing the  difference  in  colour 

and  form  between  male  and  female  feathers.  The  determina- 
tion of  the  difference  in  growth-gradients  and  in  teeth  is  not 
in  the  least  explained  by  this. 


Fig.  84. — Diagram  to  illustrate  Przibram's 

hypothesis   as   to    reversal    of   chelae   in 

heterochelous  Crustacea. 

C,  crusher ;    N,  nipper  claw. 

In  each  case  the  crusher  has  been  removed,  and  its 
regeneration  rate  is  assumed  to  remain  constant  in  spite 
of  age.  Dotted  lines  indicate  growth.  The  height  of 
the  lines  is  not  supposed  to  indicate  absolute  size,  but 
is  adjusted  so  that  greater  height  indicates  capacity  to 
develop  into  a  crusher  and  to  inhibit  the  other  claw, 
causing  it  to  become  a  nipper. 

(a)  In  young  animals  the  nipper  grows  relatively  fast 
and  can  thus  differentiate  into  a  crusher  at  the  next 
moult,  causing  the  regenerating  crusher  to  become  a 
nipper  ;  [b)  in  old  animals  the  nipper  grows  relatively 
slowly  ;  the  regenerating  claw  can  thus  differentiate 
into  a  crusher  again  at  the  next  moult,  and  the  nipper 
remains  a  nipper  ;  (c)  at  an  intermediate  stage,  neither 
claw  gets  sufficient  advantage  to  develop  into  a  crusher 
by  the  first  moult  ;  but  at  the  succeeding  moult  the 
old  crusher  will  become  a  crusher  again. 


§  6.     Specific  Growth-intensities  and  their  Interaction 

A  series  of  highly  important  experiments  bearing  on  our 
problems  has  been  carried  out  by  Harrison  (1924,  1929),  and 
later  by  Twitty  and  Schwind  (1931),  in  grafting  organs  from  one 
species  of  urodele  larva  to  another  which  has  a  different  normal 
growth-rate.  The  species  used  were  Ambly stoma  tigrinum, 
which  has  a  high  growth-rate,  and  A .  pimctatuni  which,  even 
when  fed  as  fully  as  possible,  grows  at  a  considerably  lower 


192 


PROBLEMS    OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


rate  in  the  same  conditions  ;  and  they  then  grafted  limb-disks 
and  eye-rudiments  from  one  species  to  the  other.  The  main 
important  finding  is  that  the  organ  retained  their  specific 
growth-rates  even  on  the  bodies  of  their  new  hosts,  provided 
that  conditions  were  equalized  by  keeping  both  species  at  the 
same  nutritive  level  (which  was  most  simply  accomplished  by 
giving  both  the  maximum  amount  of  food  they  would  take). 
Under  these  conditions,  the  transplanted  organ  attained  the 
same  size  which  it  would  have  had  if  left  in  the  body  of  its  own 
species ;  tigrinum  organs  grew  just  as  fast  as  normal  though 
on  the  slow-growing  bodies  of  punctatum,  punctatum  organs 
just  as  slow  as  normal  though  on  the  fast-growing  tigrinum 
bodies  (Fig.  85).     On  the  other  hand,  this  inherent  growth- 


• 

• 

O 

30 

0    0 

O 

0 

0 

t 

2S 

t/> 

0 

X 
0. 
<r 
0 

m 

Z 

Q: 

< 

UJ 

0 

Ul 

t 

2.0 

E 

t 

£ 

6 

___-~- 

. 

—-■» 

Zj 

_  ^"^ 

-i 

<*"" 

£ 

1.5 

6 

,' 

jf 

Z 

© 

a 

s 
* 
s 

S* 

* 
* 

UJ 

© 

,*■ 

>- 

s' 

UJ 

10 

® 

,'* 

u. 

•         **' 

0 

»' 

en 

ID 

• 

*■' 

•  = NORMAL  TIGRINUM  EYE 

°s 

O  =  TRANSPLANTED  TIGRINUM  EYE 

b 

05 

• 

_»_=  NORMAL  EYE.  OF  PUNCTATUrl  HOST 

E 

< 

a 

0 

-n 


to 


^0 


60 


70 


80 


DAYS    AFTER    OPERATION 
A 


Fig.   85. — Graph  showing  the  growth  of  normal 

(A)  Growth  of  tigrinum  eye  grafted  on  to  punctatum,  compared  with  that  of  a  normal  tigrinum 
eye,  and  that  of  the  normal  punctatum  eye  of  the  host. 


INTERACTION   OF   GROWTH-RATIOS 


193 


capacity  of  the  organ  was  related  to  the  growth  of  the  body  (I 
am  now  interpreting  the  data  in  terms  of  the  views  put  forward 
in  this  book)  according  to  the  law  of  constant  coefficient  of 
growth-partition  (Figs.  31,  86).  In  other  words,  the  amount 
of  growth  made  by  the  organ  was  a  function  not  only  of  its 
own  higher  or  lower  growth-potential,  but  also  of  the  amount 
of  growth  made  by  the  body,  and  this  was  equally  true  both 
for  normal  and  transplanted  organs.  For  instance,  at  first  it 
appeared  that  tigrinum  (rapid-growing)  organs  grew  even 
faster  when  transplanted  than  when  left  in  place,  and  Harrison 
put  forward  an  elaborate  hypothesis  to  account  for  this.  It 
later  turned  out,  however,  that  this  was  due  to  the  punctatum 
hosts  having  been  at  an  optimum  nutritive  level,  while  the 
tigrinum  controls  were  not  being  given  quite  as  much  food  as 


CC 

Ul 

h- 

LU 

T. 

_i 
-j 

E 

Z 

ID 
> 

ID 

U. 

o 

o: 
ui 

1- 

ID 

z 
< 


?<■ 

/ 
/ 
/ 

/ 

0 
/ 
/ 

^<~—~ 

•""" 

1  " 

y 

s 
s 
/ 

/ 

/ 

r 

0 

O 

O 

1 r 

0 

/ 
/ 

/ 

0 

• 

0 

• 
• 

• 

• 

Ul 

0 
/ 

0 

e 

@ 

9 

(!) 

O 

• 

as 

,'    9 
® 

•   -  NORr- 

O    •  TRAN 
.«-  -  NORf 

AL  PUNCTA 
3PLANTED 
AL   EYE  OF 

TUM  EYE 
PUNCT.  EYE 
'  TIGRINUMI 

10ST 

10 


11         ,52<f    -'"       "30    3*        3940    ~        "to      5*      5fl60  "     70 


80 


DAYS   AFTER    OPERATION 
B 


and  grafted  eyes  of  two  species  of  Amblystoma. 

(B)  Reciprocal  experiment.     Growth  of  punctatum  eye  grafted  on  to  tigrinum,  compared  with  that 
of  a  normal  punctatum  eye,  and  that  of  the  normal  tigrinum  host  eye. 

13 


194 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


or 

UJ 

h 
z 

D 
LU 


fc 


0.060 


0050 


2 
Q 

2 

LU 


O.OTO 


0.000 


0.020 


"30 

DAYS      AFTER     OPERATION 
Fig.  86. — Similarity  of  relative  growth  of  eye  of  two  species  of  Amblystoma 
with  different  absolute  growth-rates. 

The  curves  are  derived  from  the  means  from  5  specimens  of  each  species,  which  were  used  in  eye- 
grafting  experiments.  They  represent  the  ratio  between  the  diameter  of  the  normal  unoperated  eye 
and  the  total  length. 

The  ratios  decrease  (negative  heterogony)  but  are  closely  similar  for  the  two  species  in  spite  of 
the  fact  that  during  the  period  the  mean-length  of  the  tigrinum  larvae  had  increased  from  about 
14  to  no  mm.,  while  that  of  the  punctatum  larve  had  only  increased  from  about  13  to  nearly  55  mm. 
The  operation  was  carried  out  in  the  embryonic  period. 

they  could  eat.1     By  reversing  the  nutritive  situation,  the 
amount  of  growth  made  by  the  grafted  limbs  could  be  reduced 


1  The  matter  is  actually  not  quite  as  simple  as  this.  From  the 
detailed  results  of  Twitty  and  Schwind  (1931)  it  appears  that  the 
correspondence  between  grafted  and  control  limbs  only  remains  perfect, 
even  in  maximally  fed  specimens,  up  to  a  certain  time  in  larval  life. 
After  this,  there  is  a  slight  decrease  in  the  size  of  the  large  limbs  grafted 
on  to  the  small  host,  and  a  more  considerable  increase  of  the  small 
limbs  grafted  on  to  the  large  host  (Fig.  85) — an  effect  the  reverse  of 
that  first  posited  by  Harrison.  It  would  thus  appear  that  the  size 
of  the  host  gradually  comes  to  influence  the  inherent  growth-capacity  of 
the  graft,  although  this  influence  is  always  slight  compared  to  the  differ- 
ence in  the  inherent  growth-capacity  of  the  organs  of  the  two  species. 

Further,  Detwiler  (1930)  and  Severinghaus  (1930)  claim  that  the 
host  may  in  some  cases  exert  some  effect  upon  the  inherent  growth- 
rate  of  the  graft  in  early  stages  before  feeding  begins.  But  what- 
ever the  extent  of  these  minor  effects,  the  specific  growth-rate  of  the 
organ  is  the  main  factor  in  determining  its  relative  growth-rate  when 
transplanted. 


INTERACTION   OF  GROWTH-RATIOS  195 

below  that  made  by  the  controls  left  in  place.  Thus  we  clearly 
see  that  the  relative  size  of  any  organ  is  due  to  two  variables 
— its  inherent  growth-capacity,  and  a  regulatory  partition- 
coefficient  which  allots  material  as  between  organ  and  rest- 
of-body.1  We  could  have  deduced  this  from  our  studies  on 
the  chelae  of  Uca,  etc.,  but  this  work  clinches  the  matter 
decisively  by  means  of  experimental  tests. 

This  work  of  Harrison's  has  also  shed  important  light  on 
growth-gradients.  In  addition  to  grafting  whole  eyes,  he  made 
separate  inter-specific  grafts  (a)  of  optic  vesicle  and  (b)  of 
lens-producing  epithelium  (Harrison,  19293).  Eyes  were  thus 
produced  which  contained  rapid-growing  optic  cup  and  slow- 
growing  lens,  and  others  with  slow-growing  optic  cup  and  fast- 
growing  lens  ;  and  either  sort  in  both  kinds  of  host.  In  every 
case,  there  was  a  mutual  influence  of  the  components  upon 
each  other.  The  growth  of  the  eyes  as  a  whole  was  of  inter- 
mediate rate,  that  of  the  rapid  component  was  slowed  down, 
that  of  the  slow  component  speeded  up.2 

Fig.  87,  constructed  from  Harrison's  data,  shows  the  results 
quantitatively.  The  association  of  a  fast-growing  optic  vesicle 
with  a  slow-growing  lens  retards  the  growth  of  the  optic  vesicle 
by  22  per  cent,  in  a  punctatum  body  (No.  2  in  Fig.  87 :  ratio 
1-26  instead  of  i-6i)  ;  and  by  17  per  cent,  in  a  tigrinum  body 
(No.  4  :  ratio  0-83  instead  of  i-o)  ;  similarly,  it  accelerates  the 
growth  of  the  lens  by  13  per  cent,  in  a  punctatum  body  (No.  9) 
and  by  6  per  cent,  in  a  tigrinum  body  (No.  11).     The  reverse 

1  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  Twitty  and  Schwind  (1.  c.)  in  their 
latest  paper,  published  after  this  chapter  was  first  written,  also  adopt 
the  phrase  partition-coefficient  of  growth.  They,  however,  think  of  the 
partition-coefficient  as  a  percentage  ratio,  and  therefore,  since  the 
ratio  eye-diameter :  body-length  decreases  considerably  during  larval 
life,  find  it  necessary  to  postulate  a  progressive  change  in  the  coeffi- 
cient. If  our  conception  be  adopted  of  a  partition-coefficient  which 
is  an  exponent  of  body-size,  this  difficulty  disappears,  and  the  coeffi- 
cient can  be  considered  to  remain  constant  throughout  growth. 

2  That  such  interaction  of  neighbouring  parts  as  regards  their  growth- 
intensity  need  not  always  occur  is  shown  by  the  recent  work  of  Schwind 
(193 1),  who  made  heteroplastic  grafts  of  parts  of  the  shoulder-girdle 
between  the  same  two  species.  He  found  that  the  presence  of  a 
grafted  coracoid  region  growing  at  a  different  rate  from  the  host's 
organs  had  no  effect  on  the  growth  of  the  host's  scapular  region.  Thus 
we  have  here  an  example  of  mosaic  growth-rates,  as  opposed  to  mutual 
regulation,  which  is  perhaps  comparable  to  the  mosaic  differentiation 
of  some  developing  eggs  as  opposed  to  the  regulatory  capacities  of 
others. 


196 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


16  ~Q)  T  whole  eye  on  P 


T  whole  eye  on  P  Qy~ 


15 


14 


13 


1-2 


-(g)  T  optic  vesicle  onP 
-(3)  T  lens  ectoderm  on  P 


II  ■ 


T  lens  ectoderm  onP($y 


T  optic  vesicle  on  P  (9)- 


association,  of  a  slow-growing  optic  vesicle  with  a  fast-growing 
lens,  accelerates  the  growth  of  the  optic  vesicle  in  a  tigrinum 
body  by  25  per  cent.  (No.  5),  and  by  22  per  cent,  in  a  punc- 
tatum  body  (No.  3).  And  it  retards  the  growth  of  the  lens 
by  20  per  cent,  in  a  punctatum  body  (No.  9),  by  21  per  cent, 
in  a  tigrinum  body  (No.  10).  The  regulation  is  a  gradual  one, 
as  shown  by  Harrison's  Fig.  37. 

Further,  Harrison  gives  conclusive  proofs  that  the  regula- 
tion is  due  to  chem- 
ical and  not  in  any 
appreciable  degree 
to  merely  mechani- 
cal causes.  He  also 
finds  some  regula- 
tion of  a  similar  sort 
in  other  tissues  in 
the  proximity  of  the 
eyes. 

We  could  inter- 
pret these  results  in 
various  ways.  Per- 
haps both  rapid- 
growing  and  slow- 
growing  organs  pro- 
duce specific  sub- 
stances which  in- 
teract with  each 
other.  Perhaps 
there  is  only  one 
type  of  substance,  a 
positive  or  growth- 
promoting  sub- 
stance ;  in  such 
case,  when  there  is 
a  deficiency  of  this 
in,  e.g.,  the  slow-growing  lens,  there  will  be  a  greater  differ- 
ence in  concentration  of  this  substance  between  optic  vesicle 
and  lens,  therefore  more  diffusion  of  the  substance  left  in  the 
optic  vesicle  and  accordingly  less  rapid  growth  of  the  opt  c 
vesicle.  This  latter  suggestion  would  be  in  harmony  not  only 
with  the  facts  as  to  growth-centres  and  growth-gradients  here 
set  forth,  but  also  with  recent  work  on  plant  growth,  e.g.  by 
Dolk,  who  finds  a  specific  growth-hormone  with  quantitative 


10 


0  9 


0  8 


0  7 


0  6 


@P  lens  ectoderm  on  T 
(§)P  optic  vesicle  on  T 


-(6)  P  whole  eye  on  T 


P  opt/c  vesicle  on  T  (jdy^ 

P  lens  ectoderm  on  T(Th 
P  whole  eye  on  T    Qz) 


(a) 


(b) 


Fig.  87. — Diagram  to  show  the  results  of  grafting 

whole  eyes  and  their  parts  between  Ambly  stoma 

tigrinum  (T)  and  punctatum  (P). 

The  ordinates  give  the  ratios  of  the  linear  dimensions  of  (a)  the 
optic  bulb  and  (fc)  the  lens  on  the  side  receiving  the  graft  to  those 
of  the  intact  eye  of  the  other  side  (see  text  for  details). 

(Constructed  from  Table  II  in  Harrison,  1929B.) 


EXTERNAL   CONDITIONS  197 

action.  On  this,  however,  only  further  experiment  can  decide  ; 
but  the  results  are  clearly  of  importance  in  that  they  show 
experimentally  that,  as  we  have  deduced  from  mere  measure- 
ments, rapidly-growing  organs  may  exert  an  influence  upon 
the  growth  of  neighbouring  organs. 

§  7.    The  Influence  of  External  Conditions 

We  next  have  to  consider  the  effect  upon  growth-gradients 
and  heterogenic  organs  in  general  of  the  natural  or  experimental 
alteration  of  conditions. 

The  heteroplastic  experiments  with  Ambly stoma  eyes  which 
we  have  just  been  discussing  provide  us  with  some  facts  bear- 
ing on  this  problem.  In  Chapter  II  reference  was  made  to 
Twitty's  experiments  in  grafting  on  to  punctatum  host-larvae, 
tigrinum  eyes  of  the  same  size  but  less  physiological  age  than 
the  host's  eyes.1  He  found  that  when  the  hosts  were  starved, 
their  body-length  (five  animals,  over  an  average  of  thirty-five 
days)  decreased  by  18  per  cent.,  their  own  eyes  remained  un- 
changed in  diameter,  and  the  grafted  eyes  increased  very 
slightly,  by  2-5  per  cent.  When,  however,  they  were  fed  just 
more  than  enough  to  maintain  their  size,  their  body-length 
(four  animals  over  an  average  of  thirty-one  days)  increased 
by  7  per  cent.,  their  own  eyes  by  practically  the  same  amount 
(6-5  per  cent.),  but  the  grafted  eyes  by  40-5  per  cent.  One 
of  these  specimens  showed  an  increase  of  50  per  cent,  in  the 
diameter  of  the  grafted  eye,  but  without  any  change  in  body- 
length.  It  is  thus  clear  that  competition  for  food  plays  an 
important  part  in  the  regulation  of  relative  size  of  parts.  The 
rapidly  growing  eye,  whether  rapidly  growing  by  virtue  of  its 
youth  or  its  higher  specific  growth-intensity,  can  draw  dis- 
proportionately upon  the  supply  of  food  available  (for  further 
discussion  of  this  general  problem,  see  Jackson,  1925,  and 
Huxley,  1921).  It  is  clear  that  much  valuable  work  would 
be  possible  in  determining  the  quantitative  growth-relations, 
in  varying  nutritive  conditions,  of  heteroplastic  grafts  of  the 
same  and  of  different  ages,  and  of  homoplastic  grafts  of 
different  age  from  their  host.   (Fig.  31.) 

We  have  already  considered  the  effect  of  poor  nutritive 
conditions  upon  the  forceps  of  male  Forficula  (Chapter  II)  and 
upon  the  dorsal  crest  of  male  newts  (Chapter  VI).  Perkins 
(1929)  has  analysed  the  effect  of  the  parasite  Sacculina  upon 

1  A  similar  regulation  of  rate  of  development  was  found  by  Choi 
(193 1 ),  who  grafted  lateral  half -larvae  of  two  species  of  frog  together. 


198 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


the  growth-gradient  in  Carcinus.     He  finds  that  the  effect  of 
the  parasite  is  primarily  to  reduce  general  growth  of  the  crab 


D 


Fig.  88. — Regulation  of  growth  of  eyes  of  one  species  of  Amblystoma  grafted 
to  individuals  of  another  species  and  of  different  age.     All  x  6. 

G,  grafted  eyes. 

(A)  A  specimen  of  A.  punctatum  with  an  eye  from  a  younger  specimen  of  the  larger  species,  A. 
tigrinum. 

(B)  The  same  40  days  later,  after  feeding  on  maintenance  diet ;   the  grafted  eye  has  enlarged. 

(C)  A  similar  specimen  to  (B),  but  starved  since  the  operation  ;   the  grafted  eye  has  not  grown. 

(D)  A.  tigrinum,  with  an  eye  from  an  older  A.  punctatum. 

(E)  The  same  specimen  45  days  later,  after  normal  feeding.     The  grafted  eye  has  lagged  in  its 
growth. 


EXTERNAL  CONDITIONS  199 

by  acting  as  a  new  and  a  very  active  '  growth-centre  '  which, 
of  course,  enters  into  competition  for  food-material  with  the 
organs  of  the  crab's  own  body.  Secondly,  however,  he  finds 
that  this  effect  is  not  uniform  on  all  the  organs.  It  is  greatest 
in  those  of  most  rapid  inherent  growth-potential  (highest 
growth-coefficient).  Thirdly,  he  believes  that  normally  excess 
of  growth  of  one  part  is  associated  with  a  '  drainage  effect ' 
upon  the  growth  of  other  parts,  and  that  when  the  growth 
of  the  organs  with  high  growth-coefficient  is  inhibited,  as  in 
Sacculina,  there  is  a  releasing  effect  on  those  of  low  growth- 
coefficient  leading  to  an  actual  increase  in  their  relative  size. 
It  is  by  this  means  that  he  would  account  for  the  well-known 
fact  of  the  increase  in  the  abdomen-width  (approximation  to 
female  type)  in  sacculinized  male  Crustacea. 

This  third  conclusion  of  his  does  not  appear  to  be  well 
founded.  It  is  in  disagreement  with  the  correlation  we  have 
found  between  the  presence  of  a  highly  heterogonic  organ 
(e.g.  chela)  and  excess  growth  in  the  appendages  posterior  to 
it  ;  and  with  the  important  fact  discovered  by  G.  Smith 
(1906A),  to  which  sufficient  attention  has  not  been  paid,  that 
parasitized  female  crabs,  even  if  Perkins  be  right  in  supposing 
that  their  general  growth  is  checked,  show  accelerated  develop- 
ment of  the  female  secondary  sexual  characters  of  their  abdo- 
men. This  last  point,  together  with  the  fact  that  in  males 
which  have  recovered  from  the  parasite,  the  gonad  develops 
ova,  seems  to  me  conclusive  proof  that  the  effect  of  the  parasite 
here  is  in  major  part  a  specifically  sexual  one,  and  not  merely 
a  quantitative  growth-effect.  Be  this  as  it  may,  Perkins 
has  shown  that  there  does  exist  such  a  quantitative  growth- 
effect  of  Sacculina  upon  its  host,  and  that  in  regard  even  to 
appendages  which  show  no  obvious  secondary  sexual  differ- 
ences, it  exerts  a  differential  and  graded  influence  ;  and  this 
opens  the  door  to  all  kinds  of  future  work.1 

Another  influence  upon  differential  growth  is  shown  by 
the  work  of  Thiel  (1926)  upon  the  Lamellibranch  mollusc 
Sphaerium.  He  shows  that  in  clean  water  with  high  oxygen 
content,  the  form  of  the  shell  becomes  more  rounded  than 
in   the   dirty  water  of  its  normal  habitat.     This,   however, 

1  In  this  connexion  the  specific  and  differential  morphogenetic  effect 
of  the  parasitic  worm  Mermis  upon  its  ant  hosts  should  be  noted, 
although  for  the  moment  its  relation  to  the  growth-gradients  of  the 
ant-body  cannot  be  clearly  envisaged.  See  Wheeler  (1928),  Vandel 
(i93o). 


200  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

appears  to  be  mainly  or  solely  a  mechanical  effect  due  to  an 
alteration  in  the  direction  rather  than  the  amount  of  growth 
of  the  mantle-edge,  and  to  be  determined  by  an  increase  in  the 
number  of  embryos  contained  in  the  gills. 

Similarly,  Huntsman  (1921)  found  that  light  not  only 
markedly  retarded  the  growth  of  mussels  (Mytilus),  but  also 
affected  their  shape.  Although  the  depth  of  the  shell  relative 
to  length  was  not  altered,  the  relative  breadth  was  increased 
from  42  to  46  per  cent  ;  as  result,  the  ratio  of  weight  to  the 
product  of  (/  X  d  X  br)  of  course  increased.  The  light 
appeared  to  inhibit  the  growth  of  the  edge  of  the  mantle,  which 
is  responsible  for  additions  in  length  and  in  depth.  Relative 
breadth,  on  the  other  hand,  again  depends  on  the  angle  at 
which  the  mantle-edge  is  growing. 

Entz  (1927),  in  an  exhaustive  study  on  Peridinians,  has 
shown  that  the  relative  length  of  the  horns  is  markedly  altered 
by  salinity,  while  the  size  of  the  body  is  little  affected.  In 
different  external  conditions,  the  antapical  horn  may  vary  in 
the  ratio  of  4  to  1  ;  the  post-equatorial  horn  in  the  ratio  of 
5  or  6  to  1  ;  and  the  other  two  horns  from  zero  to  a  con- 
siderable development.  As  Entz  puts  it,  the  relative  size  of 
the  horns  renders  small  differences  of  salinity  visible  in  an 
obvious  and  exaggerated  form.     (See  also  Gajewski,  p.  259.) 

What  again  appears  to  be  a  comparatively  simple  influence 
is  that  revealed  in  what  Przibram  (1925)  calls  the  '  Tail- 
thermometer  '  of  rats  and  mice — namely,  the  fact  that  the 
relative  tail-length  of  these  rodents  (pp.  22,  40)  increases 
with  increase  of  the  external  temperature  in  which  they  grow 
up.  The  relationship  is  an  approximately  linear  one.  If  rela- 
tive tail-length  be  expressed  as  trunk  length  per  cent,  the  value 
of  this  index  of  tail-length  (for  young  Albino  rats)  decreases 
by  075  for  each  rise  of  i°  C.  in  external  temperature.  He  has 
also  shown  that  this  is  correlated  with  an  actual  increase  of 
internal  temperature  (0-2°  C.  for  each  50  of  external  increase)  ; 
and  further,  that  this  is  really  the  important  agency  in  pro- 
ducing the  effect.  We  may  therefore  conclude  that  the  effect  is 
due  in  part  to  a  differential  temperature-coefficient  for  tail- 
growth.  On  the  other  hand,  the  fact  that  the  tail  (and  other 
organs  such  as  ears  and  limbs,  which  also  show  a  similar  effect 
with  temperature)  have  a  relatively  large  surface,  and  therefore 
a  lower  temperature  than  the  rest  of  the  body  (cf.  Crew's  and 
Moore's  proof  of  this  fact  for  the  mammalian  scrotum),  doubt- 
less enters  into  the  picture.  Higher  internal  temperatures, 
especially  with  higher  external  temperatures,  would  reduce  the 


EXTERNAL   CONDITIONS  201 

temperature-difference  between  tail  and  body,  and  would 
therefore  accelerate  the  tail's  relative  growth.1 

Information  perhaps  more  important,  and  certainly  more 
directly  correlated  with  Perkins's  results,  is  afforded  by  our 
knowledge  of  the  differential  effect  upon  bodily  proportions 
produced  by  malnutrition,  by  hormones,  and  by  teratological 
embryonic  agencies. 

Jackson  (1925)  has  published  interesting  data  concerning 
the  effect  of  malnutrition  upon  differential  growth  in  rodents. 
An  important  fact  is  that  in  young  animals  held  at  constant 
body-weight,  certain  organs,  notably  the  skeleton,  continue 
growth,  and  continue  on  the  whole  in  the  same  differential 
way  as  in  the  normally-fed  animal — a  pretty  demonstration  of 
the  existence  of  inherent  growth-potentials  and  their  variation 
in  different  parts  of  the  same  organ-system. 

The  actual  details  of  the  process  vary  according  to  the  age 
at  which  the  animals  are  subjected  to  the  treatment.  (In 
acute  inanition  leading  to  actual  weight-loss,  the  changes,  as 
expected,  are  different  in  degree.) 

In  albino  rats  kept  at  maintenance  from  three  weeks  of 
age,  the  tail  actually  grows  in  absolute  length,  and  consider- 
ably in  relative  length.  The  absolute  head- weight  is  slightly 
increased.  When  the  experiment  started  at  birth,  the  increase 
in  head-weight  was  much  more  marked.  The  brain  and  the 
testes  are  other  organs  which  show  increase  of  weight  when 
growing  animals  are  kept  at  constant  weight,  especially  in 
the  new-born  (Fig.  89).     Full  details   are  given  by  Jackson. 

Hammond  (1928,  1930,  1931)  has  also  some  interesting 
remarks  on  the  effect  of  undernutrition  at  various  periods 
upon  relative  growth  in  mammals  (sheep,  rabbit,  etc.).  In 
an  adult,  the  loss  of  weight  occurs  first  mainly  from  fat,  then 
mainly  from  muscle,  last  of  all  the  bones  and  the  more  '  vital ' 
organs,  such  as  heart,  lungs,  etc. 

In  a  young  growing  animal  the  vital  organs  appear  to  have 
first  call  on  nutritive  material :  during  moderate  under- 
nutrition they  thus  continue  their  growth  more  or  less  un- 
affected, while  that  of  muscles  (and  fat)  is  markedly  inhibited  : 
since  muscles  show  positive  heterogony  in  juvenile  life,  the 
animal  will  retain  juvenile  proportions  (and  will,  of  course, 
not  be  so  valuable  as  a  carcass). 

In  general,  when  organs  have  their  period  of  maximum 
absolute  growth  at   different   times   (from  whatever  physio- 

1  See  also  Abe  (1931),  Endokrinol.,  9,  and  Przibram,  ibid.,  no,  for 
effect  of  internal  temperature  upon  relative  cell-size  in  rats. 


202 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


logical  cause),  ample  nutrition  at  the  period  of  maximum 
growth,  followed  or  preceded  by  undernutrition  at  other 
periods,  will  produce  an  animal  with  the  organ  of  unusually- 
large  relative  size  ;  e.g.,  in  rabbits,  the  ears  have  an  early 
period  of  maximum  growth  :  accordingly  maximal  feeding 
when  young,  when  followed  by  low  feeding  later,  will  produce 
a  rabbit  with  ears  above  the  normal  proportionate  size. 
Hammond  further  points  out  that  since  in  meat  animals  the 

maximum  percentage  of 
flesh  is  only  produced  by 
a  high  level  of  feeding 
throughout  most  of  the 
growth-period,  animals 
cannot  show  their  full 
potentialities  as  meat- 
producers  if  kept  in  un- 
favourable nutritive  con- 
ditions. When  practising 
genetic  selection  for  meat 
qualities,  it  is  therefore 
necessary  to  provide 
optimum  conditions  for 
individual  development 
in  order  to  be  able  to 
pick  out  extreme  vari- 
ants. Conversely,  if  a 
breed  is  required  for  a 
poor  environment,  selec- 
tion should  be  practised 
with  sub-optimal  nutri- 
tion, of  the  type  to  be 
expected  in  this  environ- 
ment. 

In  regard  to  plants, 
numerous  examples  are 
known  of  external  conditions  affecting  proportions.  We  may 
cite  two  papers  of  Pearsall  and  Hanby  (1925  and  1926).  In  the 
former  they  showed  that  in  Potamogeton  leaves  excess  calcium 
causes  a  predominance  of  growth  in  breadth,  excess  potassium  a 
predominance  of  growth  in  length.  This  was  due  partly  to 
the  greater  relative  length  of  the  individual  cells  in  the  Ca 
cultures,  partly  to  the  arrangement  of  cells  in  the  young 
leaf-initials.     In  the  latter  paper  they  found  that  reduced 


Head 
£0.6  per  cent 

Head 
££.T  per  cent. 

Head 
10. 1  per  cenr. 

fbre -limbs 
6.9  per  cenf. 

Hind-limbs 
15.6  percent 

fbre-Iimbs 
9.6  percent. 

fore-limbs 
8.5  per  cent. 

Hind-limbs 
15.7  percent. 

Hind  limbs 
15.4  per  cent. 

Trunk 
6T.4  percent. 

Trunk 
54. 1  per  cent". 

Trunk. 
55.4  per  cent; 

Controls  at  3  weeks    Constant  >  10  weeks   Controls  at  10  weeks 

Fig.  89. — Diagram  showing  changes  pro- 
duced in  relative  weight  of  various  parts 
of  the  body  in  young  rats  held  at  constant 
weight  for  7  weeks  by  under- feeding  (centre) 
as  compared  with  controls  at  the  beginning 
(left)  and  end  (right)  of  the  experiment. 


RHYTHMICAL  IRREGULARITIES  203 

hydrostatic  pressure  causes  palmate  leaves  to  become  not 
only  smaller,  but  more  dissected  and  with  relatively  smaller 
basal  lobes.  However,  as  growth  in  plants  clearly  follows 
very  different  laws  from  growth  in  animals,  we  will  not 
attempt  to  enter  into  any  detail. 

§  8.    Rhythmical  Irregularities  of  Growth-ratio 

Finally,  we  must  just  mention  a  curious  but  possibly  im- 
portant fact,  namely  the  tendency  of  structures  to  grow  by 
abnormally  high  growth  first  in  one  dimension  of  space,  then  , 
in  another,  so  that  the  growth-ratio  for  breadth  on  length  does 
not  remain  constant,  but  fluctuates  more  or  less  rhythmically 
round  a  mean.  Przibram  (1902)  has  pointed  this  out  in  regard 
to  the  carapace  of  crabs.  In  these  he  followed  individuals 
through  several  moults,  so  he  could  be  certain  of  the  fluctua- 
tion in  proportions. 

I.  W.  Wilder  (1924)  finds  a  similar  alternation,  of  periods 
of  filling  out  and  periods  of  rapid  length-growth  with  drop 
in  the  body-build  index,  in  the  larval  growth  of  the  salamander 
Eurycea  bilineata,  and  the  same  phenomenon  is  stressed  for 
human  children  by  various  authors,  notably  Bean  (1924), 
Harris  (1931  A  and  b),  and  with  all  the  apparatus  of  biometrical 
method  by  Berkson  (1929) 1.  Thiel  (1926),  as  the  result  of 
careful  measurements  on  the  skull  of  the  bivalve  mollusc 
Sphaerium,  finds  an  alternation  of  periods  of  increased  intensity 
of  growth  in  height  and  decreased  intensity  of  growth  in 
breadth  with  periods  where  the  reverse  relation  holds.  Cog- 
hill  (1928)  finds  evidences  of  the  same  sort  of  thing  for  definite 
centres  within  the  embryonic  nervous  system  of  amphibia. 
(He  also  finds  evidence  that  this  periodicity  alternates  in 
closely  adjacent  centres.)  And  various  authors  have  empha- 
sized that  the  same  phenomenon  occurs  in  regard  to  the  post- 
natal length-  and  breadth-growth  of  the  human  cranium. 
Thus  the  phenomenon  would  appear  to  be  general.  This 
again  emphasizes  the  need  for  large  bodies  of  observations 
on  proportionate  growth ;  but  its  physiological  basis  is  at 
present  quite  unexplained. 

This  chapter,  as  I  pointed  out  in  the  introduction  to  it,  has 
inevitably  been  both  discursive  and  inconclusive.  However, 
the  facts  and  ideas  set  forth  in  it  may  serve  to  point  the  way 
to  more  crucial  and  more  radical  methods  of  analysing  the 
problem. 

1  See  also" the  recent  paper  of  Davenport  (1931),  Proc.  Amer.  Philos. 
Soc,  70,  381. 


CHAPTER   VII 

BEARINGS   OF   THE   STUDY   OF   RELATIVE 
GROWTH   ON   OTHER   BRANCHES   OF 

BIOLOGY 

IT  will  be  clear  from  preceding  chapters  that  the  study  of 
relative  growth  has  important  bearings  upon  many  other 
branches  of  biology.  In  the  present  chapter  I  will  attempt 
to  summarize  a  few  of  these  as  succinctly  as  possible.  We 
will  begin  with  its  bearing  upon  systematics. 

§  i.     Heterogony  and  Taxonomy  :    Sub-species  and 

Taxonomic  Forms 

Systematists  are  agreed  that  mere  size-differences  may  have 
no  taxonomic  significance,  since  they  are  often  the  direct 
effects  of  environmental  conditions.  But  they  usually  attach 
much  greater  importance  to  differences  in  the  percentage  size 
of  parts.  Our  studies  of  heterogony,  however,  make  it  obvious 
that  such  differences  may  have  precisely  as  little  taxonomic 
significance  as  those  in  absolute  size,  for  wherever  an  organ 
is  heterogonic,  differences  in  absolute  total  size  of  body  will 
bring  about  differences  in  relative  size  of  the  part. 

When  such  problems  crop  up,  they  require  analysis  along 
the  following  lines  : 

(i)  Is  there  a  difference  in  total  absolute  size  between 
the  varieties  considered  ? 

(2)  If  so,  is  the  difference  due  (a)  wholly  to  environmental 
differences,  (b)  wholly  to  genetic  differences,  or  (c)  to  a  com- 
bination of  the  two  ? 

(3)  Is  there  a  difference  in  the  relative  size  of  any  parts  or 
organs  ? 

(4)  If  so,  is  there  also  a  difference  in  total  absolute  size  ? 

(a)  If  not,  heterogony  is  not  at  work,  and  the  difference 

is  genetic  and  is  of  taxonomic  value. 

(b)  If  yes,  then  do  the  relations  of  relative  size  of  part  to 

absolute  size  of  whole  obey  the  simple  heterogony 

law  ? 

204 


HETEROGONY  AND  TAXONOMY      205 

(i)  If  not,  then  some  at  least  of  the  difference  in 
relative  size  (percentage  proportions)  is  prima 
facie  of  independent  genetic  origin,  and  there- 
fore of  taxonomic  significance, 
(ii)  If  yes,  then  prima  facie  the  differences  in  pro- 
portions are  merely  secondary  effects  of  the 
difference  in  absolute  size,  and  therefore  not 
of  taxonomic  significance.1 

(5)  While  measurement  and  simple  mathematical  analysis 
will  thus  give  important  prima  facie  evidence,  it  is  of  course 
desirable  to  apply  experimental  tests  wherever  possible  to 
clinch  the  matter. 

A  few  examples  will  illustrate  my  meaning. 

(1)  The  Red  Deer  (Cervus  elaphus)  of  Scotland  rarely  exceed 
125  kg.  in  (clean)  body-weight,  and  rarely  show  more  than 
twelve  points  on  their  antlers.  In  some  localities,  the  usual 
run  of  body- weight  is  only  75-90  kg.,  with  six  to  eight  points. 
In  some  districts  of  Europe,  however  (e.g.  the  Carpathians),  stags 
run  to  double  the  maximum  Scottish  body- weight,  with  twenty, 
twenty-five  or  more  points,  and  there  appear  to  be  no  con- 
tinental districts  in  which  the  mean  weight  or  point-number 
is  as  low  as  in  Scotland.  Further,  the  relative  size  (weight) 
of  the  antlers  is  clearly  much  higher  in  the  larger  continental 
stags  (Huxley,  1931A). 

It  would  be  natural  to  consider  the  low  size  and  antler 
development  of  the  Scottish  deer  as  constituting  criteria  of 
a  true  geographical  variety  or  sub-species,  as  has  also  been 
done  with  some  island  races,  which  are  also  small  in  both  these 
respects. 

The  problem  is  complicated,  however,  by  the  fact  that  in 
the  peat-bogs  of  Scotland  are  found  the  skeletons  of  deer 
rivalling  the  biggest  existing  European  specimens  in  size  and 
point-number  ;  and  that  these  date  back  only  a  few  thousand 
years  (Ritchie,  1920)  ;  Fig.  90.  It  would  seem  difficult  to 
imagine  that  true  evolutionary  (genetic)  change  reducing  the 
body-weight  by  half  could  have  occurred  in  such  a  short  space 
of  time.  It  is  true  that  persistent  killing  for  trophies  of  the 
biggest  stags,  with  the  best  heads,  would  have  had  a  genetic 
effect,  but  this  could  only  have  been  intensively  operative  for  a 
very  few  centuries  at  most  ;  and  in  any  case  the  same  process 
should  have  been  at  work  on  the  Continent.     Ritchie  himself 

1  See  Champy  (1929,  p.  239)  where  the  same  problem  is  discussed 
along  somewhat  similar  lines. 


206 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


(1.  c.)  ascribes  the  change  to  the  altered  environment  produced 
by  the  cutting  down  of  the  forests  in  Scotland,  and  the  giving 
over  of  many  of  the  original  haunts  of  the  deer  to  agriculture. 
The  Red  Deer  is  by  nature  a  forest  species  ;  driven  from  the 
lowlands,  and  when  deprived  of  the  shelter  and  succulent 
browsing  provided  by  forests,  it  grows  stunted.  This,  how- 
ever, takes  no  account  of  the  difference  in  relative  size  of 
antlers  between  Scotch  and  e.g.  Carpathian  strains.  Here, 
however,    analysis    of    the    available    weight-measurements 


Fig.  90. — Differences  in  absolute  body- size  and  relative  antler-size  of  pre- 
historic (left)  and  modern  (right)  Scottish  Red  Deer. 


(Huxley,  I.e.)  reveals,  as  we  have  seen  (p.  42),  that  in  spite 
of  large  individual  variations,  the  relative  weight  of  antlers 
increases  regularly  with  absolute  weight  of  body  (Figs.  25,  29). 
The  antlers  thus  constitute  a  heterogonic  organ,  and  we  should 
expect  stunting  to  be  followed  by  a  diminution  in  relative  antler- 
size.  Furthermore,  the  number  of  points  on  the  antler  is 
also  found  to  be  a  function  of  absolute  antler-size  (Huxley, 
1926,  1931A).  Here  again  there  is  considerable  individual 
variation,  but  the  means  show  a  regular  curve.  It  would 
appear  to  be  an  automatic  consequence  of  increase  of  antler- 


HETEROGONY  AND  TAXONOMY      207 

bulk  that  the  rapidly  growing  bone-material  should  branch 
more  profusely  :  the  same  phenomenon  is  found,  e.g.,  in  the 
antler-like  mandibles  of  stag-beetles  (Lucanidae)  and  the 
horns  of  other  beetles  (see  Fig.  93). 

We  thus  arrive  at  presumptive,  prima  facie  evidence  for 
the  truth  of  Ritchie's  view.  Finally  comes  experiment,  and 
settles  the  question.  During  the  last  hundred  years,  a  number 
of  Red  deer  from  Scotland  (and  elsewhere)  have  been  imported 
into  New  Zealand  and  there  liberated.  The  regions  where 
they  were  liberated  were  profusely  forest-covered  ;  and  the 
stags  of  Scottish  strain  in  this  new  environment  attained 
body-weights  of  200  kg.  and  over,  with  relatively  large  antlers 
showing  twenty  and  more  points  :  in  other  words,  they  bridged 
most  of  the  differences  between  the  Scottish  and  Carpathian 
strains  in  one  generation.  Still  further  evidence  is  provided 
by  later  events.  Lacking  natural  enemies,  the  herds  of  deer 
in  New  Zealand  became  too  numerous,  and  began  to  destroy 
the  forests ;  with  overcrowding  and  less  favourable  food 
conditions,  '  degeneration  '  set  in,  and  now  in  many  regions 
the  mean  and  the  maximum  body-weight  and  point-number 
are  far  below  what  they  were  a  few  decades  back.  See  Thomson 
(1922)  and  Huxley  (1931A). 

We  are  thus  perfectly  justified  in  concluding  (1)  that  the 
bulk  of  the  observable  differences  in  size  and  proportions 
between  the  existing  Scottish  strain  of  Red  deer  and  (a)  the 
existing  Carpathian  strain  and  (b)  the  sub-fossil  Scottish  type 
are  non-genetic  and  of  no  taxonomic  significance.  (2)  However, 
we  must  admit  that  killing  of  the  finest  males  is  likely  to  have 
had  some  genetic  effect ;  this  will  have  been  exerted  on  both 
strains,  but  may  have  been  more  intensive  in  Scotland.  In 
any  case,  its  primary  effect  will  have  been  to  reduce  the  mean 
size  of  both  races,  the  effect  on  relative  antler-size  and  point- 
number  being  consequential.  It  should  further  have  had  a 
'  dysgenic  '  selective  effect,  in  that  among  stags  of  equal  body- 
weight,  more  of  those  with  genetic  tendency  to  relatively 
larger  antlers  will  on  the  average  have  been  killed  off.  (3) 
There  may  also  be  true  genetic  differences  between  the  Scottish 
and  Carpathian  strains.  But  (4)  the  differences  due  to  (2)  and 
(3)  are  relatively  small,  and  the  whole  problem  must  be  studied 
afresh  before  we  can  be  sure  what  they  are,  and  indeed,  as 
regards  those  under  (3),  whether  they  exist  at  all.  As  corol- 
lary, we  may  take  it  that  differences  in  proportional  antler- 
size  in  dwarf  island  races  of  deer  are  probably  only  secondary 


2o8  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

effects  of  differences  in  absolute  size,  and  that  when  an  island 
race  is  smaller,  its  small  size  is  probably  due  in  the  main  to 
environmental  stunting.  This  is  supported  by  the  findings  of 
Antonius  (1920),  who  shows  that  in  the  dwarf  race  of  deer  on 
Sardinia,  the  length  of  the  face  relative  to  the  cranium  is 
reduced.  Since  the  face  is  positively  heterogenic,  this  again 
is  to  be  expected  if  the  animal  is  stunted.  The  stunting  has 
produced  a  strain  which,  because  dwarfed,  has  permanently 
juvenile  proportions.     See  also  Klatt  (1913)  on  dog  skulls.1 

I  have  spent  some  time  on  this  case,  as  its  analysis  is  fairly 
complete.  We  may  presume  that  similar  differences  in  rela- 
tive antler-size  found  in  geographical  races  of  Roe-deer  are 
secondary,  though  here  the  differences  in  absolute  size 
(which  on  the  whole  grades  upwards  from  west  to  east  across 
Europe)  are  themselves  more  likely  to  be  genetic,  since  the 
type  of  habitat  of  the  Roe-deer  is  approximately  the  same 
over  its  whole  range. 

It  is  equally  clear  that  many  other  percentage  measurements 
— e.g.  of  chela-size  or  abdomen-size  in  crabs — will  in  them- 
selves be  of  no  systematic  value.  What  are  taxonomically 
distinctive  in  such  organs  are  their  growth-constants — the 
values  of  the  growth-ratio  and  of  the  partition-constant  in 
the  heterogony  formula,  and  the  absolute  body-sizes  at  which 
heterogony  (if  it  is  not  continuous  or  uniform)  begins,  ends 
or  alters.  These  numerical  values,  if  properly  established, 
would  be  true  taxonomic  characters  ;  since,  however,  they 
are  far  less  convenient  to  ascertain  (though  probably  of  much 
greater  biological  importance)  than  the  usual  type  of  specific 
difference,  which  is  selected  for  its  obviousness  and  ease  of 
recognition,  they  are  not  likely  to  be  much  employed. 

A  peculiarly  interesting  example,  constituting  in  a  sense  a 
test-case,  is  provided  by  the  Lucanid  beetle  Cyclommatus 
tarandus,  with  markedly  heterogonic  male  mandibles.  This 
has  been  studied  by  Dudich  (1923),  whose  measurements  and 
conclusions  have  been  further  analysed  by  me  (1927,  1931c). 
Coleopterists  have  distinguished  a  number  of  forms  of  the  male 
of  this  stag-beetle — five  main  types,  or  if  we  include  sub-types, 
no  fewer  than  seven,  all  based  on  structural  characteristics  of 
the  mandible.     (See  also  Griffini,  1919,  Natura,  10,  13.) 

They  are  as  follows  (I  omit  the  sub-types)  : 

1A  slightly  different  case  of  retention  of  juvenile  proportions  is 
given  by  Drennan  (1932)  who  discusses  the  skull  of  the  pre-Bushman 
race  of  South  Africa.    This  appears  more  akin  to  paedomorphosis  (p.  239) . 


HETEROGONY  AND  TAXONOMY 


209 


(1)  Prionodont.    Mandible  beset  with  inwardly-directed  teeth 
throughout  its  length  (2  sub-forms). 

(2)  Amphiodont.     A  toothless  gap  on  the  mandible,  separat- 
ing '  prebasal '  and  '  sub-apical '  teeth. 

(3)  Telodont.  Pre- 
basal teeth  lacking. 

(4)  Mesodont.  With 
a  new,  single  'sub- 
median  '  tooth,  on  the 
ventral  side  (2  sub- 
forms)  . 

(5)  Mesamphiodont. 
Numerous  teeth  in 
homologous  position 
to  sub-median  tooth 
of  (4) ;  and  also  a  set 
of  teeth  in  position 
of  pre-basals  of  (2). 
(Fig.  91.) 

These  types  grade 
into  each  other  imper- 
ceptibly, and  the  dis- 
tinctions are  admit- 
tedly arbitrary  :  e.g. 
a  specimen  is  classified 
as  Amphiodont  if  a 
gap  is  present  which 
is  considered  larger 
than  the  normal  gap 
between  two  teeth, 
Prionodont  if  it  is  con- 
sidered not  to  exceed 
this  size.  Further- 
more, there  is  a 
correlation  between 
tooth-type,  mandible- 
size,  and  body-size, 
the  five  types,  in  the 
order  listed  above,  succeeding  each  other  with  increase  of  size  '> 
and  even  within  each  '  form  '  there  is  a  trend,  with  increasing 
size,  away  from  the  type  of  the  previous  form  and  towards 
that  of  the  one  succeeding. 

It  might  be  at  once  concluded,  one  would  think,  that  all 
14 


Fig.  91. — (1)  Female  and  (2 — 6)  five  different- 
sized  males  of  the  stag-beetle,  Cyclommatus 
tarandus,  to  scale,  to  show  the  change  in  form 
and  relative  size  of  the  male  mandible  with 
increase  of  absolute  body-size. 

Male  forms  :   2,  prionodont ;  3,  amphiodont ;    4,  telodont ; 
5,  mesodont ;    6,  mesamphiodont. 


210  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

the  '  forms  '  are  purely  arbitrary  growth-types,  the  heterogonic 
increase  of  mandible-size  with  total  size  being  accompanied, 
as  often,  by  changes  in  tooth-characters  and  other  morpho- 
logical alterations.  But  Dudich  states  that  he  is  forced  to 
regard  them  as  in  some  way  '  real '  and  of  taxonomic  im- 
portance, for  the  following  reasons  :  (i)  Because  the  several 
'  forms  '  are  transgressive  as  regards  body-length,  the  smallest 
of  form  3,  for  instance,  being  smaller  than  the  largest  of 
form  2.  (2)  Because,  although  the  frequency-curve  for  female 
body-length  is  unimodal  and  approximates  to  normal  type, 
that  for  the  body-length  of  the  males  is  irregular,  multimodal, 
and  skew.     He  attaches  more  importance  to  (1). 

Analysis  (Huxley,  1931c)  of  his  figures  by  body-size  (178 
specimens  grouped  into  28  classes)  and  a  plotting  of  the 
resultant  means  showed  that  when  all  the  '  forms '  were 
lumped  together,  a  clear  approximation  to  the  simple  hetero- 
gony  formula  (constant  growth-partition  coefficient  of  male 
mandible)  was  found  (with  the  deviation  from  it  at  highest 
absolute  sizes  which  we  previously  established  as  usual  in 
holometabolous  insects  :  see  Chapter  II).  When  however  the 
'  forms  '  were  taken  separately,  and  each  subdivided  into  size- 
classes,  the  resultant  plot  resembled  a  series  of  overlapping 
tiles  on  a  roof,  thus  giving  graphic  proof  of  Dudich's  contention 
that  they  are  transgressive  as  regards  body-size  (Figs.  35,  92). 

The  type  of  overlapping,  however,  at  once  gives  the  key 
to  the  situation.  (1)  What  we  have  plotted  are  the  means. 
(2)  But  we  should  expect  a  definite  range  of  variation  in  the 
relative  size  of  mandible  for  given  body-size,  whether  this  be 
due  to  variations  in  growth-partition  constant  (k)  or  fractional 
constant  (b).  (3)  Over  the  range  of  size  where  two  '  forms  ' 
overlap  (as  elsewhere,  of  course)  we  should  accordingly  expect 
to  find  some  with  mandible-size  well  above  the  mean  for  that 
particular  body-size,  others  with  mandible-size  well  below 
that  mean.  (4)  But  it  is  a  general  rule  that  increasing  absolute 
size  of  many  organs  (other  Lucanid  mandibles — see  especially 
the  paper  by  Griffini,  1912 — deer  antlers,  etc.)  is  correlated 
with  morphological  changes  (Fig.  93).  (5)  We  should  there- 
fore expect  that,  over  each  region  of  the  size-range  where 
overlap  occurs  between  two  '  forms ',  individuals  which  vary 
in  the  direction  of  high  mandible-size  should  on  the  whole 
have  the  tooth-characters  of  the  form  above,  those  which  are 
low  variants  as  regards  mandible-size  should  on  the  whole 
have  the  tooth-characters  of  the  lower  form.     (6)  The  trans- 


20  30  40  50  60  70         80  mm. 

Fig.  92. — Graph  to  show  relative  growth  of  the  mandible  in  the  different  male   forn 

of  the  stag-beetle,  Cyclommatus  tarandus. 

Mean  mandible-length  (mm.)  has  been  plotted  logarithmically  against  mean  body-length  (mm.)  for  various  si2 
classes  of  each  of  the  five  male  forms  (see  Fig.  91) :  x ,  prionodont ;  +,  amphiodont ;  Q,  telodont ;  A.  mesodon 
©  tmes  amphiodont. 

The  various  curv«  overlap  each  other  in  a  regular  way  (see  text). 

211 


212 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


gressive  variation  of  the  forms  as  regards  size  has  therefore 
no  '  real '  or  taxonomic  meaning,  but  is  an  automatic  result 
of  splitting  up  a  continuous  series  on  the  basis  of  purely  arbi- 
trary characteristics.  (7)  Thus,  if  you  were  to  plot  the  extreme 
variants,  you  would  find  the  means  for  the  series  taken  as  a 
whole  keeping  in  the  middle  between  the  extremes,  while  the 
curves  for  the  class-means  of  the  '  forms  '  taken  separately 

would  each  begin 
close  to  the  ex- 
treme plus  limit 
of  variation,  and 
end  near  the  ex- 
treme minus  limit. 
I  have  treated 
this  case  also  in 
some  detail,  since 
it  provides  an 
excellent  example 
of  the  dangers 
inherent  in  mere 
labelling :  although 
the  several  forms 
are  actually  quite 
continuous  one 
with  the  other  as 
regards  their  diag- 
nostic characters, 
the  mere  fact  of 
having  separated 
them,  though  on 
arbitrary  grounds, 
made  it  possible 
to  group  the  facts  so  as  to  make  the  arbitrary  separation 
appear  based  upon  some  biological  reality  ;  and  it  is  only 
further  analysis  based  upon  a  study  of  the  laws  of  relative 
growth  and  its  variation  which  enables  us  to  detect  the  fallacy. 

§  2.     Heterogony  in  Groups  higher  than  the  Species 

There  is  no  need  to  imagine  that  the  heterogony  mechanisms 
and  other  laws  of  differential  growth  are  confined  within  the 
boundaries  of  single  species.  On  the  contrary,  there  is  every 
reason  to  suppose  that,  like  the  activities  of  ductless  glands, 
these  growth-mechanisms  may  operate  in  very  similar  fashion 


Fig.   93. — To   illustrate   change   of   form   of  man- 
dible with    increase  of  its   absolute   size   in  male 
stag-beetles. 

Below,  a,  b,  c,  side  view  of  the  head  in  the  minor,  media  and  major 
forms  of  Psalidoremus  inclinatus.  Above,  a — 1,  mandibles  in  the 
genus  Odontolabis. 


HETEROGONY  AND  TAXONOMY      213 

throughout  considerable  groups  of  animals.  What  we  have 
just  been  saying  about  systematics  has  an  immediate  bearing 
upon  certain  evolutionary  problems.  For  we  should  then 
expect  to  find  heterogonic  organs  varying  in  their  relative 
size  with  absolute  size  of  body  in  different-sized  species  of  the 
same  genus,  or  different-sized  genera  of  the  same  family,  just 
as  in  different-sized  individuals  of  the  single  species.  Our 
supposition  is  confirmed  :  this  does  occur.  It  is  not  universal 
or  inevitable,  but  it  does  occur  frequently. 

The  rule  was  independently  discovered  by  Lameere  (1904  ; 
seealso  1915)  and  Geoff rey  Smith  (1906B),  and  numerous  further 
instances  of  it  have  been  put  on  record  by  Champy  (1924 


Fig.   94. — Phenomenon  of  Lameere  and  Geoffrey  Smith  in  species  of  the 

Dynastid  beetle  Golofa. 

Below,  two  specimens  of  G.  porteri. 

Above,  right,  G.  cczcum ;   left,  G.  imperialis. 

and  1929)  :    Lucanidae  (1924,  pp.  142, 152)  ;  Dynastidae  (ibid., 
pp.  152-4) ;  and  see  Fig.  94. 

In  the  most  striking  cases,  the  heterogonic  organs  in  the 
males  of  the  large  species  are  relatively  enormous,  while  in 
those  of  the  small  species  they  are  scarcely  more  developed 
than  in  females  (e.g.  Fig.  94  ;  the  beetle  Golofa  porteri  against 
G.  imperialis,  Champy,  1929,  p.  230).  This  at  first  sight  appears 
as  an  example  of  orthogenesis  ;  but  if  orthogenesis  be  taken 
in  its  strict  sense,  of  a  determinate  evolutionary  change  in 
the  germ-plasm,  this  is  not  so.  All  that  we  have  is  a  type 
of  growth-mechanism,  which,  if  not  modified,  will  yield  certain 
predictable  results,  as  regards  relative  organ-size,  with  any 
given  absolute  body-size.  If  a  new  high  or  low  extreme  of 
body-size,   not  previously  attained  in  the  evolution  of  the 


214  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

group,  is  reached  by  a  given  species,  the  growth-mechanism 
will  see  to  it  that  new  potentialities  of  relative  organ-size  are 
realized.  But  though  the  proportions  of  the  organ  are  new, 
the  same  single  growth-mechanism  is  at  work.  There  has 
been  no  change  in  its  hereditary  basis,  determinate  or  other- 
wise ;  merely  new  results,  potential  in  it  from  the  first,  have 
been  realized. 

If  we  wish  to  search  for  evolutionary  parallels,  we  find  that 
a  similar  situation  has  occurred  in  regard  to  many  time- 
relations  in  body-processes  of  warm-blooded  vertebrates, 
which  take  place  at  temperatures  well  above  the  lethal  tempera- 
tures for  most  cold-blooded  vertebrates.  Accordingly  such 
processes  occur  at  speeds  which  are  never  realized  in  cold- 
blooded forms.  The  speed  of  such  processes  in  the  cold-blooded 
forms  varies  with  temperature  in  a  regular  way.  The  maxi- 
mum speed  in  the  cold-blooded  forms  is  limited  by  the  tempera- 
ture which  they  can  tolerate  without  dying ;  but  the  actual, 
and  much  higher,  speeds  in  warm-blooded  forms  approximate 
closely  to  the  speeds  which  are  obtained  by  extrapolating  the 
curve  obtained  for  the  cold-blooded  forms  to  the  blood- 
temperature  of  the  warm-blooded.  An  example  of  this  is 
seen  in  the  lapse  of  time  between  onset  of  convulsions  due  to 
insulin  injection  in  a  frog,  which  dies  at  about  30 °  C,  and 
in  a  rabbit,  which  dies  at  370  C.  (Huxley  and  Fulton,  1924). 

The  evolutionary  importance  of  the  facts  lies  in  this  :  that 
whenever  we  find  the  rule  of  Lameere  and  Smith  holding  true 
for  a  series  of  separate  forms,  we  are  justified  in  concluding 
that  the  relative  size  of  horn,  mandible,  or  other  heterogonic 
organ  is  automatically  determined  as  a  secondary  result  of  a 
single  common  growth-mechanism,  and  therefore  is  not  of 
adaptive  significance.  This  provides  us  with  a  large  new  list 
of  non-adaptive  specific  and  generic  characters. 

The  operation  of  the  rule,  however,  is  not  constant :  it  is, 
in  fact,  merely  a  rule,  with  numerous  exceptions.  There  are 
a  number  of  cases  in  which  related  species  of  very  dissimilar 
absolute  size  show  secondary  sexual  characters  of  the  same 
relative  size.  Champy  (1924,  p.  155)  lists  a  number  of  these, 
and  Dr.  Arrow,  of  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History), 
has  informed  me  that  there  are  numerous  other  examples  to 
be  found  in  Coleoptera.  This  should,  however,  not  surprise 
us.  The  fact  that  the  growth-ratio  of  the  male  chela  of  Uca 
changes  during  the  life-history,  or  that  the  onset  and  end  of 
heterogony  may  vary  for  the  same  organ  in  different  types, 


HETEROGONY  AND  TAXONOMY      215 

indicates  that  such  growth-mechanisms  can  be  quite  markedly 
modified  should  biological  need  arise. 

We  meet  with  a  precisely  similar  state  of  affairs  in  regard 
to  other  biological  rules.  For  instance,  there  is  an  undoubted 
tendency  for  secondary  sexual  characters  acquired  by  one  sex 
to  be  transferred,  in  whole  or  in  part,  to  the  other  sex,  even 
if  of  no  biological  value  in  the  other  sex.  But  this  general 
tendency  is  constantly  being  modified  or  overruled  by  other 
agencies,  e.g.  the  need  for  protective  coloration  in  certain 
female  birds  frequently  inhibits  the  transference  of  male 
display  characters  to  the  females,  and  the  tendency  can  only 
manifest  itself,  among  females  of  these  groups,  in  those  species 
which  are  not  in  need  of  protection  as  regards  colour,  because 
they  nest  in  holes  (e.g.  tits,  red-breast). 

Doubtless,  as  well  as  such  total  exceptions  to  Lameere's 
rule,  we  should  also  find  many  minor  modifications,  revealed 
by  organs  whose  relative  size  was  not  precisely  what  should 
be  expected  on  an  embracing  formula,  though  in  part  a  function 
of  absolute  body-size.  But  to  detect  these  we  should  have  to 
make  quantitative  studies  of  the  variation  of  relative  organ- 
size  (a)  within  the  individuals  of  the  several  species,  (b)  among 
the  species  of  the  genus  ;  and  this  has  not  yet  been  attempted. 

The  undertaking  of  this  task  in  insects  and  Crustacea  should 
be  all  the  more  interesting,  since  in  regard  to  relative  brain- 
size  in  mammals,  Lapicque  (1907,  1922)  and  Dubois  (1914, 
1922)  and  Klatt  (1921)  have  established  the  remarkable  fact 
that  different  formulae  apply  to  the  infra-specific  and  inter- 
specific variation  respectively.  Variation  of  body-size  within 
the  species  (e.g.  in  different  breeds  of  dogs  or  rabbits)  has 
less  effect  on  absolute  size  (though  more  on  relative  brain-size) 
than  does  variation  of  body-size  from  one  species  to  another. 
In  both  cases  the  formula  y  =  bxk  is  followed,  but  whereas 
the  value  of  the  growth-partition  coefficient  (k)  of  the  brain 
is  0-56  when  different  species  are  considered,  it  is  only 
0-22  for  different-sized  individuals  of  the  same  species.  In 
this  particular  case,  the  facts  are  doubtless  to  be  correlated 
with  the  artificial  nature  of  the  intra-specific  selection  that 
has  been  at  work.  Man  has  been  concerned  to  produce  large 
or  small  breeds,  irrespective  of  their  general  adaptation  or 
their  efficiency  in  a  state  of  nature.  The  changes  in  absolute 
brain-size  produced  by  such  changes  in  body-size  are  presum- 
ably the  minimum  to  be  expected  as  automatic  or  secondary 
result  of  the  change  in  body-size  ;     while   those    found  as 


216  PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 

between  wild  species  would  represent  the  best  possible  physio- 
logical adjustment  between  brain-size  and  body-size.  We 
should  also  expect  that  the  genetic  variations  in  body-size 
within  a  wild  species  would  also  presumably  be  largely  inde- 
pendent of  those  affecting  absolute  brain-size  ;  but  so  far  as  I 
know,  data  on  this  point  are  lacking.  (See  also  p.  224  ;  heart.) 
Whether  any  such  discrepancy  between  intra-  and  inter- 
specific formulae  would  be  found  in  regard,  e.g.,  to  the  horns 
or  mandibles  of  male  beetles  remains  to  be  seen.  If  it  did 
occur,  it  might  well  be  expected  to  be  of  opposite  nature,  the 
larger  species  having  relatively  smaller  horns  than  would  be 
expected  from  the  extrapolation  of  the  intra-specific  curve  of 
smaller  species.  But  this,  as  I  have  already  said,  also  remains 
to  be  determined. 

§  3.    Heterogony  and  Evolution 

A  further  evolutionary  implication  of  these  facts  is  this  : 
that  the  existence  of  an  organ  with  high  growth-ratio  tends 
to  limit  the  extreme  size  attainable  by  the  type  in  question 
during  evolution,  for  with  very  large  absolute  size,  the 
relative  size  of  the  organ  will  tend  to  become  so  huge  that 
it  becomes  unwieldy  or  even  deleterious.  Doubtless  the  organ 
could  be  held  in  check  by  a  modification  of  its  growth-ratio 
such  as  we  have  been  envisaging.  But  for  increase  of  absolute 
size,  two  concomitant  processes  of  mutation  would  then  have 
to  occur — mutations  favouring  decreased  growth-ratio  of  the 
organ,  as  well  as  those  favouring  increased  absolute  body-size, 
so  that  the  evolutionary  problem  is  thereby  complicated. 

It  can  be  calculated  that  a  male  Uca  with  body  weighing 
1  kg.  would,  if  its  claw's  growth-ratio  had  remained  unaltered, 
boast  a  large  chela  weighing  some  10  kg. — which,  as  Euclid 
says,  is  absurd  :  and  it  is  perhaps  no  coincidence  that  the 
largest  fiddler-crabs  attain  sizes  far  below  those  of  many 
other  Brachyura,  and  even  far  lower  than  those  of  other  land 
or  semi-land  crabs  (Ocypoda,  Birgus,  etc.)  ;  see  p.  32.  The 
excessive  antlers  of  the  Irish  '  elk ',  Megaceros,  may  very 
likely  be  accounted  for  on  similar  grounds.  An  organ  which 
is  verging  on  the  deleterious  may  rapidly  become  actually 
deleterious  if  conditions  change. 

A  further  important  modification  of  the  rule  has  been 
pointed  out  by  Champy  (1924,  p.  156  seq.),  viz.  that  it  applies 
only  to  the  size  of  the  organ.  The  details  of  form  may  be 
radically  modified,  and  yet  the  general  size  conform  to  the  rule. 


HETEROGONY  AND  EVOLUTION 


217 


This  implies  that  we  have  a  fundamental  growth-mechanism 
controlling  size  and  location  of  organ,  but  that  its  form  is 
capable  of  modification  by  numerous  independent  genes.     We 


Fig.  95. — Specific  variations  in  detail  of  heterogonic  organ  (cephalic  horn) 
in  different  species  of  Goliath  beetles  (Goliathidae). 
1  Chelorina  polyphemus.  2,  Eudicella  euthalia.  3,  Goliathus  giganteus.  4,  Mccynorhina  torquata. 
5,  Taurina  nireus.  6,  Stephanorhina  guttata.  7,  Neptunides  polychrous.  8,  Taurma  Umgiceps. 
q  Trigonophorus  delesserti.  10,  Rhanzania  bertolinii.  11,  Myctenstes  rhinophyllus.  12,  Theodosia 
magnifica.  (1 1  and  1 2  resemble  Dynastids  in  possessing  prothoracic  horns) .  1 3  and  14,  Dicranocephalus 
wallichii,  two  views. 

must  further  suppose  that  other  independent  genes  are  capable 
of  modifying  the  size-relations  (growth-ratio)  of  the  organ  in 
minor  quantitative  ways.     (Fig.  95.) 


2i8  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

Perhaps  the  most  interesting  evolutionary  aspect  of  the  study 
of  relative  growth  is  when  we  find  a  series  of  related  forms  pos- 
sessing a  markedly  heterogonic  organ,  which  not  only  differ  in 
size,  but  also  succeed  each  other  in  order  of  absolute  size  during 
evolutionary  time.  A  classical  example  is  afforded  by  the 
deer  (Cervidae).  It  was  long  ago  pointed  out  that  in  a  broad 
way  the  antlers  of  deer  increased  in  complexity  from  their  first 
geological  appearance  up  to  the  Pleistocene,  much  as  do  the 
antlers  of  an  individual  deer  during  its  single  lifetime,  and 
this  was  adduced  as  an  example  of  the  laws  of  recapitulation. 
So  in  a  sense  it  is,  but  it  appears  to  owe  its  existence  to  the 
presence  of  a  fundamental  heterogony-mechanism  for  antler- 
growth,  accompanied  by  increase  of  body-size  both  during 
ontogeny  and  phylogeny.  Increase  of  absolute  body-size 
automatically  brings  about  disproportionate  increase  of  antler- 
size,  and  increase  of  antler-size  appears  to  be  of  necessity 
accompanied  by  greater  complexity  of  branching  (or  palmation). 
And  this  applies  equally  to  the  individual  and  to  the  race. 

Theoretically,  the  most  interesting  case  is  that  of  the 
Titanotheres,  worked  out  by  H.  F.  Osborn  (1929,  and  earlier 
papers  there  cited).  These,  like  so  many  other  mammals, 
begin  their  evolutionary  career  as  small  organisms,  and  steadily 
increase  in  size  until  they  become  extinct.  They  also  begin 
hornless,  and  end  with  a  single  bifurcated  frontal  horn. 

But — and  this  is  the  salient  feature  of  this  example — Osborn 
has  been  able  to  distinguish  at  least  four  distinct  lines  of 
descent  in  the  group,  characterized  by  differences  in  skull- 
shape,  dentition,  leg-size,  etc.,  and  presumably  mode  of  life  ; 
and  in  each  of  the  groups  we  meet  with  the  same  phenomenon 
of  small  and  hornless  forms  steadily  increasing  in  size  and 
eventually  becoming  horned.  Thus  we  find  the  origin  of 
horns  of  the  same  type,  growing  from  the  same  location,  taking 
place  independently  in  four  separate  groups  :  and  Osborn 
insists  that  this  must  be  interpreted  as  true  orthogenesis — in 
the  strict  sense  of  the  term,  as  implying  predetermined  varia- 
tion of  the  germ-plasm,  not  merely  of  directional  evolution. 

However,  as  pointed  out  earlier  (Huxley,  1924;  and  see 
Sturtevant,  1924),  our  studies  make  it  clear  that  this  interpre- 
tation is  not  necessary.  Granted  (a)  that  there  existed  in 
the  germ-plasm  of  the  ancestor  of  the  four  lines  of  descent 
the  hereditary  basis  of  growth-mechanism  for  a  frontal  horn, 
and  (b)  that  increase  of  size  up  to  a  certain  limit  was  advan- 
tageous for  Titanotheres  in  general,  as  would  seem  inherently 


HETEROGONY  AND   EVOLUTION  219 

probable,  then  the  results  follow  without  any  need  for  invok- 
ing orthogenesis.  Natural  selection  would  account  for  the 
increase  of  absolute  size,  and  increase  of  absolute  size  would 
evoke  the  latent  potentialities  of  the  horn's  growth-mechanism 
in  the  history  of  the  race  just  as  surely  as  it  does,  for  instance, 
in  the  individual  deer  to-day,  or  as  it  undoubtedly  did  in  the 
individual  Titanothere  in  the  Oligocene.  No  alteration  in  the 
hereditary  basis  for  horn-growth  need  be  involved  at  all, 
whether  determinate  or  otherwise  :  the  visible  horn-changes 
are  automatic  results  of  the  effect  of  size-changes  in  the  un- 
altered mechanism  for  horn-growth.1 

The  only  remarkable  thing  about  this  case  is  that  the 
mechanism  for  horn-growth  must  have  been  represented  in 
the  germ-plasm  before  it  could  ever  operate — before  any  single 
Titanothere  was  large  enough  to  have  a  horn  at  all.  And 
this  is  undoubtedly  surprising.  Once  more,  it  makes  it  ex- 
tremely difficult  to  assign  any  adaptive  value  to  the  horns, 
at  any  rate  in  the  early  stages  of  their  evolutionary  develop- 
ment, when  they  were  represented  only  by  the  merest  incipient 
knobs,  and  still  more  when  they  merely  existed  potentially  !  2 

To  take  a  case  nearer  home,  Parsons  (1927)  maintains  that 
the  British  race  is  showing  evolutionary  change,  because  the 
mean   proportions   of   British   skulls   have   slightly   changed 

1  Doubtless  some  quantitative  modifications  in  growth-ratio  of  horn 
took  place,  as  evidenced  by  the  difference  in  relative  horn-size  in  the 
various  groups  ;    but  this  does  not  affect  the  main  argument. 

Champy  (1924,  p.  155)  takes  an  almost  identical  view.  He  writes  : 
'  Le  phenomene  d'orthogenese  ou  rectigradation,  lorsqu'il  accompagne 
une  augmentation  de  taille,  n'est  pas  un  phenomene  evolutif,  c'est 
un  phenomene  purement  physiologique  d'equilibre  nutritif.  La  seule 
evolution  qu'il  y  ait  a  expliquer  est  l'augmentation  de  taille.' 

2  The  Asiatic  Titanothere  genus  Embolotherium  is  distinguished  not 
only  by  possessing  a  very  large  and  peculiarly-shaped  horn,  but  by 
this  being  formed  entirely  from  the  nasal  bones,  instead  of  from  both 
nasals  and  frontals,  as  in  all  other  genera.  During  both  the  ontogeny 
and  the  phylogeny  of  other  late  Titanotheres,  there  is  a  tendency  for 
the  horns  to  grow  in  an  anterior  direction  as  well  as  to  increase  in  size. 
It  may  be  suggested  that  the  condition  in  Embolotherium  represents 
a  further  step  in  this  evolution — the  actual  shifting  of  the  growth- 
centre  from  the  fronto-nasal  to  the  nasal  region.  This  would  be  a 
shift  of  a  whole  subsidiary  growth-region  with  a  gradient  of  its  own, 
along  a  main  gradient.  Somewhat  similar  shifts  of  quantitative  growth- 
centres  within  a  single  growth-gradient  have  been  already  recorded. 
The  most  relevant  case  is  the  shift  of  the  growth-centre  of  the  female 
abdomen  of  Pinnotheres  to  the  terminal  segment  in  place  of  the  sub- 
terminal  segment  where  it  is  situated  in  most  Brachyura  (p.  95)  ;  cf. 
also  p.  117  (Copepod  body-regions). 


220  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

during  historic  times.  This  may  be  so  ;  but  caution  is  indi- 
cated. If  it  should  prove  to  be  the  case,  as  is  quite  possible 
on  the  evidence,  that  the  various  dimensions  of  the  skull  alter 
at  slightly  different  rates  with  increased  absolute  size,  then 
the  change  observed  by  Parsons  may  be  merely  the  effect  of 
the  increase  of  mean  stature  which  appears  undoubtedly  to 
have  occurred  in  Europe  in  the  past  few  centuries.  And 
since  this  is  in  all  probability  phenotypic  in  origin,  the  change 
in  skull-proportions,  though  of  course  in  a  sense  an  evolutionary 
change,  has  far  less  significance  than  we  should  at  first  sight 
be  inclined  to  assign  to  it.     (See  Hooton,  1931.) 

Parsons  himself  states  that  the  mean  male  stature  of  the 
upper  and  middle  classes  has  risen  rapidly  by  perhaps  three 
inches  to  about  5  ft.  9  in.,  whereas  the  mean  for  the  whole 
population  is  only  about  5  ft.  5  in.,  and  that  for  the  stunted 
slum  and  factory  populations  perhaps  an  inch  or  so  less.  The 
high  stature  of  the  best-nourished  classes  is  a  modern  pheno- 
menon, due  to  good  food,  exercise,  etc.,  and  was  not  realized 
among  the  early  Saxons  (mean  5  ft.  6  in.). 

The  change  in  skull-proportions  to  which  Parsons  refers  is 
one  in  increased  relative  height  (taken  as  percentage-ratio  of 
(auricular)  height  in  relation  to  total  head-size — measured  as 
[length  +  breadth  -f-  height]  as  a  standard).  As  a  matter  of 
fact,  when  we  make  a  correlation-table  between  relative 
skull-height  and  absolute  skull-size  as  measured  by  Parsons's 
figure  for  [length  +  breadth  +  height],  we  obtain  a  definite 
correlation  (Table  XIII). 

Naturally  it  would  be  much  more  satisfactory  to  make  a 
correlation  table  for  all  the  individual  measurements  available, 
but  this  must  be  a  task  for  the  physical  anthropologists. 

We  should  also  expect  to  find  a  correlation  between  total 
stature  and  total  head-size  :  it  is  noteworthy  that  the  lowest 
values  are  for  poor  neighbourhoods  in  London  and  for  soldiers 
in  the  eighteenth  century ;  and  the  educated  twentieth- 
century  type,  which  we  know  to  have  a  mean  stature  much 
above  that  of  previous  centuries,  has  values  both  for  absolute 
skull-size  and  relative  skull-height  far  beyond  any  previous 
limit. 

As  regards  relative  breadth  (cephalic  index),  it  seems  probable 
that  different  skull-types  may  show  a  change  with  age  (size) 
in  either  of  two  opposite  directions,  but  here  the  evidence  is 
conflicting.  In  any  case  Parsons's  data  are  most  simply, 
though   not   necessarily,   to  be  interpreted  as  a  further  ex- 


HETEROGONY  AND  EVOLUTION 

TABLE   XIII 


221 


G 

F 

B,  E 

A 

C 

D 

Relative  skull- 
height,  per  cent 

272-6-277-5 


267-6-272-5 


262-6-267-5 


257-6-262-5 


252-6-257-5 


460-1  465-1  470"1  475"1  480-1 

-465  -470  -475  -480  -485 

Absolute  skull-size  (1.  +  br.  +  h.),  mm. 

A  Mean  of  the  three  main  racial  stocks  of  Britain,  early  Mediterranean 

(Neolithic),  Alpine  (Beaker),  and  Nordic  (Anglo-Saxons). 

B  Fourteenth  and  fifteenth  century  villagers,  Northants. 

C  London  plague  skulls,  seventeenth  century,  probably  poor  stock. 

D  Eighteenth  century,  London,  poor  neighbourhood. 

E  Soldiers,  eighteenth  century. 

F  Twentieth  century,  poor  classes. 

G  Twentieth  century,  educated  and  well-to-do  classes. 

ample  of  change  of  relative  proportions  with  change  of  absolute 
size. 

As  suggested  by  Hooton  (1931,  p.  408),  a  similar  effect  may- 
be responsible  for  the  changes  in  skull-form  of  the  descendents 
of  immigrants  into  the  U.S.A.,  made  familiar  by  the  work 
of  Boas. 

All  the  cases  we  have  so  far  considered  have  another  aspect 
of  interest.  They  are  all  examples  of  what  Darwin  called 
correlated  variation,  where  change  in  one  character  auto- 
matically brings  about  change  in  another  character  (unless 
counter-selection  operates  against  the  correlated  change). 
Thus  they  relieve  us  of  the  necessity  for  seeking  utilitarian 
explanations  for  the  correlated  changes  ;  natural  selection 
need  not  be  invoked  to  account  for  the  details  of  such  char- 
acters. 

The  burden  on  natural  selection  is  also  appreciably  light- 


222  PROBLEMS   OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 

ened  by  the  demonstration  of  the  existence  of  growth-gradients. 
As  pointed  out  in  Chapter  IV,  the  method  of  Cartesian  trans- 
formation of  related  forms  employed  by  D'Arcy  Thompson 
shows  that  the  great  majority  of  the  striking  changes  in  shape 
and  relative  size  of  parts  necessary  for  the  evolution  of  a  sunfish 
(Orthagoriscus)  from  a  Diodon-like  ancestor  not  only  need 
not  but  cannot  have  been  separately  evolved  ;  they  can  only 
be  interpreted  as  due  primarily  to  a  single  main  change  in 
the  form  of  the  growth-gradient  along  the  animal's  axis.  And 
the  factual  evidence  we  possess,  as  well  as  a  priori  reasoning, 
indicates  that  a  mutation  can  act  on  a  growth-gradient  as  a 
whole,  thus  simultaneously  altering  the  proportions  of  a  large 
number  of  parts. 

An  even  more  fully  worked-out  example  is  that  of  the  con- 
formation of  domestic  breeds  of  sheep  analysed  by  Hammond 
(I.e.).  As  we  have  already  seen  in  Chapter  III,  Hammond 
has  been  able  to  show  that  the  changes  in  proportions  which 
take  place  in  foetal  and  post-natal  life  in  improved  breeds  of 
'  domestic  '  sheep  represent  merely  an  accentuation  of  quali- 
tatively similar  changes  which  occur  in  unimproved  breeds 
and  in  wild  species  (Fig.  96).  In  other  words,  there  is  a 
greater  intensity  of  the  relevant  growth-changes,  which  means 
primarily  a  steepening  of  the  growth-gradients  concerned. 
Here  again,  the  characters  actually  affected  by  selection  are 
quite  few,  namely  the  growth-gradients  ;  whereas  the  number 
of  what  are  usually  called  '  characters '  which  are  altered 
during  the  process  is  very  large. 

In  general,  we  may  say  that  the  existence  of  growth-gradients 
gives  opportunity  for  mutation  and  selection  to  affect  a 
number  of  parts  in  a  correlated  way,  thus  greatly  simplifying 
the  picture  of  the  genetic  and  selective  processes  at  work. 

The  cases  previously  considered  concern  organs  with  specific 
heterogony  mechanisms.  D'Arcy  Thompson  (1.  c.)  has  drawn 
attention  at  some  length  to  the  functional  changes  necessitated 
by  increase  in  absolute  size.  These  are  for  the  most  part 
well  known,  such  as  the  need  for  increased  relative  weight  of 
skeleton  in  large  land  animals,  the  need  for  increase  of  absorp- 
tive surface  of  the  gut  with  increase  of  bulk  to  be  nourished 
(on  which  topic  a  recent  essay  of  R.  Hesse  (1927)  may  be 
consulted  for  further  details),  and  so  forth.  In  any  case, 
they  do  not  so  much  concern  us  here,  since  we  are  chiefly 
dealing  with  the  automatic  and  primarily  non-adaptive  effects 
of  inherent  growth-mechanisms. 


HETEROGONY  AND  EVOLUTION 


223 


An  exhaustive  botanical  study  of  the  relation  of  size  to 
internal  morphology  has  recently  been  published  by  Wardlaw 
(1924-8),  but  the  details  are  of  a  technical  nature  and  I  cannot 
enter  into  them  here.  The  conclusion  which  chiefly  interests 
us  is  that  certain  characteristic  types  of  internal  morphology 
in  vascular  plants  (e.g.  polystely)  need  have  no  phyletic  value, 
since  they  appear  to  be  modifications  directly  dependent  upon 
increase  in  size.     These  and  other  -'results  have  been  sum- 


Fig.  96. — Changes  in  proportions  during  growth  in  wild  sheep  and  improved 
breeds  of  domestic  sheep  (see  text). 


marized  in  a  book  by  Bower  (1930).  The  general  conclusion 
to  be  drawn  from  these  botanical  studies  would  seem  to  be 
that  in  this  case  apparent  orthogenesis  is  to  be  explained  by 
parallel  adaptive  evolution  due  to  size-increase. 

We  may  take  one  example  of  the  individual  changes  corre- 
lated with  size  increase  (Bower,  I.e.,  p.  16).  As  we  pass  up 
from  rhizome  to  stem  in  Psilotum  triquetrum,  the  size  of  the 
organ  increases.  The  size  of  the  tracheidal  tract  also  increases, 
and  its  form  also  changes,  exposing  more  surface  than  it  would 


224 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


have  if  it  remained  approximately  cylindrical.     This  is  summar- 
ized in  the  following  table,  abridged  from  Bower's  Table  I. 


Diameter  of  stele,  mm. 

Surface-volume  ratio  of  tracheidal 
tract    

Surface-volume    ratio    of    equiva- 
lent cylinder 


0-17 

o-34 

0-29 

o\53 

o-6i 

9-26 

5-90 

5-40 

3-64 

3-20 

6-82 

4-!5 

1-88 

1-08 

0-91 

075 

3-00 

o-8i 


i.e.  the  actual  surface  :  volume  ratio  diminishes  to  about 
30  per  cent  of  its  initial  value  :  but  if  the  conducting  tissue  had 
remained  cylindrical  in  form  the  ratio  would  have  decreased 
to  about  13  per  cent.  Changes  precisely  similar  in  principle 
occur  in  phylogenetic  series  with  increase  of  size  :  see  e.g. 
Bower's  Table  X. 

§  4.     Heterogony  and  Comparative  Physiology 

Disproportionate  change  of  relative  size  with  change  of 
absolute  size  may  have  important  results  in  studies  in  com- 
parative physiology.     (See  also  Murr,  p.  260.) 

This  is  well  brought  out  by  Klatt  in  an  interesting  paper 
(1919).  He  finds  the  relation  of  heart-weight  to  body- weight 
in  vertebrates  to  follow  our  familiar  formula  for  constant 
growth-partition,  the  (mean)  coefficient,  or  as  he  calls  it,  the 
'  heart-exponent ',  being  0-83  :  i.e.  heart-weight  =  constant 
X  body- weight  °'83.  It  is  interesting  to  find  that  the  value 
appears  to  be  very  similar  whether  the  size-differences  con- 
sidered are  intra-  or  inter-specific  ;  this  result  differs  from 
that  of  Dubois,  etc.  (1.  c),  on  the  brain,  a  difference  which  may 
presumably  be  correlated  with  the  prompt  functional  regula- 
tion of  the  size  of  the  heart  to  the  work  it  is  called  upon 
to  do. 

In  passing,  it  may  be  noted  that  the  heart  as  a  whole  appears 
to  have  a  different  growth-coefficient  from  the  right  ventricle 
and  the  auricles.  These  latter,  according  to  Hasebrock  (1927), 
have  a  coefficient  close  to  2/3,  which  would  indicate  their 
functional  dependence  upon  surface-area,  or  upon  general 
metabolism,  which  in  warm-blooded  forms  is  nearly  propor- 
tional to  surface-area  ;  while  the  left  ventricle  has  a  much 
higher  coefficient,  nearly  in  direct  proportion  to  body-weight. 

But  from  the  point  of  view   of   comparative    physiology, 


HETEROGONY   AND   PHYSIOLOGY 


225 


the  interest  lies  in  the  following  considerations.  It  has  usually 
been  customary,  as  was  done  by  Parrot  (1894)  for  birds,  to 
compare  the  cardiac  efficiency  of  different  species  according 
to  their  percentage  heart-weights.  From  what  has  been  said, 
this  is  entirely  erroneous  ;  variations  in  cardiac  efficiency 
can  only  be  determined  in  relation  to  the  mean  value  to  be 
expected  at  a  given  body-size  for  the  exponential  growth- 
partition  formula,  which  will  be  given  by  the  fractional  co- 
efficient b  in  the  formula  y  =  bxk.  Clearly,  the  percentage 
method  will  put  large  birds  at  a  disadvantage. 


TABLE   XIV 


True  relative 

A 

Per  cent. 

B 

heart-size  = 

heart-weight 

fractional 

constant  (6) 

Capercaillie 

7-81 

Magpie  .... 

0-0228 

Magpie    .... 

9-34 

Chaffinch 

0-0240 

Wild  Swan  . 

1 1 78 

Capercaillie 

0-0322 

Chaffinch 

14-16 

Hobby   .... 

0-0402 

Peregrine  Falcon    . 

14-91 

Peregrine  Falcon   . 

0-0467 

Hobby          .      .      . 

16-98 

Song  Thrush     . 

0-0528 

Song  Thrush 

25-64 

Wild  Swan 

0-0550 

The  table  shows  for  a  few  birds  from  Parrot's  list  the  order 
of  cardiac  efficiency  (in  ascending  relative  heart-size)  as  deter- 
mined (A)  by  percentage  methods  and  (B)  by  the  correct 
method.     It  will  be  seen  how  different  the  two  are. 

Dubois  (1.  c.)  and  Lapicque  (1.  c.)  have  given  us  a  similar 
method  for  judging  of  the  true  degree  of  '  cephalization  ' 
(true  relative  brain-size)  in  vertebrates.  Thus  the  true  relative 
brain-size  (fractional  constant  b  in  the  growth-partition  formula) 
for  the  mouse  family  is  0-07,  for  the  cat  family  0-31-0-34,  for 
tailed  monkeys  0-4-0-5,  for  anthropoid  apes  0-7,  for  man  2-8, 
whereas  percentage  values  give  no  information  of  any  value 
at  all. 

A  similar  method  of  approach  can  be  utilized  for  many  organs. 
Huxley  (1927c)  has  used  it  for  relative  egg-weight  in  birds. 
Here  it  is  found  that  the  exponent  (partition-coefficient  of 
material  between  egg  and  body)  is  not  constant  over  the  size- 
range  covered  by  birds,  but  diminishes  steadily  with  absolute 
size,  from  0-9  or  0-95  for  the  smallest  birds  to  about  0-7  for 
15 


226 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


the  largest.  It  is  suggested  that  it  would  be  most  advantageous 
to  have  a  linear  relation  (exponent  =  i-o),  but  that  physio- 
logical difficulties  connected  with  surface-area  (which  would 
give  a  limiting  value  of  0-67)  interfere  with  this,  and  that  they 
interfere  increasingly  with  increased  absolute  size.  It  is  inter- 
esting to  find  the  large  Ratites  lie  very  close  to  the  theoretical 
curve,  in  spite  of  their  relatively 
huge  bulk  and  their  flightless 
habits.   (Fig.  97  ;  see  also  p.  264.) 


Body-weight,  q. 
300     400        600     BOO    1.000 


SO 


Body-weight,  q. 
8      iol"PP«"»""20 

1     ■ 


1 1 r 

4  000       6000  8.000  10.000  70000      30.000  40,000  100.000 

Body-weight    q 
(lower  cur.el 

Fig.  97. — Graph  showing  change  of  egg- weight  with  body-weight  in  432  species 
of  birds  :    Means  by  weight-classes,  logarithmic  plotting. 

o,  Carinatae  ;  X,  Ratitae  (excluding  Apteryx,  which  is  plotted  separately)  ;  K  mean  for  last  class 
of  Carinatae  combined  with  Ratitae  (except  Apteryx). 

The  graph  begins  with  the  upper  curve  ;  k  =  i-o.  The  value  of  k  then  sinks  (dotted  line),  finally 
approximating  to  0-67  (solid  line,  below). 


Each  large  group  has  its  own  curve,  differing  chiefly  in  the 
fractional  constant  b.  The  modifiability  of  relative  egg-size 
in  relation  to  adaptive  needs  is  clearly  seen  in  the  abnormally 
low  position  of  the  value  for  species  which  are  reproductive 


HETEROGONY  AND   PHYSIOLOGY  227 

parasites  upon  smaller  birds,  like  Cuculus  canorus,  and  in 
the  high  values  of  b  found  for  most  forms  with  precocial 
young. 

In  regard  to  the  physiological  side  of  the  problem,  it  is  im- 
portant to  distinguish  two  very  different  ways  in  which  change 
in  relative  size  of  a  part  may  be  brought  about.  We  have 
already  discussed  certain  implications  of  this  distinction,  but 
have  not  set  it  forth  in  precise  form.     (See  also  pp.  257-8.) 

(1)  An  organ  may  be  capable  of  functional  adjustment  in 
size.     The  best  example  of  this  is  the  heart. 

(2)  An  organ  may  possess  a  differential  coefficient  of  growth- 
partition,  which  operates  wholly  or  largely  irrespective  of 
functional  demands,  e.g.  the  antlers  of  deer,  the  large  chela 
of  male  Uca,  the  limb  of  Ambly stoma  tigrinum  grafted  on  to 
A.  panctatum,  the  pituitary  of  rabbits  (Robb,  1929),  etc. 
Increase  of  absolute  size  of  an  animal  will  in  both  cases  bring 
about  an  alteration  of  relative  size  of  the  part,  but  in  the 
first  case  owing  to  functional  hypertrophy,  in  the  second  owing 
to  the  specific  growth-intensity  of  the  organ,  which  in  its  turn 
is  presumably  due  to  a  specific  growth-promoting  substance. 
And  doubtless  in  many  cases,  both  mechanisms  will  operate 
simultaneously. 

Some  cases  of  so-called  functional  hypertrophy  may  turn 
out  to  belong  to  the  second  group,  e.g.  the  enlargement  of  the 
remaining  testis  after  unilateral  castration  is  probably  not 
functional  in  the  usual  sense  at  all,  but  depends  upon  the  exist- 
ence of  a  specific  partition-coefficient  for  testis-tissue  relative 
to  total  size.     (See  Domm  and  Juhn,  1927,  and  also  p.  257.) 

The  distinction,  as  I  have  suggested,  is  usually  not  an 
absolute  one.  If  one  prevents  a  limb  from  exerting  its  normal 
function,  e.g.  by  tying  it  up  at  birth,  its  growth  will  be  markedly 
subnormal.  With  regard  to  heart-weight,  etc.,  it  is  a  priori 
almost  certain  that  the  heart,  in  addition  to  its  capacities 
for  marked  functional  size  and  regulation,  possesses  a  primary 
partition-coefficient  which  will  differ  from  species  to  species. 
What  we  can  say,  however,  is  that  in  some  cases  the  differences 
observed  are  due  solely  or  mainly  to  functional  regulation, 
in  others  solely  or  mainly  to  differences  in  inherent  growth- 
capacity. 

But  there  are  cases  in  which  organs  attain  their  definitive 
relative  size  entirely  owing  to  one  or  other  of  the  two  methods. 
The  size  of  the  organs  of  holometabolous  insects  must  depend 
entirely   on   their   growth-partition   coefficient  ;     while    it    is 


CQ 


0> 


6  ~ 


60 

a 


Oh 
I 

<u 

>> 

c 
o 

<u 
c 
<u 


o    ~ 


n 

(A     CD 
.      Ut 


•5  c 
c  rt 

■a  I 

■?■§ 


•  bo 
C 


u  3 

C    CD 
"H-"tj 

■a* 

nj  o 


O 

o 


°  (JO 
,2  -CQ 
«      CQcQ 

— -    '     (fl 


j=0 


-   Q 


;CQ  a 
'a 
bo 

ST1" 

>,JS  0)    - 
a-      .ti  S 

.c  «  A<-> 

>  -^  2  -o 

>  in   C  .© 

C  3   o   O 

o  Cj^'u! 
«  rt       o 


00 

a* 


V 


5S« 


Ph 


C  o 

a 

S3 


s-  °  °*. 

ro    CO    O)    qj  -*-> 

*  N   >   H 
eo  i^H  i-<  cti  t/i 

j-    U,     O  ^j    U] 

cj~<cq  g, 

60 

.£ 


0 


228 


RELATIVE   GROWTH  AND   GENETICS  229 

highly  probable  that  the  size  of  tendons  in  the  mammalian 
body  is  entirely  or  almost  entirely  due  to  functional  response. 
Thus,  when  we  compare  organs  of  different  relative  size  in 
two  individuals,  races,  or  species  of  different  absolute  size, 
our  analysis  should  be  devoted  to  establishing  (1)  whether 
the  difference  is  due  to  the  organ's  capacity  for  functional  size- 
regulation  ;  (2)  whether  it  is  a  mere  consequential  effect  of 
increase  of  absolute  size,  as  is  the  case  with  the  relatively 
large  antlers  of  Red  Deer  imported  into  New  Zealand  from 
Scotland,  or  of  the  relatively  large  mandibles  of  absolutely 
large  male  Lucanidae  ;  or  (3)  whether  it  is  due  also  to  genetic 
alteration  in  the  growth-partition  coefficient  ;  or  (4),  of  course, 
to  a  combination  of  these  in  differing  degrees. 

§  5.     Relative  Growth  and  Genetics 

We  next  come  to  the  subject  of  genetics.  It  is  clear  that 
the  chief  genetic  factors  controlling  any  organs  which  show  a 
constant  differential  growth-ratio  or  a  constant  growth- 
partition  coefficient  must  be  rate-genes,  or  genes  which  deter- 
mine the  rate  of  a  developmental  process.  Such  factors  have 
been  deduced  or  demonstrated  for  numerous  characters, 
notably  in  the  sex-determining  genes  of  moths  (Goldschmidt, 
1923,  1927)  and  the  eye-colour  genes  of  the  crustacean 
Gammarus  (Ford  and  Huxley,  1929)  (for  other  cases  see  the 
references  in  the  works  cited,  and  also  Ford,  1929,  Belehradek 
and  Huxley,  1930) ;  see  Figs.  98,  99. 

There  are  two  general  points  which  are  worth  stressing. 
The  only  case  where  the  curve  for  the  development  of  such 
characters  has  been  quantitatively  obtained  by  direct  measure- 
ment is  that  of  the  eye-colour  of  Gammarus.  Here  it  appears 
clear  that  the  actual  form  of  the  curve  is  determined  by  two 
factors — an  inherent  greater  or  less  velocity  of  pigment- 
deposition,  and  some  regulating  mechanism  which  relates 
this  to  the  growth  of  the  body  as  a  whole.  This  is  clearly 
brought  out  by  two  facts — first,  the  relations  in  slow-growing 
mutants  ;  secondly,  the  slight  lightening  of  colour  which 
occurs  in  the  eyes  of  certain  strains  of  Gammarus  after  sexual 
maturity.  '  Slow  growth  '  is  a  recessive  mutation,  which  at 
first  shows  abnormally  dark  eyes.  This  appears  to  be  due  to 
the  fact  that  the  eggs  are  of  normal  size,  that  a  pigment 
precursor  is  formed  in  them  in  some  simple  relation  to  egg- 
size,  and  then,  when  the  time  comes  for  the  deposition  of 
pigment,  the  eye-area,  over  which  it  is  to  be  spread,  is  abnor- 


230 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


10- 

%10 

V 

p 

^   2 


- 

- 

- 

- 

_rrSS- 

A—n 

nss 

- 

/  / 

5exu.il  maturity 
of  dd  begins 

Extrusion     10 


20  30 

Time  in  Days    , 


VO 


50 


Fig.  99. — Actual  rate  of  darkening  (smoothed  curves)  in  1,000  rapid-darkening 
(n-SS)  and  1,000  slow-darkening  (rrss)  specimens  of  Gammarus  chevreuxi  at 

230  C.   (compare  Fig.  98). 


mally  small  owing  to  the  slow  growth.  Later,  however,  the 
eye-colour  is  regulated  towards  what  is  '  normal '  for  the 
particular  rate-genes  involved;  this  appears  due  to  the  fact 
that  further  formation  of  pigment  occurs  in  relation  to  body- 
size  (Ford,  1928)  ;  Fig.  ioo. 


12 

%> 

<^   5 

I" 

v 
* 


Time  in  Days 

Fig.  100. — Effect  of  size  (rate  of  body-growth)  on  rate  of  eye-darkening  in  a 
single  genetic  strain  of  Gammarus  chevreuxi. 

All  specimens  were  males  of  constitution  rrss,  kept  at  230  C.  The  figures  on  the  curves  give  eye- 
length  in  mm. 

Max.,  curve  of  darkening  in  slow-growing  specimens,  which  attain  sexual  maturity  at  time  repre- 
sented by  vertical  line  C  ;  min.,  curve  for  fast-growing  specimens  (maturity  attained  at  A) ;  mean, 
curve  for  mean  of  population  (maturity  attained  at  B). 


- 

- 

max.. 
mean. 

'^r29 

- 

/ 

/* 

- 

f-10 

(  / 

/'" 

1 

miny 

S-33 

- 

x-W 

- 

"^16 

*-""X"2 

1 

frfn/A 

0 

2 

0 

3 

0 

/ 

7      4 

0  i 

?      ( 

*y 

RELATIVE  GROWTH  AND   GENETICS  231 

The  second  point,  the  slight  lightening  of  eye-colour  after 
maturity,  is  due  to  the  expansion  in  size  of  the  individual 
eye-facets,  causing  the  same  amount  of  pigment  to  be  spread 
over  a  greater  area  (Ford  and  Huxley,  1927). 

This  complex  relationship  is  precisely  similar  to  what  we 
have  found  to  obtain  for  the  relative  growth  of  an  organ 
such  as  a  limb  (see  Chapter  VI),  where  two  factors  are  also 
at  work,  the  inherent  growth-potential  of  the  organ,  and  some 
mechanism  regulating  this  in  relation  to  the  growth  of  the 
body  as  a  whole.  Since  the  relative  factor  occurs  in  both 
cases,  it  is  not  to  be  expected  that  the  curves  for  characters 
controlled  by  rate-genes  will  shed  light  directly  on  the  nature 
of  the  biochemical  processes  involved,  even  if  plotted  against 
time.  It  would  be  theoretically  better  to  plot  them  against 
some  quantitative  character  of  the  animal,  e.g.  the  amount 
of  some  important  substance  in  the  body,  or  even  the  total 
body-bulk.  In  this  way  we  should  obtain  a  growth-partition 
coefficient  for  the  chemical  substance  responsible  for  the 
character,  just  as  we  obtain  a  similar  coefficient  for  the  growth 
of  heterogonic  organs  when  their  size  is  plotted,  not  against 
time,  but  against  body-size  ;  and  it  is  these  coefficients  which 
are  of  the  greater  biological  importance,  and  are  quantitatively 
comparable  one  with  another.  That  this  method  may  be 
valuable  is  seen  in  the  already  cited  work  of  Teissier  (1931). 

The  second  general  point  is  this.  Just  as  the  proportions 
of  a  fiddler-crab  are  continuously  changing,  so  may  the  eye- 
colour  of  a  Gammarus  change  throughout  life,  or  at  least 
until  long  after  sexual  maturity.  But  a  holometabolous  insect 
has  its  adult  proportions  fixed  once  for  all  at  the  attainment 
of  the  imaginal  instar  ;  and  similarly  even  characters  that 
are  determined  by  rate-factors  will  in  holometabolous  insects 
become  fixed  at  the  same  period — the  final  moult  will  take 
a  cross-section  across  the  developmental  curves  whose  results 
will  only  be  made  visible  at  this  instant.  Thus  a  static  is  sub- 
stituted for  a  dynamic  picture.1 

We  may  thus  suppose  that  such  a  gradation  as  that  presented 
by  the  eye-colour  of  various  multiple  allelomorphic  series 
(e.g.  of  the  white-eye  locus  in  Drosophila)  represents  merely  a 

1  This  is  not  rigidly  true  :  there  are,  for  instance,  some  eye-colours 
in  Drosophila  which  change  with  the  age  of  the  imago,  but  such  changes 
play  a  minor  part  as  compared  with  those  in,  e.g.,  Gammarus,  and  it 
is  quite  possible  that  they  are  not  of  the  same  nature  ;  in  any  case  they 
are  not  known  to  be  related  to  size. 


232  PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 

cross-section  across  a  series  of  curves  for  a  number  of  similar 
processes  occurring  at  different  rates,  such  as  are  actually 
visible  in  Gammarus,  but  could  in  Drosophila  only  be  detected 
by  chemical  means  or  by  deduction. 

The  Gammarus  eye-colour  curves  also  show  the  phenomenon 
of  an  equilibrium-position — i.e.  the  degree  of  pigmentation 
finally  ceases  to  change.  This  merely  means  that  pigment 
and  eye-area  are  now  increasing  at  the  same  rate,  instead  of 
the  pigment-formation  proceeding  at  a  more  rapid  rate  as  at 
first — in  other  words,  it  corresponds  to  a  change  from  heter- 
ogony  to  isogony,  such  as  we  have  seen  to  occur  in  regard  to 
the  size-relations  of  many  organs  (Chapter  I,  etc.).  In  the 
case  of  rate-genes,  when  this  change  occurs  before  birth,  we 
get  an  apparently  fixed  character  ;  but  we  may  either  observe 
(Gammarus  wild-type  eye)  or  deduce  (human  black  eyes)  that 
rate-factors  have  been  operative  in  the  prenatal  period. 

With  all  these  similarities,  we  may  with  some  confidence 
assume  that  the  proportions  of  parts,  at  least  in  so  far  as  they 
are  determined  during  the  period  of  auxano-differentiation  and 
not  during  that  of  histo-differentiation,  will  be  found  to  be 
determined  by  rate-factors  operating  according  to  the  same 
rules  as  have  been  found  to  hold  for  the  rate-factors  controlling 
pigmentation  in  the  eye  of  Gammarus. 

For  an  interesting  corollary  of  this,  we  may  look  to  the  work 
of  Davenport  (1923  ;  his  p.  151)  on  human  body-build.  He 
has  plotted  the  frequency  for  relative  chest-girth  (chest-girth  : 
stature)  in  man  at  various  ages  in  a  three-dimensional  form. 
If  the  mean  values  alone  were  taken,  the  age-change  would 
consist  in  a  marked  downward  slope  of  the  curve  from  birth 
to  late  adolescence,  followed  by  a  slight  upward  tendency, 
and  then  often  a  stable  equilibrium-position.  When  the  fre- 
quency model  is  examined,  however,  it  is  seen  not  only  that 
there  is  very  great  variation  at  all  ages,  but  that  there  is  a 
well-marked  multimodality.  The  general  shape  of  the  curve 
indicates  that  we  are  dealing  with  interrelated  rate-factors ; 
the  multimodality  shows  that  there  exist  a  few  main  genetic 
types,  each  corresponding  to  one  sort  of  body-build  and 
determined  by  a  particular  gene  or  set  of  genes  influencing 
relative  growth  of  chest-girth  and/or  stature  (Fig.  101). 

An  important  corollary  of  all  this  is  that  we  should  expect 
numerous  genetically-determined  characters  concerning  relative 
size  of  parts  to  alter  with  absolute  size  of  body,  without  there 
being  any  change  in  their  genetic  basis.     The  unusual  propor- 


RELATIVE   GROWTH   AND   GENETICS 


233 


tions  of  the  limbs,  e.g.  in  human  pygmies,  may  probably  be 
accounted  for,  wholly  or  in  large  part,  along  these  lines. 

Similarly,  the  general  sexual  differences  in  limb-proportions 
in  man,  women  usually  having  relatively  short  arms,  and 
relatively  shorter  legs,  with  in  either  case  the  distal  portion 
of  the  limb  short  relatively  to  the  proximal  portion  (see  e.g. 
Hooton,  1931,  p.  255)  may  also  be  due  to  altered  time-relations 
of  relative  growth.     The  curves  given  by  Davenport  (1926) 


Fig.  10 1. — Body-build  in  Human  Beings.     View  of  a  solid  model,  illuminated 
from  the  top  of  the  page,  showing  distribution   of   relative   chest-girth   in 

man  from  birth  to  20  years. 

Ordinates,  relative  chest-girth  (chest  girth  as  a  percentage  of  stature).  Abscissae,  age  in  years. 
The  mean  relative  chest-girth  diminishes  to  about  15  years,  then  rises  again.  There  are  several 
well-marked  modes  for  relative  chest-girth  which  persist  throughout,  indicating  the  presence  of 
distinct  genetic  types. 


give  strong  confirmation  to  this  view.  See  also  Wallis  (1932) 
who  finds,  as  is  to  be  expected  on  the  basis  of  the  ideas  set 
forth  in  this  volume,  that  relative  limb-size  in  boys  and  girls 
is  more  strongly  correlated  with  absolute  height  than  with  age. 
If  the  main  principles  involved  would  appear  to  be  compara- 
tively simple,  the  detailed  complexity  which  may  occur  in 
certain  cases  can  be  realized  by  reference  to  the  problem  of 
the  size  of  the  eye  and  its  two  lobes  in  various  members  of 


234  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

the  bar-eye  series  of  Drosophila  (for  details  see  Goldschmidt, 
1927  ;  and  notably  Hersch,  1928). 

An  interesting  case  where  genes  independently  control 
growth-intensity  in  length  and  in  breadth  is  afforded  by  the 
studies  of  Sinnott  and  his  associates  (see  Sinnott  and  Hammond, 
1930),  who  find  that  fruit-shape  in  the  gourd  Cucurbita  depends 
on  the  interaction  of  various  separate  factors  of  this  nature. 
Sinnott  and  Durham  (1929)  find  that  most  of  the  form- 
differences  depend  primarily  on  the  growth  of  the  carpellary 
tissue,  the  wall  of  the  ovary  and  fruit  merely  following  the 
form-changes  induced  by  the  central  region.  The  results  of 
Sinnott  (1930). may  be  interpreted  to  mean  that  there  exist 
various  genes  controlling  size  and  shape  independently,  but 
that  the  shape-factors  generally  control  growth-ratios,  and 
therefore  there  is  a  progressive  change  of  shape  with  absolute 
size  in  individual  development. 

An  instance  of  a  single  gene  having  a  differential  but  appar- 
ently graded  effect  on  a  localized  region  is  found  in  the  house- 
mouse,  where  the  gene  for  short  ears  produces  a  marked  short- 
ening of  the  skull,  especially  in  the  anterior-palate  region  ; 
a  very  marked  diminution  in  the  height  just  behind  the  incisors 
with  a  slighter  diminution  posteriorly,  and  an  increase  in 
width,  rather  more  marked  posteriorly  than  anteriorly  (Snell, 

1931). 

§  6.     Relative  Growth,  Embryology,  and  Recapitulation 

A  rather  different  set  of  evolutionary  problems  from  those 
we  considered  previously  has  light  shed  on  it  by  a  considera- 
tion of  differential  growth-coefficients  and  the  rate-genes  which 
we  must  postulate  to  regulate  them.  These  are  the  problems 
of  recapitulation  and  of  vestigial  organs. 

There  are  numerous  cases  of  recapitulation  which  cannot, 
in  my  opinion,  be  accounted  for  along  these  lines,  e.g.  the 
presence  of  notochord  and  gill-clefts  in  the  embryos  of  the 
highest  vertebrates,  but  there  are  many  others  which  do  receive 
some  explanation  from  this  source.  E.g.  we  find  that  the 
relatively  long-armed  Gibbons  have  a  fetus  which,  though 
longer-armed  than  that  of  other  anthropoids,  is  relatively 
shorter-armed  than  the  adult  (Schultz,  1926).  Presumably 
the  line  of  least  biological  resistance  in  altering  proportions  of 
limbs,  etc.,  is  to  modify  relative  growth-rates,  rather  than  to 
modify  the  original  partition  of  material  in  the  early  embryo 
between  organ  and  rest-of-body.     And  if  this  is  so,  the  recapitu- 


RELATIVE   GROWTH   AND   RECAPITULATION     235 

latory  phenomenon  follows  automatically.  Similar  reasoning 
will  apply  to  such  cases  as  the  negative  heterogony  of  the  tail 
of  fetal  man  or  positive  heterogony  of  the  toes  of  the  Jacana 
after  hatching  (Beebe  ;  see  p.  262). 

As  regards  vestigial  organs,  the  arm-chair  critic  often 
demands  of  the  evolutionist  how  the  last  stages  in  their  reduc- 
tion could  occur  through  selection,  and  why,  if  reduction  has 
gone  as  far  as  it  has,  it  could  not  go  on  to  total  disappearance. 
In  the  light  of  our  knowledge  of  relative  growth,  we  may 
retort  that  we  would  expect  the  organ  to  be  formed  of  normal 
or  only  slightly  reduced  relative  size  at  its  first  origin,  but 
then  to  be  rendered  vestigial  in  the  adult  by  being  endowed 
with  negative  heterogony.  If  rate-genes  are  as  common  as 
they  appear  to  be,  then  what  we  have  called  the  line  of  bio- 
logical least  resistance  would  be  to  produce  adult  vestigiality 
of  an  organ  by  reducing  its  growth-coefficient.  So  long  as  it 
is  reduced  to  the  requisite  degree  of  insignificance  at  birth 
(or  at  whatever  period  a  larger  bulk  would  be  deleterious), 
there  is  no  need  for  reduction  of  its  growth-rate  to  be  pressed 
further.  But  the  negative  heterogony  with  which  it  is  endowed 
will  continue  to  operate,  and  it  will  therefore  continue  to 
grow  relatively  smaller  with  increase  of  absolute  size.  This 
last  fact  may  account  for  the  apparently  useless  degree  of 
reduction  seen  in  some  vestigial  organs,  e.g.  that  of  the  whale's 
hind-limb.  The  degree  of  reduction  may  be  useless  considered 
in  relation  to  the  adult,  but  the  relative  size  in  the  adult  may 
be  merely  a  secondary  result  of  the  degree  of  negative  heter- 
ogony needed  to  get  the  organ  out  of  the  way,  so  to  speak, 
before  birth.  In  addition  threshold  mechanisms  will  possibly 
be  at  work,  so  that  the  organ,  after  progressive  reduction, 
eventually  disappears  entirely. 

In  such  cases  quite  small  differences  in  growth-ratio,  if  the 
range  of  absolute  size  over  which  they  operate  is  considerable, 
will  make  quite  large  differences  in  final  relative  size,  a  fact 
which  indubitably  will  help  to  account  for  the  high  variability 
of  vestigial  organs.  Even  when  the  organ  itself  never  grows, 
as  in  the  imaginal  structures  of  insects  with  a  metamorphosis, 
a  similar  degree  of  variability  may  be  brought  about  by 
relatively  small  variations  in  the  rate-genes  responsible.  As 
Goldschmidt  has  shown  by  his  classical  researches  on  sex 
in  Lymantria,  the  end-result  in  such  cases  depends  on  the 
amount  of  some  effective  substance  produced  by  the  gene  at 
the  critical   period  for  differentiation  of  the  organ  affected. 


236 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


Since  both  the  rate  of  production  of  the  substance  and  the 
precise  time  of  differentiation  can  be  varied  both  by  environ- 
mental and  genetic  agencies,  there  is  room  for  considerable 
elasticity  in  the  end-result  provided  that  this  is  between  the 
normal  upper  and  lower  thresholds  for  the  development 
of  the  character  in  question.     E.g.,  in  normal  male  Lyman- 

tria  an  adequate 
excess  of  male- 
determining  over 
female  -  determin- 
ing substance  is 
present  well  before 
the  period  of 
differentiation; 
but  in  female 
intersexes  this  ex- 
cess of  male-deter- 
mining substance 
i  s  transformed 
into  an  excess  of 
female  -  determin- 
i  n  g  substance 
during  the  differ- 
entiation phase. 
Thus  whereas 
normal  males  are 
not  affected  as 
regards  their  sex- 
characters  by  en- 
vironmental agen- 
cies such  as 
t  emperature, 
similar  agencies 
applied  during  the 
development  o  f 
an  intersex  can 
exert  a  marked 
influence    on  the   degree  of  intersexuality. 

So  with  vestigial  organs  (Fig.  102).  If  the  production  of  a 
limb-determining  substance,  for  instance,  be  normally  above 
the  necessary  threshold  well  before  the  onset  of  the  phase  of 
differentiation  during  metamorphosis,  the  limbs  will  be  stable 
organs,  little  affected  in  their  proportions  or  characters  by 


Fig 


102. — Hypothetical    curves  to    illustrate  the 
relation  of  rate-genes  to  vestigial  organs. 

1 — 1 ,  lower  threshold  of  amount  of  determining  substance  which 
must  be  produced  by  the  rate-gene  before  differentiation  of  the 
organ  can  begin.  2 — 2,  upper  threshold  ;  if  this  is  reached  during 
the  period  of  differentiation,  complete  development  of  the  organ 
occurs.  X— X,  effective  time  of  differentiation.  This  may  be 
varied  so  as  to  occur  earlier  (X~)  or  later  (X  +  ).  A — A,  action  of 
rate-gene  promoting  normal  complete  development  of  organ  ;  the 
full  effective  amount  of  determining  substance  is  always  produced 
before  'the  period  of  differentiation.  B — B,  action  of  rate-gene 
whose  intensity  has  been  reduced  to  produce  the  total  evolutionary 
disappearance  of  the  organ.  The  lower  threshold  of  determining 
substance  is  never  reached  before  the  period  of  differentiation. 
C — C,  action  of  rate-gene  normally  promoting  a  vestigial  develop- 
ment of  the  organ.  Slight  variations  in  its  intensity  or  in  the  time 
of  differentiation  will  produce  large  differences  in  the  degree  of 
development  of  the  organ. 


RELATIVE   GROWTH   AND   RECAPITULATION     237 

environmental  variations.  Equally,  if  the  rate-genes  con- 
cerned are  so  much  reduced  in  intensity  that  the  limb-determin- 
ing substances  are  well  below  the  threshold  during  the  whole 
differentiation  period,  the  absence  of  limbs  will  be  a  stable 
character.  But  if  the  intensity  of  the  rate-genes  has  only  been 
reduced  to  a  pitch  at  which  a  certain  small  amount  of  limb 
development  can  normally  proceed,  environmental  agencies 
will  quite  certainly  be  capable  of  affecting  the  precise  degree 
of  this  development  within  fairly  wide  limits.  A  good  example 
of  variability  of  this  sort  in  vestigial  organs  is  provided  by  the 
vestigial  limbs  of  the  stump-legged  mayfly — Campsurus  segnis, 
described  and  figured  by  A.  H.  Morgan  (1929). 

A  somewhat  similar  fact,  due  to  somewhat  similar  causes, 
is  found  in  Gammarus  (op.  cit.).  Normal  black  eyes,  which 
are  due  to  genes  whose  influence  is  to  take  melanin  formation 
very  rapidly  up  to  saturation-point,  are  scarcely  affected  by 
temperature.  Other  genes  slow  down  the  process  so  much 
that  the  threshold  for  visible  melanin-production  is  normally 
never  reached.  The  permanently  pure  red  eyes  thus  produced 
also  are  little  affected  by  temperature.  Genes  of  intermediate 
strength,  however,  which  at  room  temperature  produce  a 
moderate  darkening  to  red-brown,  are  markedly  influenced 
in  their  effects  by  temperature-changes  :  at  high  temperatures 
the  eyes  of  animals  containing  such  genes  are  dark  chocolate, 
at  low  temperatures  almost  pure  scarlet  (Fig.  103). 

Finally,  since  rate-genes  can  obviously  mutate  both  in  the 
plus  and  the  minus  direction,  so  as  to  accelerate  or  slow  down 
the  processes  which  they  control,  it  is  clear  that  changes  in 
rate-genes  could  as  easily  lead  to  the  opposite  of  recapitulation 
as  to  recapitulation.  Many  examples  of  neoteny  would  fall 
under  this  head.  See  e.g.  Mjoberg's  discussion  (1925)  on  the 
larviform  females  of  certain  Lycid  beetles.  De  Beer  (1930) 
has  dealt  fully  with  this  point,  and  has  proposed  a  useful 
terminology. 

Finally,  it  is  clear  that  numerous  examples  of  von  Baer's 
Law,  that  related  forms  tend  to  resemble  each  other  more  in 
the  early  stages  of  their  development  than  when  adult,  need 
have  nothing  whatever  to  do  with  Haeckel's  reformulation 
of  von  Baer's  Law,  or  with  recapitulation,  but  are  simply 
consequences  of  the  laws  of  relative  growth  and  of  physio- 
logical genetics.  For  instance,  the  proportions  of  the  fore- 
limbs  of  man  and  all  anthropoids  are  more  similar  in  the  fetus 
than  in  the  adult   (Schultz,   1926).     But  in  every  case  the 


238 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


relative  length  of  the  fore-limb  increases  between  fetus  and 
adult.  This  happens  to  be  '  recapitulatory  '  in  excessively 
long-armed  forms  like  the  gibbon,  but  is  the  reverse  of  reca- 
pitulatory in  man,  who  is  undoubtedly  descended  from  brachi- 
ating  ancestors  with  relatively  longer  arms.  The  great 
similarity  of  the  fetuses  is  due  to  the  fact  that  in  all  cases 
the  arms  begin  relatively  small,  and  that  final  differences  of 
proportion  are  due  to  the  different  degrees  of  positive  heter- 
ogony  which  they  exhibit.  The  '  recapitulation '  by  the 
new-born  lamb  in  improved  breeds  of  sheep  of  the  approximate 
proportions  of  adult  wild  sheep  (Chapters  III,  VII)  is  another 


%13 
%12 

hi 

%10 

I   9 
\   * 

I    ? 
|* 

4r « 

•5  •» 

t2 


- 

(alld, 

->ad)2 

S°C 

M 

- 

(/ 

^ 

\ 

23°  I 

T 

\M 

-    / 

( 

. 

20  °L 

- 

- 

- 

15°Ct 

-I 

Extrusion 


8 
Time  in  Weeks 


10      tl      12 


Fig.  103. — Effect  of  temperature  on  eye-darkening  in  a  pure  genetic 
strain  (rrSS)  of  Gammarns  chevreuxi. 

At  io°  C.  no  melanin  is  deposited.     At  13°,  deposition  begins  only  after  5-6  months.     The  figure 
shows  the  facts  for  temperatures  from  150  to  28°. 

example  of  a  change  of  this  sort  which  happens  to  be  reca- 
pitulatory. 

All  coloured  Gammarus  eyes  so  far  investigated  begin  as 
pure  red  (Ford  and  Huxley,  op.  cit.).  But  we  have  in  this 
no  grounds  whatever  for  supposing  that  Gammarus  are  de- 
scended from  a  red-eyed  ancestor.  It  would  appear  to  be  a 
direct  consequence  of  the  empirical  fact  that  melanin  deposi- 
tion can  only  begin  after  the  red  (lipochrome)  pigment  has 
been  formed. 

Again,  the  fact  that  both  chelae  of  male  Uca  begin  of  female 
type,  so  that  males  and  females  are  more  alike  when  young, 
does  not  in  the  least  prove  that  the  males  of  any  ancestral 
Uca  ever  possessed  two  chelae  of  existing  or  any  other  female 
type.     In  fact,  all  the  probabilities  are  against  this.     It  is  due, 


RELATIVE    GROWTH   AND   RECAPITULATION     239 

we  may  suggest,  rather  to  the  fact  that  a  large  adult  chela 
must  begin  its  existence  of  small  relative  size,  and  that  the 
form  of  the  small  chela  has  been  moulded  by  natural  selection 
into  the  female-type  or  feeding  chela.  A  similar  reasoning 
applies  to  the  male  type  of  juvenile  female  abdomen  in  all 
Brachyura :  this  affords  no  presumption  whatever  that 
ancestral  female  crabs  when  adult  ever  possessed  an  abdomen 
as  narrow  as  that  of  the  existing  male.  The  presumption  is 
quite  different — that  during  Brachyuran  evolution  the  male 
abdomen  has  been  narrowed,  the  female  broadened,  and  that 
it  has  proved  an  ontogenetic  convenience  to  produce  the 
abdomen  at  its  first  appearance,  when  it  is  relatively  small, 
in  a  form  similar  to  that  of  the  male,  from  which  the  female 
type  is  derived  by  differential  heterogony. 

Numerous  other  examples  could  be  given  of  this  distinction 
between  von  Baer's  and  Haeckel's  laws  ;  but  enough  has  been 
said  to  show  the  importance  of  the  distinction,  and  the  reason 
for  the  greater  universality  of  von  Baer's  generalization. 

Further,  it  is  in  general  clear  that  rate-genes  may  mutate 
in  either  a  plus  or  a  minus  direction,  either  accelerating  or 
retarding  the  rates  of  the  processes  they  affect.  In  the  former 
case  the  effect  will  be  in  certain  respects  at  least  recapitulatory, 
since  a  condition  which  used  to  occur  in  the  adult  is  now  run 
through  at  an  earlier  stage.  In  the  latter  case,  the  effect 
will  be  anti-recapitulatory,  since  a  condition  which  once 
characterized  an  earlier  phase  of  development  is  now  shifted 
to  the  adult  phase.  Neoteny  is  the  most  striking  example 
of  this  effect  ;  but  we  may  also  get  single  characters  behaving 
in  this  way.  When  this  occurs,  previous  adult  characters, 
though  still  in  a  real  sense  potentially  present,  never  appear 
because  their  formation  is  too  long  delayed  :  they  are  lost 
to  the  species  by  being  driven  off  the  time-scale  of  its  develop- 
ment. For  examples  of  this,  notably  in  Helix,  see  the  discus- 
sion in  Ford  and  Huxley,  1927.     (Fig.  104.) 

De  Beer  (1930),  in  his  resume  of  this  and  kindred  subjects, 
has  given  the  useful  term  paedomorphosis  to  this  type  of  effect. 
Bolk  (1926)  has  drawn  attention  to  the  importance  of  such 
effects  in  the  evolution  of  man,  summing  up  the  result  as  a 
process  of  '  fetalization  ',  since  in  many  respects  post-natal 
or  adult  man  resembles  the  fetal  stages  of  apes.  See  also 
Kieslinger  (1924). 

Such  phenomena  are  unintelligible  on  the  Haeckelian 
doctrine.     But  they  immediately  fall  into  place  when  it  is 


240 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


grasped  that  most  examples  of  recapitulation  constitute 
simply  one  side  of  a  more  general  problem — the  problem  of 
altering  the  relative  rates  of  growth  and  of  other  processes 
within  the  body. 


t 


t 
S 

I1 


X                 ^"n 

y 

s 

s                             _ 

,-'l 

A 

/     ,''' 

\            y 

^-JK 

.               ** 

sr> 

£ — ^r 

•    (a) 

/j/ 

• 

fA" 

/  /  / " 

// /j 

X 

time 


Fig.   104. — Diagram  to  illustrate  positive  and  negative  mutations  in  rate- 
factors,  leading  to  recapitulation  and  paedomorphosis  respectively. 

X — X,  period  after  which  no  further  differentiation  of  the  character  is  possible  (adult  phase  in 
forms  with  fixed  adult  size  ;  maximum  size  in  forms  with  continuous  growth).  The  curves  represent 
the  development  of  a  character  controlled  by  a  rate-gene.  The  portions  of  the  curves  to  the  right 
of  X — X  (dotted)  cannot  be  realized.  I,  condition  in  ancestral  form;  II,  result  of  a  mutation 
accelerating  the  process.  The  old  adult  condition  (A)  now  becomes  the  juvenile  condition  (J'). 
A  portion  of  the  curve  hitherto  unrealized  is  now  incorporated  in  the  life-history  (heavy  line)  leading 
to  a  new  adult  condition  (A').  Ill,  result  of  a  mutation  slowing  down  the  process.  The  old  juvenile 
condition  (J)  now  becomes  the  adult  condition  (A").  A  portion  of  the  curve  (heavy  dotted  line), 
including  the  old  adult  condition  (a),  is  now  extruded  from  the  life-cycle  by  retardation. 


§  7.    General  Approach  to  the  Problem  of  Qualitative 

Form-change 

In  general,  it  is  clear  that  the  effect  of  our  knowledge  of  rate- 
factors  and  of  the  rules  regulating  relative  growth  will  make 
it  possible  to  analyse  the  problems  involved  in  changes  in 
proportion  with  a  new  insight. 

In  studying  the  growth  of  any  part,  it  is  by  no  means  suffi- 
cient to  determine  its  percentage  change  in  relative  size,  as 
has  often  been  the  case  in  the  past.  A  percentage  change  is 
the  easiest  to  visualize  by  graphic  methods,  and  is  often  very 
important  in  comparing  related  forms.     But  from  the  point 


QUALITATIVE   FORM-CHANGE  241 

of  view  of  the  underlying  mechanism,  it  tells  us  little.  A 
percentage  change  in  relative  size,  as  the  work  of  Scammon 
has  made  clear  (p.  132),  may  be  merely  an  effect  of  the  law 
of  developmental  direction  and  the  time-handicap  thus  given 
to  some  organs  as  against  others  ;  the  organ,  once  it  begins 
its  growth,  may  grow  in  linear  proportions  to  the  body  as  a 
whole,  and  yet  show  a  change  in  relative  size.  Or  a  per- 
centage change  may  be  due  solely  to  the  heterogony  of  the 
organ,  to  its  possessing  a  growth-coefficient  above  or  below 
the  body  as  a  whole.  Or  thirdly,  it  may  of  course  be  and 
doubtless  often  is  due  to  a  combination  of  the  two  causes. 
In  the  first  case,  its  relative  growth  will  be  according  to  the 
formula 

y  =  bx  +  a (1) 

In  the  second  case,  according  to  the  formula 

y  =  bxk (2) 

In  the  third  case,  according  to  the  formula 

y  =  bxk  +  a (3) 

When  k  =  1,  then  formula  (1)  becomes  equivalent  to  formula 
(3).  And  when  in  addition  a  =  o,  it  becomes  equivalent  to 
formula  (2).  Thus  for  those  numerous  cases  where  the  growth- 
coemcient  is  close  to  unity,  and  the  onset  of  development  of 
the  organ  is  not  far  from  that  of  the  standard  part  taken  as 
representative  of  the  rest  of  body  (or  from  the  mean  value 
for  all  parts,  when  the  body  as  a  whole  is  taken  as  standard), 
the  three  formulae  will  serve  equally  well. 

Formula  (3)  is  the  most  inclusive,  and  should  be  taken  as 
the  theoretical  basis  for  analysis  ;  but  a  will  often  be  negligible 
where  heterogony  is  marked  ;  and  where  heterogony  is  not 
marked,  k  will  be  so  close  to  unity  that  Scammon's  formula  (1) 
will  approximately  apply.     (See  also  Chap.  IV,  §  7.) 

In  addition  to  a  precise  analysis  of  growth  after  the  organ 
has  appeared,  it  is  also  of  theoretical  importance  to  know 
the  time  of  its  first  appearance.  From  the  work  on  Gammarus, 
we  know  that,  as  regards  the  straightforward  rate-genes 
discussed  in  §  5,  the  slower  the  rate  of  the  process  which  they 
control,  the  later  is  its  visible  onset. 

This  is  presumably  due  to  there  being  a  maximum  threshold 
which  must  be  attained  by  the  substance  whose  production 
they  control  before  visible  effects  are  produced.  It  is  on 
general  grounds  probable  that  this  is  a  widespread  rule.  In 
addition,  genes  have  been  discovered  whose  primary  effect 
16 


242  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

is  on  the  time  of  onset  of  a  process,  and  not  on  its  rate  (Ford 
and  Huxley,  op.  cit.). 

It  should  be  possible  by  comparing  related  forms  to  discover 
whether  time-relations  of  this  second  type  are  involved  in 
addition  to  those  of  the  first.  We  must  further  remember 
that  growth-coefficients  may  change  during  ontogeny  ;  they 
may  change  from  strong  to  less  strong  positive  heterogony,  as 
in  Uca  large  chela,  or  from  isogony  to  positive  heterogony, 
as  in  Maia  large  chela,  etc.  These  facts  must  also  have  their 
genetic  basis. 

With  an  analysis  such  as  this,  we  may  hope  for  a  fuller 
understanding  of  the  processes  involved  in  changes  of  propor- 
tion. One  alteration  in  a  single  rate-gene  may  delay  the  first 
formation  of  an  organ  and  also  decrease  the  growth-coefficient 
once  it  is  formed.  Further,  although  the  processes  of  histo- 
differentiation  do  not  seem  to  follow  the  same  laws  of  relative 
growth  as  those  of  auxano-differentiation,  the  quantitative 
intensity  of  the  two  kinds  of  growth-processes  may  well  be 
controlled  by  the  same  genes. 

In  considering  evolutionary  changes  in  relative  size,  we 
must  accordingly  try  to  distinguish  the  various  agencies  which 
may  be  at  work.  It  appears  that  these  may  be  (a)  mutations 
affecting  the  primary  gradient  of  the  early  embryo,  on  which 
the  time-relations  of  antero-posterior  differentiation  depend ; 
(b)  mutations  affecting  specific  rate-genes ;  (c)  mutations 
affecting  specific  '  time-genes  ' — genes  controlling  time  of  onset 
and  not  rate  of  processes.  The  processes  controlled  by  the 
rate-genes  and  time-genes  will  be  processes  concerned  with 
growth-gradients,  whether  of  a  major  or  minor  nature  :  they 
will  therefore  always  affect  a  number  of  parts  in  a  correlated 
way. 

Finally,  it  is  at  least  possible,  as  we  have  seen  in  an  earlier 
section,  that  the  primary  '  axial  gradient '  of  the  developing 
egg  and  early  embryo,  on  which,  we  must  suppose,  depend 
the  facts  subsumed  under  the  law  of  antero-posterior  differ- 
entiation, itself  continues  to  operate  later  as  a  growth-influenc- 
ing gradient,  as  well  as  influencing  the  time-relations  of 
differentiation.  This  would  mean  that  mutations  primarily 
selected  because  of  their  effect  upon  early  development  would 
have  an  effect  upon  proportional  size  in  later  life — an  interest- 
ing example,  if  substantiated,  of  what  Darwin  called  correlated 
variation. 


CONCLUSION  243 

§  8.    Conclusion 

We  have  now  completed  our  brief  survey.  Starting  from 
the  fact  of  obviously  '  dysharmonic  '  or  heterogenic  growth, 
we  have  discovered  our  first  new  empirical  law — the  law  of 
constant  differential  growth-ratio.  We  have  then  recognized 
that  it  is  only  a  special  case  of  the  law  of  differential  growth- 
partition,  which  is  the  prime  quantitative  basis  of  relative 
growth.  Passing  on  from  that,  we  have  found  a  further  and 
quite  unexpected  empirical  law — that  the  existence  of  a 
differential  growth-ratio  in  an  organ  or  region  seems  always 
to  be  associated  with  a  growth-gradient  culminating  in  a 
growth-centre  ;  or  in  other  words,  that  the  distribution  of 
growth-potential  is  not  marked  by  discontinuities  or  by 
frequent  oscillations,  but  occurs  in  an  orderly  and  continuously 
graded  way.  And  we  then  showed  that  these  localized  growth- 
gradients  were  but  special  cases  of  growth-gradients  permeating 
the  whole  body.  These  laws,  however,  only  appear  to  apply 
to  the  stages  of  growth  occurring  after  histological  differentia- 
tion has  been  completed.  Very  rapid  growth,  obeying  quite 
other  laws,  occurs  during  the  earlier  period.  For  these  two 
phases  of  development,  the  terms  histo-differentiation  and 
auxano-differentiation  are  proposed. 

After  demonstrating  that  these  growth-gradients  were  opera- 
tive both  in  multiplicative  and  accretionary  growth,  giving 
rise  to  structures  as  dissimilar  as  a  crustacean  chela  or  a 
fowl's  comb  on  the  one  hand,  and  a  Nautilus  shell  or  a  rhino- 
ceros horn  on  the  other,  we  made  it  probable  that  the  growth- 
gradients  were  either  directly  or  indirectly  correlated  with 
the  morphogenetic  gradients  or  fields  of  Child,  Weiss  and  others, 
and  in  general  with  the  various  polarized  and  field  effects  in 
the  animal  body. 

In  a  discussion  of  the  obscure  subject  of  the  physiological 
basis  of  growth-gradients,  we  discovered  that  the  existence 
of  a  single  appendage  with  high  growth-ratio  is  associated 
with  a  slight  increase  of  growth  in  the  regions  immediately 
posterior  to  it,  but  a  slight  decrease  in  those  immediately 
anterior.  The  meaning  of  this  remains  quite  unknown,  but 
it  has  certain  parallels  in  the  field  of  regeneration  and  of 
experimental  embryology.  Further,  the  study  of  relative 
growth  confirms  that  of  regeneration  in  making  us  believe 
that  the  relative  growth-rate  (differential  growth-ratio)  of  a 
part  is  determined  in  some  way  as  an  equilibrium  between 


244  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

the  growth  of  the  part  and  the  growth  of  the  rest  of  the  body. 
The  role  of  hormones  and  of  mutation  in  differential  growth 
has  been  discussed,  and  the  extent  of  our  ignorance  on  this 
subject  emphasized. 

Finally,  the  bearings  of  the  study  of  differential  growth  on 
other  branches  of  biology  have  been  discussed,  and  it  has  been 
shown  that  light  is  thereby  shed  upon  such  diverse  problems 
as  orthogenesis,  recapitulation,  vestigial  organs,  the  existence 
of  non-adaptive  characters,  physiological  genetics,  comparative 
physiology,  and  systematics. 

I  may  conclude  as  I  began,  by  a  quotation  from  D'Arcy 
Thompson,  to  whose  classical  work  all  students  of  relative 
growth  owe  so  much  [Growth  and  Form,  p.  719)  : 

"  The  study  of  form  may  be  descriptive  merely,  or  it  may  become 
analytical.  We  begin  by  describing  the  shape  of  an  object  in  the 
simple  words  of  common  speech  :  we  end  by  defining  it  in  the  precise 
language  of  mathematics  ;  and  the  one  method  tends  to  follow  the 
other  in  strict  scientific  order  and  historical  continuity". 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Abeloos,  M.  (1928)  :  Sur  la  dysharmonie  de  croissance  chez  Planaria 
gonocephala  Duges  et  sa  reversibilite  au  cours  du  jeune  ;  C.R. 
Soc  Biol.,  98,  917. 

(1930)  :     Recherches  experimentales  sur  la  croissance  et  la  re- 

generation chez  les  Planaires  ;  Bull.  Biol.  France  et  Belg.,  64, 

1-140. 
Adolph,  E.  F.  (1930)  :    Body  Size  as  a  Factor  in  the  Metamorphosis 

of  Frogs  ;    Anat.  Rec,  47,  304. 
Allen,  B.  M.  (191 8)  :   The  Results  of  Thyroid  Removal  in  the  Larvae 

of  Rana  pipiens  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  24,  489-519. 

(191 9)  :    The  Development  of  the  Thyroid  Glands  of  Bufo  and 

their  normal  relation  to  Metamorphosis  ;  Journ.  Morph.,  32, 
489-507. 

Alpatov,  W.  W.  (1930)  :  Phenotypical  Variation  in  Body  and  Cell- 
size  of  Drosophila  melanogaster  ;    Biol.  Bull.,  58,  85-103. 

Anderson,  B.  G.  (1931)  :  Relative  Growth  in  Daphnia  Magna  ;  Anat. 
Rec,  51,  Suppl.,  p.  55. 

Antonius,  H.  O.  (1920)  :  Bemerkung  iiber  einige  Saugetierschadel 
von  Sardinien  ;  Kon.  Akad.  Wetens.  Amsterdam,  29,  26,  vi.  20, 
P-  254. 

Appleton,  A.  B.  (1929)  :  The  Relation  between  the  Rate  of  Growth 
and  the  Rate  of  Ossification  in  the  Foetus  of  the  Rabbit  (pre- 
liminary communication)  ;    Proc.  Assoc.  Anat.,   1929,  p.   23. 

Atkins,  D.  (1926)  :  The  Moulting  Stages  of  the  Pea-crab  {Pinnotheres 
pisum)  ;    Journ.  Mar.  Biol.  Assn.,   14,  475. 

Balfour-Browne,  F.  (1909)  :  The  Life-history  of  the  Agrionid 
Dragonfly  ;    Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  Lond.,  1909,  253-84. 

Bateson,  W.  (1894)  :  Materials  for  the  Study  of  Variation.  London  : 
Macmillan. 

Bateson,  W.  and  Brindley,  H.  H.  (1892)  :  On  some  Cases  of  Varia- 
tion in  Secondary  Sexual  Characters  statistically  examined ; 
Proc.  Zool.  Soc.   (1892),  585. 

Bean,  R.  B.  (1924)  :  The  Pulse  of  Growth  in  Man.  A  preliminary 
report ;    Anat.  Rec,  28,  45-61. 

Becher,  A.  (1923)  :   (Sheep-dog  Skull).  Arch.  Naturgesch.  (A.)  1923,  (9). 

de  Beer,  G.  R.  (1930)  :  Embryology  and  Evolution.  Oxford  : 
Clarendon  Press. 

Belehradek,  J.  and  Huxley,  J.  S.  (1930)  :  The  Rate  of  Eye-growth 
and  its  Variation  in  Gammarus  chevreuxi  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Biol., 

7,  37- 
Benazzi,   M.   (1929)  :    Manifestazioni  quantitative  della  rigenerazione 
negli  insetti ;    Rivista  di  Biologia,   1 1 ,  fasc.  5-6,  p.  9. 

245 


246  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

Benoit,  J.  (1927A)  :    Obtention  chez  les  coqs  d'un  etat  intermediate 
de  la  crete  .   .   .  ;    C.R.  Soc.  Biol.,  97,  275. 

(1927B)  :   La  croissance  conditionnee  de  la  crete  .  .   .  ;    C.R.  Soc. 

Biol.,  97,  279. 
Berkson,  J.  (1929)  :   Growth  Changes  in  Physical  Correlation — height, 

weight     and    chest-circumference,    males;    Human    Biol.,     1, 

462-502. 
Berrill,  N.  J.  (1931)  :    Regeneration  in  Sabella  pavonina  (Sav.)  and 

other  Sabellid  Worms  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  58,  495-523. 
Bertalanffy,  Ludwig  (1928)  :    Kritische  Theorie  der  Formbildung. 

Berlin  :    Borntraeger. 
Blyth,  J.  S.  S.,  Dodds,  E.  C.  and  Gallimore,  E.  J.  (1931)  :   Observa- 
tions on  the  Assay  of  the  Comb-growth  Promoting  Hormone  ; 

Journ.  Physiol.,  73,  136-40. 
Bolk,  L.   (1926)  :    Das  Problem  der  Menschwerdung.     Jena,   1926. 
Bo  vet,  D.   (1930)  :    Les  territoires  de  regeneration  ;    leurs  proprietes 

etudiees  par  la  methode  de  deviation  du  nerf  ;   Rev.  Suisse  Zool., 

37,  83-145. 
Bower,  F.  O.  (1930)  :    Size  and  Form  in  Plants,  with  special  reference 

to  the  Primary  Conducting  Tracts.     London  :    Macmillan. 
Bray,  G.  (1931)  :    Recent  Advances  in  Allergy.     London  :    Churchill, 

1931- 

Brody,  S.  (1928)  :  An  Analysis  of  the  Course  of  Growth  and  Senescence. 

In  Growth,   by  Robbins  and  other  authors.     Yale  University 

Press. 
Bush,  S.  F.  (1930)  :    Asymmetry  and  Relative  Growth  of  Parts  in  the 

two    Sexes   of   the   Hermit-crab   Eupagurus   prideauxi  ;    Arch. 

Entw.  Mech.,  123,  39. 
Bush,  S.  F.  and  Huxley,  J.  S.  (1930)  :  Distribution  of  Growth-activity 

in  Eupagurus  ;    Nature,   126,  240-1. 

Calman,  W.  T.  (1909)  :  Treatise  on  Zoology,  Vol.  VII.     Appendiculata, 

3rd  fasc.  Crustacea.     London  :    Black. 
Champy,  C.  (1922)  :    (Thyroid)  ;    Arch.  Morph.  Gen.  Exp.,  1922. 

(1924)  :   Sexualite  et  Hormones.     Paris  :    G.  Doin. 

(1929)  :     La   croissance   dysharmonique    des   caracteres   sexuels 

accessoires  ;    Ann.  Sci.  Nat.  Zool.,   (10)   12,  193. 
Child,  C.  M.  (1915)  :    Senescence  and  Rejuvenation.     Chicago. 
Choi,    M.    H.    (1931)  :     Synchronism   of   Development   in    Parabiotic 

Amphibian  Larvae  ;    Folia  Anatomica  Japonica,  9.  No.  5. 
Clark,  A.  (1927)  :  Comparative  Physiology  of  the  Heart.     Cambridge 

Univ.  Press. 
Clausen,  H.  J.  (1929)  :    Rate  of  Histolysis  of  Anuran  Tail  Skin  and 

Muscle  during  Metamorphosis  ;    Anat.  Rec,  44,  218. 
Coghill,  G.  E.  (1928)  :  VIII.     (Growth  of  Nervous  System)  ;  Journ. 

Comp.  Neurol.,  45. 
Collip,    J.   B.    (1930)  :     (Placental   Hormones)  ;     Canad.   Med.  Assoc. 

Journ.,  23,  631. 
Cott,   H.   B.    (1929)  :     Observations  on  the  Natural  History  of  the 

Racing-crab  Ocypoda  ceratophthalma,   from  Beira  ;    Proc.   Zool. 

Soc.   (1929),  755- 
Cushing,  H.  (1912)  :  The  Pituitary  Body  and  its  Disorders  ;  Lippincott. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  247 

Davenport,  C.  B.  (1923)  :  Body-build  and  its  Inheritance  ;  Carnegie 
Inst.,   Washington,  Publ.,  No.  329,  p.   176. 

Davenport,  C.  B.  (1926)  :  Human  Metamorphosis  ;  Amer.  Journ.  Phys. 
Anthrop.,  9,  205-32. 

Davenport,  C.  B.  and  Swingle,  W.  W.  (1927)  :  Effects  of  Operations 
upon  the  Thyroid  Glands  of  Female  Mice  on  the  Growth  of 
their  Offspring  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  48,  395-440. 

Detwiler,  S.  R.  (1930)  :  Some  Observations  upon  the  Growth, 
Innervation  and  Function  of  Heteroplastic  Limbs ;  Journ. 
Exper.  Zool.,  57,  183. 

Diakonov,  D.  M.  (1925)  :  Experimental  and  Biometrical  Investiga- 
tions on  Dimorphic  Variability  of  Forficula  ;    Journ.  Genetics, 

15,  261. 

Dombrowski,  von   (1889)  :    TJber  die  Geweihbildung  der  Rothirsche 

der  Gegenwart  .  .   .  ;    Der  Weidmann,  20  (Nos.  15-19,  42,  44). 
(1892)  :  Die  Gehornbildung  des  Rehbockes  des  Gegenwart,  etc.  ; 

Der  Weidmann  (1892-4),  22,  23,  24. 
Domm,  L.  V.  and  Juhn,  Mary  (1927)  :    Compensatory  Hypertrophy 

of  the  Testes  in  Brown  Leghorns  ;    Biol.  Bull.,  52,  458-473. 
Donaldson,  H.  H.  (1924)  :  The  Rat  ;  Philadelphia  :   Wistar  Inst.  Mem. 
Drennan,  M.  R.  (1932)  :    Pedomorphism  in  the  Pre-Bushman  Skull ; 

Amer.  Journ.  Phys.  Anthrop.  (cited  from  Wistar  Inst.  Advance 

Abstract-sheet  No.  179). 
Dubois,  E.  (1914)  :  Die  Gesetzmassige  Beziehungvon  Gehirn- zur  Kor- 

pergrosse  bei  den  Wirbeltieren  ;   Zeits.  Morph.  u.  Anthrop.,  18. 

(191 8)  :    On  the  Relation  between  the  quantities  of  the  Brain, 

the  Neurone  and  its  Parts,  and  the  Size  of  the  Body  ;    Acad. 
Sci.  Amsterdam,  Proceedings,  20,  1328. 

(1922)  :    Phylogenetic  and  Ontogenetic  Increase  of  the  Volumes 

of  the  Brain  in  Vertebrata  ;    K.  A  had.  Wetens.  Amsterdam,  25, 

330- 
Dudich,  E.  (1923)  :    Ueber  die  Variation   des  Cyclommatus  tarandus 
Thunberg  ;    Arch.  f.  Naturgesch.,  (A)   1923,  (2)  62. 

Eigenbrodt,  H.  J.  (1930)  :    The  Somatic  Effects  of  Temperature  on 

a  Homozygous  Race  of  Drosophila  ;   Physiol.  Zool.,  3,  392-411. 
Emerson,  A.  E.   (1926)  :    Development  of  a  Soldier  of  Nasutitermes 

(Constrictotermes)  .  .  .  ;    Zoologica,  7,  69. 
Emery,  C.  (1921)  :    Quels  sont  les  facteurs  du  Polymorphisme  du  sexe 

feminin  chez  les  Fourmis  ?  ;    Rev.  Gen.  Sci.,  32. 
Entz,  G.  (1927)  :    Beitrage  zur  Kenntnis  der  Peridineen.  II.  resp.  VII. 

Studien    an    Siisswasser-Ceratien ;     Arch.    f.    Protistenk.,    58, 

344-440. 

Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1930)  :  Growth  and  Differentiation  of  the  colonies 
of  Zoothamnium  alternans  ;    Biol.  Bull.,  58,  28. 

Ford,  E.  (1930)  :  Herring  Investigations  at  Plymouth.  VIII.  The 
transition  from  larva  to  adolescent ;    Journ.  Mar.  Biol.  Assn., 

16,  723- 

(193 1  a)  :    Growth  in  Length  during  the  Transition  from  Larva 

to  Adolescent  in  the  Pilchard  and  Sprat  :    Journ.  Mar.  Biol. 
Assn.,  17.  977-85. 


248  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

Ford,  E.  (1931B)  :  Changes  in  Length  during  the  Larval  Life  and 
Metamorphosis  of  the  Freshwater  Eel  (Anguilla  vulgaris  Turt.)  ; 
Journ.  Mar.  Biol.  Assn.,   17.  987-1000. 

Ford,  E.  B.  (1928)  :  The  Inheritance  of  Dwarfing  in  Gammarus  chev- 
reuxi  ;    Journ.  Genet.,  20,  43. 

(1929)  :    The  Physiology  of  Genetics;    Eugen.  Rev.,  21,  114. 

Ford,  E.  B.  and  Huxley,  J.  S.  (1929)  :  Genetic  rate-factors  in  Gam- 
marus ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,   117,  67. 

Gabritschevsky,  E.  (1930)  :  Les  reductions  regulatrices  et  les  com- 
pensations hypertrophiques  pendant  l'ontogenese  et  la  regenera- 
tion de  l'araignee  Thomisus  onistus  ;    Bull.  Biol.,  64,  155-88. 

Gajewski,  N.  (1922)  :  Ueber  die  Variabilitat  bei  Artemia  salina ; 
Intern.  Rev.  Ges.  Hydrobiol.,  10,  139,  299. 

Gause,  C.  F.  (1931)  :  Ueber  den  Einfluss  verkiirzter  larvaler  Ernahr- 
ungszeit  auf  die  Eiergrosse  von  Drosophila  ;  Biol.  Zentralbl., 
51,  209. 

Giesbrecht,  W.  (1910)  :  Fauna  und  Flora  des  Golfes  von  Neapel  ; 
33,  Stomatopoda  (i) 

Goldschmidt,  R.  (1923)  :  The  Mechanism  and  Physiology  of  Sex 
Determination  ;    London  :   Methuen. 

(1927):  Physiologische  Theorie  der  Vererbung ;  Berlin:  Springer. 

Gray,  J.  (1929)  :   The  Kinetics  of  Growth  ;   Brit.  Journ.  Exper.  Biol., 

6,  248. 
Griffini,  A.  (191 2)  :    Strane  variazioni  individuali  in  alcune  specie  di 

Coleopteri  ;    Boll.  Mat.  Sci.  Fis.  Nat.,  Lodi,  13,  (8). 
Guyenot,  E.  and  Ponse,  K.   (1930)  :    Territoires  de  regeneration  et 

transplantations  ;    Bull.  Biol.  Fr.  et  Belg.,  64,  251-84. 

Hammett,  F.  S.  (1929A)  :  Thyroid  and  Differential  Development ; 
Endokrinologie ,  5,  81. 

(1929B)  :    Thyroid  and  Growth  ;    Quart.  Rev.  Biol.,  4,  353. 

Hammond,  J.  (1921)  :    On  the  Relative  Growth  and  Development  of 

Various  Breeds  and  Crosses  of  Sheep  ;    Journ.  Agric.  Sci.,  11, 
267-407. 

(1928)  :  Selection  for  Meat  Production  ;   Verh.  v.  Internal.  Kongr. 

Vererbungswiss,  Berlin,  1927,  2,  769-95. 

(1928)  :    How  Feeding  affects  Conformation  ;    Farmer  and  Stock- 

breeder and  Agric.  Gaz.,  10.12.28,  p.  4. 

(1929)  :    Probleme  der  Fleischerzeugung  ;    Zeits.  Zuchtungskunde, 

4,  543-62. 
(1930)  :   Animal  Production  :   the  Influence  of  Natural  Conditions 

on  Animal  Production  ;    Trop.  Agric,  7,  147-50. 
(1931)  :    Growth  of  the  Rabbit  in  Relation  to  Flesh  Production  ; 

Year  Book  Nat.  Rabbit  Council  (1931). 
Hardest y,    Mary    (1931)  :     The   Structural   Basis  for  the   Response 

Comb  of  the  Brown  Leghorn  Fowl  to  the  Sex  Hormones  ;  Amer. 

Journ.  Anat.,  47,  277-323. 
Hare,  F.  (1932)  :    Polymorphism   among   the    Sub-genera  of  Nasuti- 

termes  ;    Journ.  Morph.  and  Physiol,  (in  press). 
Harris,  H.  A.  (1931A)  :  The  Comparative  Aspect  of  Growth  in  Children  ; 

Lancet,  28  Mar.,   1931,  p.  691. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  249 

Harris,  (1931B)  :  The  Anatomical  and  Physiological  Characteristics  and 
Development  of  Children  between  the  ages  of  7  and  1 1  ;  Report. 
Consultative  Committee  on  the  Primary  School,  pp.  222-54. 

Harrison,  R.  G.  (1924)  :  Some  unexpected  Results  of  the  Hetero- 
plastic Transplantation  of  Limbs  ;  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci.,  10, 
69-74. 

R.  (1929A) :  Heterotransplantation  in  Amphibian  Embryos  ;  Proc. 

X.  Internal.  Zool.  Congr.  Budapest,  1927  (1929). 

(1929B)  :    Correlation  in  the  Development  and  Growth  of  the 

Eye  studied  by  means  of  Heteroplastic  Transplantation  ;  Arch. 
Entw.  Mech.,   120,  1. 

Hasebrock,  K.  (1917)  :  Die  Entwicklungsmechanik  des  Herzwachs- 
tum  ;    Pfluger's  Archiv,   168. 

Haseman,  J.  D.  (1907A)  :  The  Direction  of  Differentiation  in  regenerat- 
ing Crustacean  appendages:    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  24,  617. 

(1907B)  :   The  Reversal  of  the  Direction  of  Differentiation  in  the 

Chelipeds  of  the  Hermit-crab  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  24,  663. 
Heath,  H.  (1927)  :    Caste-formation  in  the  Termite  genus  Termopsis  ; 
Journ.  Morph.  and  Phys.,  43,  387. 

(1928)  :    Fertile  Termite  Soldiers  ;    Biol.  Bull.,  54,  324. 

Hecht,  S.  (1916)  :    Form  and  Growth  in  Fishes  ;    Journ.  Morph.,  37, 

379- 
Henderson,   J.  R.  and  Matthai,  G.   (1910)  :    On  certain  species  of 

Palaemon  from  South  India  ;   Records  of  the  Indian  Museum,  5, 

277-306. 
Herms,  W.  B.   (1928)  :    The  Effect  of  Different  Quantities  of  Food 

during  the  Larval  period  on  the  sex-ratio  and   size  of  Lucilia 

sericata  Meigen  and  Theobaldia  incidens  (Thorn)  ;    Journ.  Econ. 

Entom.,  21,  720. 
Herrick,  F.  H.  (191 1)  :    Natural  History  of  the  American  Lobster; 

Bull.  U.S.  Bureau  Fisheries,  29,  149,  Document  No.  747. 
Hersh,  A.  H.   (1928)  :    Organic  Correlation    and    its   Modification  in 

the  bar  series  of  Drosophila  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  50,  239. 
Hesse,  R.  (1927)  :    Uber  Grenzen  des  Wachtums  ;    Jena,  G.  Fischer, 

1927. 
Hickling,  C.  F.  (1930)  :    A  Contribution  towards  the  Life-history  of 

the  Spur-dog  ;    /.  Mar.  Biol.  Ass.,  16,  529. 
Hinton,  M.  A.  C.   (1926)  :    Monograph  of  the  Voles  and  Lemmings 

(Microtinae)  ;    London,  British  Museum  (Natural  History). 
Hirsch,  G.  C.  (1931)  :  The  Theory  of  Fields  of  Restitution  with  special 

Reference  to  the  Phenomena  of  Secretion  ;    Biol.  Rev.,  6,  88. 
Hooton,  E.  A.  (1931)  :    Up  from  the  Ape.     London  :    Allen  &  Unwin. 
Hubbs,  Carl  L.  (1925)  :   The  Metamorphosis  of  the  Californian  Ribbon 

Fish,  Trachypterus  rex-salmonorum  ;  Papers  Michigan  Acad.  Sci., 

Arts  and  Letters,  5,  469-76. 
Hutt,  F.  B.  (1929)  :    Sex  Dimorphism  and  Variability  in  the  Appen- 
dicular  Skeleton   of   the   Leghorn   Fowl ;     Poultry   Science,   8, 

202-18. 
Huntsman,   A.   G.    (192 1)  :    The  Effect  of  Light  on   Growth  in  the 

Mussel :    Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  Canada,  15,  (5),  23-8. 
Huxley,    J.    S.    (1921)  :     Studies   in   Dedifferentiation.     II.    Dediffer- 

entiation  and  Resorption  in  Perophora  ;  Q.  J .  Micr.  Soc,  65,643. 


250  PROBLEMS  OF  RELATIVE  GROWTH 

Huxley,  J.  S.  (1924A)  :  The  Variation  in  the  Width  of  the  Abdomen 
in  Immature  Fiddler-crabs  considered  in  relation  to  its  relative 
Growth-rate  ;    Amer.  Nat.,  58,  468. 

(1924B)  :    Constant  Differential  Growth-ratios  and  their  Signifi- 

cance ;    Nature,   114,  895. 
(1924c):    Early  Embryonic  Differentiation;    Nature,   114,  3. 

(1926)  :    The  Annual  Increment  of  the  Antlers  of  the  Red  Deer 

(Cervus  elaphus)  ;    Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  (1926),   102 1. 

(1927A)  :  Further  Work  on  Heterogonic  Growth;  Biol.  Zentralbl., 

47,  151. 

(1927B)  :    Discontinuous  Variation  and  Heterogony  in  Forficula  ; 

Joum.  Genetics,   17,  309. 

(1927c)  :    On  the  Relation  between  Egg- weight  and  Body- weight 

in  Birds  ;    Joum.  Linn.  Soc.  (Zool.),  36,  457. 

(1927D)  :    Studies  on   Heterogonic   Growth    (IV).     The  bimodal 

cephalic  horn  of  Xylotrupes  gideon  ;    Joum.  Genetics,  17,  45. 

(193 1  a)  :   The  Relative  Size  of  Antlers  in  Deer  ;    Proc.  Zool.  Soc. 

(1931),   (819-64). 

(1931B)  :  Notes  on  Differential  Growth  ;  Amer.  Nat.,  65,  289-315. 

(1931c)  :    Relative  Growth  of  Mandibles  in  Stag-beetles  (Lucani- 

dae)  ;    Linn.  Soc.  Joum.  (Zool.),  Vol.  37  :    675-703. 

Huxley,  J.  S.  and  Callow,  F.  S.  (unpublished)  :  Note  on  the  Asym- 
metry of  male  Fiddler-crabs  (Oca  pugilator). 

Huxley,  J.  S.  and  Fulton,  J.  F.  (1924)  :  The  Influence  of  Temperature 
on  the  Action  of  Insulin  ;    Nature,  16.2.24,  234. 

Huxley,  J.  S.  and  Richards,  O.  W.  (1931)  :  Studies  in  Heterogonic 
Growth  (8).  Changes  in  proportions  in  the  abdomen  of  the 
shore-crab  Carcinus  maenas  ;  Joum.  Mar.  Biol.  Assn.,  17,  1001. 

Imms,  A.  D.  (1920)  :  On  the  Structure  and  Biology  of  Archotermopsis  ; 
Phil.   Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  B.,  209,  75. 

Jackson,  C.  M.  (1925)  :  The  Effects  of  Inanition  and  Malnutrition 
upon  Growth  and  Structure  ;    London  and  Philadelphia,  1925. 

Jucci,  C.  (1924)  :  II  polimorfismo  unisessuale  di  un  Acaro  plumicolo  ; 
Boll.  Lab.  Zool.  Gen.  Agr.  Portici.,   18,  79. 

Juhn,  M.,  Faulkner,  O.  H.,  and  Gustavsen,  R.  G.  (1931)  :  The 
Correlation  of  Rates  of  Growth  and  Hormone  Threshold  in  the 
Feathers  of  Fowls  ;    Joum.  Exper.  Zool.,  58,  69. 

Kalshoven,  L.  G.  (1930)  :  De  Biologie  van  de  Djatitermiet  Kalotermis 
teitenae.  .  .  .     (H.  Veenman  &  Zonen,  Wageningen). 

Keith,  A.  (1923)  :  The  Adaptational  Machinery  concerned  in  the 
Evolution  of  Man's  Body  ;    Nature,   18-8-1923,  Suppl. 

Kemp,  S.  (191 3)  :  Crustacea  Decapoda.  Records  of  the  Indian  Museum, 
8  (1912  to  1922),  289-310. 

(1914)  :    Records  of  the  Indian  Museum,   10,  81. 

(1915)  '■    Fauna  of  the  Chilka  Lake,  Crustacea  Decapoda,  Memoirs 

of  the  Indian  Museum,  5,  201—325. 
Keys,    Ancel   B.    (1928)  :    The   Weight-length   Relation   in   Fishes ; 

Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci.,   14,  922-5. 
Kieslinger,   A.    (1924)  :    Neotenie,   Persistenz,   Degeneration  ;    Proc. 

Konink.  Akad,   Wetens.  Amsterdam,  27,  761-71. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  251 

Klatt,  B.  (1913)  :  Ueber  den  Einfluss  der  Gesamtgrosse  auf  das 
Schadelbild,  etc.  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  36,  387-471. 

(191 9)  :  Zur  methodik  vergleichender  metrischer  Untersuchungen, 

besonders  des  Herzgewichtes  ;    Biol.  Zentralbl.,  39,  406. 
Kozelka,  A.  W.  (1930)  :  Integumental  Grafting  as  a  Means  of  Analysing 

the  Factors  determining  the  Secondary  Sexual  Characters  of 

the  Domestic  Fowl ;    Anat.  Rec,  47,  302. 
Kuhl,  W.  (1928)  :    Die  Variabilitat  der  abdominal  Korperanhange  bei 

Forficula  auricularia  ;    Zts.  Morph.  Oekol.  d.  Tiere,  12,  299. 
Kunkel,  B.  W.  and  Robertson,  J.  A.  (1928)  :    Contributions  to  the 

Study  of  Relative  Growth  of  Parts  in  Gammarus  chevreuxi  ; 

Joitrn.  Alar.  Biol.  Assn.,  15,  655. 

Lameere,  A.  (1904)  :  L'e  volution  des  ornements  sexuels  ;  Bull.  Acad. 
Belg.  (1904),  1337. 

(191 5)  :    Les  caracteres  sexuels  des  Prionides  ;  Bull.  Set.  Fr.  et 

Belg.,  49,  1915- 
Landauer,  W.  (1927)  :    Untersuchungen  iiber  Chondrodystrophie.     I. 

Allgemeine  Erscheinungen  und  Skelett  chrondrodystrophischer 

Hiihnerembryonen  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,   110,  195-278. 
■  (1929)  :     Thyrogenous  Dwarfism   {Myxcedema  infantilis)   in  the 

Domestic  Fowl;    Amer.  Journ.  Anat.,  43,  1-20. 
Lapicque,    L.    (1907)  :    Le   poids  encephalique   en   fonction   du   poids 

corporal  entre  individues  d'une  meme  espece ;    Bull.  Mem.  Soc. 

Anthrop.,  Paris  (5),  8,  313. 

(1922)  :  Le  poids  du  cerveau  et  l'intelligence.     Chap.  2  in  '  Traite 

de  Psychologie ',  ed.  Dumas,  Paris. 
Lapicque,  L.  and  Giroud,  A.   (1923)  :  Sur  le  nombre  des  fibres  ner- 

veuses  peripheriques  en  fonction  de  la  grandeur  du  corps  ;   C.R. 

Soc.  Biol.,  88,  43. 
Latimer,  Homer  B.  and  Aikman,  J.  M.  (1931)  :   The  Pre-natal  Growth 

of  the  Cat.     I.  The  growth  in  weight  of  the  head,  trunk,  fore- 
limbs,  and  hind-limbs  ;    Anat.  Rec,  48,  1-26. 
Light,  S.  F.   (1927)  :    A  new  and  more  exact  Method  of  expressing 

important  specific   Characters   of   Termites ;    Univ.    Cal.  Publ. 

Entomol.,  4,  75-88. 
Lillie,  F.  R.  and  Juhn,  M.  (1932)  :    The  Physiology  of  Development 

of  Feathers  ;    Physiol.  Zool.,  cited  from  Wistar  Inst.  Advance 

Abstract-sheet. 
Lund,  E.  J.  (1923)  :    Threshold  Densities  of  the  Electric  Current  for 

Inhibition  and  Orientation  of  Growth  in  Obelia  ;    Proc.   Soc. 

Exper.  Biol,  and  Med.,  21,  127-8. 

(1928)  :    Relation  between  Continuous  Bioelectric  Currents  and 

Cell  Respiration.  II.  (a)  A  theory  of  continuous  bio-electric 
currents  and  electric  polarity  of  cells.  II.  (b)  Theory  of  cell 
correlation;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  51,  265-90. 

Mackintosh,  N.  A.  and  Wheeler,  J.  F.  G.  (1929)  :  Southern  Blue 
and  Fin  Whales  ;    Discovery  Reports,   1 ,  257-540. 

Martin,  R.  (1928)  :  Lehrbuch  der  Anthropologic  2nd  Ed.  Jena, 
1928. 


252  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

Matthew,  W.  D.  (1926)  :  The  Evolution  of  the  Horse  ;  Quart.  Rev. 
Biol.,   1,  139. 

Mead,  C.  H.  (1930)  :  A  Quantitative  Study  in  Human  Teratology  ; 
Human  Biol.,  2,  1. 

Mjoberg,  Eric  (1925)  :  The  Mystery  of  the  so-called  '  Trilobite 
Larvae  '  definitely  solved  ;    Psyche,  32,  119-54. 

Morgan,  A.  H.  (1929)  :  The  Mating  Flight  and  the  Vestigial  Struc- 
tures of  the  Stump-legged  Mayfly,  Campsurus  segnis  Needham  ; 
Ann.  Entomol.  Soc.  Amer.,  22,  61-8. 

Morgan,  T.  H.  (1923A)  :  The  Development  of  Asymmetry  in  the 
Fiddler-crab;    Amer.  Nat.,  bl ,  269. 

(1923B)  :    Further  Evidence  on  Variation  in  the  Width  of  the 

Abdomen  in  Immature  Fiddler-crabs  ;    Amer.  Nat.,  57,  274. 

(1924)  : 

Nanagas,   J.  C.   (1925)  :    A  Comparison  of  the  Growth  of  the  Body 

Dimensions  of  Anencephalic  Human  Fetuses  with  normal  Fetal 

Growth    as    determined    by    Graphic    Analysis    and    Empirical 

Formulae  ;    Amer.  Journ.  Anat.,  35,  455. 
Needham,  J.  (1931)  :   Chemical  Embryology.     Cambridge.  Univ.  Press. 

3  vols. 
Nevalonnyi,    M.    and    Podhradsky,    J.    (1930)  :     Der   Einfluss   der 

Schilddriise  und  des  Thymus  auf  die  Skelettbildung  .  .  . ;  Vest- 

nik  Ceskoslov.  Akad.  Zemedelske.,  6,  1. 
Nomura,  E.  (1928)  :   On  the  Relation  between  Weight  and  Dimensions 

in  the  Bivalves,   Tapes  philippinarum  and  Cytherea  meretrix  ; 

Sci.  Rep.  Tohoku  Imp.   Univ.  (4th  Ser.,  Biol.),  3,  113-24. 
Nomura,  E.  and  Sasaki,  K.  (1928)  :   On  the  Relation  between  Weight 

and  Dimensions  in  the  Gastropods,  Haliotis  gigantea  var.  discus 

and  Littorina  sitchana  ;  Sci.  Rep.  Tohoku  Imp.  Univ.  (4th  Ser., 

Biol.),  3,  125. 

Olmsted,  J.  M.  D.  and  Baumberger,  J.  P.  (1923)  :  Form  and  Growth 
of  Grapsoid  Crabs  ;    /.  Morph.,  38,  279. 

Osborn,  H.  F.  (1929)  :  The  Titanopheres  of  Ancient  Wyoming,  Dakota, 
and  Nebraska  ;  U.S.  Dept.  of  the  Interior  Geol.  Survey,  Mono- 
graph No.  55. 

Palenitschko,    Z.    G.    (1927)  :     Zur   vergleichenden   Variabilitat   der 

Arten  und  Kasten  bei  den  Ameisen  ;    Zeits.  Morph.  u.  Okol., 

9,  410. 
Parkes,  A.  S.  (1929)  :  The  Internal  Secretions  of  the  Ovary.     London  : 

Longmans  Green  &  Co. 
Parrot,   C.    (1894)  :     Uber  die   Grossenverhaltnisse  des  Herzens  bei 

Vogeln  ;    Zool.  Jahrb.  (Syst.),  7. 
Parsons,  F.  G.  (1927)  :    The  Englishman  of  the  Future  ;    Rept.  Brit. 

Assoc.  Leeds,  1927,  Pres.  Address,  Section  H. 
Pearsall,  W.  H.   (1926)  :    Growth  Studies.     V.  Factors  affecting  the 

development  and  form  of  leaves  ;    Ann.  Bot.,  40,  85-103. 
■ (1927)  :    Growth  Studies.     VI.  On  the  relative  sizes  of  growing 

plant  organs;    Ann.  Bot.,  41,  549. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  253 

Pearsall,  W.  H.  and  Hanby,  A.  M.  (1925)  :    The  Variation  of  Leaf 

Form  in  Potamogeton  perfoliatus  ;    New  Phyt.,  24,  112-20. 
Pearson,   J.   (1908)  :    L.M.B.C.  Memoir  No.   16  ;    Cancer.     London : 

Williams  &  Norgate. 
Perkins,  M.   (1929)  :    Growth  Gradients  and  the  Axial  Gradients  of 

the  Animal  Body  ;    Nature,   124,  299. 
Petersen,    Chr.    (1921)  :     Das    Quotientengesetz  :     eine    biologisch- 

statistische  Untersuchung  ;    Kopenhagen,  Bianco  Lunos,  1921. 
Pezard,  A.    (191 8)  :    Le   conditionnement  physiologiques   des   carac- 

teres  sexuels  secondaires  chez  les  Oiseaux. 

(1921)  :    Numerical  Law  of  Regression  of  certain  Secondary  Sex 

Characters  ;    Journ.  Gen.  Physiol.,  3,  271. 
Przibram,  H.  (1902)  :  Intraindividuelle  Variabilitat  der  Carapax-dimen- 
r -"""Sionen  bei  brachyuren  Crustaceen  ;  Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  13,  588. 

(191 7)  :      Wachstumsmessungen    an     Sphodromantis     bioculata 

Burm.     III.  Lange  regenerierender  und  normaler  Schreitbeine  ; 
Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  43,  1. 

(1925)  :    Direkte  Temperaturabhangigkeit  der  Schwanzlange  bei 

Ratten,  Mus  (Epimys)  decumanus  Pall,  und  M.  (E.)  rattus  L.  ; 
Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,   104,  434. 

(1927)  :     Diskontinuitat  des  Wachstums  als   eine  Ursache  dis- 

kontinuierlicher  Variation   bei  Forficula  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech., 
112,  142. 

(1930)  :     Connecting    Laws    in    Animal    Morphology.     London  : 

Univ.  London  Press. 
Purdy,  C.  and  Sheard,  C.  (1931)  :    Electric  Potentials  in  the  Skin  ; 
Anat.  Rec,  51,  25. 

Raw,  Frank  (1927)  :  The  Ontogenies  of  Trilobites,  and  their  Signifi- 
cance ;    Anier.  Journ.  Sci.,  14,  1-35,  131-49. 

Ritchie,  J.  (1920)  :  The  Influence  of  Man  on  Animal  Life  in  Scot- 
land ;    Cambridge  Univ.  Press. 

Robb,  R.  Cumming  (1929)  :  On  the  Nature  of  Hereditary  Size-limita- 
tion. II.  The  growth  of  parts  in  relation  to  the  whole  ;  Brit. 
Journ.  Exper.  Biol.,  6,  311-24. 

Robbins,  W.  J..  Brody,  S.,  Hogan,  A.  G.,  Jackson,  C.  M.  and  Greene, 
W.  (1928)  :    Growth.     New  Haven  :    Yale  Univ.  Press,   1928. 

Rorig,  (1901)  :    (Deer  Antlers) ;  Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,   11,  65. 

Ruud,  Gudrun  (1929)  :  Heteronom-orthotopische  Transplantationen 
von  Extremitatenanlagen  bei  Axolotlembryonen  ;  Arch.  Entw. 
Mech.,  118,  308-51. 

Ruzicka,  V.  (1921)  :  Uber  Protoplasmahysteresis  und  eine  Methode 
zur  direkten  Bestimmung  derselben  ;    Pfl.  Arch.,  194,  135. 

Santos,  F.  V.  (1929)  :    Studies  on  Transplantation  in  Planaria  ;    Biol. 

Bull.,  57,  188-97. 
Sasaki,  K.   (1928)  :    On  the  Growth  of  Telmessus  cheiragonus  ;    Sci. 

Rep.  Tohoku  Imp.   Univ.  (4th  Ser.,  Biol.),  3,  805. 
Scammon,  R.  E.  and  Calkins,  L.  A.  (1929)  :    The  Development  and 

Growth  of  the  External  Dimensions  of  the  Human  Body  in 

the  Fetal  Period.     Univ.  Minnesota  Press  :   Minneapolis,  p.  367. 


254  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

Schmalhausen,  J.  (1927A)  :  Beitrage  zur  quantitativen  Analyse  der 
Formbildung.  I.  t)ber  die  Gesetzmassigkeiten  des  Embryon- 
alen  Wachstums  :   Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  109,  455-512. 

(1927B)  :    Beitrage  zur  quantitativen  Analyse  der  Formbildung. 

II.     Das  Problem  des  proportionalen  Wachstums  ;   Arch.  Entw. 

Mech.,  110,  33-62. 
(1930)  :    Ober  Wachstumformeln  und  Wachstumstheorien  ;  Biol. 

Zentralbl.,  50,  292-307. 
Schmalhausen,  I.  and  Stepanova,  J.  (1926)  :  Das  embryonale  Wachs- 

tum  des  Extremitattenskelettes  des  Huhnchens  ;  Arch.  Entw. 

Mech.,  108,  729. 
Schultz,  A.  H.  (1926)  :    Fetal  Growth  of  Man  and  other  Primates  ; 

Quart.  Rev.  Biol.,  1,  465. 

(1930);  The  Skeleton  of  the  Trunk  and  Limbs  of  Higher  Primates  ; 

Human  Biol.,  2,  303. 
Schwind,  J.    L.    (1931)  :    Heteroplastic    Experiments    on    the    Limb 

and  Shoulder  Girdle  of  Amblystoma  ;   Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  59, 
265. 
Severinghaus,  A.  E.  (1930)  :    Gill  Development  in  Amblystoma  punc- 

tatum  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  56,  1. 
Sexton,  E.  W.  (1924)  :  The  Moulting  and  Growth-stages  of  Gammarus, 

with  descriptions  of  the  Normals  and  Intersexes  of  G.  chevreuxi ; 

Journ.  Mar.  Biol.  Assn.,  13,  340. 
Seymour   Sewell,    R.   B.    (1929)  :     The   Copepoda   of   Indian   Seas : 

Calanoida  ;    Mem.  Indian  Mus.,   10,  1-221. 
Shaw,  M.  (1928)  :    A  Contribution  to  the  Study  of  Relative  Growth 

of  parts  in  Inachus  dorsettensis  ;  Brit.  Journ.  Exper.  Biol.,  6,  145. 
Silvester,    (1926)  :    Descrizione  di  particolori  individui,   etc.  ;    Boll. 

Lab.  Zool.  Gen.  (S-  Agr.,  19,  1. 
Sinnott,   E.  W.   (1930)  :    The  Morphogenetic  Relationships  between 

Cell  and  Organ  in  the  Petiole  of  Acer ;    Bull.  Torrey  Bot.  Club, 

57,  1-20. 
Sinnott,  E.  W.  and  Durham,  G.  B.  (1929)  :    Developmental  History 

of  the  Fruit  in  lines  of  Cucurbita  pepo  differing  in  fruit  shape  ; 

Bot.  Gazette,  87,  411-21. 
Sinnott,  E.  W.  and  Hammond,  D.  (1930)  :    Factorial  Balance  in  the 

Determination  of  Fruit  Shape  in  Cucurbita  ;  Amer.  Nat.,  64, 

509-24. 
Sjostedt,   Y.    (1925)  :     Revision  der  Termiten  Afrikas  ;    K.   Svensk. 

Vetensk.  akad.  Handl.  (3),  3,  1. 
Smirnov,   E.  and  Zhelochovtsev,  A.  N.    (1926)  :    Veranderung  der 

Merkmale  bei  Calliphora  erythrocephala  Mg.  unter  dem  Einfluss 

verkurzter  Ernahrungsperiode  der  Larve  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech., 

108,  579-95- 
Smirnov,   E.   and  Zhelochovtsev,   A.   N.    (1931)  :    Das  Gesetz  der 

Altersveranderungen  der  Blattform  bei  Tropaeolum  majus  L. 

unter  verschiedenen  Beleuchtungsbedingungen  :    Planta  Arch, 
f.  wissens.  Bot.,  15,  299-354. 
Smith,  G.  W.  (1906A)  :   Fauna  and  Flora  des  Golfes  v.  Neapel,  Vol.  29 

(Rhizocephala) . 

(1906B)  :  High  and  Low  Dimorphism  ;  Mit.  Zool.  Stat.  Neapel, 

17,  312. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  255 

Snell,  G.  D.  (1931)  :  Inheritance  in  the  House  Mouse:  the  linkage 
relations  of  short-ear,  hairless,  and  naked  ;    Genetics,  16,  42-74. 

Sporn,  E.  (1926)  :  Uber  die  Gesetzmassigkeiten  im  Bau  der  Muschel- 
gehause  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  108. 

(1926)  :     Einiges    iiber    Ideal-,    Normal-    und    Individual-formen 

der  Blatter ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,   107. 

Stockard,  C.  R.  (1931)  :  The  Physical  Basis  of  Personality.  New 
York  and  London. 

Streeter,  G.  L.  (1930)  :  Deficiencies  in  Foetal  Tissues.  .  .  .  Con- 
tributions to  Embryology,  No.  126    (Carnegie  Institution),  32. 

Sturtevant,  A.  H.  (1924)  :  An  Interpretation  of  Orthogenesis  ;  Science, 
59,  579- 

Taylor,  W.  P.  (1915)  :  Description  of  a  new  subgenus  (Arborimus) 
of  Phenacomys,  with  a  contribution  to  knowledge  of  the  habits 
and  distribution  of  Phenacomys  longicaudus  True  ;  Proc.  Cal. 
Acad.  Sci.,  4th  series,  5,  111-61. 

Tazelaar,  M.  A.  (1930)  :  The  Relative  Growth  of  parts  in  Palaemon 
carcinus  ;    Brit.  Journ.  Exper.  Biol.,  7,  165. 

Teissier,  G.  (1927)  :  La  croissance  nucleaire  en  fonction  de  la  crois- 
sance  cellulaire  au  cours  de  l'ovogenese,  chez  Hydractinia 
echinata  (Flem.)  ;    C.R.  Soc.  Biol.,  97,  1524. 

(1929)  :    Dysharmonies  chimiques  dans  la  croissance  larvaire  de 

Tenebrio  molitor  ;    C.R.  Soc.  Biol.,  100,  1171. 

-  (1931)  :     Recherches    morphologiques    et    physiologiques    sur    la 

croissance  des  insectes  ;    Trav.  Stat.  Biol.  Roscoff,  9,  29—238. 
Thiel,  M.  E.  (1926)  :  Formwachstumversuche  an  Sphaerium  corneum  ; 

Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,   108,  87-137. 
Thompson,  C.  B.  (191 7)  ;   Origin  of  the  Castes  of  the  Common  Termite, 

Leucotermis  flavipes.  Journ.  Morph.,  31,  83. 
Thompson,  D'Arcy  W.  (1917)  :   Growth  and  Form  :   Cambridge  Univ. 

Press,  p.  793. 
Thomson,  G.  M.  (1922)  :   The  Naturalization  of  Plants  and  Animals  in 

New  Zealand  :    Cambridge  Univ.  Press. 
Todd,   T.   Wing  ate   (1926)  :     Skeletal  Adjustment  in   Jaw  Growth  ; 

Dental  Cosmos,  Dec,  1926,  p.  17. 
Tucker,   B.  W.   (1930)  :    On  the  Effects  of  an  Epicaridan  parasite, 

Gyge  branchialis,  on  Upogebia  littoralis  ;    Quart.  Journ.  Micros. 

Sci.,  74,  1-118. 
Twitty,   V.   C.    (1930)  :    Regulation  in  the  Growth  of  Transplanted 

Eyes  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  55,  43. 
Twitty,  V.  C.  and  Schwind,  J.  L.  (1931)  :    The  Growth  of  Eyes  and 

Limbs   transplanted   heteroplastically   between   two   species  of 

Amblystoma  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  59,  61-86. 

Ubisch,  L.  v.  (191 5)  :  Uber  den  Einfluss  von  Gleichgewichtsstorung 
auf  die  Regenerationsgeschwindigkeit  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  41, 

237-50. 
Ubisch,  L.  von  (1922)  :   Uber  die  Aktivierung  regenerativer  Potenzen  ; 
Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  51,  33-58. 

(1923)  :     Das  Differenzierungsgefalle  des  Amphibienkorpers  und 

seine  Auswirkungen  ;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  52,  624-70. 


256  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

Vandel,  A.  (1930)  :  La  production  d'intercastes  chez  la  fourmi  Pheidole 
pallidula  sous  Taction  de  parasites  du  genre  Mermis  ;  Bull.  Biol., 
64,  457-94- 

Wachs,  H.  (1914)  :  Neue  Versuche  zur  Wolff 'schen  Linsenregeneration  ; 

Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  39. 
Waddington,  C.  H.  (1929)  :    Notes  on  graphical  methods  of  recording 

the  dimensions  of  Ammonites  ;    Geol.  Mag.,  66,  180-6. 
Wallis,   R.   Sawtell   (1932)  :     Relative  Growth  of  the   Extremities 

from   Two   to   Eighteen   Years   of   Age ;     Amer.   Journ.   Phys. 

Anlhrop.    (cited    from    Wistar    Inst.    Advance    Abstract-sheet 

No.   179). 
Wardlaw,  C.  W.  (1924-1928)  :  Size  in  Relation  to  Internal  Morphology. 

1,  2  and  3  ;    Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  Edinb.,  53  (1924),  54  (1925)  and 
56  (1928). 

Watanabe,  Y.  (1931)  :  On  the  Physiological  Axial  Gradients  of 
Chaetopod  Annelids.  II.  Axial  Gradients  of  Oxidizable  Sub- 
stance in  Earthworms  as  determined  by  the  Manoilov  Reaction. 
Sci.  Repts.  Tohoku  Imp.  Univ.  4th  Series  (Biol.),  6,  437-73. 

Weiss,  P.  (1926)  :  Morphodynamik  :  ein  Einblick  in  die  Gesetze  der 
organischen  Gestaltung  an  Hand  von  experimentellen  Ergeb- 
nissen  ;    Abhandl.  theoret.  Biol.,  Heft  23  ;    pp.  43. 

Werner,  F.  (1927)  :  Wachstum  und  Formentwicklung  der  Cladocere 
macrothrix  rosea;    Arch.  Entw.  Mech.,  109,  241-52. 

Wheeler,  W.  M.  (1920)  :    Ants.     New  York  :    Columbia  Univ.  Press. 

(1928)  :    Mermis  Parasites  and  Intercastes  among  Ants  ;    Journ. 

Exper.  Zool.,  50,  165. 

Wilder,  I.  W.  (1924)  :  The  Relation  of  Growth  to  Metamorphosis 
in  Eurycea  bislineata  (Green);   Journ.  Exper.  Zool.,  40,  1-112. 

Yerkes,  R.  M.  (1901)  :  A  Study  of  Variation  in  the  Fiddler-crab 
Gelasimus  ;    Proc.  Amer.  Acad.  Arts.  Sci.,  36,  417. 

Zeleny,  C.  (1905)  :    Compensatory  Regulation  ;    Journ.  Exper.  Zool., 

2,  1. 

Zuckerman,  S.  (1926)  :  Growth-changes  in  the  Skull  of  the  Baboon, 
Papio  porcarius  ;    Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  (1926),  843. 


ADDENDA 

HERE  I  have  summarized  a  few  papers  which  I  came 
across  too  late  to  insert  in  the  body  of  the  book. 
Owing  to  an  oversight,  the  valuable  work  of  Robb 
(1929)  has  not  been  adequately  discussed  in  the  text.  It  has 
very  interesting  bearings  on  the  relation  of  heterogon  to  endo- 
crine control  (see  Chap.  VI,  §4).  He  investigated  the  growth 
of  various  organs  in  a  large  (Flemish)  and  small  (Polish) 
breed  of  rabbits,  reaching  about  6  and  3  kg.  adult  weight 
respectively,  and  in  their  Fx  hybrids. 

He  first  found  that  the  pituitary  (weight)  shows  simple 
negative  heterogony  relative  to  (clean)  body- weight,  with  the 
same  growth-coefficient  (k  =  0-55)  in  all  three  types  ;  the 
curves  all  have  the  same  point  of  origin.  Adrenal  weight 
shows  simple  positive  heterogony,  but  k  is  higher  for  the  small 
breed  (1-34  as  against  1-19  for  the  Flemish).  As  a  result  the 
relative  weight  attained  by  the  adrenal  in  the  adult  Polish 
is  just  double  what  it  is  in  the  adult  Flemish  (0-2  as  against 
o-i  per  cent)  ;  the  hybrids  show  an  intermediate  value.  The 
difference  is  due  almost  exclusively  to  an  enlargement  of  the 
cortex. 

The  growth  of  the  thyroid  falls  into  two  phases,  one  of 
negative  heterogony  (k  about  0-53)  up  to  about  600  g.  body- 
weight,  and  one  of  positive  heterogony  (k  about  1-12)  from 
then  on. 

The  testis,  like  the  adrenal,  attains  a  higher  relative  weight 
in  the  dwarf  than  in  the  giant  race  (0-3  as  against  0-12  per 
cent,  with  a  value  of  0-2  in  the  hybrids),  and  the  heterogony 
curves  against  body- weight  are,  of  course,  very  dissimilar  in 
the  two  breeds.  But  when  testis  weight  is  plotted  logarith- 
mically against  adrenal  weight,  the  two  breeds  show  almost 
identical  curves,  negatively  heterogonic  (k  =  0-74)  up  to  40 
days  of  age,  then  with  very  high  positive  heterogony  (k  =  2-3). 
Testis  weight  against  pituitary  weight,  on  the  other  hand, 
shows  k  =  1-4  up  to  40  days,  but  then  k  =  5-1  for  the  giant, 
5-8  for  the  dwarf  race.  This  appears  to  indicate  a  more 
marked  interdependence  of  testis  and  adrenal  cortex  than  of 
*7  257 


258  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

testis  and  pituitary.  The  identical  growth-coefficient  of  the 
pituitary  in  both  races  indicates  that  body-size  here  must 
primarily  depend  upon  other  factors  than  relative  pituitary  size. 

Robb  concludes  with  an  interesting  theoretical  discussion, 
which  cannot  be  summarized  here.  One  point  deserves 
mention  :  if  an  organ  has  a  certain  fraction  in  active  hetero- 
genic relation  with  the  body,  but  also  an  inert  fraction  which 
is  isogonic,  then  the  formula  for  its  growth  will  be  y  =  bx  -+-  c. 
In  some  cases  apparently  irregular  heterogony  curves  could 
be  made  to  conform  to  the  simple  heterogony  formula  by 
correcting  for  such  an  inert  fraction  ;  but  this  for  the  moment 
remains  speculative. 

Werner  (1927)  gives  an  elaborate  discussion  of  form-changes 
in  the  Cladoceran  Macrothrix  rosea.  Certain  parts  appear  to 
show  positive,  others  negative  heterogony.  But  the  growth- 
changes  are  often  complex,  and  would  appear  to  indicate  the 
existence  of  elaborate  gradient-fields  controlling  growth. 

Anderson  (193 1)  finds  that  the  simple  heterogony  formula 
applies  to  the  growth  of  various  parts  in  the  Cladoceran 
Daphnia  magna.  Interestingly  enough,  while  carapace  length 
is  positively  heterogonic  (relative  to  total  length)  until  the 
time  of  maturity,  after  which  it  becomes  isogonic  or  slightly 
negatively  heterogonic,  carapace  height  shows  positive  heter- 
ogony throughout  life,  although  its  growth-coefficient  is  lower 
after  maturity. 

Adolph  (1930)  has  an  interesting  note  on  the  interrelated 
effects  of  size  and  age  upon  metamorphosis  in  unoperated 
frog  larvae.  He  finds  that  for  a  given  brood,  (W  —  d)  (A  —  e) 
is  a  constant,  where  W  is  body- weight  at  completion  of  meta- 
morphosis, A  the  age  in  days  at  which  forelimbs  appeared, 
and  d  and  e  are  constants.  Thus  no  increase  of  size  would 
permit  metamorphosis  to  occur  before  e  days,  but  meta- 
morphosis would  never  occur  if  the  animal  never  attained  to 
body-weight  d.  We  may  conclude  that  the  growth  of  the 
thyroid  (or  of  the  thyroid-controlling  agency  of  the  pituitary) 
normally  shows  a  heterogonic  relation  to  absolute  size  ;  but 
that  time  also,  within  limits,  promotes  its  growth  (see  p.  39,  n.). 

Further  evidence  of  change  of  proportions  with  change  of 
size  in  termites  (see  p.  65)  is  afforded  by  the  work  of  Light 
(1927).  In  this  paper  he  confined  himself  to  the  soldier  caste 
of  Coprotermes.  Thirteen  species  of  different  absolute  size 
were  measured.  There  was  no  correlation  between  absolute 
size  and  certain  characters  such  as  the  length-width  ratio  of 
the  head.     But  there  was  for  other  characters,  e.g.  the  ratio 


ADDENDA  259 

of  minimum  to  maximum  breadth  of  head  and  of  gula.  The 
minimum  head-breadth  is  anterior;  the  maximum  gular- 
breadth  is  at  a  spot  close  to  the  maximum  head-breadth,  with 
maximum  gular-breadth  more  anterior.  Accordingly  we  find 
these  ratios  move  in  opposite  directions  with  increasing 
absolute  size,  that  for  head  increasing  steadily  from  below 
o-6  to  over  0-65,  that  for  gula  decreasing  steadily  from  over 
07  almost  to  0-5.  This  means  that  with  increased  absolute 
size,  the  lateral  growth  of  the  head  (and  its  parts)  is  relatively 
greater  anteriorly  than  in  the  region  of  maximum  width. 
And  this,  we  may  presume,  is  correlated  with  a  relative 
increase  of  jaw-size,  though  Light  gives  no  data  on  this  point. 

With  reference  to  the  conclusions  of  Hecht  (p.  38),  the 
work  of  Keys  (1928)  also  indicates  that  Hecht's  assumption 
of  form-constancy  in  teleost  fish  is  not  strictly  true.  He  finds 
that  in  herrings,  sardines,  and  Fundulus  the  weight  increases 
faster  than  the  cube  of  the  length,  which  implies  form-change. 
Somewhat  similar  results  have  been  obtained  by  Hickling 
(1930)  for  the  dogfish  Acanthias  vulgaris.1 

In  connexion  with  the  law  of  antero-posterior  development, 
and  the  graded  changes  it  may  induce  (see  p.  132),  the  follow- 
ing point,  which  has  been  brought  to  my  notice  by  Professor 
R.  J.  S.  McDowall,  is  of  interest.  Bray  (1931)  finds  that  the 
incidence  of  eczema  on  different  regions  of  the  body  varies 
with  age.  The  incidence  for  head  and  neck  declines  with 
age,  that  for  extremities  increases  with  age,  while  that  for 
the  trunk  remains  approximately  constant.  There  is  reason 
to  believe  that  the  incidence  of  ringworm  behaves  in  a  some- 
what similar  way. 

Gajewski  (1922)  discusses  the  effect  of  salinity  upon  Artemia 
salina,  whose  form-changes  continue  long  after  sexual  maturity. 
Increasing  salinity  diminishes  final  absolute  size,  and  also 
changes  bodily  proportions,  as  seen  in  the  following  table  (for 
females  :  males  are  similar). 

Salinity  (Baumez).  .         40  f  120  180        2 2°  Be 

Body-length,  mm..  .      15-56  I3'°5  IO'65         9-62  7-8 

Post-abdomen 

— — ; ratio         .        o-Q2  1-02  1-20  1-30  1-42 

abdomen 

Length-breadth  ratios  : 

Of  8th  post-abdominal 

segment  .  .2-3  27  3-5  4-5  5-0 

Of  7th  ditto        .  .        1-3  1-35  1-4  1-5  i-6 

Of  gill-sacs  of  6th  foot .        2-0  1-9  i-8  1-7 


1  The  same  is  indicated  for  the  Bittering,  Paracheilognathus,  by  the 
data  of  Shaw  (1931),   Bull.   Fan.  Memor.   Inst.  Biol.,  2,  245. 


17* 


260  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 

The  furca  diminishes  disproportionately  with  increasing 
salinity.  It  would  be  of  great  interest  to  investigate  the 
growth-coefficients  of  various  parts  accurately  in  different 
salinities.     This  is  an  important  addition  to  Chap.  VI,  §  7. 

Murr  (1929)  x  gives  particulars  concerning  the  relation 
between  retinal  cells  and  the  body  as  a  whole  in  various 
mammals,  both  as  regards  relative  size,  and  relative  develop- 
mental rate.  The  results  are  interesting  both  as  regards 
individual  ontogeny  and  comparative  physiology. 

Unpublished  work  which  E.  B.  Ford  kindly  allows  me  to 
quote,  on  relative  eye-size  in  males  of  the  red  no-white  mutant 
of  Gammarus  chevreuxi  at  230  C,  shows  that  after  a  head- 
length  of  a  little  over  0-5  mm.  has  been  attained,  up  to  the 
maximum  size  (head-length  1-64  mm.)  there  is  simple  negative 
heterogony  both  of  eye-length  (dorso-ventral)  and  eye-breadth 
(antero-posterior)  against  head-length  (antero-posterior),  the 
growth-coefficients  (k)  being  0-89  and  071  respectively. 
Immediately  after  extrusion,  however  (head-length  0-25  —  0-3 
mm.),  both  dimensions  show  positive  heterogony  (k  nearly 
2 -5  for  eye-length  and  over  1-5  for  eye-breadth),  subsequently 
diminishing  regularly  to  reach  their  definitive  values.  As 
consequence  eye-breadth  relative  to  eye-length  shows  a  steady 
negative  heterogony  with  k  a  little  below  o-8  during  the 
'  definite  '  period  and  for  a  little  before  it,  with  a  still  lower 
k  value  (o-6  to  0-65)  for  the  earliest  stages.  The  early  phase 
of  positive  eye-heterogony  would  seem  to  be  due  to  the  late 
development  of  the  organ,  which  is  not  fully  differentiated 
at  the  time  of  extrusion.     (See  Chap.  IV,  §  7.) 

With  reference  to  the  correlation  between  growth-rate 
and  sensitivity  to  female  hormone  in  fowl  feathers  (p.  101), 
Lillie  and  Juhn  (1931)  find  that  this  holds  also  in  different 
parts  of  the  single  feather.  This  growth-gradient  has  im- 
portant consequences  for  the  development  of  certain  feather- 
patterns. 

With  reference  to  bio-electric  phenomena  (p.  174),  Purdy 
and  Sheard  (1931)  find  in  human  beings  that  there  is  a  definite 
association  of  '  low  metabolism  with  large  differences  of 
electrical  potential  as  measured  at  the  extremities  of  the 
body  '  and  vice  versa. 

J.  W.  Buchanan  (1930,  J.  Exper.  Zool.,  57,  307  and  455) 
establishes    the    existence    of    an    antero-posterior    osmotic 

1  Murr,  E.  (1929),  Zur  Entwicklungsphysiologie  des  Auges,  II, 
Biol.  Zentralbl.,  49,  346. 


ADDENDA  261 

gradient  concerned  with  water-appropriation,  analyses  its 
action,  and  discusses  it  in  relation  to  other  '  axial  gradients  ' 
of  Planarians  (see  pp.  171-2'). 

Olmsted  and  Baumberger  (1923)  state  that  in  the  crabs 
Hemigrapsus  oregenensis,  H.  nudus,  and  Pachygrapsus  cras- 
sipes,  carapace  length  increases  in  a  linear  relation  with 
carapace  width.  Unfortunately  they  do  not  give  their  actual 
measurements,  and  their  graphs,  in  which  individual  points 
are  plotted,  might  equally  well  indicate  slight  heterogony. 
This  is  especially  so  with  P.  crassipes,  where  length  seems  to 
show  slight  positive  heterogony  relative  to  width.  In  H. 
nudus  the  points  are  too  few  for  any  conclusion,  and  in  H. 
oregonensis  the  relation  appears  to  show  if  anything  a  slight 
negative  heterogony.  There  must  be  marked  heterogony  of 
the  male  chela,  especially  in  H.  oregonensis,  where  large  males 
have  chelae  up  to  30  per  cent  of  total  weight,  while  the  value 
for  large  females  is  never  over  7  per  cent.  In  Carcinus  maenas, 
Huxley  and  Richards  (1931)  find  a  slight  heterogony  of  carapace 
length. 

Mr.  G.  H.  Locket  kindly  allows  me  to  cite  his  results  (unpub- 
lished) on  the  chelicerae  of  the  spider  Theridion  lineatum.  The 
jaw  undergoes  heterogonic  growth  and  takes  on  its  definitive 
appearance  only  at  the  last  moult,  at  which  sexual  maturity 
is  attained  ;  prior  to  this  it  appears  to  be  almost  isogonic. 
(In  the  genus  Linyphia,  there  are  signs  of  heterogony  at  the 
penultimate  moult.)  The  jaw  (basal  joint,  paturon)  of  the 
adult  male  is  much  elongated,  whereas  that  of  the  female 
remains  more  nearly  similar  to  that  of  the  juvenile  stages. 
The  adult  jaw  has  a  prominent  tooth  on  its  inner  surface, 
and  measurements  can  be  made  of  the  lengths  proximal  and 
distal  to  this.  Sternal  area  was  taken  as  standard  body 
measurement,  and  the  square  root  of  this  was  used  as  a  stan- 
dard against  which  to  plot  linear  jaw  measurements.  There 
is  a  moderate  size-range  in  adult  females,  a  considerable  one 
in  adult  males  (probably  dependent  mainly  on  differences  in 
total  moult-number).  It  is  clear  that  in  the  formation  of 
the  male  type  (i)  jaw-breadth  and  jaw-length  are  both  posi- 
tively heterogonic,  but  length  much  more  so  than  breadth 
(k  =  about  1-9  as  against  about  1-3)  ;  (ii)  in  regard  to  length- 
growth,  the  basal  region,  proximal  to  the  tooth,  is  roughly 
isogonic,  while  the  distal  region  beyond  the  tooth  is  very 
highly  heterogonic  (k  =  27)  ;  (iii)  the  length  of  the  falx 
(distal  joint,  unguis)  is  highly  heterogonic  (k  =  2-6),  but  less 


262  PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

so  than  the  distal  region  of  the  main  jaw.  Here  we  find 
differential  growth  operative  definitely  within  a  single  segment 
of  an  appendage  (compare  pp.  81,  98). 

In  the  female,  the  figures  are  more  irregular,  but  jaw-area 
and  falx-length  clearly  show  negative  heterogony,  while  the 
distal  region  of  the  jaw  is  distinctly  positive.  Jaw-length  as 
a  whole  is  approximately  isogonic,  which  means  that  jaw- 
breadth  must  be  negatively  heterogonic. 

In  the  spider  Dolomedes  plantarius,  P.  Bonnet  (La  Mue, 
L'Autotomie  et  la  Regeneration  chez  les  Araignees,  These, 
Toulouse,  1930)  in  his  Table  25  gives  measurements  of  the 
lengths  of  legs  at  all  instars  from  2nd  to  nth  (adult)  in  two 
individuals.  From  these  the  mean  increases  per  moult  can 
be  calculated  ;  and  it  is  then  found  that  all  the  legs  are  in- 
creasing at  the  same  rate — i.e.  for  this  region  of  the  body 
there  exists  no  growth-gradient  comparable  to  that  seen  in 
hermit-crabs,  etc.  (p.  in). 

W.  Beebe  (Tropical  Wild  Life  in  British  Guiana,  1917, 
chaps.  18  and  19)  gives  some  data  as  to  the  heterogony  of 
the  claws  of  the  Jacana.  That  of  the  hind  toe  is  greatest. 
In  the  embryo  the  claws  are  not  dissimilar  to  those  of  other 
birds  and  the  hind  claw-length  is  about  ^  of  the  toe-length  ; 
in  half-grown  chicks  it  is  \,  in  adults  about  f. 

The  other  claws  grow  more  slowly,  reaching  about  §  of  the 
length  of  the  hind-claw  ;  their  relative  breadth-growth  is  greater 
than  that  of  the  hind-claw.  The  heterogony  of  the  claws  begins 
only  in  the  late  embryo  ;  that  of  the  toes  begins  much  earlier. 

He  also  refers  to  the  bill  of  the  aberrant  cuckoo-like  Ani, 
which  is  swollen  in  the  adult.  It,  however  does  not  begin 
its  positive  heterogony  until  after  the  young  bird  has  left  the 
nest.  At  hatching,  it  is  typically  cuckoo-like,  though  some- 
what swollen.  It  would  be  interesting  to  obtain  accurate 
measurements  on  these  structures.  The  case  of  the  Jacana  is 
interesting,  since  the  great  length  of  toes  and  claws  is  quite  defin- 
itely adaptive,  allowing  the  bird  to  walk  over  floating  leaves. 

G.  Duncker  (1903 ;  Biometrika,  2,  307)  attacks  the  problems 
of  growth-correlation  and  asymmetry  in  male  fiddler-crabs 
(see  pp.  80  and  121)  by  means  of  standard  biometrical 
methods.  These,  however,  failed  to  give  any  very  important 
biological  information,  e.g.  as  to  growth-centres  or  growth- 
gradients,  or  at  least  nothing  so  clear-cut  as  is  to  be  obtained 
by  the  simple  methods  of  taking  means  for  a  number  of  size- 
classes.     The  growth-gradient  in  the  large  chela  is  indicated 


ADDENDA  263 

by  the  fact  that  the  correlation  between  right  and  left  side 
diminishes  distally  along  the  appendage.  The  correlations 
for  lengths  of  merus,  carpus  and  propus  are,  for  right-handed 
males,  0754,  0-698  and  0-473  ;  for  left-handed  males,  0-789, 
0-699,  °'549-  He  suggests  that  the  chela  asymmetry  may  be 
responsible  for  the  asymmetry  of  other  parts. 

Marples  (Proc.  Zool.  Soc,  1931,  p.  997)  has  given  some 
interesting  facts  as  to  the  percentage  changes  of  different 
parts  of  birds'  wings  during  development.  For  calculating 
growth-coefficients,  he  has  kindly  put  at  my  disposal  his 
original  data  on  the  Common  Tern  (the  species  on  which 
the  most  numerous  measurements  were  taken).  For  a  proper 
analysis,  considerably  more  measurements  are  needed,  includ- 
ing measurements  of  some  standard  part  of  the  body  ;  but 
provisionally  we  can  see  that  there  are  three  distinct  phases 
of  growth,  during  each  of  which  the  relative  growth-rates  of 
different  parts  of  the  wing  remain  approximately  constant. 
The  first  phase  ends  at  hatching  ;  the  second,  juvenile  phase 
goes  from  hatching  (wing-length  below  40  mm.)  to  wing- 
length  about  100  mm.  ;  the  third  up  to  the  largest  adults 
(wing-length  over  180  mm.). 

The  growth-coefficients  (approximate  only)  of  the  lengths 
of  ulna  and  radius,  relative  to  humerus  length,  are  as  follows  : 

Phase.  r  23 

Ulna        .  .  .  .  .1-05  about  o-8        1-6 

Radius    .  .  .  .  .1-2  ,,       o-8        1-45 

The  growth-gradient  appears  to  centre  in  the  radius  in  the 
1st  phase  (though  this  may  be  due  in  part  to  the  late  differ- 
entiation of  this  terminal  region)  ;  to  be  reversed,  centering 
in  the  upper  arm,  in  the  2nd  phase  ;  and  again  to  change  its 
form,  centering  in  the  fore-arm,  in  the  final  phase  (cf.  p.  34). 

I  have  not  discussed  the  enormous  body  of  data  given  in 
Donaldson  s  The  Rat  (1924),  since  all  the  comprehensive  tables 
there  set  forth  do  not  give  the  actual  values  for  the  various 
organs,  but  calculated  values.  These  values  have  been 
calculated  in  accordance  with  empirical  formulae  devised  by 
Hatai  to  fit  smooth  curves  to  the  data. 
These  formulae  are  of  the  following  types  : 

y  =  a  log  x  +  b 

y  =  a  (log  x  -f-  c)  -f-  b 

y  =  ax  +  b  log  x  +  c 

y  =  ax  -f  b  (log  %  -f-  c)  -\-  d 

y  =  (ax  -f-  b)  -f-  b  (log  x  4-  c)  +  d 

y  =  axb 


264  PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 

where  y  =  organ-size,  %  =  body-size,  and  a,  b,  c,  d  are  con- 
stants. Most  of  these  have  no  assignable  biological  signi- 
ficance. 

If  the  measurements  contained  in  the  original  papers  were 
re-analysed,  it  is  probable  that  a  number  of  cases  of  simple 
heterogony  would  be  revealed.  I  have  done  this  for  one  or 
two  organs.  E.g.  testis  weight  (S.  Hatai,  1913,  Am.  J.  Anat., 
15,  8y),  after  an  early  period  of  rather  slow  growth,  where 
more  data  are  needed,  shows  a  good  approximation  to  simple 
heterogony  between  body- weights  25  g.  and  95  g.,  with  growth- 
coefficient  about  1-65.  After  this,  it  enters  on  a  phase  of 
negative  heterogony,  with  k  only  about  0-4  to  0-45.  The 
ovary  shows  a  very  similar  set  of  three  phases,  but  the  points 
are  more  irregular. 

The  hypophysis  shows  an  interesting  sex-difference.  From 
body-weights  of  60  g.  on,  k  for  the  male  hypophysis  is  positive 
(k  about  1-3),  whereas  for  the  female  it  is  negative  (k  rather 
below  o-8).  Below  this  size,  the  points  are  rather  irregular, 
but  those  for  both  sexes  appear  to  fall  on  a  prolongation  of 
the  curve  for  large  females. 

For  heart -weight  (males)  k  is  close  to  o-8  from  body- weight 
140  g.  on.  Before  that,  the  points  are  more  scattered,  but 
could  be  considered  as  fitting  the  same  curve,  though  appar- 
ently with  a  temporary  acceleration  of  relative  growth  from 
body- weight  60  to  120  g.,  later  compensated  for. 

The  kidneys  (males)  begin  by  being  somewhat  negatively 
heterogonic  (k  about  075),  and  then,  after  an  irregular  period, 
show  definite  positive  heterogony  from  body- weight  180  g.  on, 
with  k  close  to  i-i.  Lung- weight  (males)  is  more  irregular, 
but  roughly  approximates  to  a  negative  heterogony  of  growth- 
coefficient  about  o-8  throughout.  For  further  analyses  along 
these  lines  the  data  should  be  re-grouped  into  larger  size- 
classes. 

T.  C.  Byerley  (1932,  J.  Exp.  Biol.,  9,  15)  has  recently  shown 
that  in  chick  embryos  allantois  weight  shows  negative  hetero- 
gony relative  to  egg- weight,  being  roughly  proportional  to  the 
two-thirds  power  of  egg- weight.  It  may  be  recalled  that  egg- 
weight,  at  least  in  large  birds,  is  itself  roughly  proportional 
to  the  two-thirds  power  of  body- weight  (p.  226). 

He  further  points  out  an  important  connexion  between  rela- 
tive and  absolute  growth.  In  fowls,  gut-weight  shows  negative 
heterogony  (H.  B.  Latimer,  1924,  /.  Agr.  Res.,  29,  363). 
Byerley  finds  a  linear  relation  between  feed-consumption  and 


ADDENDA  265 

gut- weight  (up  to  sexual  maturity),  Accordingly  there  will 
be  a  steady  decline  in  the  amount  of  food  ingested  per  unit 
of  body-weight  ;  and  this  may  be  presumed  to  be  responsible 
for  the  steady  decline  in  percentage  absolute  growth-rate 
during  this  period. 


INDEX    OF   AUTHORS 


Abe,  Y.,  201  n. 

Abeloos,  M.,  4,  21,  53,  138,  172,  174, 

179 
Adolph,  E.  F.,  39,  258 
Aikman,  J.  M.,  133 
Allen,  B.  M.,  181-2 
Allen,  J.  A.,  41  n. 
Alpatov,  W.  W.,  65 
Alverdes,  F.,  173 
Anderson,  B.  G.,  258 
Appleton,  A.  B.,  39  n. 
Arrow,  Dr.,  214 
Atkins,  D.,  94 

Baer,  K.  von,  237,  239 

Baillie-Grohman,  W.  A.,  45 

Balfour-Browne,  F.,  17 

Banks,  E.,  15,  23,  62 

Bateson,  W.,  117 

Bateson,  W.,  and  Brindley,  H.  H.,  59, 

72.  76 
Baumberger,  J.  P.,  261 
Bean,  R.  B.,  203 
Becher,  A.,  14,  18 
Beebe,  W.,  235,  262 
Beer,  G.  R.  de,  237,  239 
Belehradek,  J.,  and  Huxley,  J.  S.,  229 
Benazzi,  M.,  85 
Benoit,  J.,  177 
Berkson,  J.,  203 
Berrill,  N.  J.,  172 
Bertalanffy,  L.,  119,  171 
Blyth,   J.   S.  S.,  Dodds,  E.  C,  and 

Gallimore,  E.  J.,  178 
Boas,  F.,  221 
Bolk,  L.,  239 
Bonnet,  P.,  262 
Boveri,  Th.,  112,  171 
Bower,  F.  O.,  223-4 
Bray,  G.,  250 

Brindley,  H.  H.,  59,  72,  76 
Buchanan,  J.  W.,  172,  260 
Bush,  S.  F.,  17,  61,  62,  87,  91,  in,  138 
Bush,  S.  F.,  and  Huxley,  J.  S.,  91,  11 1 

Callow,  F.  S.,  85,  121 

Caiman,  W.  T.,  117,  137 

Champy,  C,  1,  42,  55,  57,  115  ;;.,  179, 

180,  182,  188,  205  n.,  213-14,  216, 

219  n. 


Child,  C.  M.,  112,  129,  170-6,  179 

Choi,  M.  H.,  197 

Clausen,  H.  J.,  173 

Coghill,  G.  E.,  203 

Collip,  J.  B.,  178 

Cott,  H.  B.,  17,  87 

Crew,  F.  A.  E.,  200 

Cushing,  H.,  188 

Davenport,  C.  B.,  203  n.,  232 
Davenport,     C.     B.,     and     Swingle, 

W.  W.,  131 
Dean,  I.,  82,  85,  90 
Diakonov,  D.  M.,  72,  74 
Dombrowski,  E.  von,  42,  45, 
Domm,  L.  V.,  and  Juhn,  M.,  227 
Donaldson,  H.  M.,  1,  16,  263 
Dubois,  E.,  17,  138,  215,  224-5 
Dudich,  E.,  59,  60,  76,  208-10 
Durham,  G.  B.,  234 
Duncker,  G.,  262 

Edmonds,  E.,  65 

Edwards,  A.  S.,  113 

Edwards,  A.  S.,  and  Huxley,  j.  S., 

113 

Eigenbrodt,  H.  J.,  63 

Emerson,  A.  E.,  65  «.,  67 
Emery,  C,  63 
Entz,  G.,  200 

Faulkner,  O.  H.,  100-2 

Faure-Fremiet,  E.,  117 

Ford,  E.,  116,  117 

Ford,  E.  B.,  147,  229,  260 

Ford,  E.   B.,  and  Huxley,   J.   S.,   4, 

229-231,  238-9,  242 
Fulton,  J.  F.,  214 

Gabritchevsky,  E.,  125 

Gajewski,  N.,  200,  259 

Gause,  C.  F.,  63 

Giesbrecht,  W.,  118 

Goldschmidt,  R.,  4,  119,  229,  234 

Gray,  J.,  n 

Griffin,  A.,  208,  210 

Grohman,  W.  A.  Baillie-,  45 

Gustavsen,  R.  G.,  100-2 

Guyenot,  E.,  117 

Guyenot,  E.,  and  Ponsc,  K.,  171,  175 


267 


268 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE  GROWTH 


Haeckel,  E.,  237,  239 

Haldane,  J.  B.  S.,  81 

Hammett,  F.  S.,  183-8 

Hammond,  D.(  234 

Hammond,  J.,  17,  88-90,  138,  201-2, 

222 
Hanby,  A.  M.,  202 
Hardesty,  M.,  178 
Hare,  F.,  66,  67 
Harris,  H.  A.,  203 
Harrison,  R.  G.,  7  n.,  191-6 
Hasebrock,  K.,  224 
Haseman,  J.  D.,  168  n. 
Hatai,  S.,  16,  263-4 
Heath,  A.,  65,  67 
Hecht,  S.,  38,  100,  259 
Henderson,  J.  R.,  and  Mathai,  G.,  17, 

85 
Herms,  W.  B.,  63 
Herrick,  F.  G.,  118 
Hersh,  A.  H.,  15,  21,  234 
Hesse,  R.,  222 
Hickling,  C.  F.,  259 
Hinton,  M.  A.  C.,  40 
Hirsch,  G.  C,  171 
Hooton,  E.  A.,  220-1 
Huntsman,  A.  G.,  200 
Hutt,  F.  B.,  182 
Huxley,  J.  S.,  4,  8,  9,  14,  17,  18,  20, 

34,  42,  45,  59,  61,  62,  72,  76,  82,  83, 

87,  88,  96,  113,  116,  119,  123,  150, 

166,  197,  205-8,  210,  218,  225,  229- 

31,  238-9,  242. 
Huxley,  J.  S.,  and  Callow,  F.  S.,  85, 

121 
Huxley,  J.  S.,  and  Fulton,  J.  F.,  214 
Huxley,  J.  S.,and  Richards, O.  W.,  20, 

261 

Imms,  A.  D.,  67 

Jackson,  C.  M.,  16,  39  n.,  197,  201 
John,  67 
Jucci,  C,  78 
Juhn,  M.,  227,  260 

Juhn,  M.,  Faulkner,  O.  H.,  and  Gus- 
tavsen,  R.  G.,  100-2 

Kalshoven,  L.  G.,  66 
Kearney,  38  n. 
Keith,  A.,  130,  188 
Kemp,  S.,  17,  33,  82,  85,  90 
Keys,  A.  B.,  38,  259 
Kieslinger,  A.,  239 
Klatt,  B.,  17,  208,  215,  224 
Kozelka,  A.  W.,  178 
Krizenecki,  J.,  174 
Kuhl,  W.,  72  n. 


Kunkel,  B.  W.,  and  Robertson,  J.  A., 
34,  40,  138 

Lameere,  A.,  213,  214 
Landauer,  W.,  131  n. 
Lapicque,  L.,  17,  138,  215,  225 
Lapicque,  L.,  and  Giroud,  A.,  17 
Latimer,  H.  B.,  and  Aikman,  J.  M., 

133 
Lebour,  M.,  159 
Levy,  H.,  6,  157 
Light,  S.  F.,  258 
Lillie,  F.  R.,  and  Juhn,  M.,  260 
Lipschiitz.,  A.,  177 
Locket,  G.  H.,  261 
Lund,  E.  J.,  174 

McDowall,  R.  J.  S.,  259 
Mackintosh,    N.    A.,    and    Wheeler, 

J.  F.  G.,  16,  135-7 
Marples,  B.  J.,  263 
Martin,  R.,  1 
Mathai,  G.,  17,  85 
Matthew,  W.  D.,  no 
Mead,  C.  H.,  129 
Miller,  W.  F.  C,  102 
Mjoberg,  E.,  237 
Morgan,  A.  H.,  237 
Morgan,  T.  H.,  32,  167 
Murr,  E.,  224,  260 

Nahagas,  J.  C,  128 

Needham,  J.,  119,  171 

Nevalonnyi,  M.,  and  Podhradsky,  J., 

187 
Nomura,  E.,  15 

Olmsted,  J.  M.  D.,  and  Baumberger, 

J.  P.,  261 
Osborn,  H.  F.,  218 

Parkes,  A.  S.,  179 

Parrot,  C,  225 

Parsons,  F.  G.,  219-20 

Pearsall,  W.  H.,  14,  16,  21 

Pearsall,  W.  H.,  and  Hanby,  A.  M., 

202 
Pearson,  J.,  93 
Perkins,  M.,  169,  197-9 
Petersen,  Chr.,  161  n. 
Pezard,  A.,  8,  177-8 
Podhradsky,  J.,  187 
Ponse,  K.,  171,  175 
Przibram,  H.,  1,  7  ».,  17,  40,  51  n.,  53, 

68,  72,  96,   125-7,    !35.    165,   174, 

175  n.,  189-191,  200,  203 
Purdy,  C,  and  Sheard,  C,  174,  260 


INDEX  OF  AUTHORS 


269 


Ratcliffe,  F.  N.,  169 

Raw,  F.,  134 

Richards,  O.  W.,  20,  261 

Ritchie,  J.,  205-7 

Robb,  R.  C,  49  n.,  176  n.,  227,  257 

Robbins,  W.  J.,  Brody,  S.,  et.  al.,  38  n. 

Robertson,  J.  A.,  34,  40,  138 

Rorig,  42 

Ruud,  G.,  135 

Ruzicka,  V.,  7 

Santos,  F.  V.,  172 

Sasaki,  K.,  14,  15,  93 

Scammon,  R.  E.,  132-3,  136-7.  241 

Scammon,  R.  E.,  and  Calkins,  L.  A., 

132 
Schmalhausen,  I.,  7,  139-47 
Schmalhausen,  I.,  and  Stepanova,  J., 

118 
Schultz,  A.  H.,  137,  234 
Schwind,   J.   L.,   49M.,    191.    i94M-> 

195  n. 
Seymour  Sewell,  R.  B.,  85-6,  123,  133 
Sexton,  E.  W.,  40 

Shaw,  M.  E.,  14,  34,  35,  55  »■.  68,  123 
Shaw,  T.  H.,  259  n. 
Sheard,  C,  174,  260 
Silvester,  66  n. 
Sinnott,  E.  W.,  174 
Sinnott,  E.  W.,  and  Durham,  G.  B., 

234  _ 

Sinnott,  E.  W.,  and  Hammond,  D. 

Sjostedt,  Y.,  66 

Smirnov,     E.,     and     Zhelochovstev, 

A.  N.,  63,  65,  163,  176  n. 
Smith,  G.  W.,  34,  35,  53-5,  70,  199, 

213 
Snell,  G.  D.,  234 
Spemann,  H.,  172 
Sporn,  E.,  163 
Stepanova,  J.,  118 
Stockard,  C.  R.,  129-31,  172 
Sturtevant,  A.  H.,  218 


Sumner,  F.  B.,  40 
Suster,  I.,  175  ». 
Swingle,  W.  W.,  131 

Taylor,  W.  P.,  15,  22 
Tazelaar,  M.  A.,  14,  34,  91,  121 
Teissier,  G.,  16,  17,  21,  25,  58,  61  n., 

231 
Thiel,  M.  E.(  199,  203 
Thompson,  C.  B.,  67 
Thompson,  D'Arcy  W.,  1,  3,  79,  87, 

104-10,    150-4,    157-61,    I7X»   222, 

244 
Thomson,  G.  M.,  207 
Todd,  T.  W.,  95 
Tucker,  B.  W.,  14,  98,  99 
Twitty,  V.  C,  51,  197 
Twitty,  V.  C,  and   Schwind,  J.  L., 

49  n.,  191,  194  n. 

Ubisch,  L.  von,   112,   126,    135,   171, 
173 

Vandel,  A.,  66  n.,  199  n. 

Wachs,  H.,  51 
Waddington,  C.  H.,  158  n. 
Wallis,  R.  S.,233 
Wardlaw,  C.  W.,  223 
Watanabe,  Y.,  174 
Weiss,  P.,  112,  171 
Werner,  F.,  176  n.,  258 
Wheeler,  S.  F.  G.,  16,  135-7 
Wheeler,  W.  M.(  61,  66  n.,  199  n. 
Wilder,  I.  W.,  17,  203 

Yerkes,  R.  M.,  121 

Zeleny,  C,  166,  189,  190 
Zhelochovstev,   A.   N.,   63,   65,    163, 

176  n. 
Zuckerman,  S.,  14,  18,  19 


SUBJECT    INDEX 


{Figures  in  italics  refer  to  pages  with  illustrations  of  the  subject  cited.) 


abdomen,  crustacean,  14,  75,  16,  17, 
20,  34,  35,  68,  69,  86m.,  g3,  94, 

95.  239 
achondroplasia,  131 
adaptation,  214,  219 
adrenal,  257-8 
adult  phase,  39 

age,  physiological,  175 

anencephaly,  man,  127,  130 

angle,  constant,  of  logarithmic  spiral, 

157 
antennae,  55,  in,  112,  113,  114,  115, 

175 

—  copepods,  85,  86 
antero-posterior     differentiation , 

ii8m.,  132  seq.,  139 
antlers,  deer,   17,  42  seq.,  43,  44,  46, 

4J,  48,  205,  206,  207,  210,  216, 

218-19,  227 
ash  content,  mealworm,  29 
asymmetry,   fiddler-crabs,    121,    166, 

189 

—  hermit-crabs,  112,  190 

—  in  heterochely,  96  seq.,  189-91 
auxano-differentiation,  120,  148,  232 
axial  gradients,  139,  171-6,  242 

beak,  Hornbills,  15,  23 
beard,  man,  102 
bimodality,  yi,  72  n.,  73 
bio-electric  potential,  174,  260 
body-build,  man,  232,  233 
brain,  chick,  145,  146 

—  mammals,  17,  215-16,  225 

—  rat,  164,  185 
breadth-growth,   and   depth-growth, 

96,  gy,  100,  200 

—  and  length-growth,  95,  96,  97,  96', 

100,  114,  115,  173,  200,  203,  234 

carapace,  crustacean,  23,  24,  25,  27, 

106,  loy,  203,  258,  261 
Cartesian  co-ordinates,  104,  105,  106, 

J07,  108,  iog 
castration,  177-8,  183 
chelae,  8  seq.,  14,  ly,  31,  33,  34,  38,  53, 

55.  69,  70,  80,  82,  83,  84,  85,  90, 


gi,  g2,  96,  gy,  g8,  99,  119,  121, 
166,  167-9,  216,  22y,  238,  262-3 

chelicerae,  spiders,  261 

chemo-differentiation,  119,  150,  168, 
169 

comb,  fowls,  177-8 

combustion,  heat  of,  28,  29,  30 

correlation,  vii,  221 

—  of  growth-effects,  120  seq. 
cranium,  mammals,  14,  18,  ig 
crest,  newts,  179,  180 
crusher  claw,  96,  gy,  189-9J 
cyclopia,  172 

Developmental  Direction,  law  of,  132 

seq. 
differentiation,  direction  of,  168  n. 

—  law    of    antero-posterior,    118  n., 

132  seq.,  139 
digits,  proportions  of,   130,  188,  235, 

262 
dimorphism,  68  seq. 

—  developmental,  70 

—  environmental,  71 

—  genetic,  70 
diphasic  species,  70 
dominant  region,  172,  173,  175 
dwarfs,  ateliotic,  131 

—  mongoloid,  131 


eczema,  259 

eggs,  relative  size  in  birds,  225-26 
elytron,  beetles,  25,  114 
environment,  influence  upon  relative 

growth,  197  seq. 
equilibrium-position,  36,  232 
evolution,  3,  106  seq.,  216  seq. 
eye,  Drosophila,  14,  21,  22 

—  stick-insect,  27 
eye-colour,  Drosophila,  231-2 

—  Gammarus,  228,  229,  230-2,  237- 

38 

—  man,  232 

eyes,  grafted,  51,  ig2,  ig3,  ig4,  [95, 
196,  197 

—  rat,  184,  185 


270 


SUBJECT   INDEX 


271 


fai  1  ,  mammals,  1 4 
fat-content,  mealworm,  j<» 

—  wax-moth,  30 

feathers,  growth-rates  of,  100-2,  264 
field,  morphogenetic,    117,    152,    171, 

175,  176  n.,  258 
fish,  proportions  of,  37,  38,  259 
forceps,  of  male  earwigs,  71  seq. 
form-changes,  39-41 
function,  effect  of ,  115,  119,  222,  224, 

227 

ganglia,  29 

—  asymmetrical,  in  Uca,  16S 
genetics,  4 

—  and  proportions  of  parts,  204,  207 
gigantism,  131 

gizzard,  birds,  146 
glutathione,  169 
gnathopod,  36,  38 
gradient,  osmotic,  260-1 
gradients,  axial,  139,  171-6,  242 

—  in  bio-electric  potential,  174,  260 

■ —  in  chemical  substances,  169,  iy<>, 

174 

-  in  differentiation,  174 

in  variability,  174 

—  metabolic,  171  n. 

qualitative   differences    between, 
176 
-temperature,  172 
grafting,  51,  52,   135 

178,  191-7 
growth,  absolute,  6 

—  accretionary,  149  seq. 

—  additive,  149 

-  by  cell-multiplication  and  cell  size 

increase,  184-5 

—  differential,  1 

—  equilibrium  of,  50,  55 

—  in  open  and  closed  systems,  60 

—  in  various  planes  of  space,  95-100 

—  limited,  38  n.,  39,  40 

—  linear,  132,  137,  140 

—  multiplicative,  11,  149 

—  relative,  in  embryonic  life 

—  relative,  limitation  of,  49 

—  two  phases  of,  118  seq. 

—  unlimited,  38  n.,  39,  40 
growth-centres,  83,  85,  91-5 
growth-coefficient,  8,  58,  81, 

—  corrected,  146 
growth-constants,  145 
growth-gradients,  3,  jgseq.,  105,  159, 

160,  174-6 

—  determination  of,  167  seq. 

— ■  distribution  in  body,  104  seq. 

—  form  of,  90  seq. 

—  general,  ill  seq.,  152 


^l,   167,   [73, 


139  seq. 
60 


186 


growth-gradients        in        epidermal 
structures,  100-2 

—  major  and  minor,  no,  112 

—  positive  and  negative,  87  seq. 

—  steepness  of,  83  seq.,  114,  131,  172 
growth-intensity,  3,  139 

—  local,  effect  of,  122,  123,  124,  125 
—  specific,  91  seq.,  227 

growth-partition,    3,  49,    51,    57,    50, 

165 
growth-potential,  80,  81,  97 

—  general  distribution  in  body,  104 

seq. 
growth-profile,  116 
growth-quotients,  135-41 
growth-rate,  relative,  6,  9 
growth-ratio,      lateral,      in      Mollusc 

shells,  159 

—  length-width,    in    Mollusc   shells, 

154 

—  median,  in  Mollusc  shells,  155 
growth-ratios,  constant,  4,   7,   8,    n, 

30,    38,    51.    57.    *54    seq.,    165, 

234 

examples  of,  13  seq. 

Haeckel's  Law,  237  seq. 
head,  whales,  16,  136,  137 
heart,  birds,  224-5 

—  chick,  143 

—  rat,  184,  185 

—  vertebrates,  17,  264 
heterochely,  96  seq.,  189  seq.,  igi 
heterogony,  5,  8 

—  and    secondary    sex    characters, 

188-9 

—  and  sexual  maturity,  8 

—  in  related  species,  32 

—  onset  of,  31 

—  positive  and  negative,  17,  87  seq., 

"3 

heterogony-mechanism,  and  detailed 

form-changes,  217 
heteromorphosis,  172,  175 
'  high  '  males,  55,  70-6 
histo-differentiation,  120,  232 
histolysis,  173 
hormones,  and  heterogony,  176  seq., 

257 

—  and  specificity,  177,  181,  188 

—  sensitivity  to,  101,  177,  181,  186, 

260 
horns,  beetles,  17,  55,  115  n.,  188,  213, 
217 

—  Peridinians,  200 

—  vertebrates,  150-4,  173,  188,  218- 

19 
hypertrophy,    functional,    115,    222, 
224,  227 


272 


PROBLEMS  OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


insects,  holometabolous,  55  seq.,  115, 
231 

—  neuter,  61  seq. 
insulin,  214 

interaction,    of    organs    of    different 

growth-intensities,  195,  196 
intersexuality,  36 
isogony,  8,  37 

kidney,  chick,  143,  145 

—  rat,  184,  264 

Lameere,  phenomenon  of,  2x3-14 
leaves,  plants,  14,  16,  176  n.,  202 
lens,  chick,  144 

—  interaction  with  growth  of  optic 

cup,  195,  J96 
light,  effect  on  growth,  200 
limb-buds,  Urodele,  135,  192 
limbs,  Amphibian,  and  thyroid,   179 

seq.,  188 

—  chick,  142,  143,  144,  146 

—  Crustacea,  137 

—  fowls,  183,  187 

—  insects,  17,  25,  55,  56,  113,  114, 

126,  127,  128 

—  man,  138 

—  sheep,  17,  88  seq. 

—  spiders,  262 

'  low  '  males,  55,  70-6 

mandibles,  beetles,  17,  25,  55,  58,  59, 

113,  114,  209-12 
mane,  horse,  102 
mass-factor,  146 

mathematics,  and  biology,  2,  244 
maxilliped,  and  chela-growth,  123 
metabolic  gradients,  171 
metamorphosis,  120,  179-82 
morphogenetic  field,    117,    153,    171, 

175,  176  n.,  258 
moulting,  and  dimorphism,  68  seq. 
moults,  additional,  73  seq. 
multimodality,  73,  78 
mutation,  and  growth-gradients,  222, 

234 

—  and  growth-ratios,  234 
myxoedema,  131  n. 

neoteny,  67,  237-40 

nerve-fibres,  mammals,  17 

nervous  system,  and  asymmetry  of 

Uca,  168,  169 
neurons,  mammalian,  17 
New   Zealand,   introduction   of   Red 

Deer,  207 
nipper  claw,  96,  97,  189-91 
nitrogen  content,  mealworm,  26,  29 
nucleus,  neuron,  27 


nucleus,  oocyte,  17,  21 
nutrition,  and  Forficula  forceps,  74, 
75 

—  and  relative  growth,   193-4,  T97. 

198,  199,  201,  202 

ommatidia,  crustacean,  24 

—  insect,  27 

oocyte,  Hydractinia,  17,  21 

operculum,  of  Hydroides,  189 

optic  cup,  interaction  with  growth  of 

lens,  195,  196 
organizer,  in  development,  172 
orthogenesis,  218-19 
oxygen  consumption,  29 
ovary,  264 

paedomorphosis,  239-40 

parasites,  effect  on  host's  growth,  38, 

66  m.,  99,  197-9 
partition-coefficient,  3,  49,  227 
pelvis,  avian,  evolution  of,  106,  108 
pereiopods,  and  chela-growth,  121  seq. 

—  crabs,  17,  137 
periodicity,  of  growth,  203 
peristalsis,  173 
phosphorus-content,   mealworm,    28, 

29 

—  wax-moth,  30 
physiology,  comparative,  3 
pituitary,   178,    186,  187,   188,  227, 

257-8,  264 
placenta-extract,  178 
polarity,  119 
position,  spatial  and  morphological, 

116 
precocial  young,  87,  90 
proportions  of  parts,  change  of,  38-41, 

88,  106,  182-8,  200,  201-2,  216- 

23,  224-9,  257,  259 
pupa,  insect,  60 

rate-genes,  4,  228,  229,  230-40 
recapitulation,  4,  234-40 
regeneration,  and  growth,  50,  51  n., 
53,  85,  100-2,  125-8,  165-7 

—  and  morphogenetic  fields,  152 

—  rate  of,  166,  190 
regeneration-gradient,  85,  173 
regression,  of  antlers,  44 

—  of  fowl's  comb,  1 78 

—  of  newt's  crest,  179,  180 

—  of  starved  Planarians,  175,  179 
regulation,  of  size,  52,  191-7,  228-9 
retinal  cells,  260 

rhythms,  of  growth,  203 

ringworm,  259 

root,  plants,  13,  14,  21 


SUBJECT   INDEX 


273 


salinity,  effect  upon  Artemia,  259 

Sardinia,  dwarf  deer,  208 
selection,  and  environment,  202 

—  and  growth-gradients,  88,  222,  223 
sensitivity  to  hormones,  and  growth- 
rate,  10 1,  184-6,  260 

sex-hormones,  177-9,  182,  188 
shells,  145  seq. 

—  bivalve,  162 

—  conical,  155 

—  foraminiferan,  163 

—  logarithmic-spiral,  155  seq.,  156 

—  turbinate-spiral,  159  seq.,  160 
shoot,  plants,  13,  14,  21 
shoulder-girdle,  grafted,  195  n. 
size,  adaptive  increase  of,  218-19 

—  and  differentiation,  39  n.,  175,  179, 

181-2,  207,  2og,  212,  213,  222-4, 

258 

—  limited  by  heterogony,  32 

—  non-adaptive  increase  of,  220-1 

—  range  of  in  Lucanidae,  76 
skeleton,  fowl,  187 

—  rat,  184-6 

skull,  evolution  of,  in  horse,  107,  iog 

—  form  of,  in  man,  219-2J 
soldiers,  ants,  61  seq. 

—  termites,  65  seq.,  258 
spiral,  logarithmic,  151  seq. 

—  turbinate,  159  seq. 
starvation,  179,  180,  201,  202 
sub-species,  205,  208,  2og-n 
sulphur  compounds,  and  growth,  169, 

170 
sulphydryl,  169,  iyo 
systematics,  3,  204-14 


tail,  man,  235 

—  mice,  15,  17,  22,  200 

—  salamander,  17 

'  tail ',  Papilio,  55,  57,  188 

taxonomy,  3,  204-14 

teeth,  150 

temperature,  and  relative  growth,  200 

temperature-gradients,  172 

tendons,  relative  size  of,  229 

teratology,  127  seq. 

testis,  177-8,  227,  257,  264 

thyroid,  181,  183-8,  257 

time  of  origin  of  organs,  140  seq., 
201-2 

time-relations,  growth  and  differen- 
tiation, 133,  140  seq.,  201-2,  232, 
236-40 

tracheidai  tract,  relative  size,  223-4 

trimodality,  73,  76 

undernutrition,  201,  202 

vestigial  organs,  235,  236,  237 
viscosity,  and  age,  7 
von  Baer's  Law,  237  seq. 

water  content,  mealworm,  26,  29 

—  —  wax-moth,  29,  31 
wing-rudiments,  dragonflies,  17 
wings,  birds,  263 

—  insect,  17,  113 
workers,  ants,  61  seq. 

—  termites,  66  seq. 
work-growth  ratio,  186 


INDEX    OF   ORGANISMS 

(Figures  in  italics  refer  to  pages  with  illustrations  of  the  organisms  cited.) 


Acanthias,  259 

Acanthocinus,  55 

Acanthotermes,  66 

Acarines,  78 

Aeschna,  85 

Alpheus,  34,  96,  189 

Amblystoma,  50,  52,   191,   1Q4,  796, 

197,  I98,  227 
Ammonites,  155,  156,  15812.,  161 
Analges,  77,  78 
Anguilla,  117 
Ani,  262 
Anomia,  163 
Anomma,  61,  62,  64 
Anoplocnemis,  55 
Antelope,  153,  188 
Antheracoceros,  23 
Anthropoid  ape,  225,  234 
Ants,  61-4 
Anura,  181 
Apatornis,  106,  108 
Apteryx,  226 
Archaeopteryx,  106,  108 
Armitermes,  67 
Artemia,  259 
Axolotl,  183  n. 

Baboon,  14,  iS,  ig 
Balaenoptera,  136 
Basset-hound,  131 
Beetles,  55,  56 
Birgus,  216 
Blatta,  27 
Blowfly,  62,  65 
Brachiopod,  149,  162 
Brachyura,  216,  239 
Brassica,  21 

Calliphora,  65 

Camponotus,  62,  64 

Campsurus,  237 

Cancer,  23,  27,  93,  169,  770 

Capercaillie,  225 

Capreolus,  45,  46,  47 

Carcinus,  16,  20,  24,  25,  27,  34,  169 

Cardium,  162 


Carinatae,  226 

Carrot,  13,  21 

Cat,  133,  134,  225 

Cephalopod,  155 

Cervidae,  218 

Cervus,  42,  43,  44,  45,  47,  48,  205 

Chaffinch,  225 

Chameleon,  188 

Chaoborus,  27 

Chick,  118,  140,  143 

Cladoceran,  258 

Clausilia,  161 

Cloe,  126,  135,  173,  174 

Clupea,  harengus,  116 

—  pilchardus,  116 

— ■  sprattus,  116 

Cockle,  162 

Cockroach,  27 

Coleoptera,  214 

Copepods,  86,  117,  133,  137 

Coprotermes,  258 

Cotton,  13,  21 

Crab,  14,  23,  24,  25,  93,  107,  169,  189, 

203,  239,  261 
Crayfish,  27 
Crustacea,  68 
Cuculus,  227 
Cucurbita,  234 
Cyclommatus,  58,  59,  60,  76,  208,  209, 

211 

Daphnia,  258 

Daucus,  21 

Decapoda,  14 

Deer,  42-8,  188,  205,  206,  208,  210, 

227 
Dentalium,  155 
Diodon,  104,  105,  222 
Dixippus,  27 
Dog,  14,  18,  131,  215 
Dogfish,  259 
Dolomedes,  262 
Donax,  162  n. 
Dragonfly    17,  85, 
Drosophila,  15,  21,  22,  63,  231 
Dynastidae,  55 
Dytiscus,  25 


274 


INDEX   OF   ORGANISMS 


275 


Earthworm,  174 

Earwig,  71-5 

Eel,  117 

Elasmotherium,  151 

Embolotherium ,  219  n. 

Enema,  188 

Equus,  no 

Eriphia,  23,  27,  189 

Eucalanus,  86 

Euchirus,  56 

Eupagurus,  gi,  in,  112,  119 

Eurycea,  17,  203 

Falcon,  peregrine,  225 

Fiddler-crab,  8-12,  31-5,  41,  80,  168, 

262 
Fish,  37 

Foraminifera,  163 
Forficula,  71-5 
Fowl,  100,  101,  131,  183,  187 
Frog,  182,  214,  258 
Fundulus,  172,  259 

Galleria,  16 

Gammarus,  34,  40,  228,  237,  238,  241, 

260 
Gastropod,  156,  157,  161 
Gibbon,  234,  238 
Giraffe,  88 
Goat,  153 
Goliathidae,  217 
Golofa,  213 
Gossypium,  21 
Gourd,  234 
Gyge,  98 

Haliotis,  159 

Helix,  161,  239 

Hemigrapsus,  261 

Hemiptera,  55 

Hermit-crab,  17,  gi,  111,  112 

Herring,  116,  259 

Hobby,  225 

Homarus,  96,  97,  169,  170,  189 

Hordeum,  21 

Hornbill,  15,  23 

Horse,  107 

House-fly,  63 

Hydractinia,  17,  21 

Hydroid,  172,  189 

Inachus,  36,  38,  53,  54,  6g,  122,  123, 

124 
Insects,  17,  55,  68 

Jacana,  235,  262 

Lamellibranch,  162 
Limacina,  759 


Linum,  21 

Linyphia,  261 

Lobster,  96,  g7,  118,  120,  169,  189 

Lucanidae,  55,  58,  59,  76,  113,  207, 

208,  210 
Lucanus,  25,  58,  59,  76,  78,  114,  115 
Lycidae,  237 

Macrothrix,  258 

Magpie,  225 

Maia,  34,  82,  83,  84,  122,  123 

Mammals,  17 

Man,  127-33,  203,  219-2J,  225,  232, 

233,  235.  259 
Mantids,  174 
Mayfly,  237 
Mealworm,  16,  25,  174 
Megaceros,  216 
Mesohippus,  107,  iog 
Microtinae,  40 
Miohippus,  107,  iog 
Mite,  77,  78 

Mollusca,  15,  149,  154,  160,  203 
Monkey,  225 
Mouflon,  88 

Mouse,  15,  22,  200,  225,  234 
Mussel,  200 
Mytilus,  200 

Nannocalanus,  86 
Nasturtium,  14,  16,  176  n. 
Nautilus,  156,  157 
Neotoma,  41  11. 
Newt,  179,  180 
Notonecta,  25,  27 

Ocypoda,  17,  87,  216 
Orthagoriscus,  104,  222 
Orthopristis,  37 
Orthoptera,  17 
Oryctes,  115 
Ox,  88 

Pachygrapsus,  25,  27,  261 
Palaemon,  17,  33,  34,  82,  84,  85,  90, 

91,  92,  123,  124,  125,  175 
Pandalus,  170 
Papilio,  55,  57,  188 
Papio,  18,  ig 
Parahippus,  107,  iog,  no 
Pea,  13,  21 
Pea-crab,  37,  g4 
Pecten,  161,  163 
Peridinians,  200 
Periplaneta,  170 
Phanaeus,  188 
Pheidole,  63 
Phenacomys,  15,  22 
Pilchard,  no 


276 


PROBLEMS   OF   RELATIVE   GROWTH 


Pinnotheres,  37,  94,  95.  "9 

Pistol-crab,  34,  96 

Pisum,  21 

Planarians,  14,  21,  53,  172,  174,  179, 

261 
Planorbis,  156,  160 
Plants,  14 
Portunus,  166,  189 
Potamobius,  27 
Potamogeton,  202 
Prawn,  34,  84,  92,  123,  125 
Productus,  163 
Protohippus,  107,  109 
Psilotum,  223 
Pteropod,  159,  163 
Pupa,  161 

Rabbit,  201,  202,  215,  227,  257 
Rat,   1,   16,   183,  185,  187,  200,  201, 

202,  263 
Ratitae,  226 
Razor-shell,  162 
Red-breast,  215 
Red-deer,  42,  43,  44,  47,  48 
Reindeer,  188 
Rhinoceros,  150,  173 
Roe-deer,  45,  46,  47,  208 

Sacculina,  38,  170,  197 

Salamander,  17,  203 

Sardine,  259 

Scallop,  161 

Sheep,  17,  88,  89,  90,  153,  188,  201, 

222,  223,  238 
Solen,  162 
Sphaerium,  203 

Sphodromantis,  50,  5111.,  125,  135 
Spider,  125,  261,  262 
Spider-crab,   34,   36,   38,   53,  54,   69, 

122,  123 
Sprat,  116 
Stag-beetle,  25,  55,  58,  59,  76,   113, 

114,  115,  207,  208,  209 


Stick-insect,  27,  175 
Stomatopoda,  118 
Sun-fish,  104 
Swallow-tail,  55,  57,  188 
Swan,  wild,  225 

Tadpole,  173,  182 

Telmessus,  93 

Tenebrio,  16,  25,  26,  27,  28,  29 

Termes,  66  n. 

Termites,  65-7,  258 

Tern,  263 

Theridion,  261 

Thrush,  225 

Tit,  215 

Titanotheria,  218,  219 

Tridacna,  162 

Trilobites,  134 

Triticum,  21 

Triton,  179,  180 

Tropaeolum,  14,  16,  176  n. 

Turnip,  13,  21 

Turritella,  161 

Uca,  8-12,  31-5,  41,  80,  82,  83,  84,  85. 

119,  121,  168,  189,  216,  227,  238 
Undulina,  86  n. 
Ungulates,  87 
Upogebia,  98,  99 
Urodele,  135,  181 

Vole,  40 

Water-boatman,  25,  27 
Water-beetle,  25 
Wax-moth,  16,  29-31 
Whale,  16,  135,  136 

Xylotrupes,  61,  72,  76 

Zoothamnium,  117 


Printed  in  Great  Britain  by  Butler  &  Tanner  Ltd.,  Frome  and  London